ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Law & Surtain: The Best CB Tandem in the League? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=144098)

lawrenceRaider 07-23-2006 07:30 PM

In a word, no.

gcbroncos 07-23-2006 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rocky
look at my porter sig then


let's see....

bailey is 1st team all pro 2 yrs running (and perinnial pro bowler also)

bailey had 8 picks in only 13 games....

bailey had 2 int returns for tds last season...

he did all this while playing hurt with shoulder and hamstring injuries..

guy is a warrior...everyone (including you) knows that...d hall is nice but his resume doesn't stack up....

bailey covers everyone's top WR with no safety help....

your sig btw is friggin huge....do something about that....and your porter clip is 2 seasons old btw....

Mr. Kotter 07-23-2006 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gcbroncos
let's see....

bailey is 1st team all pro 2 yrs running (and perinnial pro bowler also)

bailey had 8 picks in only 13 games....

bailey had 2 int returns for tds last season...

he did all this while playing hurt with shoulder and hamstring injuries..

guy is a warrior...everyone (including you) knows that...d hall is nice but his resume doesn't stack up....

bailey covers everyone's top WR with no safety help....

your sig btw is friggin huge....do something about that....and your porter clip is 2 seasons old btw....

Bailey had lots of help; last year, Law didn't. :)

Hammock Parties 07-23-2006 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Dick Jones
Hahahahahahaha. Sure he did.

Eh. I don't really care what anyone else thinks. I trust Nick and he has no reason to lie to me.

headsnap 07-23-2006 08:00 PM

Jake Plummer don't care...



:)

blueballs 07-23-2006 08:01 PM

who is ****ing up the board
scroll you to death mother****er

gcbroncos 07-23-2006 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter
Bailey had lots of help; last year, Law didn't. :)



i'll just assume you're joking.....

Mr. Kotter 07-23-2006 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs
Eh. I don't really care what anyone else thinks. I trust Nick and he has no reason to lie to me.

Then, "why" didn't he "break" the story on Friday? :hmmm:


Let me guess. He did....but that's only for "premium members," right? :shrug:





ROFL

Mr. Kotter 07-23-2006 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gcbroncos
i'll just assume you're joking.....

No. :spock:

Denver's Defensive Ranking in 2005: Third
New York Jets Defensive Ranking in 2005: Twenty-Third

Next question? :rolleyes:

Hammock Parties 07-23-2006 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter
Then, "why" didn't he "break" the story on Friday? :hmmm:


Let me guess. He did....but that's only for "premium members," right? :shrug:





ROFL

His sources did not permit him to do so. Don't ask me to explain why. He wasn't happy about it.

Mecca 07-23-2006 08:11 PM

I like how the Broncos ranked 29th in pass defense yet I'm suppose to buy that their secondary is good........

Rain Man 07-23-2006 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gcbroncos
let's see....

[propaganda, propaganda, propaganda]

bailey had 8 picks in only 13 games....

So you admit that he's injury prone.

the Talking Can 07-23-2006 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs
Eh. I don't really care what anyone else thinks. I trust Nick and he has no reason to lie to me.

no, you're his only....

KChiefs1 07-23-2006 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs
His sources did not permit him to do so.

ROFL

the Talking Can 07-23-2006 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rocky
ok uprade yes maybe, but excellent is not the word. overated and gets burnt is. he gives up alot of big plays.

Dexter McCleon gives up a lot of big plays...perspective people, perspective...

Hammock Parties 07-23-2006 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1
ROFL

There's nothing so odd about that. It happens all the time in the media world. It happened to me before. If you don't respect your sources you lose them.

the Talking Can 07-23-2006 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs
There's nothing so odd about that. It happens all the time in the media world. It happened to me before. If you don't respect your sources you lose them.

Connie Chung has always had my respect. You would do well to listen to her.

Hammock Parties 07-23-2006 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can
Connie Chung has always had my respect. You would do well to listen to her.

