![]() |
I've been in the boat for a bigger bodied WR for a long time. Kinda tired of the small guys, Mahomes needs a young, point of catch, Moss the DB, kinda guy so give me Mingo over Hyatt. When we passed on George Pickens last year to trade down, then took Skyy Moore I was pretty disappointed. I saw why they did it, Pickens has some cockiness that might not play well with others, a Steelers or Raiders pick he was destined to be, but I still want that type of receiver for Mahomes and imo there's no better time to take that guy. Either this year or next, lock up a young stud big bodied receiver for Mahomes to continue his prime with. Trade draft capital to do it too, I don't care, this front office can afford to be a little risky after the last five years of success they've accomplished.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
He looks like a great fit here. |
Wanna replace Mecole? If so, I think Jamyr Gibbs provides many of those same skills....plus the additional skills of a RB. That said, I doubt the goal of our First is to simply replace Mecole. Nonetheless, I think Gibbs would be awesome in our offense.
Gibbs could also replace McKinnon, except for his blocking skills. But didn't McK have 9 receiving TDs? Lastly, does anyone see a bit of Jamal Charles in Gibbs? Looks like a clone to me. Would love to see Gibbs in red!!! |
kccrow is going to be completely and utterly insufferable if we take Gibbs.
He's going on a revenge tour, and not even the innocent will be spared. I never made fun of the pick, but I could easily see him telling me to drink anti-freeze. Hold onto your butts |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
1.) Cardinals transfer the majoriry of his salary to bonus and pay it if the draft capital is sufficient enough. 2.) Chris Jones extension 3.) Move some Thuney money around 4.) Move more Mahomes money around 5.) Move Kelce money around. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
We have many wrs they want to look at on the roster now. Taking one early may not happen. They want Toney to be the guy. Rookie wrs never do shit with Andy.
|
I mean he's being written off for good reason though, Hyatt is a giant unknown. His release packages and route tree were never fleshed out because of the Tennessee offense. If you pick him you're really just gambling that it was a case of “wasn’t asked to do” rather than “can’t do”. He's not appreciably powerful or tall that would make him an athletic freak like DK or Julio, and from what I watched he wasn't particularly great at contested catch situations.
If Veach pulls the trigger I won't bitch because it means Reid believes he can coach these things up in the kid. But as it stands, being fast can't be the only thing you bring to the table in the NFL. He's raw and I wouldn't personally touch him in the first unless the board is absolute shite. |
The real question (not calling you out specifically Iconic) is what part of the "route tree" do you guys not see Hyatt running with regularity that you think he should be running given his primary position and role?
I ask this because I've seen this take regurgitated quite frequently and I significantly question its merit but will gladly listen to anyone's take that can point to specific routes they think are requisite to him being, most ideally, a Z receiver here and he doesn't currently run. |
Quote:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Receiving yards % by route for Jalin Hyatt, JSN, Jordan Addison and Quentin Johnson (2021-22, via PFF) <a href="https://t.co/ZmwXMnSCHe">pic.twitter.com/ZmwXMnSCHe</a></p>— Austin Gayle (@austingayle_) <a href="https://twitter.com/austingayle_/status/1625967430706274304?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 15, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> As I said before, we do not know if it was a “wasn’t asked to do” rather than “can’t do” situation. I get Heupel’s offense ran a bunch of deep choice stuff and Hyatt was forced into running a lot of flys. But with all these unknowns it just remains to be seen why you'd take him when there may be better options without as many question marks. I'm not even opposed to taking him, I just see better value elsewhere personally. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.