ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Interesting Evaluation of the Broncos by Grantland (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=262270)

Chiefs Pantalones 08-11-2012 04:08 PM

Yeah dude is super homer but he does know football. Most Denver fans are huge homers. And most Oakland fans I know are just dumb as shit. Their football talk consists of "well we got Seymour!" and/or "Raider Nation baby!"

Quesadilla Joe 08-11-2012 04:08 PM

This years Broncos team would kick the living shit out of last years Broncos. There isn't a position on the Broncos roster where we haven't improved from the year before.

RealSNR 08-11-2012 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel>Manning (Post 8809951)
This years Broncos team would kick the living shit out of last years Broncos. There isn't a position on the Broncos roster where we haven't improved from the year before.

How's your team's Christian faith doing this year?

Quesadilla Joe 08-11-2012 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8809990)
How's your team's Christian faith doing this year?

Yeah losing Tebow and Dawkins definitely hurts our Christian faith depth.

Bewbies 08-11-2012 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel>Manning (Post 8809951)
This years Broncos team would kick the living shit out of last years Broncos. There isn't a position on the Broncos roster where we haven't improved from the year before.

I tend to agree with this. And would say the same about KC too.

bevischief 08-11-2012 05:04 PM

What the hell did I just read?

Deberg_1990 08-11-2012 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyV13 (Post 8809925)
Yeah, its long.

The cliff's notes is that the Broncos are unlikely to be super bowl contenders due to:

1) They had a terrible Points/For Points/Against ratio--- -81 and finished 8-8. Teams that similarly outperformed their ratio tended to regress in the following year.

2) Manning was showing signs of regression his last full season. That process is likely to continue.

3) Veteran qb stars switching teams usually take at least a year to regain their footing cites: Warren Moon, Favre, Montana, Kurt Warner, Randal Cunningham as examples.

4) Broncos have the toughest schedule as rated by Football Outsiders. Unlikely to be dominant with that schedule.

5) Weak supporting cast: Denver's receiving corp is the weakest Manning has ever had in his career and Denver's line is suspect. No Jeff Saturday hurts Manning's ability to make line adjustment calls.

6) Weak defense aside from Dumervil and Von Miller.

Bottom line: He sees Denver no better than 8-8 this season.

They are better than that.

I actually see a situation similiar to what Montana did for us. Good first season, probably carries the team on his back to a playoff win or two. Then his skills decline rapidly the next year.

DTLB58 08-11-2012 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyV13 (Post 8809925)
Yeah, its long.

The cliff's notes is that the Broncos are unlikely to be super bowl contenders due to:

1) They had a terrible Points/For Points/Against ratio--- -81 and finished 8-8. Teams that similarly outperformed their ratio tended to regress in the following year.

2) Manning was showing signs of regression his last full season. That process is likely to continue.

3) Veteran qb stars switching teams usually take at least a year to regain their footing cites: Warren Moon, Favre, Montana, Kurt Warner, Randal Cunningham as examples.

4) Broncos have the toughest schedule as rated by Football Outsiders. Unlikely to be dominant with that schedule.

5) Weak supporting cast: Denver's receiving corp is the weakest Manning has ever had in his career and Denver's line is suspect. No Jeff Saturday hurts Manning's ability to make line adjustment calls.

6) Weak defense aside from Dumervil and Von Miller.

Bottom line: He sees Denver no better than 8-8 this season.

Nice job :thumb:

Secondly, dang I wish I could write and research that for a living instead what I do.

spades 08-11-2012 05:49 PM

The injuires and talent level of the Colts were the reason for Manning's struggles in 2010. It is that simple

manchambo 08-11-2012 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel>Manning (Post 8809951)
This years Broncos team would kick the living shit out of last years Broncos. There isn't a position on the Broncos roster where we haven't improved from the year before.

You really are dumber than a rock. I don't see why these people don't ban you. How about olb, MLB, safety, wr, rb, d end and every position on the oline for positions where the broncos didn't get better?

Hog's Gone Fishin 08-11-2012 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8809846)
Cliff notes.

X 2. **** all that !

Pasta Little Brioni 08-11-2012 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel>Manning (Post 8809951)
This years Broncos team would kick the living shit out of last years Broncos. There isn't a position on the Broncos roster where we haven't improved from the year before.

Yeah, you are going to have to explain this. Show us how they got better position by position and we'll rate you. Go!!!

cabletech94 08-11-2012 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 8810076)
They are better than that.

I actually see a situation similiar to what Montana did for us. Good first season, probably carries the team on his back to a playoff win or two. Then his skills decline rapidly the next year.

plus we can't factor in if peyton's head is gonna fall off his shoulders late in the season or early.
:D

Rausch 08-11-2012 07:09 PM

It will also be interesting to see how the team adapts from Choir-boy to Payed-a-ton's antics when things don't go well.

When he's losing and someone drops a pass or misses a block he runs around screaming at people like a 3rd grade brat denied ice cream after baseball practice...

vailpass 08-11-2012 07:12 PM

tl/dnr

Statistics. Yay!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.