![]() |
Quote:
|
I think it depends on how they use him. Steve Smith has had a pretty good run with the Panthers, and he's only 5'9, 185. I think McCluster could conceivably be the same kind of player, although he'd obviously have to add more bulk. DeSean Jackson's a bit taller, but not much thicker. There's probably a few more guys in the league that don't have the prototypical 6'2, 215 pound receiver build. If he's just a running back, and they limit his role to that of Sproles or Bush, then I'm not sure how much longevity he'll have (but that would be true of anybody - I wonder that about Charles, it's a brutal position).
|
Quote:
|
Depends on how you use him. Are you going to Herm the shit out of him like Herm did with LJ?
|
Bet you DeSean Jackson is around the league for a while.
Honestly we have no idea who's going to be great 5 years down the road. We just don't know. This game can beat up any man's body in that amount of time. If you have a guy you know who can be electric for you right now, take him. Better to get a guy that can win you games. Look at what he's done so far? You could argue he won us that 1st game. Drafting Dexter has been such a breath of fresh air IMO. |
|
Still think he's basically Eric Metcalf.
|
Quote:
|
What we are building around is having multiple offensive weapons, not one specific player. Having McCluster in means that we have one more weapon and we are that much more dangerous. I don't understand why it is even a question of value with him. It was a great pick, end of story.
I'm amazed at how many people at CP still have a problem with the pick. It's as if they think they are doing more college scouting than the Chiefs staff. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
He needs to develop as a receiver for long term productivity
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.