32 teams would have either drafted Fisher or Joeckel had they been in the same position.

:thumb: This times a million.

Sweet. How about we just make a robot our ****ing GM?


"Beeep beeeeeeeep beep beep beeeep.... QB Assessment Analysis complete. Risk rating: 34%. Failure outlook: unclear. Possible threat to RoboGM job integrity. Truefan heuristic protocol activated. RoboGM has terminated QB prospect H32B7 from Big Board. Begin program TrenchBuilder23.7"

ROFL well done

Everybody doing the wrong thing doesn't make it right.

:thumb:

Beep beeeep beep beep beep beep beeeeeeeeeep...

Press conference mode activated. Beginning program ClicheGenerator.gm.

Analyzing question491. Safeguard filter implemented in secondary Response Generator. Boring quotient increased 17.3%. Begin answer:

"It's a process."

Should've quit while you were ahead

Exactly. There's nothing novel or unique about what Dorsey is doing.

I think dice would do just as well.

The point was its not like he reached. You can only select from the hand you were dealt.

It would be different if we passed on a Manning or Luck.
Posted via Mobile Device

It's about maximizing your value. There were a number of players they could have picked that would have provided better return than either Fisher or Joeckel. Hindsight shows us that.

A really good GM doesn't need the benefit of hindsight.

Now you're just being picky.

I wonder, with all that technology that Dorsey has, if this Chiefs draft will be as lame as last his last one?

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/-LshS8OaqLc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>