![]() |
Quote:
That doesn't strike me as bad at all. He takes less money in 2013 to accommodate Santana's contract. Assume Santana is gone after next year, that frees up $12 million, basically Guthrie takes that spot and the Royals might be counting on in-house guys (Paulino, Duffy, Odorizzi, etc.) to help fill out the staff in 2014. I'd still like to see a No. 1 or 2 type acquired to anchor the rotation the next 3 years or beyond. |
I like it.
Bringing back Guthrie is a big step, and I'm interested to see how that third year is arranged. (EDIT: Jeremy Guthrie's deal is 3 years, $25 million according to Bob Dutton) So, we know the rotation is going to include: Santana Guthrie With Chen and Mendoza both in the running for a likely rotation spot. Hopefully, this signals the end for Luke Hochevar or a non-tender offer for Luke Hochevar. |
Boy, if they could just bring in one more frontliner - that might be enough to compete assuming Santana is servicable.
Marcum maybe? Hometown kid - coming off injury, would probably sign at a discount. |
For reference, 2012 pitcher salaries (keep in mind, this doesn't account for years on each player's deal - some better than others):
pitcher salaries |
I am now going to move on to dreaming about a trade for David Price...
|
I like it. The third year may signal that we are serious about doing what it takes given the reality of free agency.
|
Quote:
We've got all our major trade pieces still in hand. |
Always liked Jeremy Glad he got a good deal.
|
Quote:
Quote:
You'd have loved to have only had to go 2 for him, but that wasn't terribly realistic. If the Royals wanted another reliable pitcher off the FA market with any track record at all, he was going to want 3 years. |
If it pushes Luke off the team I am all for it. Also the low first year leaves money for another starter this year.
|
As expected, Royals Review is melting down about this.
|
greg schaum greg schaum @Greg_Schaum
Plenty smoke KC not done- TB a hot team for KC- Shields, Archer, Colome, Markel and INF Lee mentioned ( Hosmer and/ or Myers would go) |
Quote:
Really though, if the Royals are going to deal Hosmer, I would think they could get Hellickson for him. Hosmer for Hellickson and Archer would be a really nice deal for the Royals and it would be a pretty smart move for the Rays as well. |
Bob Dutton@Royals_Report
#Royals GM Dayton Moore says any further additions will likely require corresponding payroll-clearing moves. Like the Royals are spending too much money ... Give me a break! |
Bob Dutton @Royals_Report
#Royals GM Dayton Moore says any further additions will likely require corresponding payroll-clearing moves. This is Just sad |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.