ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs Jones, Griffin, Foles or Tannehill?

Page 2 of 5

Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

Jones, Griffin, Foles or Tannehill? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=252798)

OnTheWarpath15

11-21-2011 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 58kcfan89 (Post 8128560)

You act like this is going to be difficult.

Plus, there's a handful of teams currently in front of us that'll finish with more wins IMO.

This.

I can absolutely see this team losing out.

Here's a list of teams with 3 wins or less:

Indy, Carolina, Minnesota, STL, Arizona, Jacksonville, Miami and Washington.

Indy will absolutely pick ahead of us.

Of the remaining teams, Carolina, Minnesota, STL, Arizona and Jacksonville all have high picks at QB or just traded for a guy.

Miami is going to win a few more games.

That leaves Washington and the 4-6 teams - Cleveland, Philly, San Diego, Seattle and Tampa.

Every one of those teams will win a few more games - except for Cleveland.

There's going to be an opportunity to trade up.

BossChief

11-21-2011 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 8128557)

We're not picking anywhere near 16.

And FWIW, as of now, RGIII is considered a R2 pick - though rising.

I don't give a **** what it takes to move as far as we need to. Without a franchise QB, this roster is going to waste.

Maybe on Friday he was.
...

Id also like to add that we might as well stop listing RG3 in these because he has said to some people that he wants to come back to get his masters next year.

More reason to go all in for Barkley or Luck.

I dont care if we end up with the #2 pick, Id still trade the whole draft for Luck.

OnTheWarpath15

11-21-2011 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8128567)

Right now, apart form the guys that would be obvious reaches, I would be happy with anyone except Jones.

If we draft Landry Jones, Ill be happy that they at least tried with one of the top "perceived" quarterbacks...but inside I will be disappointed.

Id rather trade away the whole entire draft to get Luck or Barkley (even if we already have a top 5 pick) than sit pat and draft Landry Jones.

Same.

BryanBusby

11-21-2011 06:25 PM

I'd rather **** a rusty snow blower than watch Foles play for the Chiefs.

(This goes for Jones, too)

FD	11-21-2011 06:28 PM

No to Jones or Tannehill. Yes to Griffin, Luck or Barkley.

'Hamas' Jenkins

11-21-2011 06:31 PM

It would be classic Chiefs to go 30 years without drafting a QB in the first and then use that pick on Landry Jones.

Titty Meat

11-21-2011 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 8128597)

There's going to be an opportunity to trade up.

http://i51.tinypic.com/2wghu7t.jpg

Extra Point

11-21-2011 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 8128629)

It would be classic Chiefs to go 30 years without drafting a QB in the first and then use that pick on Landry Jones.

I sharpened all the knives at the wrong time.

OnTheWarpath15

11-21-2011 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 8128629)

It would be classic Chiefs to go 30 years without drafting a QB in the first and then use that pick on Landry Jones.

I haz a sad, because it's probably exactly what will happen should he declare.

Extra Point

11-21-2011 06:33 PM

I'd wait for little brother Rodgers. Sorry.

MTG#10

11-21-2011 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8128532)

Matt Barkley

This. If he's still there you have to take him.

BossChief

11-21-2011 06:37 PM

I hate to say it, but the way these guys LOVE Cassel, they are probably blowing loads left and right scouting Jones.

He is basically a more advanced, even less mobile version of Cassel.

He would also allow them to keep Cassel at the helm for another year or two.

IMO he is the Blackledge of this class of quarterbacks.

DeezNutz

11-21-2011 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 8128538)

Do whatever you have to do to get Luck, Barkley or RGIII.

This completely unnecessary rhetorical arrangement is here for the purpose of showing total agreement with the above syntactical grouping.

BossChief

11-21-2011 06:44 PM

I wouldn't trade up for RG3...but I would take him even if we are drafting in the top 5 (this is considering that Barkley and Luck are off the board when we pick).

DeezNutz

11-21-2011 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8128666)

I wouldn't trade up for RG3...but I would take him even if we are drafting in the top 5 (this is considering that Barkley and Luck are off the board when we pick).

Latest Walters has RGIII going #2 overall.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:07 PM.

Page 2 of 5

Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page