ChiefsPlanet
Page 2 of 4 1 2 34
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Al Saunders (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=265852)

Imon Yourside 10-28-2012 11:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 9061233)
Matt Cassel running Saunders offense would be like Jimmy Hendrix singing the Barber of Seville.
I'm very certain Al would tell Cassel to get lost or get Priest some nachos or something.

Simply Red 10-28-2012 11:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClevelandBronco (Post 9061226)
crown yo ass!
I can't crown my ass, but crown they broncos ass.

Simply Red 10-28-2012 11:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fire_egoli (Post 9061213)
where is al these days wash? what has he done lately?
You'd be amazed at how much hot trim Sanders pulls in real life.

cdcox 10-28-2012 11:30 PM
We need a clean flush. New QB, HC and GM all together. If you bring in a new HC and a new QB, you are committing to Pioli for another 2 to 3 years. Don't do this piecemeal.

ClevelandBronco 10-28-2012 11:31 PM
http://img0.etsystatic.com/000/0/641....304879392.jpg

mcan 10-28-2012 11:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 9061233)
Matt Cassel running Saunders offense would be like Jimmy Hendrix singing the Barber of Seville.
Matt would certainly not be my first choice to run Saunders' scheme. But he WOULD be better with Al at the helm than he was with Weiss. Mostly though, Charles would be a beast. Five carries... What a joke. Priest was savvy and strong, but not anywhere as gifted of a runner as Charles. It sickens me how poorly coached this offensive line is. There was a one play yesterday where all four of the Raiders down linemen got into the backfield nearly untouched. Unacceptable. This is all about coaching. I believe Saunders would he a fantastic option.

Simply Red 10-28-2012 11:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcan (Post 9061275)
Matt would certainly not be my first choice to run Saunders' scheme. But he WOULD be better with Al at the helm than he was with Weiss. Mostly though, Charles would be a beast. Five carries... What a joke. Priest was savvy and strong, but not anywhere as gifted of a runner as Charles. It sickens me how poorly coached this offensive line is. There was a one play yesterday where all four of the Raiders down linemen got into the backfield nearly untouched. Unacceptable. This is all about coaching. I believe Saunders would he a fantastic option.
I totally agree here mcan, i don't do a lot of football takes on here, but i've always spoken highly on this beautiful man. He's a great Football mind, IMO.

tk13 10-28-2012 11:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcan (Post 9061275)
Matt would certainly not be my first choice to run Saunders' scheme. But he WOULD be better with Al at the helm than he was with Weiss. Mostly though, Charles would be a beast. Five carries... What a joke. Priest was savvy and strong, but not anywhere as gifted of a runner as Charles. It sickens me how poorly coached this offensive line is. There was a one play yesterday where all four of the Raiders down linemen got into the backfield nearly untouched. Unacceptable. This is all about coaching. I believe Saunders would he a fantastic option.
Don't forget Mike Solari. He was a huge part of that, and usually designed the run attack. Look what he's doing now in San Francisco. They're averaging almost 6 yards a carry... as a team.

Imon Yourside 10-28-2012 11:42 PM
I really wanted Al over Herm and wonder what our Franchise would look like today had that happened.

Phobia 10-28-2012 11:44 PM
Al Saunders was canned as the Raiders OC last year then tried to find work in the offseason. Eventually went back to Oakland as an offensive assistant. He's not going to get a HC job in the NFL again. He's not highly regarded by anybody at this point and he's older than Romeo.

fire_egoli 10-28-2012 11:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN (Post 9061296)
I really wanted Al over Herm and wonder what our Franchise would look like today had that happened.
we'd be minus charles, carr, flowers, albert, bowe, hali

The Bad Guy 10-28-2012 11:46 PM
Why do we always have to go with a familiar face? Saunders was good about 8 years ago. Why am I going back to the early 2000's?

Imon Yourside 10-28-2012 11:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fire_egoli (Post 9061305)
we'd be minus charles, carr, flowers, albert, bowe, hali
Well considering this is officially the crappiest offense to ever grace the field, I could live with it.

Imon Yourside 10-28-2012 11:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9061306)
Why do we always have to go with a familiar face? Saunders was good about 8 years ago. Why am I going back to the early 2000's?
Because it was the last time we were worth a flying Fukushima.

Simply Red 10-28-2012 11:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phobia (Post 9061304)
Al Saunders was canned as the Raiders OC last year then tried to find work in the offseason. Eventually went back to Oakland as an offensive assistant. He's not going to get a HC job in the NFL again. He's not highly regarded by anybody at this point and he's older than Romeo.
he's motivated though, he's old but had a great demeanor. I'd love to see him back. But then again, I really did always like Sanders, i wasn't joking there. He got OUR players to respond, it seemed.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:34 PM.
Page 2 of 4 1 2 34
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.