![]() |
Quote:
Riiiiiight. |
Hard to believe that a QB would be playing his best during his first start in a year.
data incomplete conclusion fail |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Besides, the 2 games of data backs up my argument a hell of a lot better than yours. |
Daniel is probably one of the league's better backup quarterbacks, which is what he should remain.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
at least we can confirm that Bowe is allergic to the endzone.
|
I want to know what you're smoking if you think Smiff is way better than Daniel!
|
And QBR is not a stat Id rely on to pick a QB.
|
6-10 doesn't satisfy Lil' Chiefy. He demands at least 7 in order to feel good about himself.
|
Give me a break. Smith is easily better than daniel.
What I hope this exposed was the dumbass myths we've been shoveled all year long that are excuses for Smith. The OL is terrible... They looked just fine today behind a QB who got rid of the ball quickly. The receivers are a dumpster fire... They were getting open today and had a QB who actually took shots at them downfield. The second half showed us the real chase Daniel. Neither Smith nor Daniel are the answer. Sorry guys... While this game should signal to management that we should no longer make excuses for Smith, it probably solidifies chase Daniel as our backup. It's one of those catch 22 only the Chiefs can find themselves in. Backup plays well enough to damage stock of first string qb but also strengthen stock of the backup qb who isn't the answer. |
let's not get carried away here guys, 16/27 157yds 0td 0int doesn't qualify as tearing it up solely because his name isn't Smith ROFL
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.