ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Mike Wallace could be traded (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=261838)

Titty Meat 07-28-2012 01:14 AM

Wallace is more of a deep threat than Bowe.

BigMeatballDave 07-28-2012 01:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8773725)
Wallace is more of a deep threat than Bowe.

He's faster, so yeah that helps.

I'd still take Bowe over him.

QB still matters, though.

Titty Meat 07-28-2012 01:25 AM

If Baldwin is as advertised the offense would add a whole new dimension.

The 49ers will trade for him.

themanwithnoname 07-28-2012 03:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr_capone (Post 8773653)
Complement Baldwin. I am a big believer in needing a good, fast, receiver to complement a strong physical beast like Balkwin. Yes, I understand that Baldwin is as of yet a mostly unknown quantity but he has shown he can go get the ball. The question is if we have a QB on the team that can get him the ball.

/Id rather have a Cris Carter- Randy Moss to a Fitz-Boldin tandem.

I actually thought Baldwin could be the deep threat, I remember them saying he's deceptively fast and had a good ability to get behind the defender, and then combine that with his size and athleticism. He's not so much an all the way deep threat, but I think he's got the ability to at least spread the defense more than they have Bowe do.

the Talking Can 07-28-2012 04:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr_capone (Post 8773611)
Wallace for Bowe straight across.

/my dick is hard

they don't want to pay wallace, so they'll pay bowe?

the chiefs don't want to pay bowe but they'll pay wallace?

huh?

BoneKrusher 07-28-2012 05:41 AM

having Wallace on this team would be like having a new Corvette in parked in the driveway but you cant drive it because gas prices are too high.

Mr. Flopnuts 07-28-2012 05:42 AM

Kate Upton.

notorious 07-28-2012 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher (Post 8773777)
having Wallace on this team would be like having a new Corvette in parked in the driveway but you never get out of first gear because of a shitty driver


FYP

BoneKrusher 07-28-2012 07:29 AM

[QUOTE=notorious;8773807]
Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher (Post 8773777)
having Wallace on this team would be like having a new Corvette in parked in the driveway but you never get out of first gear because of a shitty driverQUOTE]

yeah that's a better way of saying what i wanted to say. ;)

DTLB58 07-28-2012 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8773725)
Wallace is more of a deep threat than Bowe.

Doesn't matter. Pioli/Hunt aren't going to pay big $ for a WR.
They know what they have at QB. It would be a waste to pay for a speed guy. Makes more sense to pay Bowe and they didn't do that.

Next subject.

JD10367 07-28-2012 07:41 AM

As of July 1st, here were the top teams with the most salary cap space:

Jacksonville Jaguars: $25,115,885
Tennessee Titans: $19,970,080
Cleveland Browns: $17,774,764
Kansas City Chiefs: $16,548,048
Cincinnati Bengals: $16,309,693
Philadelphia Eagles: $15,879,570
Tampa Bay Buccaneers: $15,740,231
Indianapolis Colts: $14,595,514
Green Bay Packers: $11,255,804
Denver Broncos: $10,878,461
New England Patriots: $10,873,988

While I'd love to dream about Wallace in a Flying Elvis helmet, and we all can worry about Peyton-to-Wallace, the truth is that the Chiefs are the team with more room, if they ever decide to stop being cheap. (Yeah, the Jags, Titans, and Browns have even more room... but I don't see those teams doing anything.)

DTLB58 07-28-2012 07:45 AM

Mort Just reported on espn radio the Steelers gave him their best offer early this past week and it wasn't good enough.

He wants to be paid as the 3rd highest WR behind you know who... Steelers aren't that kind of a franchise and neither are the Chiefs.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-28-2012 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DTLB58 (Post 8773823)
Mort Just reported on espn radio the Steelers gave him their best offer early this past week and it wasn't good enough.

He wants to be paid as the 3rd highest WR behind you know who... Steelers aren't that kind of a franchise and neither are the Chiefs.

**** these greedy douchebags.

BoneKrusher 07-28-2012 08:00 AM

the chiefs are one the top 5 cheapest teams in the league when it comes to payroll.

yep, no need to wonder any longer as to why the Chiefs have one playoff win since 1993.

hey Clark, you get what you pay for.

Messier 07-28-2012 08:05 AM

That's the problem with WRs, they all think they're one of the top five in the NFL, and they never get what they ask for, unless they really are the best.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.