I'd rather have Luck, Mallet, Ponder, hell even Jarrod Johnson.

But probably only Luck or Mallet in the top five. But it doesn't matter, unless we trade up.

Who and the who?

I'm not having a QB named "Ponder" on my ****ing team; it reeks of bad mojo.

Only Luck if he gets his long-ball in shape. If he could do that; I'm in.

What is the deal with Mallet, I've heard he is a Tebow clone, but with a better, more traditional throwing motion. So is he more like Steve Young?

He's a 6'7 freak with a ****ing cannon and can play under center. **** Tim Tebow.

Mallet's a Tebow clone?

Yep, I'm on the planet.

Locker sucks because he had one game under 500 yards and 7 TD passes /CP Know it all dumb asses.

LMAO You're a ****ing moron that didn't see that game, or understand any of the predicating circumstances of his performance. You also didn't see the NFL type TD throw he made early on in the game. He's going to be a star at the next level. More so than any Nebraska QB that's EVER played the game, or ever will for that matter.

He looks like a cross between Bradford and last year, USC-Sanchez, which is cool with me.

He's got a pretty sweet mid-range ball.

I will take Mallett first, then Locker. Luck has a lot of potential, I guess, but I don't know why people are so high on him as of right now.

He's got great pocket presence, he's very precision with the dink and dunk, but if we're going to upgrade, I'd at least like to see a guy who can hit 35 and 40 yards out and do it well and often.

did you watch the game?

Locker and Mallett are accurate and have good pocket presence as well.

Well, that's why Luck ain't exactly my first choice. :D