ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs *****IF***** Winston signs in KC.

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

*****IF***** Winston signs in KC. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=257384)

total a-hole move....thought he signed. left my computer for 20 minutes and this was posted. never again

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 8460459)

Fixed.

You illiterate bitches.

LMAO

It depends on whose first round pick it is on option 1. If it's a team you expect to have a top 5 pick, then I'd go for it. If it's a team you expect to go deep into the playoffs, then no way.

I'm going to assume that you don't have a chance to pick up a 2013 first round pick from a team that's going to suck this year so I'll go with option 2 and take DeCastro.

Can we just merge this thread with the Winston thread, where it BELONGS.

The Chiefs have been riding the "Well get out franchise QB next year" line since Len Dawson retired.

Never heard of Winston besides the cigs, who is he? Our franchise savior?

Quote:

Originally Posted by evolve27 (Post 8460524)

Never heard of Winston besides the cigs, who is he? Our franchise savior?

RT and is only 28 and good.

A and C are correct

B is for baloney

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8460440)

That's what they say every year.

It never is.

There were four QB largely considered first round guys.

Luck, RG3, Landry Jones, and Barkley.

Jones and Barkley are back in the water. It immediately makes next year's QB class stronger. There will be at least two QB worthy of top five picks, and possibly more.

Add to that this reality:

This year's teams that needed a QB:

Colts, Chiefs, Browns, Dolphins, Seahawks, Redskins.

This year's answers to those needs:

Colts: Luck
Chiefs: nothing
Browns: Flynn/Tannehill
Dolphins: Flynn/Tannehill
Seahawks: nothing
Redskins: RG3

That means that next year, it will be the Chiefs and the Seahawks with the obvious needs at quarterback, a need SO obvious we will take one in the first round.

Two teams with need vs. 3 or more top QB prospects? I'll take that over four teams fighting for 2 guys.

Oh, and if Tennessee gets Manning, that might shift Locker out. And I think a trade back to Washington State makes a LOT of sense...

I think we should keep Hudson at LG and draft a C in the 3rd or later.

I see no reason to expend a first rounder on a guard.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan50/50 (Post 8460523)

The Chiefs have been riding the "Well get out franchise QB next year" line since Len Dawson retired.

this is like in the movie, when the hero sees the guy who murdered his parents, and he wants to charge in and kill him.

Then his partner says, "He's surrounded by fifty guards! You'll only be doing him a favor. I know you want revenge, but now isn't the time."

And then the hero swallows his anger and they go back to the van.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bevischief (Post 8460551)

RT and is only 28 and good.

He needs a haircut.

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 8460583)

you have no idea how many teams will be hot for a QB...but there will be several as there always is...injuries, retirements, new coaches, new gms...priorities change

Quote:

Originally Posted by RUSH (Post 8460485)

Barkley and Wilson are probably top 5 picks. Both seniors and locks to come out obviously. After that.... Who?

Landry Jones?

Murray and Bray are underclassmen. Can't rely on them coming out.

Not seeing how that's a stronger class.

That's what I just said.

This is great news !!!! Now that we have Winston we're unstoppable!