ChiefsPlanet
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3456
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs 6 Picks In This Draft And Odds Are Not a Single One Will Start This Year (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=283611)

Pasta Little Brioni 05-11-2014 07:26 AM
Having a guy like Ford to give TamHous a breather and Vance Walker being able to rush the passer will make a huge difference.

Sully 05-11-2014 07:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEX (Post 10622656)
Yep and the Chiefs O-Line SCARES the hell out of me. Way too many questions for them all to work out.

I've become less and less worried about it through the years. We had one of the best OL ever several years back, and didn't do a thing with it. Conversely, there have been some teams with terrible OL win the Super Bowl. So I'd be ok with an average OL, consider limited resources.

RealSNR 05-11-2014 07:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPATCH (Post 10622658)
I honestly hate that literally everyone has to reference Drew Brees when they are talking about these short ass qbs
They bring up Vince Young and Jamarcus Russell all the time when talking about black QBs.

The short-asses deserve some racism, too.

Pasta Little Brioni 05-11-2014 07:32 AM
I really love the Murray pick too. So much to like about it.

Mr. Arrowhead 05-11-2014 07:37 AM
In the end the draft isnt suppose to be about this year, in the end its about the future. But I bet ford ends up playing over 50% of the snaps on defense this year

milkman 05-11-2014 07:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPATCH (Post 10622658)
I honestly hate that literally everyone has to reference Drew Brees when they are talking about these short ass qbs
Would you rather Doug Flutie?

milkman 05-11-2014 07:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Arrowhead (Post 10622673)
In the end the draft isnt suppose to be about this year, in the end its about the future. But I bet ford ends up playing over 50% of the snaps on defense this year
The first and second rounds should be about both this year, and the future.

Pasta Little Brioni 05-11-2014 07:51 AM
The funniest thing is this place whined for YEARS about not taking playmakers. They do it and now they should a stocked the trenches or reached for a guy just to throw at receiver.

DaWolf 05-11-2014 07:56 AM
That's not always a bad thing. As long as some if these guys are solid starters in a year or two, then it's all good. If a bunch of them started this year, then you probably have a crappy talent base to begin with.

We need to see last years class step up big this year, this years class contribute this year and step up next year.

And next years draft should be interesting. Mark Dominic tweeted out that next years draft is supposed to be better than this years draft, and we ought to be going into it with at least 11 picks...

Pasta Little Brioni 05-11-2014 07:58 AM
You're posts are boring without the NWO music

milkman 05-11-2014 08:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaWolf (Post 10622704)
That's not always a bad thing. As long as some if these guys are solid starters in a year or two, then it's all good. If a bunch of them started this year, then you probably have a crappy talent base to begin with.

We need to see last years class step up big this year, this years class contribute this year and step up next year.

And next years draft should be interesting. Mark Dominic tweeted out that next years draft is supposed to be better than this years draft, and we ought to be going into it with at least 11 picks...
Wait.

This years draft, which is considered by most to be the deepest in years, primarily because of all the underclassmen that declared, is not as good as as next year's class, which should be depleted because of all the underclassmen in this one?

BigMeatballDave 05-11-2014 08:08 AM
Yeah, I just don't see how next years draft could be better than this year.

chiefzilla1501 05-11-2014 08:10 AM
I get that we needed a Safety.

But the way people are talking, they would have considered this draft to be a huge success if we got a 50 reception #2 WR and a bunch of o-linemen, and a bust if players like Ford and Gaines become playmakers but don't start full time in year 1.

Sorry, guys. This is the first time in a long time I felt this team was committing to BPA instead of drafting for need. I'm just amazed that after years of complaining that we don't do this, when we finally do it, people are getting pissy about it.

ct 05-11-2014 08:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sully (Post 10622651)
Breaking news; "Starting" positions don't mean anything in today's NFL. (Except QBs and OL)
This

Pasta Little Brioni 05-11-2014 08:15 AM
People were begging for wide outs that will be JAGS in this league.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:31 PM.
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3456
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.