What does Connie Chung have to do with this? She's just a talking head.

Big Dick Jones 07-23-2006 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs
Eh. I don't really care what anyone else thinks. I trust Nick and he has no reason to lie to me.

What? He has EVERY reason to lie to you. He knows you will stupidly spew anything he tells you. You're his prize dipshit.

Sure-Oz 07-23-2006 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs
Nick has known since Friday but was not allowed to break it.

The Boston Globe broke the story.

So Ty Law really did sign within 48hrs!!!!!!!!1111one11

alanm 07-23-2006 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Jones
And do you think Deltha O'Neal is the best CB in the league? INT stats are way overrated.

I don't see how you can sit there with a straight face and type that Int's are waaaaay overrated. What it means is that the individual stopped 10 offensive possessions by the opposing team. I put it right up there with recovered fumbles. It's certainly a game changing stat.

Malcor 07-23-2006 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gcbroncos
what is that pic supposed to tell me?

this doesn't change my statement one bit....is bailey supposed to be happy kennison scored on someone else?

It might not tell you anything...but THAT tells me something. Mostly it tells me you're an idiot. You said yourself that Bailey covers the teams best reciever...so unless he spends all day on Gonzalez...he covers Eddie. Just like he was a moment before the pic was taken.

~nods~

Mr. Kotter 07-23-2006 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gcbroncos
let's see....

bailey is 1st team all pro 2 yrs running (and perinnial pro bowler also)

bailey had 8 picks in only 13 games....

bailey had 2 int returns for tds last season...

he did all this while playing hurt with shoulder and hamstring injuries..

guy is a warrior...everyone (including you) knows that...d hall is nice but his resume doesn't stack up....

bailey covers everyone's top WR with no safety help....

your sig btw is friggin huge....do something about that....and your porter clip is 2 seasons old btw....

You DO realize the Bronco "secondary" finished 29th out of 32 teams last year, don't you?

I mean, to be fair....opponents were often playing from behind, and had to throw the ball...BUT, still, to give up more yards than all but 3 other clubs....is nothing to be proud of, I'd say.

greg63 07-23-2006 08:50 PM

About time; now the Ty Law threads can all be combined into this one.

penguinz 07-23-2006 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rocky
you do realize the guy he picked off werent great right and they working on him. Meaning he Int'd some crappy QBs like JP losman!! got lucky with the ones from trent and brady. He picked off tui and delhomme who are int machines. He picked off chris simms in his first staart for crying out loud. Hes overated and your going to see how many times he gets exploited.

Are you drunk or just stupid?

Simply Red 07-23-2006 09:18 PM

I'd say the best CB tandem in football is probably true. But I think the number one tandem will be shared with a few teams.

Big Dick Jones 07-23-2006 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penguinz
Are you drunk or just stupid?

What a coincidence! I was about to ask you the same thing.

KingPriest2 07-23-2006 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KingPriest2
It is not the mange but it is something

http://forum.signonsandiego.com/uplo...09#post2108809

07-24-2006, 02:06 AM
ROCaMOB
Probationary User Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1

Re: Ty Law IS a Chief

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am a long time NY Jets fan -- And I just wanted to weigh in on the KC Ty Law situation. Ty Law is an upgrade for KC at CB -- but I don't know how much he will actually improve their Defense. He had ten picks last year -- but that was because he blew would blow off his assignment and act as a ball hawk. He made our defense look worse than it was because of his selfish play. IMO he was the downfall of our young safety Eric Coleman. Law is old, slow and he gets flagged just about every game for the "Ty Law rule." The old man can't bump WR's ten yards down the field anymore.

All of these Chief fans sound like I did last year -- excited about our chances. 12 losses later, I realized that Ty Law wasn't the answer or the problem. The problem was HERM EDWARDS. The lack of clock management, the cutting of practices and conditioning lead to terrible performances and injured players. The man is a hell of a motivator, but he doesn't know X's and O's to save his life.

