![]() |
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
|
Quote:
|
I wonder how much the people who pulled up her shirt had to pay....Oh yeah, NOTHING. Always find the richest person you can and sue them!
5.8 million for a photo of a pair of tits? That judge has balls with that ruling! |
stupid bitch better not get a cent, I bet she loved it at the time.
|
I think the lawsuit is BS. If you walk into a bar that has signage for GGW, you either, (a) accept that there may be a chance that your breasts will be exposed, or (b) hop your ass in your car and go to a different establishment.
Granted, yes, GGW does have women sign a waiver to help keep them from getting sued. However, in this case, participants exposed her breasts. I think that GGW should just be forced to edit out the scene in all future productions of the DVD. |
Was it in a public setting when filmed? Did the guy that dropped her top work for ggw? if the guy was a randm person, then it is not ggw problem. It was filmed at a bar, she knew she would be on film if at the bar. Ggw is only at fault if their guy assualted her.
If the verdict stands, lots of people/paparazzi and companies are going to be sued. |
Quote:
|
Anybody got the video?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's pretty irresponsible of them. GGW deserved the hit. In the grand scheme of things, it's pocket lint for Joe Francis and ultimately it will keep him from being as reckless in the future. |
Quote:
|
My question is if the jury favored ggw in the first case then what right does a judge have to not heed a jury ruling and retry a case.
|
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.