He's using a franchise in a city and situation as unattractive as KC with brand new management to illustrate how ****ing inept our management in it's second year is proving itself to be.

Hey Mic,

I've got a present for you:

http://promote-my-site.com/images/ju...onclusions.jpg

My thoughts exactly.

Don't bitch up now...
You used Cleveland as a model for success.
Pashos and Fujita don't exactly make for the best off-season ever.

We could draft two players who'll be cheaper alternatives and longer-term solutions come April.

Jeez dude...

Simmer down a bit. You need an e-hug or something?
Posted via Mobile Device

I'm fine with it. He runs hard, is decent in short yardage, and heck, it is the AFC West. Whoever plays in the AFC West stays in the AFC West. It's not like we're building our rushing attack around the guy.

Try not to poke the angry badger, mkay?
Posted via Mobile Device

JFC, we can't fill every hole on this roster in the draft.

Not at all jumping to conclusions.
It's fairly simple mathematics.

You used Cleveland as an example of what this organization ought to be doing.

My question is... Why sign a guy like Fujita when we could, for example, draft a Sergio Kindle?

You couldn't do both? Fujita is a TED backer in a 3-4, and Kindle is a rush linebacker. Completely independent of each other.

Its going to take FAs AND drafting to round out this team. We can sign the leftover scraps in FA or get some decent ones, I would prefer to sign some decent ones.

We can't get two LB's in the April draft?
Really?

You really believe that signing Fujita, who's career will be grinding to a halt in the next two years, is more prudent than drafting someone who'll be peaking then?

He looked better last year, but every other year in his career I would've said something like, "He can only play on calm days, because a strong breeze will knock him down".

Fujita could play outside as well, but point taken.
Either way...I'd rather us draft an ILB.

Vrabel?