Kaylore |
11-21-2012 09:44 AM |
You guys are off on this. Just because Pioli was a bad GM, doesn't mean the whole concept of hiring a GM and then a head coach is bad. That's like getting in a car accident and then deciding you shouldn't drive anymore.
The GM and Coach with split duties model is working everywhere else in the NFL. You just got a bad GM, who ironically came from one of the last places where the coach is the GM. Another red flag is they have been drafting better in NE since Pioli left.
As for Sundquist, I would love to know how the OP got the idea that he was responsible for the Cutler trade. The brains behind Sundquist was Rick Smith who is the current GM for the Texans. How are they doing at drafting again?
Sundquist is a fraud and there's a reason he hasn't been able to get work since getting axed. He was a figurehead during the Shanahan years and none of those teams were ever very good. He was responsible for the Browncos - the Cleveland castoffs we signed for one year. He's not responsible for the Cutler trade, despite the OP's response.
As a Bronco fan, I would love for you guys to sign him. What you need to do is sign a GM who comes from a system that has success drafting and developing players, but more importantly, has had success in the pro-personnel department. Then let him pick a coach who will pick good assistants and let them focus on coaching.
The problem with your front office is Pioli, not having a GM. You don't want to go back to the nineties model.
|