ChiefsPlanet
Page 2 of 5 1 2 345
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Super Bowl winning QBs... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=275632)

beach tribe 08-26-2013 06:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9917624)
I think it's something like 51% of the SBs being won by HOF QBs, so no. And then you've got all the SB's from the last decade being won by future HOFer's besides probably Flacco.
None of those QBs were HOF worthy until they won a SB except maybe Elway so.....

cdcox 08-26-2013 07:24 PM
Joe is a good name for a QB.

Billy Joe, not so much.

splatbass 08-26-2013 07:28 PM
So if we had taken Geno at 1.1 he would have been a likely SB winner, but since he was taken in the 2nd he probably won't be? Is that what the OP is trying to say?

Good thing we have a QB taken at 1.1.

Baby Lee 08-26-2013 08:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 9917587)
Sorry if repost...

26-of-46 Super Bowl winning teams had starting QBs taken in the first round of the draft (56%...56 ****ing percent). Of those, 22 were taken in the Top-10 picks, the area of the board where teams hope to find their franchise guys. And 33% of Super Bowl winning QBs are #1 overall picks. A total of 14 first round QBs have been named the Super Bowl MVP.
Good thing we have a #1 pick leading the team.

Chiefs Pantalones 08-26-2013 08:18 PM
@draftbreakdown: David Fales would make sense for KC. Hyper-accurate w/ good feet (both important attributes for a WCO QB) http://t.co/ABi3ojQvlf

cdcox 08-26-2013 08:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 9917852)
@draftbreakdown: David Fales would make sense for KC. Hyper-accurate w/ good feet (both important attributes for a WCO QB) http://t.co/ABi3ojQvlf
Fales is a bad name for a QB.

Chiefs Pantalones 08-26-2013 08:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 9917892)
Fales is a bad name for a QB.
Lol no joke.

-King- 08-26-2013 08:51 PM
Heh was about to post something like this.


The ironic thing is that people are now saying we should have drafted Geno even though he was a 2nd round QB.

-King- 08-26-2013 08:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 9917595)
yeah, but with a udfa we get all of the hope and none of the risk or actual success

#winwin
At least we didn't get that 2nd round QB Geno Smith.

Deberg_1990 08-26-2013 08:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 9917587)
Sorry if repost...
Nope. Never been posted around here in 13 years.

Chiefs Pantalones 08-26-2013 09:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9917919)
Nope. Never been posted around here in 13 years.
I've only been around for 12 of them, so I missed the first year it was discussed ;)

Ace Gunner 08-26-2013 09:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wazu (Post 9917599)
So basically you are describing Alex Smith, correct?
so basically, you're naming Alex Smith a championship potential QB -- correct :D

Ace Gunner 08-26-2013 09:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 9917734)
Joe is a good name for a QB.

Billy Joe, not so much.
http://ttudelts.celect.org/uploads/i...e_Tolliver.jpg

RippedmyFlesh 08-26-2013 09:49 PM
It's simple.
Don't draft your franchise qb in the 1st round and you are going against the odds to win a sb.

Chiefspants 08-26-2013 09:57 PM
Whatever, what percentage of 1st round QB's have actually won a super bowl?

/Truebluetradition


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:19 AM.
Page 2 of 5 1 2 345
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.