ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Has postseason play changed your perspective on the draft? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=352081)

Mecca 01-29-2024 12:41 PM

Reid isn't going anywhere either..

I do think they'll try to get something done with Sneed...Gay and Jones though are probably toast.

Direckshun 01-29-2024 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 17374990)
Reid isn't going anywhere either..

I do think they'll try to get something done with Sneed...Gay and Jones though are probably toast.

Off topic, but since you mentioned it in your first post in this thread: would you prefer to attack WR position in free agency, the draft, or perhaps via trade, such as a trade for AJ Brown since his 2024 number is a great deal.

Mecca 01-29-2024 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 17375003)
Off topic, but since you mentioned it in your first post in this thread: would you prefer to attack WR position in free agency, the draft, or perhaps via trade, such as a trade for AJ Brown since his 2024 number is a great deal.

I don't think trade is a real option...

I think the smartest thing they could do is look for some speed.

I know people don't love Hollywood Brown but he's likely getting less money than guys like Ridley and Evans..if you could add Brown and Franklin to the offense that would make Rice and Kelce so much better with more space.

I think there's a reasonable chance Wanya Morris is a starting OT next year...

JPH83 01-29-2024 01:03 PM

It's probably only changed my mind a little in the margins. I still think WR is a massive priority and we need one early, probably R1. Then it's OT and DT. The difference for me now is that i wouldn't hate us going for a position like LB, TE or G over OT or DT, if it's BPA. I might not even mind another fairly early CB or Safety as they're all positions we either need to think about replacing soon, or we could improve.

Pre playoffs the thought of us taking a guard over an OT or DT would've annoyed me. I think if we resigned D Smith I could live with that risk and reloading at guard first. Same with LB. I love Bolton but if we saw a coverage LB we like in the late 2nd or 3rd that's BPA I could live with it. As long as we get a WR early and bolster the DL early-ish the rest is fine.

O.city 01-29-2024 01:11 PM

The thing with HOllywood is that he does have speed and there aren't many guys hitting the market that does.

I'd guess he may get 20 mil a year.

Mecca 01-29-2024 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17375072)
The thing with HOllywood is that he does have speed and there aren't many guys hitting the market that does.

I'd guess he may get 20 mil a year.

That would be rather crazy if he got that, I assume he comes in, in the second tier of WR FAs.

O.city 01-29-2024 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 17375077)
That would be rather crazy if he got that, I assume he comes in, in the second tier of WR FAs.

Why would he get less than Christian Kirk?

RunKC 01-29-2024 01:20 PM

I think their goal this off-season has to be weapons. They can't have Kelce be the guy carrying the offense going forward.

Mecca 01-29-2024 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17375085)
Why would he get less than Christian Kirk?

Because Kirk is wildly overpaid, I figure that market will correct itself.

Shoes 01-29-2024 01:28 PM

Post-season hasn't really changed my mind in regards to draft needs- if this Chiefs team even had one more dynamic playmaker, I think we would absolutely boat race teams. Love Rashee but him and Kelce right now are best vs zone, we need a receiver who is great vs man to man. Right now when we expect man coverage you see us scheme receivers open (ala Justin Watson motion release yesterday vs the Ravens).

I'm not hung up on who we take in the 1st though, BPA at a position of need and go from there. I do think it's a likely possibility the Chiefs take a WR in the 2nd round just due to the sheer amount of great receiver prospects in this draft. There are legitimately around 10 guys that I could see carving out solid careers. The following (in no order):

-Harrison Jr
-Nabers
-Odunze
-Coleman
-Thomas Jr
-Franklin
-Mitchell
-Legette
-Worthy
-Polk
-Walker

11 guys right there that are at least intriguing prospects; doesn't even include Corley, Rice, McConkey or Wilson. There will be a talented option available at the end of the 2nd round so I would prefer them to draft elsewhere in the 1st. Veach and staff have been so god damn good drafting though so I got all the faith in the world that they are going to get it right.

JPH83 01-29-2024 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 17374982)
The only thing -- the only thing -- that I think these games have changed for me is that a Justin Reid extension is far more likely now than it was at some earlier point in the season.

Man, I feel like I'm alone in being kind of fine with moving off Reid. I like him, it's just a lot of money and I don't know we can't find another guy there. Maybe not quite as versatile or smart, and that matters, but someone who can play FS with real range. I still think Connor settles as primarily a SS and maybe Cook too.

Mecca 01-29-2024 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPH83 (Post 17375203)
Man, I feel like I'm alone in being kind of fine with moving off Reid. I like him, it's just a lot of money and I don't know we can't find another guy there. Maybe not quite as versatile or smart, and that matters, but someone who can play FS with real range. I still think Connor settles as primarily a SS and maybe Cook too.

Reid's totally coming back, Connor being a player means they'll move off Mike Edwards.

DJ's left nut 01-29-2024 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 17375099)
Because Kirk is wildly overpaid, I figure that market will correct itself.

I'm not sure if it will just yet.

But I think in another year or 2 it will.

There are just WAY more good wide receivers out there than there are QBs who can make them actually matter.

If Tyreek Hill and Jaylen Waddle are just good enough to get your asses kicked in the post-season, then Tua doesn't crack that threshhold. And if he doesn't, there are maybe 6-8 QBs that do.

If that's the case, this rush to sign FA wide-outs oughta be truly dead and buried. Moreso when you realize that most of the teams that DO have the QBs to allow WRs to move the needle will also have cap hits that make them prohibitive.

It's just really hard to see WRs as being worth what they're being paid right now. Most of the mid-tier guys don't actually make a difference. Most of the expensive guys get sent home once their QBs are exposed and frankly some of the best in the league right now are guys who were productive in their 1st and 2nd years and are still on rookie deals.

That market's out of whack but it won't correct THAT quickly, IMO. Probably need a couple more datapoints before other teams realize what seems readily apparent to me right now.

DJ's left nut 01-29-2024 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 17375213)
Reid's totally coming back, Connor being a player means they'll move off Mike Edwards.

Yeah, I'd probably give 2-1 odds on a Reid extension at the moment. I'd be floored if we moved off of him.

He's absolutely been worth his deal and some of his best play has been in the post-season. He's still young and will be extremely valuable throughput in this secondary in the coming years.

I agree that Edwards will probably move on because I suspect he'll get a nice deal somewhere. But Conner will replace him as S3 and honestly could challenge Cook for the FS spot. Conner has looked DAMN good. Better than Cook, IMO. Certainly better than Cook looked as a rookie.

Dude's coming on with a bullet.

kccrow 01-29-2024 07:40 PM

Not even a little. Offensive weapons, especially WRs, are top of the list followed by a lot of help at DT.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.