ChiefsPlanet
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Bills lean towards cutting Tyrod Taylor (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=306366)

raybec 4 03-03-2017 11:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12766585)
The closer we get, I suspect that the only way KC walks out of the 1st round with a QB is if Watson falls. He seems to fit what Andy would want. Shows a lot of the traits that Alex does on tape, though his ceiling is obviously way higher.

Personally, I would be a little concerned about drafting Watson, but excited nonetheless. Behind Mahomes, he would be my next reasonable pick for the Chiefs.
I bet Watson is the first QB off the board.

sedated 03-03-2017 11:21 AM
I'd take TT in a second if he signs for half of what Smith is making. They are essentially the same player.

raybec 4 03-03-2017 11:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sedated (Post 12766624)
I'd take TT in a second if he signs for half of what Smith is making. They are essentially the same player.
He's definitely not the long term answer, neither is Smith though.

notorious 03-03-2017 11:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sedated (Post 12766624)
I'd take TT in a second if he signs for half of what Smith is making. They are essentially the same player.
Tyrod takes more shots downfield, and isn't as good of a short passer as Alex.


He also takes a lot of hits, but so does Alex.

ChiliConCarnage 03-03-2017 11:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 12766539)
If we're going to do it, then we target the right guy in the right year, and move up to get him. Don't do this for a CP-like desperation "just draft anyone in the first" kind of selection.

When you draft a QB high, you basically are devoting 3-4 years of your franchise to them. I don't want us to do that for a tweener who might have a second round grade on them.
Yeah, that's what I mean. I'd be ecstatic if they moved up for somebody they believed in.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-03-2017 11:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by raybec 4 (Post 12766629)
He's definitely not the long term answer, neither is Smith though.
The Browns are giving serious consideration to Trubisky at #1 overall. Sounds like one way or another he will be first.

raybec 4 03-03-2017 11:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12766643)
The Browns are giving serious consideration to Trubisky at #1 overall. Sounds like one way or another he will be first.
It's so much smoke from now until the draft, it's impossible to tell what's true and what is a show. I am excited to see how it unfolds.

Eleazar 03-03-2017 11:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12766643)
The Browns are giving serious consideration to Trubisky at #1 overall.
LMAO he is probably contemplating picking up a minor weed charge to drop his stock a little.

The Franchise 03-03-2017 11:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12766643)
The Browns are giving serious consideration to Trubisky at #1 overall. Sounds like one way or another he will be first.
**** they're stupid. Take Garrett #1 and then move up for a QB from 12 if there is one you want. The would have Collins AND Garrett at LB.

jspchief 03-03-2017 12:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sedated (Post 12766624)
I'd take TT in a second if he signs for half of what Smith is making. They are essentially the same player.
If he wanted to play that cheap, Buffalo wouldn't be getting rid of him...

Rausch 03-03-2017 12:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiliConCarnage (Post 12766640)
Yeah, that's what I mean. I'd be ecstatic if they moved up for somebody they believed in.
Watch Reid move up for the Kizer...:D

Chief_For_Life58 03-03-2017 01:13 PM
I understand the "were one or 2 players away mentality " but the 1 player were missing is a ****ing qb. trade up, draft mahomes, let alex play this season and win 9 games, dont sign any fa, save money, cut his ass, give team to mahomes and see if the kid can win, if not, rinse and repeat until we find a ****ing top 7 qb or youre not winning shit in the nfl anymore. its a passing league. a god damn 7 on 7 league now. You dont have a top qb you aint winnin shit. thank you and god bless

sedated 03-03-2017 01:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 12766695)
If he wanted to play that cheap, Buffalo wouldn't be getting rid of him...
I was under the impression it was 2 years of guaranteed money that have Buffalo ready to dump him. But it is true that even mediocre QBs are breaking the bank.

Buffalo has played this better than KC did with Smith and Cassel - not sure about a guy so sign him to a deal that will let you see his ceiling before deciding whether to dump him for little to nothing. We got stuck with guys for 4-5 years and still had dead money.

Coochie liquor 03-03-2017 05:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 12766415)
We aren't spending our first on a QB when the FO thinks we are "a player or two away". They are far more likely to pick someone they think can make an immediate impact.
Dorsey doesn't always seem to go with a player that will make an immediate impact in the first. Peters was an outlier because he was ready quickly. But Fissure and Ford were both project players.

Coochie liquor 03-03-2017 05:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiliConCarnage (Post 12766523)
I'm not sure I'd want us to draft a QB at 27. Outside of Rodgers who could have been no. 1 and then slid all the way into the 20's, I can't think of many QBs in the second half of the first that ended up a hit. Flacco went 18 and is the only other "recent" example I can think of past the middle of the 1st.

Weeden, Tebow, JP Losman, Grossman, Josh Freeman, Brady Quinn, Kyle Boller
I can't think of many guys selected in the first round but after the early teens that turned out great. Just remembered Manziel! EJ Manuel was somewhere in the mid-teens too
Most of the players you mention went to a bad situation as far as teams go. Id like to think we have a better situation with system, the team that's already in place, stability, and coaching than most of those qb's were drafted into. But maybe I'm homering it up...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:58 AM.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.