A guy, who was not brain damaged, had been at my company 24 years and was just fired 2 months ago for harassment of an employee. I don't see how they fired him after being here 24 years... he wasn't such a bad guy.

It just amazes me how people will allow emotions to drive their thinking.

Thanks. So its a simple case of employee sub-standard performance resulting in termination after the appropriate steps were followed coupled with some public sympathy because said under-performing employee was "special"?

All you really know in a blowfish thread which contains some bit of 'news' intended to incite rage or derision against someone is that you are never getting the whole story

ROFL

so just because he's been there 24 years he should be allowed to harrass someone?

This made local news in Springfield a couple weeks ago. It was for far more than a jug of tea. He had been giving discounts I think I read around 20 times more often than the next highest employee and had been warned several times.

But lets not let facts cloud our judgement of the evil empire of WalMart.

They all seem brain damaged to me.

Wal Mart needed that fifty cents.

They owe Pennsylvania Employees $224 million for forcing them to work during their lunch breaks:

http://occupydemocrats.com/2016/04/1...-lunch-breaks/

Target is better anyway.

Well it's a serious policy. $.50 adds up large for Walmart.

Also, doling out hugs to Wal-Marts customers is both disgusting and a good way to get your ass beat.

It's bogus. A 50 cent mistake doesn't get people fired.

Except for ushering in chip readers. Those annoy me for some reason.

They will fire you for being over on your drawer too.

You'll have to be more specific.