ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Jonathan Rand: What if (Matt) Ryan's there? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=182786)

suds79 04-11-2008 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dj56dt58 (Post 4679024)
You mean like how Tom Brady was a middle round nobody?

Is that the exception or the rule?

Ben Rothlisburger & Eli Manning.

Brock 04-11-2008 11:16 AM

Yep, somebody always has to mention Tom Brady like he's the norm or something. Him and Joe Montana come along every 30 years or so.

Deberg_1990 04-11-2008 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 4679027)
I don't think Deberg was saying if they're good signs or not.

He was simply making a point that shows Clark is willing to pony up the big bucks as it was being questioned.

Thank You.

Tribal Warfare 04-11-2008 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 4679038)
Yep, somebody always has to mention Tom Brady like he's the norm or something. Him and Joe Montana come along every 30 years or so.


Yet both weren't taken in the 1st round

Tribal Warfare 04-11-2008 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 4678894)
It's almost as funny as you claiming that you are good at evaluating quarterbacks because you're a noted interweb quarterback genius, because you always thought trading for Trent Green was a smart move. Even though everybody else has Ryan as a first rounder and Croyle wasn't drafted until the third, you claim they're the same thing. You're good for a laugh your own self.




I called Bulger would be a good QB for the Rams too when he came up.

Brock 04-11-2008 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 4679195)
I called Bulger would be a good QB for the Rams too when he came up.

And?

Tribal Warfare 04-11-2008 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 4679200)
And?




Nice rebuttal

Brock 04-11-2008 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 4679204)
Nice rebuttal

There is nothing to rebut. You claim expertise with nothing to back it up but "6 years ago I said he would be good". Your opinions are no more qualified than anyone else's, period.

Deberg_1990 04-11-2008 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 4679038)
Yep, somebody always has to mention Tom Brady like he's the norm or something. Him and Joe Montana come along every 30 years or so.

Lets just keep drafting a QB in the 6th round every year. We are bound to hit on one every 20-30 years eventually!!

Tribal Warfare 04-11-2008 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 4679211)
There is nothing to rebut. You claim expertise with nothing to back it up but "6 years ago I said he would be good".



What do you want me to say? I called it, you want me to go on page long explanation and "findthdr it"? Back to the point of this whole thread, Ryan isn't a top QB, their's too many questions about his game if you are looking for top 5 draft pick QBs John Elway is the benchmark

Mecca 04-11-2008 01:20 PM

If he was John Elway or this QB that everyone thinks he should be to get picked by the Chiefs then they'd have no shot at picking him because they aren't sitting with the 1st pick...

Tribal Warfare 04-11-2008 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 4679307)
If he was John Elway or this QB that everyone thinks he should be to get picked by the Chiefs then they'd have no shot at picking him because they aren't sitting with the 1st pick...



Like I said John Elway is the benchmark, a man who was an ace at everything for a top 5 QB pick anything less you are gambling with disaster.

Brock 04-11-2008 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 4679336)
Like I said John Elway is the benchmark, a man who was an ace at everything for a top 1 QB pick anything less you are gambling with disaster.

FYP

Tribal Warfare 04-11-2008 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 4679341)
FYP



No, my point still stands

Deberg_1990 04-11-2008 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 4679336)
Like I said John Elway is the benchmark, a man who was an ace at everything for a top 5 QB pick anything less you are gambling with disaster.

Well shoot, lets just give up drafting a QB because we flopped with one 25 years ago.

Every draft pick is a gamble. Doesnt matter what position.

Brock 04-11-2008 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 4679343)
No, my point still stands

There is no point, unless it's "We should draft John Elway".

Mecca 04-11-2008 01:38 PM

This idea that a QB has to be perfect is damn funny, alright I guess we should just wait for that and never win anything till one of those rare guys comes along...Roethlisberger was the 3rd QB taken in his draft with the 12th pick, guess he sucks.

You are not going to get a perfect prospect very often, you just aren't. The only thing Ryan doesn't have is a huge arm and frankly Brady and Manning don't even have huge arms.

