A second this year and a first next year... we're talking about a left tackle who only gave up one sack in 2012 iirc, if someone wants him they better pony up.

Voted 2nd this year, and their 1st next year.

Toss in a 5th or 6th this year too just for kicks and giggles.

:spock:

You didn't read the thread....did you?

I went the first two choices. You simply cannot throw away the first overall pick because the talking head on TV say there isn't any quality at the top of the draft this year. If someone wants the top spot, you make them pay for it, period.


And I also went with the D's whore mom and baseball bats option. Eight Major League quality Louisville Sluggers are nothing to sneeze at, even if the whore mom may be.

...This thread isn't about Albert.



That's stupid. What if they have a guy they WANT but don't think will drop to 8-15? That would mean they could trade down one or two spots and still get their guy. That is the reason why the cost to trade up depends on your position. Expecting the Jaguars to pony up that much is stupid.

A top 3 QBotF this or next year(might have to trade back up).

Errr, maybe not LMAO

If we're trading down one spot with Jax I'd swap our #1, #63, #99 for their #2, #33 and #64. We don't gain a pick we just greatly improve our position. They don't lose a pick they get Geno and then give up position. We'd have a pick in every round again except the 4th but we have that comp 3rd to make up for that.

I would settle for Geno Smith, and a 2013 2nd round pick.

wouldn't trade a ****ing thing...

You get a QB and stop beating off to the dreams of 9-7...

A 2nd and a bag of chicken chips and a bag of ja lap a noes

in 95 , the Niners gave up a 1st, 3rd and 4th in 95 and a 1st in 96 to move up 20 spots (30th to 10th) to draft JJ Stokes. ROFL


Yes, the price is high if you want to jump from a low to a high spot.

So far, Dorsey has been getting raped in FA. Yes, he did make some nice moves, but..

He could have probably used Glenn Dorsey in the Alex trade.

He could have used Cassel earlier in a trade instead of holding on to him for so long.

I wouldn't be surprised to see him get blown in a trade down, if it happens..

Glenn Dorsey was not under contract. Therefore....we couldn't trade him.

A) No, he hasn't.
B) No, he couldn't have. Dorsey was a free agent and they would have had to re-sign him in order to trade him, and then San Francisco would have just offered Dorsey more money. This is reeruned.
3) WTF are you even talking about now.
4) ANYTHING WE GET FOR TRADING DOWN IS GOOD. THE ONLY UNACCEPTABLE EVENT IS STAYING AT 1.1 AND TAKING A NON-QB.