ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Life World Markets Crashing!!!! (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=193842)

Amnorix 10-10-2008 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Braincase (Post 5100564)
Economic power is being consolidated. Smaller independent banks that took too many risks are being absorbed by the uberpowerful banks (families) that have the reserves. We're panicking, they're buying. This was all a mistake that could have been avoided, but we allowed fractional reserves to go from 10x to 30x. People were lending a bunch of money they didn't have, and the lawmakers allowed it to happen.

Yeah, the Bush family is part of the problem. Do a search on Brown Brothers Harriman, and then take a look at who originally loaned BBH the money they needed to get started in the first place - you'll find the heirs of Nathan Rothschild.

This whole mess is being manufactured to eliminate fringe players, and get the payments going to a select few banking families.

We don't need Obama or McCain. We need Andrew Jackson.

http://www.tfhp.org/images/tinfoil-hat.jpg

Amnorix 10-10-2008 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tomahawk kid (Post 5100710)
Warren Buffet is literally shitting himself right now related to how all these irrational bastards are going to make him even richer........

That's about right. If he lives long enough for the market to turn, he'll top $100 billion personally. :eek:

Bwana 10-10-2008 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod (Post 5100930)
I voted for Bush and I'm not happy about my choice. However, In no way did I bring anything on anyone. :rolleyes:

Garbage like this is exactly why we have a DC Forum. Please take it there.

Bingo

BigRedChief 10-10-2008 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod (Post 5100930)
I voted for Bush and I'm not happy about my choice. However, In no way did I bring anything on anyone. :rolleyes:

It was all your fault. It's going to be your fault in 2 weeks when LSW beats the snot out of Belton too.:) Global warming?Your fault too.

eazyb81 10-10-2008 10:39 AM

Oct. 10 (Bloomberg) -- Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi said political leaders are discussing the idea of closing the world's financial markets while they ``rewrite the rules of international finance.''

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...d=aP5mpMUORBWM

Really hope this is smoke. Would just delay the inevitable and instill more fear.

teedubya 10-10-2008 10:53 AM

I don't know if this is out there, but maybe some of you folks might know.

Ok. say... Goog has 314.45 million shares MSFT microsoft has 9.13 Billion shares.

I want to easily compare each stock, on the same scale, as if they both had 1 billion shares... know of any tool?

to get google to 1 billion shares, we would need to add 3.1801558276355541421529654953093 times the amount of shares, thus decreasing the value by that much.

GOOG would be around $100.75 if they had 1 billion shares.

With MSFT, Id have to decrease the amount of shares, thus INCREASE the price per share by 9.13 as they have 9.13 billion shares. so the 21.18 stock price becomes
$193.3734 per share.

So, by doing this math, it appears that GOOG is a way better value.

Now, does this computation have any merit in the stock market world? I have never seen this before, but its probably around and has a name.

Any Stock Market Gurus out there have any input?

penguinz 10-10-2008 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ari Chi3fs (Post 5101169)
I don't know if this is out there, but maybe some of you folks might know.

Ok. say... Goog has 314.45 million shares MSFT microsoft has 9.13 Billion shares.

I want to easily compare each stock, on the same scale, as if they both had 1 billion shares... know of any tool?

to get google to 1 billion shares, we would need to add 3.1801558276355541421529654953093 times the amount of shares, thus decreasing the value by that much.

GOOG would be around $100.75 if they had 1 billion shares.

With MSFT, Id have to decrease the amount of shares, thus INCREASE the price per share by 9.13 as they have 9.13 billion shares. so the 21.18 stock price becomes
$193.3734 per share.

So, by doing this math, it appears that GOOG is a way better value.

Now, does this computation have any merit in the stock market world? I have never seen this before, but its probably around and has a name.

Any Stock Market Gurus out there have any input?

I may be wrong but you can not compare them that way. Value of a share will change as stocks are split.

cookster50 10-10-2008 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ari Chi3fs (Post 5101169)
I don't know if this is out there, but maybe some of you folks might know.

Ok. say... Goog has 314.45 million shares MSFT microsoft has 9.13 Billion shares.

I want to easily compare each stock, on the same scale, as if they both had 1 billion shares... know of any tool?

to get google to 1 billion shares, we would need to add 3.1801558276355541421529654953093 times the amount of shares, thus decreasing the value by that much.

GOOG would be around $100.75 if they had 1 billion shares.

With MSFT, Id have to decrease the amount of shares, thus INCREASE the price per share by 9.13 as they have 9.13 billion shares. so the 21.18 stock price becomes
$193.3734 per share.

So, by doing this math, it appears that GOOG is a way better value.

Now, does this computation have any merit in the stock market world? I have never seen this before, but its probably around and has a name.

Any Stock Market Gurus out there have any input?


This would not take things that are important such as REVENUE and PROFIT into consideration at all. With this theory, there are penny stocks out there that are "undervalued" and excellent buys.

teedubya 10-10-2008 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penguinz (Post 5101204)
I may be wrong but you can not compare them that way. Value of a share will change as stocks are split.


Well, that is what I am doing, changes the prices, as they 'split'.

If a stock has 1billion shares at 100, then splits 2:1 then you now have 2 billion shares worth 50. I used that same principle in getting the stocks to 1 billion.

To me, it makes sense... maybe to no one else. I don't know if its a valid gauge on stocks or not.

But, when sprint has 2.3 Billion shares at 3 bucks and ATT has 5B @ $22... it gives me a better feel instead of 3$ vs 22$.

Trying to grasp some things.

teedubya 10-10-2008 11:14 AM

I just use the Magic 8 Ball now to help me decide which stocks to buy.

yeti 10-10-2008 11:24 AM

use a Price to Earning ratio (P/E) to compare stocks with different market prices

Donger 10-10-2008 01:29 PM

Dow just went positive.

:-)

Garcia Bronco 10-10-2008 01:53 PM

Hold.....hold......hold!

teedubya 10-10-2008 04:51 PM

SELL MORTIMER SELL!!!!!111

L.A. Chieffan 10-10-2008 06:38 PM

Duke & Duke has been getting ****ed lately

wazu 10-10-2008 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Braincase (Post 5100564)
Economic power is being consolidated. Smaller independent banks that took too many risks are being absorbed by the uberpowerful banks (families) that have the reserves.

Actually a lot of the smaller, independent banks are doing quite well. Most of them couldn't afford to get involved in the sub-prime mess. They had to do business the old-fashioned way, and so for them it's business as usual, only all the big guys who usually take all their business are closing their doors.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.