If I were a Chiefs fan, I would be happy about the Law singing but ****ED about that idiot HERM running my team. If I were a chargers fan -- I wouldn't be too worried about KC. They are the third best team in that division. And as a Jets Fan, I am extatic that we got a 4th round pick for EDWARDS. Hell, I would have taken a 12 pack and a bag of chips.

Dunit35 07-23-2006 09:37 PM

I'm lookin for the info on whether or not we signed Pollard....I heard we did?

OldTownChief 07-23-2006 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dunit35
I'm lookin for the info on whether or not we signed Pollard....I heard we did?

Pollard is signed.

Chiefs Agree to Terms with Second-Round Pick S Bernard Pollard
Jul 21, 2006, 4:30:34 PM

Kansas City Chiefs President Carl Peterson announced on Friday that the club has agreed to terms of a four-year contract with S Bernard Pollard. Pollard is the fourth member of the Chiefs 2006 draft class to agree to terms with the club. As per Chiefs policy, no other terms of the agreement were made available.

“We are pleased to have our second-round draft choice Bernard Pollard under contract prior to the start of training camp,” Peterson commented. “We believe that Bernard is a tremendous talent who has the potential to eventually become a starter for our team in the future. We believe he will make a solid contribution to the Kansas City Chiefs in 2006 and for many years to come.”

“We felt after watching Bernard Pollard in college that he was going to be a physical player in the back end of our defense and I think we found out a little bit more about that this spring,” Chiefs head coach Herm Edwards commented. “He has great range and he is eager to learn. He’s a team-oriented guy. Bernard is a guy who has speed, a great ability to tackle and will help us on special teams. When you look at our secondary I think everyone was concerned about the corner position, but when I looked at it we only had three safeties who had played a significant amount of time. I think the addition of Bernard Pollard is going to help us tremendously.”

Pollard (6-1, 224) joined the Chiefs as the club’s second-round pick (54th overall) in the 2006 NFL Draft. Pollard entered the draft with one year of eligibility remaining at Purdue. He played in 36 games (35 starts), recording 254 tackles (164 solo), 8.0 tackles for loss (-26.0 yards), a sack (-3.0 yards), four interceptions for 19 yards, nine passes defensed, two fumble recoveries and two forced fumbles. Pollard also set a Boilermakers record with five blocked kicks, in addition to returning three blocked punts.

Pollard opened all 11 games at strong safety in 2005, producing 92 tackles (64 solo), 1.5 tackles for loss (-7.0 yards), three INTs, three passes defensed and a fumble recovery. He was named second-team All-Big Ten by The NFL Draft Report.

The Fort Wayne, Indiana native was selected first-team All-Indiana as a senior at South Side High School in Fort Wayne, Indiana. Pollard also competed in basketball and track in high school.

Dunit35 07-23-2006 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldTownChief
Pollard is signed.


thanks...I couldn't find it anywhere on the Star or here....got a link?

Mr. Kotter 07-23-2006 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dunit35
thanks...I couldn't find it anywhere on the Star or here....got a link?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dunit35
I'm lookin for the info on whether or not we signed Pollard....I heard we did?

Old news.... ;)

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansas...s/15096321.htm

http://www.kcchiefs.com/news/2006/07...rnard_pollard/

Dunit35 07-23-2006 09:44 PM


lol...thanks...this is the first time I've been on a computer since Friday morning.

OldTownChief 07-23-2006 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dunit35
thanks...I couldn't find it anywhere on the Star or here....got a link?


It's on kcchiefs.com

Copied it to my post above.

Dunit35 07-23-2006 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldTownChief
Pollard is signed.

Chiefs Agree to Terms with Second-Round Pick S Bernard Pollard
Jul 21, 2006, 4:30:34 PM

Kansas City Chiefs President Carl Peterson announced on Friday that the club has agreed to terms of a four-year contract with S Bernard Pollard. Pollard is the fourth member of the Chiefs 2006 draft class to agree to terms with the club. As per Chiefs policy, no other terms of the agreement were made available.