Tribal Warfare 04-11-2008 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 4679345)
Every draft pick is a gamble. Doesnt matter what position.



a top 5 pick QB that busts is the perennial franchise killer, Ryan has too many flaws to be worthy of a top selection. Ryan will need help to succeed, and can't do everything himself like Elway. I don't want to take that chance with a pick THIS high.

Mecca 04-11-2008 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 4679360)
a top 5 pick QB that busts is the perennial franchise killer, Ryan has too many flaws to be worthy of a top selection. Ryan will need help to succeed, and can't do everything himself like Elway. I don't want to take that chance with a pick THIS high.


Uh he doesn't have a big arm that's his flaw, you are acting like he's 6'1 been hurt a bunch of times and only does 1 thing well, oh wait....

Just for the record every pick is a risk and if any of them bust it will be a franchise killer type of pick....

Deberg_1990 04-11-2008 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 4679360)
a top 5 pick QB that busts is the perennial franchise killer, Ryan has too many flaws to be worthy of a top selection. Ryan will need help to succeed, and can't do everything himself like Elway. I don't want to take that chance with a pick THIS high.


True, but every top 10 pick in this draft has bust potential. You think Jake Long and Sedrick Ellis are sure things??

Tribal Warfare 04-11-2008 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 4679364)
Uh he doesn't have a big arm that's his flaw, you are acting like he's 6'1 been hurt a bunch of times and only does 1 thing well, oh wait....





The man is mobile, but he places the ball that gets the WR killed or intercepted at times

Tribal Warfare 04-11-2008 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 4679370)
True, but every top 10 pick in this draft has bust potential. You think Jake Long and Sedrick Ellis are sure things??




Long is a solid top 10 prospect, IMO Ellis would be a better pick because the man can dominate and change or the face pick

Mecca 04-11-2008 01:47 PM

I guess you better never speak of Dorsey again because he has question marks...

Tribal Warfare 04-11-2008 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 4679391)
I guess you better never speak of Dorsey again because he has question marks...

His injury status has been cleared :rockon:

Deberg_1990 04-11-2008 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 4679374)
The man is mobile, but he places the ball that gets the WR killed or intercepted at times

Do you realize that every HOF QB had flaws in his game before he was drafted???

Mecca 04-11-2008 01:54 PM

Lets take Keith Rivers then, he's safe!

Deberg_1990 04-11-2008 01:55 PM

I wish we would have never drafted Derrick Thomas. He never could tackle very well. :)

Tribal Warfare 04-11-2008 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 4679399)
Do you realize that every HOF QB had flaws in his game before he was drafted???




Yeah, but that ball placement issue scares the hell out of me. So I should just downgrade my thought process about top 5 picks and some say generational players? Nah, at Top 5 you are looking for near perfection at Top 10-15 I'd give him leeway

KCChiefsMan 04-11-2008 02:10 PM

good God, I just watched a little bit of NFL Live and here comes Mel Kiper with his new mock. He now has us taking Branden Albert, passing up Ellis and gholston. That guy is a freaking moron. He also had Talib going #10, as much of a KU homer as I am, that's just stupid. Why do I even watch ESPN?

suds79 04-11-2008 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 4679214)
If you are looking for top 5 draft pick QBs John Elway is the benchmark

Okay debate setteled.

You're open to drafting a QB in the top 5 if only he's as talented as John Elway....

So basically you'd never be for drafting a QB in the top 5 ever again because one could easily make the case that nobody has ever had the tools like Elway did.

Yet is Elway the best of all time? Maybe... Maybe not. There's more to it than just the tools as I'm sure you'd agree.

Where does a guy like Ryan rank as far as smarts and decision making? How's he under pressure? Those are the questions to be asking.

Tough part is that's hard to measure.

suds79 04-11-2008 03:18 PM

Furthermore, if there ever was a QB who compares similarly to John Elway, better hope we have the #1 to get him. Good luck with that.

OnTheWarpath15 04-11-2008 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 4679359)
This idea that a QB has to be perfect is damn funny, alright I guess we should just wait for that and never win anything till one of those rare guys comes along...Roethlisberger was the 3rd QB taken in his draft with the 12th pick, guess he sucks.

