It would be amazing to have him and Kelce but I can't see how we end up getting him.

I've been holding my breath al year that Kelce doesn't get hurt. Our offense would be much different. I trust Veach can find us a TE in FA or a later round. Kelce wasn't drafted in rd1. More a fan of moving back rather than up.

Daniel Jeremiah has him going #12 to San Fran

Has KC taking the DT from washington. Could make since in that draft scenario as he's the first DT taken off the board.

They're going to run Pitts AND Kittle?

Crazy.

When I seen this a few days ago I laughed. Why in the world would they use an high 1st rounder on a TE when they got the 2nd best in the league already? I'm sure there is other areas needed to improve upon first.

There's a lot of option for TE this year. Bushman or Ferguson for me. But we could get Kenny Yeboah in the later rounds too.

This place loves to dream up scenarios of 2 All-Pro TEs on the field at the same time, for some unknown reason. SF isn't drafting Pitts and the Chiefs aren't trading an extra first to move up for him either.

I could argue Pitts would be the best WR in the class if he was a WR, that dudes a top 10 guy.

Trade up for a Tight End when they have Kelce? Get the **** out of here, people.

He’d basically be a WR in our offense.

They could basically draft an actual WR that would see the field more, without needing to move up as much.

Easy tiger, no need for all that sass!

I recognize they’d be able to draft a WR at 32. In fact, I hope we do and I hope it’s Terrace Marshall.

I’m merely wondering if Pitts is bonerriffic enough for Veach to move up, that’s all.

No. It makes absolutely no sense.

Silly January Dante84, March Dante84 is laughing at you.

Dude's so ****ing sick. Certainly going top 8.

I'm not sure I see a world where he isn't the pick at #5 to Cincy... unless Atlanta does it at #4.

What was silly in January was the thought of KC trading up for him. It remains silly. ;)