“We are pleased to have our second-round draft choice Bernard Pollard under contract prior to the start of training camp,” Peterson commented. “We believe that Bernard is a tremendous talent who has the potential to eventually become a starter for our team in the future. We believe he will make a solid contribution to the Kansas City Chiefs in 2006 and for many years to come.”

“We felt after watching Bernard Pollard in college that he was going to be a physical player in the back end of our defense and I think we found out a little bit more about that this spring,” Chiefs head coach Herm Edwards commented. “He has great range and he is eager to learn. He’s a team-oriented guy. Bernard is a guy who has speed, a great ability to tackle and will help us on special teams. When you look at our secondary I think everyone was concerned about the corner position, but when I looked at it we only had three safeties who had played a significant amount of time. I think the addition of Bernard Pollard is going to help us tremendously.”

Pollard (6-1, 224) joined the Chiefs as the club’s second-round pick (54th overall) in the 2006 NFL Draft. Pollard entered the draft with one year of eligibility remaining at Purdue. He played in 36 games (35 starts), recording 254 tackles (164 solo), 8.0 tackles for loss (-26.0 yards), a sack (-3.0 yards), four interceptions for 19 yards, nine passes defensed, two fumble recoveries and two forced fumbles. Pollard also set a Boilermakers record with five blocked kicks, in addition to returning three blocked punts.

Pollard opened all 11 games at strong safety in 2005, producing 92 tackles (64 solo), 1.5 tackles for loss (-7.0 yards), three INTs, three passes defensed and a fumble recovery. He was named second-team All-Big Ten by The NFL Draft Report.

The Fort Wayne, Indiana native was selected first-team All-Indiana as a senior at South Side High School in Fort Wayne, Indiana. Pollard also competed in basketball and track in high school.


Didn't see it...thanks

Mr. Kotter 07-23-2006 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dunit35
lol...thanks...this is the first time I've been on a computer since Friday morning.

I know the feeling....I had been "off" since Friday, pretty much, until around the time the deal broke...:)

Rausch 07-23-2006 10:45 PM

Considering that Law has already played in Herm's D his signing should make everyone else in the secondary better.

Not only a smoother transition but also the experience and leadership can be passed on.

I don't know how much better our safeties will be this year but they'll be better than they would have been without him.

My only concern is Wesley deep...

Otter 07-23-2006 10:46 PM

All the Chiefs have to do now is make it to the playoffs AND survive the first round,

Simple enough...right?

Mr. Kotter 07-23-2006 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch
Considering that Law has already played in Herm's D his signing should make everyone else in the secondary better.

Not only a smoother transition but also the experience and leadership can be passed on.

I don't know how much better our safeties will be this year but they'll be better than they would have been without him.

My only concern is Wesley deep...

Join us on the,

"I'm-never-satisfied-sign-Dwight-Smith-Damnit-Carl!!!" Bandwagon.... ;)

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=144131

alanm 07-23-2006 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs
There's nothing so odd about that. It happens all the time in the media world. It happened to me before. If you don't respect your sources you lose them.

The NY Times doesn't have that problem. :shake:

shyguyms 07-23-2006 11:01 PM

Champ Bailey is Washed up
 
Chump is more like it
we need a little better pass rush and we are the Champions!!!!

Rausch 07-23-2006 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter
Join us on the,

"I'm-never-satisfied-sign-Dwight-Smith-Damnit-Carl!!!" Bandwagon.... ;)

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=144131

Sorry, I hear no Peterson apologists are allowed...

Hammock Parties 07-23-2006 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanm
The NY Times doesn't have that problem. :shake:

That's because the New York times is an Empire unto itself. WPI is a small-time operation compared to the NYT. We can't afford to burn bridges with anyone.

