Berry 30%
D williams 23%
Bulaga 17%
T williams 15%
Clausen 5%
Anyone else 10% (also I can add this onto any player to claim 'i knew it all along' and make myself look smarter after the draft)

edited my numbers a tad for the **** of it

Trade Down - 30%
Clausen - 25%
Berry - 30%
D. Williams - 15%

I would love to think that a trade down is 30% with the #5 overall....But a trade of a top 5 pick is pretty rare from what I understand....

It would be sick to trade down a few spots and still be in the top 10...

ROFL ^^^

I didnt specify that we would get good value out of a trade down.

I didn't even mention value....Trading the #5 pick is pretty rare (has it only happened once in the history of the draft?)...

If you are trying to say there is a 30% chance we will trade down just to get more picks without regard the value of them...I would disagree. IF we make a trade we are going to get a good value in terms of picks. Otherwise there is no point in trading the pick.

You could have just called 1-800-ask-gary

I could see how you would think that way if you had never listened to Pioli's approach to the draft. He doesn't look at the value chart. He looks at the players who will be available.

:stupid:

Eric Berry - 30%
Jimmy Clauson - 25%
Trent Williams - 20%(can play both OT spots is huge)
Dan Williams - 12%
Russell Okung - 12%
Brian Bulaga - 1%

H5N1 just laughing at something funny but the NEG must mean the truth hurts. Go have a coors light.

What are the odds of KC drafting specific players?
 

100%

did you see the smiley? it was done in jest. and **** coors light.

My process isn't as evidence-based as patteeu's, but nonetheless I'm basing them on a Monte Carlo simulation model that examines combinations of potential choices based on past behavior and quantified media reports.

I hear the **** COORS light. It was also said in jest. I was always told coors light will make your asshole hurt.