I voted 2 because there are 2 "i"s in the word "Pioli" and there's no "i" in the word "team" or the word "Mr. Potato Head".

FAX

I voted 1 because there is a lot of talented players on the roster.

I voted three. It's hard to balance how crappy your team is playing against my approval of how crappy your team is playing.

Hey look, St. Manning just threw another interception!

It's not very often I can tag a #1 when talking about the Chiefs but this thread allowed it.

Chiefs #1.

yeah--I went with 1 as well. we won't have hit rock bottom until we lose out (not that I can muster any hope from this season, even IF we somehow pull a rabbit out of our ****ing hat on this one). too much goddamned talent for me to go 0, but it was damned close.

Where the hell are the negative numbers at in this poll?

as it's literally impossible to get lower than zero (despite what many of you are feeling, and I'm feeling too, zero is the mathematical minimum in this poll), there are no numbers below zero present.

I vote "meh."

I don't think we're as bad as we looked the last two weeks but I don't think we'll be as good as I thought we'd be either...

As I noted yesterday, we're worse than we were when Herm left.

If Pioli left today, he'd be turning over far less young premier talent than he was given when he took over. The only way the incoming GM would have as good a situation as Pioli was given would be if Baldwin became the next Bowe and Houston became the next Hali. Berry would have to develop as well as Flowers has and Brown would have to become the next Carr. Asomoah would need to be the next Wade Smith. Moeaki would need to put up 4 seasons as strong as TG has put up over the last 4 years.

Let's face it, the odds are extremely long that Scott Pioli leaves this organization in a better situation than he inherited it in...when he took over a 2-14 team.

He's awful, just awful.

I went with 3

0

This

I put a 2 in. They have a few good players.

I voted 3.
We would be better off to go winless for the season actually.