ChiefsPlanet
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3456
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs Offer to Manning? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=259081)

SuperChief 04-30-2012 02:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Satanic Goat (Post 8583168)
I assure you it did.

Just another thing Pioli screwed up.
You sound like Tony Soprano's mother. Just ****ing die already and save us the constant negativity spin.

Thig Lyfe 04-30-2012 02:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyPhuD (Post 8583171)
I really like Manning, but the fact that he would go to Denver(who's only offensive skill talent was at QB), shows me that he's officially done. He's clearly been hit one too many times in the head.
Wait, which Denver QB was the talented one?

ChiefRocka 04-30-2012 02:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thig Lyfe (Post 8583267)
Wait, which Denver QB was the talented one?
Tebow the Quarter"half"back ?

King_Chief_Fan 04-30-2012 02:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Satanic Goat (Post 8583168)
I assure you it did.

Just another thing Pioli screwed up.
tell us more

InChiefsHeaven 04-30-2012 02:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Satanic Goat (Post 8583168)
I assure you it did.

Just another thing Pioli screwed up.
I seriously doubt that. For whatever reason, Payton was not interested in KC at all.

Valiant 04-30-2012 02:40 PM
By signing with denver, it shows it was all about the money. Winning was not a priority.
Hopefully his career is done, donkey shit never washes off.

vailpass 04-30-2012 02:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valiant (Post 8583294)
By signing with denver, it shows it was all about the money. Winning was not a priority.
Hopefully his career is done, donkey shit never washes off.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tooge (Post 8583217)
what is most interesting is that the offer the donks ultimately made was enought that he'd make more than he would have in Indy, and 1 million more than the entire Indy deal. Interesting. That alone tells me it was mostly about the money. The guy is an ego maniac. It will NOT end well for denver. Manning is a decent blindside hit away from eating his filet mignon and lobster through a straw while wearing diapers. He wanted as much money as he could get his hands on. If it really was about systems and winning, he would have chosen SF, Tenn, KC, or ARI in that order. All have better systems up and running and more offensive talent around him. Its pretty clear why he went to denver.
LMAO The bitter butthurt lingers on....

Bwana 04-30-2012 02:46 PM
I hope Denver has a top notch taxidermist, so the team can get some value out of Manning, after his first big shot to the head. Perhaps they can mount him next to the horse? :shrug:

tooge 04-30-2012 03:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8583297)
LMAO The bitter butthurt lingers on....
butthurt? go back and read my posts about manning, prior to denver ever signing him. I've never liked the thought of a guy that is 36 years old, coming off his fourth major neck surgery, and having not played football in a year and a half coming to my team. Never. I thought paying anything more than an incentive laden deal, which he would do if it was all about winning, was worth the risk. Hindsight is 20/20, and now that I know what denver gave to get him, I'm laughing my ass off. There is no butthurt here. I'm glad you got rid of the one winner on your offense and AT LEAST 40 million (he'll be there for 2 years) in order to have an outside shot to win in the next two years. You still gotta beat the best in the AFC, which Manning could only do once when he was healthy, with a strong supporting cast, in a dome, when he was 4 years younger. Sorry, there is no butthurt, just the facts.

DaWolf 04-30-2012 03:12 PM
Reading the article today about Manning at the Rockies game, it seemed obvious to me that Manning wanted to go somewhere that he was familiar with and where he would be surrounded by friends. He mentioned Helton, Stokley, and John Lynch prominently as influences.

I guess if the Chiefs wanted to sign the guy, they should have gone back in time and signed Stokley and Lynch, and had the Royals draft Helton back in 1995, then changed baseball's financial structure so that they could have kept Helton when he was up for free agency.

The Chiefs should have also played Gannon instead of Grbac in 1997 so that John Elway would never have won back to back championships at his age and be able to use that as a selling point to Manning...

vailpass 04-30-2012 03:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tooge (Post 8583367)
butthurt? go back and read my posts about manning, prior to denver ever signing him. I've never liked the thought of a guy that is 36 years old, coming off his fourth major neck surgery, and having not played football in a year and a half coming to my team. Never. I thought paying anything more than an incentive laden deal, which he would do if it was all about winning, was worth the risk. Hindsight is 20/20, and now that I know what denver gave to get him, I'm laughing my ass off. There is no butthurt here. I'm glad you got rid of the one winner on your offense and AT LEAST 40 million (he'll be there for 2 years) in order to have an outside shot to win in the next two years. You still gotta beat the best in the AFC, which Manning could only do once when he was healthy, with a strong supporting cast, in a dome, when he was 4 years younger. Sorry, there is no butthurt, just the facts.


LMAO

scorpio 04-30-2012 03:16 PM
Damn these grapes are sour

InChiefsHeaven 04-30-2012 03:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaWolf (Post 8583369)
Reading the article today about Manning at the Rockies game, it seemed obvious to me that Manning wanted to go somewhere that he was familiar with and where he would be surrounded by friends. He mentioned Helton, Stokley, and John Lynch prominently as influences.

I guess if the Chiefs wanted to sign the guy, they should have gone back in time and signed Stokley and Lynch, and had the Royals draft Helton back in 1995, then changed baseball's financial structure so that they could have kept Helton when he was up for free agency.

The Chiefs should have also played Gannon instead of Grbac in 1997 so that John Elway would never have won back to back championships at his age and be able to use that as a selling point to Manning...
Dear lord! When you lay it out like that...it IS like a butterfly flapping it's wings in central park!!

scho63 04-30-2012 03:26 PM
Will these Manning threads ever die??? Who gives a shit-he ain't a Chief and this horse has been beaten to death

Thig Lyfe 04-30-2012 03:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 8583402)
Will these Manning threads ever die??? Who gives a shit-he ain't a Chief and this horse has been beaten to death
Peyton Manning


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:37 AM.
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3456
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.