Mr. Kotter 07-24-2006 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch
Sorry, I hear no Peterson apologists are allowed...

:spock: You consider yourself a Peterson apologist?

Oh my. I won't be able to associate with you, ever again--what would my friends say?


....unless the occasion involves the consumption of alcohol, of course.

;)

go bo 07-24-2006 12:08 AM

alcohol, schmalcol...

abbra cadaver...

poof...

go bo 07-24-2006 12:09 AM

i meant proof...

go bo 07-24-2006 12:10 AM

is walls too tall to play nickel?

Rausch 07-24-2006 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter
...unless the occasion involves the consumption of alcohol, of course.

;)


A man must have standards... :)

gcbroncos 07-24-2006 06:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Malcor
It might not tell you anything...but THAT tells me something. Mostly it tells me you're an idiot. You said yourself that Bailey covers the teams best reciever...so unless he spends all day on Gonzalez...he covers Eddie. Just like he was a moment before the pic was taken.

~nods~



your mother....

the chiefs best receiver is TG...and he has been assigned to him at times....but the chiefs don't have a good enough WR for bailey to be "assigned" to....so bailey is moved around against you all....

please don't sit there and act like kennison is actually good...

gcbroncos 07-24-2006 06:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter
I mean, to be fair....opponents were often playing from behind, and had to throw the ball...


eegggsssactly....

don't read into stats so much....stats are for the birds....

wins & losses are what counts....

gcbroncos 07-24-2006 06:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter
No. :spock:

Denver's Defensive Ranking in 2005: Third
New York Jets Defensive Ranking in 2005: Twenty-Third

Next question? :rolleyes:


huh?

just because our defense was better that means bailey had safety help?

the Talking Can 07-24-2006 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs
That's because the New York times is an Empire unto itself. <a href="http://chiefsplanet.com">WPI</a> is a small-time operation compared to the NYT. We can't afford to burn bridges with anyone.

except for the 3 premium members who didn't get the information they were supposedly paying for....

greg63 07-24-2006 06:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gcbroncos
eegggsssactly....

don't read into stats so much....stats are for the birds....

wins & losses are what counts....



...Aren't these stats? :p

recxjake 07-24-2006 06:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs
Nick has known since Friday but was not allowed to break it.

The Boston Globe broke the story.

hahahaha

greg63 07-24-2006 06:44 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by gcbroncos
huh?

just because our defense was better that means bailey had safety help?


...Also your sig pic is too large. Here ya go little one.

Mr. Kotter 07-24-2006 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gcbroncos
huh?

just because our defense was better that means bailey had safety help?

Safety help? WTF?

....play in the secondary also depends on the kind of pressure your guys up front can give, and though you didn't have the sacks (most Broncos, and their fans don't....heh) your front 4/7 did well last year--hurries, overall pressure. Coupled with the coverage of your linebackers.....

Bailey had a lot more help than Law last year, that's for sure. The only difference was teams were always ahead of/kicking the crap out of the Jets, so teams didn't throw against them as much---because they didn't have to.....

Amnorix 07-24-2006 06:54 AM

Without reading through this entire thread, my answer is this:

Probably the best tandem, BUT:

1. without up-front pressure (which is a Chiefs' concern), no CB tandem could stop good opposing WRs forever.

2. The NFL has slanted the game more towards offense, and passing, in recent years. The concept of a true shut-down corner is more or less gone.

3. Law is excellent in run support as well. Dunno about Surtain. But it's fair to say that CBs have less impact on run defense than any other defensive position. So if your run defense still sucks...having great WRs won't save the day.

4. Older players have a few strikes against them. One is that they tend to get injured a bit more easily, and can take longer to recover. As Bill Belichick likes to say "depth in August is not the same as depth in November."

