![]() |
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I LOVE Carr. He is only gonna get better and is already really really good. Very humble and good natured as well. But... Can you justify spending an average of 22 million on a pair of corners? No matter how good...that's a tough one. Especially with Berry pulling a similar figure at safety. All in all, I keep him even if I have to go past Flowers deal. It's a passing league and with this set of 3 corners and our pass rush, this defense could be downright nasty to play against in coming years. IMO If Carr goes elsewhere, it better be for a stupid deal. |
Quote:
Everybody is on Carr's jock right now, but the guy gets burned a lot. That being said, he makes plays. He's a high level #2 corner if you have a legit #1 CB on the roster. If someone wants to pay him top flight #1 NFL corner money, I'm okay with letting him go test the waters. Arenas makes a shit ton of plays and I can see him in the Kevin Ross role of Flowers' Albert Lewis mold, especially if Berry can come out of the knee rehab without a hitch. (Berry can cover a lot of ground when healthy. I hope he had a good ortho doc for his knee and said doc did the best he ever did to fix it.) If we keep Carr, all the better, as long as we don't overpay for him. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If he tests FA and gets an insane deal that we choose not to match, it will be because Pioli badly ****ed up the negotiation process prior to this and in the end lost all leverage in the matter. If Carr leaves, it's an indictment on Pioli - period. And yeah, there are also circumstances where Carr staying could end up an indictment on Pioli. Frankly, Pioi's already dicked up the Carr discussions, all he can do now is mitigate the damage. |
at least he'll be ready for let-downs .. pot helps with that .. lol ......
|
Quote:
rule...Thats not on Pioli I think not 100% sure |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Carr isn't going to get 12-13 Million a year. Isn't that Reavis Money? Carr should be getting 7-9 Million a year, which is perfectly manageable for this team. Carr is a good CB, but lets not go overboard here. |
Quote:
Besides, Carr and Flowers were on substantially similar base contracts. Yeah, Flowers was a little more, but not exorbitantly so as a 2nd rounder. I don't believe Flowers contract would've complied with the 30% rule and his was inked in-season. Why would extending Carr have violated it whereas extending Flowers didn't? |
Quote:
Carr is a clear #1 and superior to Flowers. |
there is no excuse for not signing carr...none
plus I've been assured Clark has every intention of spending that big pile of cash he skies down in his backyard, so Carr isn't going anywhere... |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:40 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.