You are not going to get a perfect prospect very often, you just aren't. The only thing Ryan doesn't have is a huge arm and frankly Brady and Manning don't even have huge arms.


Roethlisberger is a horrible example, considering he was the 3rd QB taken in one of the best 1st round classes in the past 10-15 years.

Ryan being the 1st QB off the board in this miserable class doesn't excite me.

I'm fine if we take him, fine if we don't. I think he'll be average at best in this league.

Tribal Warfare 04-11-2008 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 4679549)

Where does a guy like Ryan rank as far as smarts and decision making? How's he under pressure? Those are the questions to be asking.

Tough part is that's hard to measure.



See the issue I stated on ball placement

KCChiefsMan 04-11-2008 04:54 PM

man I wish the draft would just hurry up!

007 04-11-2008 04:55 PM

Doesn't matter. Either way the Chiefs will make the wrong decision.

suds79 04-11-2008 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 4679747)
Doesn't matter. Either way the Chiefs will make the wrong decision.

Wow. You're a glass is 1/2 empty kind of guy aren't ya.

Dwayne Bowe to this point looks like an outstanding pick. Cheer up.

milkman 04-12-2008 09:02 AM

Quote:

Even if the Chiefs could draft Ryan, they’d have to wonder who’d be blocking for him. It makes no sense to commit a high pick to a quarterback if you can’t protect him, and the Chiefs stand three starters short of a decent line. When the Browns drafted Quinn, they’d already solidified their protection by taking Wisconsin tackle Joe Thomas with the third overall pick.
This is the dumbest argument one could possibly make against drafting a top 5 QB.
Yeah, JR, we can't possibly consider taking a QB, cause there isn't any hope at all that the O-Line can't be fixed with later picks in this draft, and in the next draft.


Quote:

Houston’s David Carr was a classic case of a highly drafted quarterback who received scant protection. The first overall pick in 2002, he was sacked 249 times during his first years as a Texan. Recently released by the Panthers, it’s tough to know whether Carr ever had the tools to win in the NFL. But it’s fair to say it was hard for him to develop while staring at the sky.
David Carr is not a classic case.

That Houston O-Line, while pretty bad, was made to look worse than they were by David Carr.

The guy could never read defenses, and held on to the ball too long, something that was listed as a weakness for him when he was coming out of school.
He never learned.

I said before the '07 season that I thought the Texans would give up almost half as many sacks without Carr.

I haven't looked up the numbers, but I'd bet that was a pretty good guess.

OnTheWarpath15 04-12-2008 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 4680533)
This is the dumbest argument one could possibly make against drafting a top 5 QB.
Yeah, JR, we can't possibly consider taking a QB, cause there isn't any hope at all that the O-Line can't be fixed with later picks in this draft, and in the next draft.




David Carr is not a classic case.

That Houston O-Line, while pretty bad, was made to look worse than they were by David Carr.

The guy could never read defenses, and held on to the ball too long, something that was listed as a weakness for him when he was coming out of school.
He never learned.

I said before the '07 season that I thought the Texans would give up almost half as many sacks without Carr.

I haven't looked up the numbers, but I'd bet that was a pretty good guess.

They gave up 22 sacks last year.

Just goes to show that the QB is just as responsible for allowing a sack as the OLmen are.

Hell, the Chiefs were an example of that last year.

Damon Huard was sacked once per 9.22 attempts with the starting OL the majority of the time.

Brodie Croyle was sacked once per 13.17 attempts, with his action coming at the end of the year when they were playing backups such as Niswanger and Taylor, and McIntosh was out.

milkman 04-12-2008 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 4677846)
If Jake Long is gone, and Ryan is still there, I could see making the pick. Get a RT, G, and possibly even a center as well. Then next year get Oher in the 1st round to fill out the O-line.

Sorry defensive homers, the offense needs fixed way worse than the d needs attention right now. Gun has had high draft picks and FA's for far to long.

I would bet that almost all these "defensive homers" would be all for taking Michael Oher if he were in this draft and sitting at 5.

But that's only speculation on my part.

I am not opposed to taking Jake Long if Dorsey and Ellis are off the board, but I don't believe that Long is the prospect at LT that Dorsey/Ellis are at DT, or that Oher will be next year, or even Andre Smith from Alabama.