I'll keep my fingers crossed for their heatlh. :)

Mr. Kotter 07-24-2006 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix
Without reading through this entire thread, my answer is this:

Probably the best tandem, BUT:

1. without up-front pressure (which is a Chiefs' concern), no CB tandem could stop good opposing WRs forever.

2. The NFL has slanted the game more towards offense, and passing, in recent years. The concept of a true shut-down corner is more or less gone.

3. Law is excellent in run support as well. Dunno about Surtain. But it's fair to say that CBs have less impact on run defense than any other defensive position. So if your run defense still sucks...having great WRs won't save the day.

4. Older players have a few strikes against them. One is that they tend to get injured a bit more easily, and can take longer to recover. As Bill Belichick likes to say "depth in August is not the same as depth in November."

I'll keep my fingers crossed for their heatlh. :)

As usual, agreed....and, this time, on all counts. :thumb:

NOTE: Our run defense last year did improve significantly. If Sims comes back healthy (and Bell is healthier,) the additions of Edwards (DT, Bufffalo) and Law will only help that cause too.

ct 07-24-2006 07:29 AM

Haven't had time to read thru this whole thread. Anyone find out the contract terms?

Mr. Kotter 07-24-2006 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coryt
Haven't had time to read thru this whole thread. Anyone find out the contract terms?

Nothing specific: 5 Years, $30 million.....but speculation is it's front loaded (based on Poston's history or 'leaking' really good deals, and their not 'leaking' this time); maybe a double-tiered bonus dependent on whether the Chiefs choose to retain him after this year....probably something like $5-6 this year, with the same guaranteed next if the Chief's choose to keep him.

ct 07-24-2006 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter
Nothing specific: 5 Years, $30 million.....but speculation is it's front loaded (based on Poston's history or 'leaking' really good deals, and their not 'leaking' this time); maybe a double-tiered bonus dependent on whether the Chiefs choose to retain him after this year....probably something like $5-6 this year, with the same guaranteed next if the Chief's choose to keep him.

Works for me, I like the front loaded aspect if that is the case.

htismaqe 07-24-2006 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix
Without reading through this entire thread, my answer is this:

Probably the best tandem, BUT:

1. without up-front pressure (which is a Chiefs' concern), no CB tandem could stop good opposing WRs forever.

2. The NFL has slanted the game more towards offense, and passing, in recent years. The concept of a true shut-down corner is more or less gone.

3. Law is excellent in run support as well. Dunno about Surtain. But it's fair to say that CBs have less impact on run defense than any other defensive position. So if your run defense still sucks...having great WRs won't save the day.

4. Older players have a few strikes against them. One is that they tend to get injured a bit more easily, and can take longer to recover. As Bill Belichick likes to say "depth in August is not the same as depth in November."

I'll keep my fingers crossed for their heatlh. :)

Our run defense got alot better last year thanks to Kawika Mitchell. With DJ's improvement and help on the other side (I'm hoping that Fox beats out Bell) our LB corp looks pretty solid.

gcbroncos 07-24-2006 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by greg63
...Aren't these stats? :p



heh....if you say so.....

so to put in your terms.....

the only stat that matters is wins & losses

gcbroncos 07-24-2006 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter
Safety help? WTF?

....play in the secondary also depends on the kind of pressure your guys up front can give, and though you didn't have the sacks (most Broncos, and their fans don't....heh) your front 4/7 did well last year--hurries, overall pressure. Coupled with the coverage of your linebackers.....

Bailey had a lot more help than Law last year, that's for sure. The only difference was teams were always ahead of/kicking the crap out of the Jets, so teams didn't throw against them as much---because they didn't have to.....



before we go any further...

are you implying that ty law is better than champ bailey?

Iowanian 07-24-2006 08:43 AM

I'm still amazed the NFL is able to locate a helmet that will fit over that lightbulb 5head of chump's.


I don't think Law is CB-Jesus at this point in his career, but he's an immediate upgrade over Warfield.

