ChiefsPlanet
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football AP not gonna be ready for the start of next year (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=254175)

SAUTO 12-24-2011 10:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cornstock (Post 8235328)
If the Vikes are not confident in AP's abilities for next year who would be up for trading Jamaal Charles to Minnesota +this years first and next years first for the Viking's pick this year to either get Luck or Barkley?

It would be great if Indy could win and give the Vikes the #1 overall and if they would go for it, it would be short of giving them a Ricky Williams-type trade deal ruining our draft future and we get our QBOTF. A solid RB is easier to find than a once in a generation QB like Luck or even Barkley if we had to go #2 overall.
Why would they trade for a guy who had a similar injury and hasn't played yet to show hes back
Posted via Mobile Device

Cornstock 12-24-2011 10:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 8235335)
Why would they trade for a guy who had a similar injury and hasn't played yet to show hes back
Posted via Mobile Device
He would be "ready" a season sooner than AP. And it would depend on the severity of AP's injury. If its only a single tear rather than a complete blowout this trade would obviously have no merit. But if AP's is really bad and Charles is showing he's recovered it might..

DaKCMan AP 12-24-2011 10:27 PM
Reminded me of McGahee in 2003.

jd1020 12-24-2011 10:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cornstock (Post 8235340)
He would be "ready" a season sooner than AP. And it would depend on the severity of AP's injury. If its only a single tear rather than a complete blowout this trade would obviously have no merit. But if AP's is really bad and Charles is showing he's recovered it might..
How is Charles going to show he's recovered before the draft?

R8RFAN 12-24-2011 10:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8235345)
How is Charles going to show he's recovered before the draft?
He could go to a funeral and shoot beside a mans head.... Oh wait

Cornstock 12-24-2011 10:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8235332)
BTW. Barkley isnt in this draft and Luck will be gone before the Vikings pick.
Yes my bad. The Colts would need to win to get the Vikings a #1. I dont think RG3 is worth trading up to take at #2

SAUTO 12-24-2011 10:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cornstock (Post 8235340)
He would be "ready" a season sooner than AP. And it would depend on the severity of AP's injury. If its only a single tear rather than a complete blowout this trade would obviously have no merit. But if AP's is really bad and Charles is showing he's recovered it might..
No one knows if he will ever be right. We all obviously hope so but I haven't seen him hit a hole yet to know
Posted via Mobile Device

R8RFAN 12-24-2011 10:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 8235349)
No one knows if he will ever be right. We all obviously hope so but I haven't seen him hit a hole yet to know
Posted via Mobile Device
He may lose a tick of speed but he is young, he should be 90%

Cornstock 12-24-2011 10:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8235345)
How is Charles going to show he's recovered before the draft?
If he's able to do a workout at that point he would be way ahead of schedule, showing that his injury wasn't catastrophic. If Peterson's injury is catastrophic Charles would be a better bet and the Vikings could even be getting value.

SAUTO 12-24-2011 10:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 8235353)
He may lose a tick of speed but he is young, he should be 90%
Sounds great for a speed guy.
Posted via Mobile Device

'Hamas' Jenkins 12-24-2011 10:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 8235342)
Reminded me of McGahee in 2003.
Not even close.

R8RFAN 12-24-2011 10:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 8235374)
Sounds great for a speed guy.
Posted via Mobile Device
Still would be faster than most

-King- 12-24-2011 11:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 8235383)
Not even close.
AT ALL.

Phobia 12-24-2011 11:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 8235383)
Not even close.
Agreed. I think McGahee hyperextended at least 30 degrees.

Phobia 12-24-2011 11:44 PM
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/r_wPOfTGegA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

:37


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:10 PM.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.