ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Thoughts of the game (long) (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=99037)

LVNHACK 09-19-2004 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PastorMikH
I'll throw my take here too if you don't mind Zach.


Offense.

Why did we not use Priest more? He averages 4.125 yards per carry and we give him the ball 16 times? He breaks off 19 yards in 2 plays and we don't go back to him? Priest is the heart of this offense, it's not Trent, it's not Tony, it sure isn't any of our WRs, it's Priest. Priest is the only player we have that we can put the game on his shoulders and he'll step up and get it done.

Trent - He is not a Top-tiered QB that can take control of the game on his own. We tried that 3 years ago and it didn't work. Now that he has gotten lots of work and is looking good, they seem to forget that and are going back to treating him like Montana or Elway asking him to fling the ball around like they do in St Louis. And he is doing just like he did when everyone was calling him trINT - forcing throws into double and triple coverage. We also seem to forget that Green is better when he is handing off to Priest. Al, go back and look at last year's tapes, learn from them and get back to that style.

WRs. Kennison with a hamstring is serious. Those things tend to cause problems for the rest of the season. And Kennison is the best WR we have. Morton seems to show up about half the time and I am tired of him letting us down. Smith is NOT going to be an answer this year. The Chiefs need to swallow their pride and get a call to Tampa Bay and get something worked out for McCardell.


Defense.

Missed tackles are still killing us. There is no leader out there. Someone has got to step up and lead this team on the defense. Everytime Jr is in there I hear his name being mentioned on something big. Shoot, he's making more plays than Sims. He's raw and has a long way to go, but if he is doing better than Sims, maybe he should be playing instead of Sims.


Special Teams.

Tynes missed another long one. I am concerned that his confidence may start to become a problem if they keep asking him to kick the long FGs that have a low percentage of being made. Kickoffs and punting are looking good from the kicker's standpoint. Mental breakdowns from the players need to be cut down.



I agree PMike.....IMO AL Saunders is killing the Offense with his play calling.....This isn't the Rams, the Chiefs don't have those WR's use Priest and then go from there...

Raiderhater 09-19-2004 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can
"On defense we just have to tackle. Really just to better tacking and things are a lot different."

I'm asking this question with complete honesty...I'm not trying to be a smart ass:

Why do you think they will ever get better at tackling?

These same players have been terrible tacklers for 2 years or more, what is suddenly going to change that?


A focus on fundamentals would help a lot. They are tackling high and not wrapping up.

Sure-Oz 09-19-2004 03:57 PM

The missed tackling at the line was ridiculous, we had so many stops at the line that turned into 1st downs or 7 yard runs!

go bo 09-19-2004 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZachKC
Yuck.

* * *

Dalton did some good things in there.

* * *

I look forward to seeing them get healthier and put some things together against the Texans. We need to get this thing turned around. I am not pressing the panic button yet...

dalton did look good early on, but it looked like he ran out of steam after awhile...

or maybe they started double-teaming him instead of sims, i don't know...

as far as the texans, i worry that we can't even beat them if we play like we did today...

|Zach| 09-19-2004 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by go bo

as far as the texans, i worry that we can't even beat them if we play like we did today...

I agree on the O's side of the ball...

But I really think our defense did good and improved. That is my big point. Our offense hung them out to dry today. I don't expect the defense to do well if the offense is getting 3 and outs left and right there is no way for our defense to do well when they are forced to be on the field as much as they were...hell they even got 2 turnovers and the offense couldnt help them out.

go bo 09-19-2004 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZachKC
I agree on the O's side of the ball...

But I really think our defense did good and improved. That is my big point. Our offense hung them out to dry today. I don't expect the defense to do well if the offense is getting 3 and outs left and right there is no way for our defense to do well when they are forced to be on the field as much as they were...hell they even got 2 turnovers and the offense couldnt help them out.

yes, our d did some good things today...

even flashed a few times...

but they screwed up more often than not, it seemed...

the really bad plays cancelled out the good ones... :( :( :(

WilliamTheIrish 09-19-2004 04:16 PM

The only thing I'll disagree with is the "defense wasn't that bad" part.

The defense was OK... for one half. Giving up a 13 play 9 minute drive is exactly what they did last week. Only they did it a quarter earlier than normal.

The D was pathetic in the 2nd half. A good defense holds that lead at home until the O explodes.

We saw that happen today. Problem was, it was the other teams D.

Boyceofsummer 09-19-2004 04:17 PM

Our problem is..................
 
Our GM sucks. Our coaches (excluding defense & special teams) suck. Our talent for the most part has passed over the hill. We have a FEW good young players with no idea how to utilize them. It's depressing. I hope the next ownership has a serious hard-on for CP. I'm sorry Mr. Hunt has to watch this. Reference the autograph post earlier this week.

