ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   News Mo. woman wins $5.8M in 'Girls Gone Wild' case (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=259009)

Dartgod 04-28-2012 11:00 AM

meh
Posted via Mobile Device

Papi 04-28-2012 11:12 AM

Looks like Angela from the Office:

http://facultyblog.eternitybiblecoll.../02/Angela.jpg

Simply Red 04-28-2012 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Papi (Post 8577487)

yes, a mongloid of sorts... one of the fuggliest GGW girls i've ever seen.

scho63 04-28-2012 01:22 PM

I wonder how much the people who pulled up her shirt had to pay....Oh yeah, NOTHING. Always find the richest person you can and sue them!

5.8 million for a photo of a pair of tits? That judge has balls with that ruling!

Bump 04-28-2012 01:26 PM

stupid bitch better not get a cent, I bet she loved it at the time.

Lumpy 04-28-2012 01:36 PM

I think the lawsuit is BS. If you walk into a bar that has signage for GGW, you either, (a) accept that there may be a chance that your breasts will be exposed, or (b) hop your ass in your car and go to a different establishment.

Granted, yes, GGW does have women sign a waiver to help keep them from getting sued. However, in this case, participants exposed her breasts. I think that GGW should just be forced to edit out the scene in all future productions of the DVD.

Valiant 04-28-2012 01:46 PM

Was it in a public setting when filmed? Did the guy that dropped her top work for ggw? if the guy was a randm person, then it is not ggw problem. It was filmed at a bar, she knew she would be on film if at the bar. Ggw is only at fault if their guy assualted her.

If the verdict stands, lots of people/paparazzi and companies are going to be sued.

Bugeater 04-28-2012 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 8578103)
I wonder how much the people who pulled up her shirt had to pay....Oh yeah, NOTHING. Always find the richest person you can and sue them!

5.8 million for a photo of a pair of tits? That judge has balls with that ruling!

Which brings up another thought...isn't that some type of crime? 'Cause if it isn't, my trips to the grocery store are going to become a lot more interesting.

ArrowheadHawk 04-28-2012 02:48 PM

Anybody got the video?

Frosty 04-28-2012 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 8578569)
Which brings up another thought...isn't that some type of crime? 'Cause if it isn't, my trips to the grocery store are going to become a lot more interesting.

Pretty sure it's sexual assault. You should try it to make sure, though.

DJ's left nut 04-28-2012 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lumpy (Post 8578171)
I think the lawsuit is BS. If you walk into a bar that has signage for GGW, you either, (a) accept that there may be a chance that your breasts will be exposed, or (b) hop your ass in your car and go to a different establishment.

Granted, yes, GGW does have women sign a waiver to help keep them from getting sued. However, in this case, participants exposed her breasts. I think that GGW should just be forced to edit out the scene in all future productions of the DVD.

It isn't a live event. GGW edited the tape to ensure her conclusion.

That's pretty irresponsible of them.

GGW deserved the hit. In the grand scheme of things, it's pocket lint for Joe Francis and ultimately it will keep him from being as reckless in the future.

Valiant 04-28-2012 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 8578627)
It isn't a live event. GGW edited the tape to ensure her conclusion.

That's pretty irresponsible of them.

GGW deserved the hit. In the grand scheme of things, it's pocket lint for Joe Francis and ultimately it will keep him from being as reckless in the future.

How does that matter? Celebs get shots of nip slips and vagina showing all the time in a public setting that they did not agree to be pictured, but it was in public so they dont have to sign off on it.. She needs to go after the guy who did it to her, unless he was employed by ggw.. If anything they should play that ggw is the hero by capturing what happened on tape..

big nasty kcnut 04-28-2012 03:29 PM

My question is if the jury favored ggw in the first case then what right does a judge have to not heed a jury ruling and retry a case.

OnTheWarpath15 04-28-2012 03:45 PM

NSFW.

http://imgur.com/a/29C3B/jane_doe039...ity_girls_orgy

Valiant 04-28-2012 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 8578832)

Yeah, those faces afterwards do not seem like a no face..


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.