Considering Jake PlummINT, Phillp Leaf..I mean ryan Rivers, and Aaron Brooks are throwing the division passes......Law will suffice.

Rausch 07-24-2006 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
Our run defense got alot better last year thanks to Kawika Mitchell. With DJ's improvement and help on the other side (I'm hoping that Fox beats out Bell) our LB corp looks pretty solid.

Are you saying that Fox is the key to a solid defense?... :)

Mr. Kotter 07-24-2006 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gcbroncos
before we go any further...

are you implying that ty law is better than champ bailey?

Not at all. Such distinctions are hard to quantify....I'll just say, they are both among the best at what they do.

dirk digler 07-24-2006 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gcbroncos
heh....if you say so.....

so to put in your terms.....

the only stat that matters is wins & losses

Ok Law has 2 SB rings how many does Chump have?

gcbroncos 07-24-2006 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter
Not at all. Such distinctions are hard to quantify....I'll just say, they are both among the best at what they do.



fair enough.....

you're right...very tough to quantify the best at corner...but a poll targeting league officials and experts will certainly favor champ....

no one is a shut down corner anymore but bailey is widely considered the closest thing to a shut down corner in today's game....

since you aren't saying law is better....no need for us to debate on this anymore...

i'm good with your comments at this point...

gcbroncos 07-24-2006 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iowanian
I'm still amazed the NFL is able to locate a helmet that will fit over that lightbulb 5head of chump's.


I don't think Law is CB-Jesus at this point in his career, but he's an immediate upgrade over Warfield.

Considering Jake PlummINT, Phillp Leaf..I mean ryan Rivers, and Aaron Brooks are throwing the division passes......Law will suffice.



i agree with this guy....(except for the jake plummer part)

gcbroncos 07-24-2006 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler
Ok Law has 2 SB rings how many does Chump have?



you're going off topic of my reply intent....

i was debating about stats on comparing entire secondaries...not individual players....

bringing up law has more SB rings is silly....kevin faulk has more rings than marshal faulk...so does that mean kevin is better?


of course not

dirk digler 07-24-2006 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gcbroncos
you're going off topic of my reply intent....

i was debating about stats on comparing entire secondaries...not individual players....

bringing up law has more SB rings is silly....kevin faulk has more rings than marshal faulk...so does that mean kevin is better?


of course not

I know I am just giving you a hard time.

Chump is a very good CB and Law will definitely be a huge upgrade over what we have had the last 3-4 years

Mr. Kotter 07-24-2006 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler
....Chump is a very good CB and Law will definitely be a huge upgrade over what we have had the last 3-4 years

And any fair minded Bronco/Raider/Charger fan will admit as much. :thumb:

gcbroncos 07-24-2006 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler
I know I am just giving you a hard time.

Chump is a very good CB and Law will definitely be a huge upgrade over what we have had the last 3-4 years



agreed....;)

KingPriest2 07-24-2006 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter
And any fair minded Bronco/Raider/Charger fan will admit as much. :thumb:


Think again

http://forum.signonsandiego.com/uplo...60#post2109660

Eleazar 07-24-2006 10:41 AM

We got a huge upgrade. No question about that.

But I don't know why you people expect donkey fans to come in here and start bowing down. It doesn't mean a thing until they start playing the games. You don't get respect based on reputation. The Chiefs are going to have to show they can put all these pieces together and the engine turns over.

htismaqe 07-24-2006 10:56 AM

Chargers fans.

Forever challenging for the title of "dumbest fans in the NFL".

Iowanian 07-24-2006 10:58 AM

shamrock who just signed up is a dolt fan.....he very well be one of the floatation devices keeping them from sinking to the bottom of that pool.

the Talking Can 07-24-2006 10:59 AM

to Chargers fans, one word:

Rivers




season in toilet

htismaqe 07-24-2006 10:59 AM

Charger fan math:

5 years, $30M = $6M per year.

ROFL


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.