OnTheWarpath15 04-12-2008 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 4680539)
I would bet that almost all these "defensive homers" would be all for taking Michael Oher if he were in this draft and sitting at 5.

But that's only speculation on my part.

I am not opposed to taking Jake Long if Dorsey and Ellis are off the board, but I don't believe that Long is the prospect at LT that Dorsey/Ellis are at DT, or that Oher will be next year, or even Andre Smith from Alabama.

You bet your ass that I'd be up for taking Oher in this draft at 5.

The three names that I keep hearing as comparisons for Oher?

Orlando Pace, Walter Jones, Jonathan Ogden.

The two names that I keep hearing as comparisons for Jake Long?

Jon Runyan and Jeff Backus.

suds79 04-12-2008 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 4680533)
This is the dumbest argument one could possibly make against drafting a top 5 QB.

Yeah, JR, we can't possibly consider taking a QB, cause there isn't any hope at all that the O-Line can't be fixed with later picks in this draft, and in the next draft.

100% agree.

What I love even more about that argument is that there's not an O-linemen that will be available worthy of the 5th pick when we draft anyways. Long will be gone and everybody else IMO will be a reach at 5.

So we won't begin to rebuild the O-line until round 2 anyways... It's the same thing.

NUMBER7 04-12-2008 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 4680545)
100% agree.

What I love even more about that argument is that there's not an O-linemen that will be available worthy of the 5th pick when we draft anyways. Long will be gone and everybody else IMO will be a reach at 5.

So we won't begin to rebuild the O-line until round 2 anyways... It's the same thing.

Excellent point...why take a chance when you can pick the number 4 rated player in the draft.

Manila-Chief 04-12-2008 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 4677930)
I'm kind of a Croyle backer, but what if the guy does not have it? Rayn this year, and Oher next year sounds a whole lot better to me than Long this year and Tebow next season.

Are you saying we will have the top pick next year? I doubt we have a shot at Oher next year. I sure hope you are correct coz we need him but more impostantly .... it will mean we had a terrible upcoming season and just maybe Clark cleans house.

I think it is 99% sure that Tebow will not come out next year. He is only a Jr. His family is certainly not rich, I met his parents before he was born (have not met him), but he has the type of character that will keep him in school. Plus, I'm not sure he will be a great NFL QB. But, maybe after 2 more years he will be that "Elway" type of guy???

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 4678166)
If he's there at 5 they have to take him period.

I don't!!! Too, many question marks about him. To me he smacks of the David Carr's of the draft ... and there have been a number of them lately.

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 4678217)
Like I just said, every single analyst would agree that the only area that Croyle can match or beat Ryan is in arm strength. That is why Ryan is a top five overall prospect and Croyle was a middle-round nobody.

Thus, if you think Croyle can do everything that Ryan can do, you must place a HUGE priority on arm strength.

It's already been said, but Croyle fell to the 3rd. because of injury concerns not his ability. Now, granted had he demostrated outstanding ability he would have been taken earlier even with the injuries.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 4678223)
Considering Ryan has yet to play a NFL game, I'm not sure how you can say that.

The only thing you can say with any certainty that Ryan > Croyle is injury history while in college.

Otherwise, their college stats are similar.

Ryan 60% completion percentage, Croyle 56%

Croyle 13 yards per attempt, Ryan 11.5

Croyle 1.86 TD's per INT, Ryan 1.51

Matt Ryan is no more guaranteed to be a good NFL QB than Croyle is to bust.

Crapshoot.

I agree 100%. I'll put forth the disclaimer ... I'm a Croyle homer ... but, I'm hoping that with a true OC (who maybe able to talk a little sense into Herm about turning his offensiveless offense up a notch or 2) that Croyle will begin to make some positive progress this year. With our offensiveless game planning last year no QB could have been successful ... teams knew what we were going to do and thus it was easy to stop us. Now, in addition to being a Croyle homer ... I hope he is successful, coz that means we have that peice of the puzzle and can patch other holes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 4678229)
Actually, almost "every single analyst" said on draft day that Croyle had 1st round talent, but that his injury history scared teams off.

