ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft mother**** you, scott pioli (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227112)

HotRoute 04-23-2010 05:13 PM

this guy has some serious playmaking ability, that is what the chiefs really need. and about clausen we said earlier today that we would have taken him at 5 yesterday now we flat out pass on him?? i can understand the frustration with pioli

FloridaMan88 04-23-2010 05:17 PM

Are the Chiefs attempting to run some sort of revolutionary spread attack using RBs instead of WRs???

With GAPING holes at WR, offensive tackle, nosetackle and linebacker the Chiefs select a player at the one position they are strong at.

This pick doesn't address a need.

LaChapelle 04-23-2010 05:23 PM

whoop

whoman69 04-23-2010 05:40 PM

I was critical of taking Clausen with number one because it puts Cassel in a lame duck/no production status. Additionally I didn't think he was much above those who we could get in later rounds. That's in round one. In round two you have to think that the guy you were considering with #5 overall is still there then you have to pull the trigger. This organization has never drafted a franchise QB. I have been watching both NFL and ESPN. Steve Young states that Pioli in drafting Clausen would be admitting that he made a mistake in picking Cassel. That's a pretty chickenshit reason for not taking a guy who could be the future of your franchise. That tells me the guy is more worried about his rep than the success of the team on the field. Can you really tell me that a slot receiver or 3rd down back is more important than a guy who could be your franchise QB?

Jethopper 04-23-2010 05:42 PM

2 kick returners this year....FINALLY

Nightfyre 04-23-2010 05:44 PM

I HATE the second round of this draft. That is my official opinion.

Mecca 04-23-2010 05:44 PM

The Arenas pick is worse...

TheGuardian 04-23-2010 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whoman69 (Post 6705459)
I was critical of taking Clausen with number one because it puts Cassel in a lame duck/no production status. Additionally I didn't think he was much above those who we could get in later rounds. That's in round one. In round two you have to think that the guy you were considering with #5 overall is still there then you have to pull the trigger. This organization has never drafted a franchise QB. I have been watching both NFL and ESPN. Steve Young states that Pioli in drafting Clausen would be admitting that he made a mistake in picking Cassel. That's a pretty chickenshit reason for not taking a guy who could be the future of your franchise. That tells me the guy is more worried about his rep than the success of the team on the field. Can you really tell me that a slot receiver or 3rd down back is more important than a guy who could be your franchise QB?

The bolded part is exactly what I told milkman a week or so ago and that stupid ****er said I was a complete dumbass for believing that as my reasoning as to why we wouldn't draft Clausen.

I am finding that Mecca, Hamas, and MM don't really know ****ing shit but talk here like they are the cock of the walk.

vailpass 04-23-2010 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 6705021)
Didn't mean to insult your boyfriend.

Hey Red, is this what your psychology books refer to as "projection"?

Sully 04-23-2010 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian

I am finding that Mecca, Hamas, and MM don't really know ****ing shit but talk here like they are the cock of the walk.

like you?

TheGuardian 04-23-2010 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sully (Post 6705591)
like you?

My lone prediction was that there was no way in hell we would draft a QB, esp in round 1.

Ebolapox 04-23-2010 05:53 PM

and a cornerback?!?

Mr. Flopnuts 04-23-2010 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 6705021)
Didn't mean to insult your boyfriend.

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6705579)
Hey Red, is this what your psychology books refer to as "projection"?

Unless you guys are projecting me as a pitcher, you can both **** off.

milkman 04-23-2010 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 6705540)
The bolded part is exactly what I told milkman a week or so ago and that stupid ****er said I was a complete dumbass for believing that as my reasoning as to why we wouldn't draft Clausen.

I am finding that Mecca, Hamas, and MM don't really know ****ing shit but talk here like they are the cock of the walk.

I think you have me confused with someone else, because I've said numerous times that one of the reasons I would be okay with picking Clausen is that it would show that Pioli isn't afraid to admit he made a mistake.

I've said numerous times that I am not sold on Clausen.

vailpass 04-23-2010 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 6705640)
Unless you guys are projecting me as a pitcher, you can both **** off.

Hey Flop,
You know I wasn't pointing that comment at you, right?
Unless you WANT to be a pitcher:eek:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.