Raiderhater 09-19-2004 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by go bo
yes, our d did some good things today...

even flashed a few times...

but they screwed up more often than not, it seemed...

the really bad plays cancelled out the good ones... :( :( :(


You have to take into consideration two key points however -

1. They are still trying to learn and gel under a new system.

2. The _ffense left them with a short field and short breathers on a very regular basis.


If the _ffense is sustaining drives and allowing them to rest, and if they are scoring, the defense looks a lot better than it has the past two games. Considering point #1 the _ffense needs to be doing every thing they can to help the defense out early on in the season, and they have not been.

go bo 09-19-2004 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raiderhader
You have to take into consideration two key points however -

1. They are still trying to learn and gel under a new system.

2. The _ffense left them with a short field and short breathers on a very regular basis.


If the _ffense is sustaining drives and allowing them to rest, and if they are scoring, the defense looks a lot better than it has the past two games. Considering point #1 the _ffense needs to be doing every thing they can to help the defense out early on in the season, and they have not been.

those are valid points, but even more damaging was the poor tackling, imo...

many times it looked like we had stopped them for no gain or even a loss, but the rb was able to break tackles and take off down the field... :banghead::banghead: :banghead:

Raiderhater 09-19-2004 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by go bo
those are valid points, but even more damaging was the poor tackling, imo...

many times it looked like we had stopped them for no gain or even a loss, but the rb was able to break tackles and take off down the field... :banghead::banghead: :banghead:


I am by no means giving a pass to the D, they still have a lot of work to do. But some of their problems can be laid at the feet of the _ffense.

go bo 09-19-2004 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raiderhader
I am by no means giving a pass to the D, they still have a lot of work to do. But some of their problems can be laid at the feet of the _ffense.

i wonder if playing that soft schedule last year created unrealistic expectations for our o...

sure, the o could have mounted some sustained drives which would have helped the d, but the d looked so outclassed that i doubt that the outcome would have been much different...

i just don't think our o is gonna score near as much as they did last year, mostly because of the schedule this year...

we have faced two pretty good defenses already and there are more coming down the road...

WilliamTheIrish 09-19-2004 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raiderhader
You have to take into consideration two key points however -

1. They are still trying to learn and gel under a new system.

2. The _ffense left them with a short field and short breathers on a very regular basis.

If the _ffense is sustaining drives and allowing them to rest, and if they are scoring, the defense looks a lot better than it has the past two games. Considering point #1 the _ffense needs to be doing every thing they can to help the defense out early on in the season, and they have not been.

It may have seemed that way but in reality it was not.

1st Quarter
Start

10:01 1:45 KC 46
6:30 5:20 CAR 34

2nd Quarter

12:34 0:51 CAR 20
10:51 1:42 CAR 22
7:39 3:43 CAR 24
0:49 0:49 CAR 37

3rd Quarter

15:00 8:13 CAR 20 16 80 TD
5:02 0:58 CAR 31
3:28 3:33 CAR 44

4th Quarter

11:27 0:52 CAR 26 2 74 TD
10:35 1:05 KC 40 3 -4 Punt
6:45 1:54 CAR 27 3 1 Punt
4:18 3:57 CAR 46 5 15 Punt


Of their 13 drives 2, started in Chiefs territory. Two at or near the Carolina 40. One of those was due to the shiot 'excessive display' penalty.

No, the defense got their hats handed to them. They played a great half. Then they tanked.\

And just to be fair, yes, the O was dogspit.

Raiderhater 09-19-2004 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by go bo
i wonder if playing that soft schedule last year created unrealistic expectations for our o...

sure, the o could have mounted some sustained drives which would have helped the d, but the d looked so outclassed that i doubt that the outcome would have been much different...

i just don't think our o is gonna score near as much as they did last year, mostly because of the schedule this year...

we have faced two pretty good defenses already and there are more coming down the road...


If AS will pull his head out of his ass and call a decent game the _ffense will improve. Sixteen rushes for Priest is not calling a good game. And a good showing by the O will help the defense out. Leaving them with a short field and small breaks on the side line is going to affect their performance. And this makes the times they did excel both today and last week more impressive. Last week they had four straight stops after the O had left them on a short field too many times. Their is some improvement there, and there will be more if the O gets their act together and takes a little pressure off of them.

Raiderhater 09-19-2004 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish
It may have seemed that way but in reality it was not.

1st Quarter
Start

10:01 1:45 KC 46
6:30 5:20 CAR 34

2nd Quarter

12:34 0:51 CAR 20
10:51 1:42 CAR 22
7:39 3:43 CAR 24
0:49 0:49 CAR 37

3rd Quarter

15:00 8:13 CAR 20 16 80 TD
5:02 0:58 CAR 31
3:28 3:33 CAR 44

4th Quarter

11:27 0:52 CAR 26 2 74 TD
10:35 1:05 KC 40 3 -4 Punt
6:45 1:54 CAR 27 3 1 Punt
4:18 3:57 CAR 46 5 15 Punt


Of their 13 drives 2, started in Chiefs territory. Two at or near the Carolina 40. One of those was due to the shiot 'excessive display' penalty.

No, the defense got their hats handed to them. They played a great half. Then they tanked.\

And just to be fair, yes, the O was dogspit.


I guess this one of those cases where perception is different than reality. And I totally agree that the first drive of the third quarter can be blamed on no one but the D. However, how did the O respond? By putting them right back out on the field. We had waaaay too many three and outs.

I am not excusing all of the defenses' play, just pointing out that they were not helped any by their O. And that can not happen while the D is still working things out with the new scheme.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.