I affirm what you wrote. I heard the same thing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 4680541)
You bet your ass that I'd be up for taking Oher in this draft at 5.

The three names that I keep hearing as comparisons for Oher?

Orlando Pace, Walter Jones, Jonathan Ogden.

The two names that I keep hearing as comparisons for Jake Long?

Jon Runyan and Jeff Backus.

Hey, maybe we can draft him this year but only get him next year when he comes out??? Kinda like a deposit. If he is that good sounds like an excellent idea to me!!!!

Brock 04-12-2008 02:58 PM

What's your plan if Croyle doesn't make it? Oh yeah, I forgot, we're the Chiefs. We'll trade for some old guy again.

Manila-Chief 04-12-2008 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 4680930)
What's your plan if Croyle doesn't make it? Oh yeah, I forgot, we're the Chiefs. We'll trade for some old guy again.

And your plan if Ryan doesn't work out???

Mecca 04-12-2008 03:02 PM

I really wish people would stop throwing up names like David Carr, he and Ryan are so far apart from each other in the type of players and prospects they are. Every QB rated high is not like every other one...compare Ryan to guys he is actually like. He is not a guy with nothing but a cannon arm who vaulted up due to scouts loving that which is what many of the guys who busted he gets compared to were/are.

Also guess what, Croyle fell because of injury history and not talent? He's still getting injured..anyone have confidence that guy can play a whole season...I certainly don't.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-12-2008 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 4680930)
What's your plan if Croyle doesn't make it? Oh yeah, I forgot, we're the Chiefs. We'll trade for some old guy again.

You are on Matt Ryan's dick like a cougar on an 80 year old oil magnate.

Mecca 04-12-2008 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manila-Chief (Post 4680933)
And your plan if Ryan doesn't work out???

Take another one a few years later.....the Colts missed on Jeff George at #1 guess they shouldn't have taken Manning some years later eh? QB is a very important position you fire till you get it right because that one position means that much to your team.

Mecca 04-12-2008 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 4680938)
You are on Matt Ryan's dick like a cougar on an 80 year old oil magnate.


Well you have to have a QB and they are going to get harder and harder to find. Atleast in the NFL mold because more and more college teams continue to go to the spread option look which is awful for pro game development.

I still contend that if Matt Ryan had a big arm he'd be the lock #1 pick and well arm strength is an overrated category for a QB as long as he doesn't have a horrible girly Pennington arm.

Chiefs Pantalones 04-12-2008 07:43 PM

If Ryan is there, you have to take him. It's time to give this another shot.

Brock 04-12-2008 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 4680938)
You are on Matt Ryan's dick like a cougar on an 80 year old oil magnate.

That is utter nonsense. I'd take Sedrick Ellis or Glenn Dorsey over Ryan. I also like Brian Brohm almost as much as Ryan. Try to pay attention to what is being said instead of what you think is being said, dumbshit.

Brock 04-12-2008 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manila-Chief (Post 4680933)
And your plan if Ryan doesn't work out???

I think you need to face the fact that the odds are very, very much against Brodie Croyle ever playing a complete season in the NFL. A guy like Ryan or Brohm or Henne would at least be able to take a beating, and probably play better overall too. I sort of like Croyle too, I'm sure he's a nice kid, but come on. He has done nothing - NOTHING - to keep the Chiefs from drafting a quarterback.

Ebolapox 04-12-2008 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 4679195)
I called Bulger would be a good QB for the Rams too when he came up.


funny. I'm pretty damned sure he would've been a great SAINTS qb, seeing as they drafted him.

Coogs 04-12-2008 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 4680539)
I would bet that almost all these "defensive homers"

Tongue in cheek Milkman! You know I respect your opinion. Just tongue in cheek stuff from Coogs. ;)

Tribal Warfare 04-12-2008 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by H5N1 (Post 4681397)
funny. I'm pretty damned sure he would've been a great SAINTS qb, seeing as they drafted him.

http://www.nfl.com/players/marcbulge...e?id=BUL162264


semantics, I still thought he would be a good QB when came up from West Viginia


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.