If this team had ....

1. A good Oline
2. A good defense
3. only the QB position to fill before being considered the top 2-3 teams in the conference, then I say bring him in.

Too bad we aren't involved in any of those situations. We have holes ****ing everywhere.

Green Bay is one of the best teams in the NFC behind only DAL and NYG.

I don't see a problem in sitting Rodgers for another year. It's not like it will hurt his development. He's still really young. If Brett can be a prob bowl QB for another year then you have to start Brett Favre. It'd be one thing if Favre was playing like a Rams Joe Namath but he's not. He's still a legitimate top 5 QB in this league. He's been the face of that organization for years. You start Favre and say sorry to Rodgers and let him wait another year. GB owes that to Favre in all he's done for that organization. If Favre is playing like shit and is primarily the reason why GB is losing then you bench him and start Rodgers.

If Rodgers wants to be traded then they trade him. Rodgers showed he can be good so I doubt GB would do something like that though they did draft Brohm.

QFT

We are a long way from making a run at the big show. The only reason Peterson would bring him is is to help fill the seats, but not even Carl could be that stupid. :hmmm:

I never said we were close to being a good team. Hence my post....."We have holes ****ing everywhere."

For instance if the Chiefs were in the same position right now as Minnesota, It would be dumb not to trade for Favre for a 4th-5th rd pick.

Really, what has Favre done for GB.

Won one SB, and lead them to another, and thrown away several other opportunities, like last year when he threw that stupid int. in OT?

Maybe he just only turned around their entire franchise into a contender just about every year since he's started.

With the only exception of 2005, GB has at least been 8-8 in all of Favre's years starting as their QB.

What did Derrick Thomas do for KC.......or Tony Gonzalez????

Winning the SB is great, but Favre has been one of the faces of the NFL.

Peyton Manning only won a single title. You wanna dog on him too? Newsflash.........Winning the SB in the NFL is a very hard thing to do and many players on get to play in only one of them, maybe perhaps a couple if they are lucky enough.

It would be one thing if Favre wasn't playing at a high level. But he is and just came off of a Pro Bowl season. You don't fix whats not broken. Favre should start in 2008 and if for whatever reason he sucks real bad, then you can bench him for not playing well.

How many players on that team on offense want to see Favre come back. Players bust their asses for players like him.

You really think any player on that team would reject Favre coming back because they think they need to move on?

but what will the "No Favre League" do with out him.

Madden will have to find a new Knob to slobber over.

You know Carl Delano has a boner just thinking about the possibilities.

Oh, you know it has got to be killing him with Brodie lined up to be the starter. Heck I still think Carl would rather Huard be the starter again :deevee:

Agreed. I'll never forget his smarmy look on Hard Knocks last year when Herm and Dick Curl are just about to go with Brodie as the starter, and Carl chimes in with his "Don't forget about Damon Huard" directive, the douche.

:spock:

Dude, I was agreeing with your take on the state of the team. We are a long way off from filling in one spot and making a run at the AFC title.

Bout made me sick to my stomach watching that :Lin:

In all honestyl the Chiefs run almost the exact same offense now that the Packers do.

But still....no.

LMAO I"ve been looking into who the proper party within the NFL is to turn in GoChiefs and his plagerism buddies. It would be hilarious if Goodell's Goons came calling for Clayton and his mommy answered the door.

You know what sucks for the Packers? His contract is up after this year. His entire career he played in one game for millions. I'm sure that adds to the Packs frustration with this whole deal. They still probably aren't 100% in what they have in Rodgers.

The main objective of this season is to once and for all flush the Herm/Dictator Carl mess down the collective toilet. 0-16 is a real possibility and bringing Favre in would ruin that.

I don't think 0-16 is a real possibility. Even the Dolphins won last year.

True, but we do have the team and coaching staff for a legitimate run at perfection.

Keep hope alive Chiefs fans! 0 for 16 can happen in '08!

I think his point is with the fact although he has won a Superbowl it was with way more talent than KC has to offer. He is one of the greats but nobody can argue much of what he has done is regular season for the most part. It will be strange to see him in Miami gear next year.

For you maybe...

It was fun watching Harmon Kilibrew in the early 70s on a young Royals team, but they didn't start winning until he was gone. It would be the same with Farve, fun to watch for a year or two then when the team is really ready to make a run it won't have a QB. We saw that act with Schottenhiemer in the 90's, a good team with no QB, so I would rather see a different act this time around.

Develop the young QB while the rest of the team is being rebuilt.

That's a foolish statement.

I think that Ron Wolf is the guy responsible for turning that franchise around, and Favre was a large piece of that puzzle, as was Reggie White.

But the fact is, Favre pissed away opportunities with his gunslinger mentality and boneheaded decisions as much as he contributed to the winning.

Fact is, their one SB win he didn't do anything special in that game or the playoffs.

Desmond Howard, White, and that RB (whose name escapes me) who had a remarkable postseason that year every bit as responsible, if not more than Brett favre.

And I thought my disdain for Peyton Manning was pretty well documented around here.

Dorsey Levens. Andre Rison also contributed to the SB win.

whatever dope your smokin' send it over.

Heh pretty standard for that douche.

Anyone still want him?

From what I'm seeing of tonights game, Thigpen did about as good for us yesterday as Favre is tonight. And Thiggy didn't cost us a high draft pick.

speaking of this game and draft picks..Washington is looking pretty good too

May God Himself help you guys.

thiggy isnt on the same lanet as farve. not eveb close. but no he wont be around long so there is no reason to have hm on our roster. it will be a while after herm is gone before we see a good team.
Posted via Mobile Device

I just wanted to chime in...

Posted via mobile device

Posted via stationary device

I can't believe this thread got nearly this many responses. I've got a riveting question. If someone left a laptop in a busy cafe then walked outside................

No, he isn't on the same planet, but for the first half tonight Thiggy actually looked better (well, maybe Favre looked worse)

The douche who stole it would do your wife and the chick you'd never admit to your wife.

Well, as long as it's not on the handlebars of a motorcycle. I mean, you have to draw a line somewhere.

The Jetsifacation of Favre is all but complete
everything the JETS touch goes bad