im giving alex a year.. Peyton did it in a year and thats where my bar is at for a 2nd round pick. He hasnt taken a snap yet for our team so im not gonna bite his head off after being in the nfc champ game a year prior to this (sanchez comes to mind :banghead:) BUT that being said. 1 year. Im hoping andy reid knows more than i and that he knows something we all dont.. But if alex and CO. cant get it done this year then im voting QB in round 1 to break the cycle 2014.. Lets face it 2013 isnt that strong of a QB class and even tho everyone is high off Geno i prefer Barkley.

Boy, you sure went on a tangent

Maybe they just know that the game day experience won't be the same without your shining personality at the games. Clark's just looking out for the fan's best interest. :evil:

Until they shit the bed at the draft

Not sure why Clark is to blame for anything.

It would have been half the cost to draft Geno or another qb instead of trading for AS. Bowe was a new deal that pays him the third most of any receiver in football. Albert was retained. Colquit was retained for big money.

Clark just writes the checks and has gotten the best available guys to make the football decisions that were available when he went shopping.

Clark has done a damn fine job.

watcha mean?

What if they don't?

I would expect it to jump to 200+%

I guess 100 is better then 50.

But from the fifty anything is possible.

I have seen this posted several times even though there is no merit to it.


Whats the logic here? Its cheaper to pay Alex Smith $8MM a year than Geno Smith?

Clark has spent enough $ since the end of the season to toss that reeruned argument out the window so after tossing the $ thing out, what is the logic again?

We aren't drafting a QB because its what? Its not more expensive so please, clarify this logic for me, please. Did you forget this isn't 3 years ago where the rookies get $50MM guaranteed?

You don't think drafting Geno Smith would have sold tickets and put butts in the seats? Seriously?

Some of you are so stuck on just repeating the same shit you don't ever even stop to check and see if the logic even fits what you are saying.

Its ridiculous. I mean ****ing ridiculous.

Geno butt hurt is strong.

i agree Geno would be cheaper. I completely agree. However, What if geno didnt pan out? Are we ready to tank a season to the 1st overall pick again??? I mean shoot maybe that would work and we could just keep drafting QB's with the 1.1 until we find the right guy but it would become kindve annoying to keep watching 2-14 seasons over and over unless we hit the jackpot on the right guy..

Regardless im not really on the Geno hype and would rather trade back some and pick up Barkley. My ideal would be trade back pick up picks and have

1.alex
2. Barkley

heading into the year. However i dont think that will happen. That being said, with alex we arent completely sure of what we are gonna get since San fran never really took the hand cuffs off alex and Andy likes to let it fly so if alex isnt the guy, we will know early. That being said, signing alex he only has 2 years left on his contract. Drafting someone 1.1 he would have 4-5. If alex doesnt pan out we only have him for year 2014 where we would draft a QB round 1 and have him either A groom behind alex in 2014 and start in 15' or B. Start in 14 and have alex mentor him along the way...

Either way i think the singing alex thing will pan out and that the FO is looking at our 1.1 as BPA and then 14' as picking up a QB in round 1 if alex sucks. Because as much as we would like to think otherwise, this draft class kindve sucks. 14' is more promising.

7-9 is perfect. If the Chiefs actually ever won anything they'd have to raise prices so high and would eventually lose/price out all their fans. Or they could just keep prices the same and give fans a break on seeing a winning product, but then all the other winning owners would be pissed off that we are undercutting them and making them look overpriced. What a shady business.

****tard