ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Herm\Carl take Chiefs to new low!!! (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=194178)

Boris The Great 10-14-2008 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5115460)
Yeah, because they\'re pussies.

It is the Dick Vermeil effect. It saturated the roster worse than anyone ever imagined. Not only did the DV era stunt the growth of this franchise as they sold out their future for a chance at a title that never came, it turned most of the key players into sorry little bitches. (To say nothing of some of the fans, but that is another story.)

Dante Hall wanted out because Herm didnt pat his head and rub his tummy after every practice. Trent Green wanted out because Herm actually wanted him to compete for the starting job, rather than hold his hand, kiss his forehead, and tell him everything would be all right.

And now, after the team wins their first game in a year, Tony Gonzalez leaves the locker room pouting over not breaking a record in the exact manner he wanted to. Because he got used to DV and Saunders and crap like the final game in 2004, when they threw him a dozen 1-yard passes just to break the single-season TE catches record. Even though the record was completely cheapened by the way they it.

What we had here under Vermeil were a bunch of soft, weak teams, and he turned a bunch of guys on the roster into soft, weak pussies.

dirk digler 10-14-2008 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 5115559)
Have we needed a RT since he left? Absolutely. Is that a good reason to overpay John Tait or any other player? No.

It wouldn't have mattered how much the Chiefs offered Tait he wasn't coming back because he hates Carl

DaneMcCloud 10-14-2008 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5115568)
Well when the Chiefs get an AFC Championship or World Championship ring then you may have a point.

Tynes has a ring doesn't he? He got it when we cut him for a kicker worse than him. We have yet to replace him with a kicker that was better than him.

HOW ****ING SAD IS THAT?

And you sit here sucking Herm's nutsack like a bitch defending BS like that.

You're a moron.

You're defending TYNES. The man who couldn't kickoff the ball more than freaking 40 yards. The man who continually choked under pressure. The man who single-handedly forced the Giants to go into overtime in Green Bay.

TYNES.

ROFL

petegz28 10-14-2008 03:06 PM

:clap:
Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 5115559)
Have we needed a RT since he left? Absolutely. Is that a good reason to overpay John Tait or any other player? No.

Yeah, overpaying LJ is much better for us so far....

Brock 10-14-2008 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5115582)
It wouldn't have mattered how much the Chiefs offered Tait he wasn't coming back because he hates Carl

Okay, mindreader.:rolleyes:

DaneMcCloud 10-14-2008 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boris The Great (Post 5115580)
It is the Dick Vermeil effect. It saturated the roster worse than anyone ever imagined. Not only did the DV era stunt the growth of this franchise as they sold out their future for a chance at a title that never game, it turned most of the key players into sorry little bitches. (To say nothing of some of the fans, but that is another story.)

Dante Hall wanted out because Herm didnt pat his head and rub his tummy after every practice. Trent Green wanted out because Herm actually wanted him to compete for the starting job, rather than hold his hand, kiss his forehead, and tell him everything would be all right.

And now, after the team wins their first game in a year, Tony Gonzalez leaves the locker room pouting over not breaking a record in the exact manner he wanted to. Because he got used to DV and Saunders and crap like the final game in 2004, when they threw him a dozen 1-yard passes just to break the single-season TE catches record. Even though the record was completely cheapened by the way they it.

What we had here under Vermeil were a bunch of soft, weak teams, and he turned a bunch of guys on the roster into soft, weak pussies.

QFFT.

OnTheWarpath15 10-14-2008 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boris The Great (Post 5115580)
It is the Dick Vermeil effect. It saturated the roster worse than anyone ever imagined. Not only did the DV era stunt the growth of this franchise as they sold out their future for a chance at a title that never game, it turned most of the key players into sorry little bitches. (To say nothing of some of the fans, but that is another story.)

Dante Hall wanted out because Herm didnt pat his head and rub his tummy after every practice. Trent Green wanted out because Herm actually wanted him to compete for the starting job, rather than hold his hand, kiss his forehead, and tell him everything would be all right.

And now, after the team wins their first game in a year, Tony Gonzalez leaves the locker room pouting over not breaking a record in the exact manner he wanted to. Because he got used to DV and Saunders and crap like the final game in 2004, when they threw him a dozen 1-yard passes just to break the single-season TE catches record. Even though the record was completely cheapened by the way they it.

What we had here under Vermeil were a bunch of soft, weak teams, and he turned a bunch of guys on the roster into soft, weak pussies.

Maybe not the way I would have gone about it, but you can't really argue any of it.

Chiefnj2 10-14-2008 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boris The Great (Post 5115580)
It is the Dick Vermeil effect. It saturated the roster worse than anyone ever imagined. Not only did the DV era stunt the growth of this franchise as they sold out their future for a chance at a title that never game, it turned most of the key players into sorry little bitches. (To say nothing of some of the fans, but that is another story.)

Dante Hall wanted out because Herm didnt pat his head and rub his tummy after every practice. Trent Green wanted out because Herm actually wanted him to compete for the starting job, rather than hold his hand, kiss his forehead, and tell him everything would be all right.

And now, after the team wins their first game in a year, Tony Gonzalez leaves the locker room pouting over not breaking a record in the exact manner he wanted to. Because he got used to DV and Saunders and crap like the final game in 2004, when they threw him a dozen 1-yard passes just to break the single-season TE catches record. Even though the record was completely cheapened by the way they it.

What we had here under Vermeil were a bunch of soft, weak teams, and he turned a bunch of guys on the roster into soft, weak pussies.


The offensive players wanted out because they saw that Herm is a reerun. They were really weak finishing in the top 3 in scoring year after year.

petegz28 10-14-2008 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5115583)
You're a moron.

You're defending TYNES. The man who couldn't kickoff the ball more than freaking 40 yards. The man who continually choked under pressure. The man who single-handedly forced the Giants to go into overtime in Green Bay.

TYNES.

ROFL


Who do we have that is better?

Tynes got a ring yes?


SO STFU you Herm-sperm eater!! ROFL

Reerun_KC 10-14-2008 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boris The Great (Post 5115580)
It is the Dick Vermeil effect. It saturated the roster worse than anyone ever imagined. Not only did the DV era stunt the growth of this franchise as they sold out their future for a chance at a title that never game, it turned most of the key players into sorry little bitches. (To say nothing of some of the fans, but that is another story.)

Dante Hall wanted out because Herm didnt pat his head and rub his tummy after every practice. Trent Green wanted out because Herm actually wanted him to compete for the starting job, rather than hold his hand, kiss his forehead, and tell him everything would be all right.

And now, after the team wins their first game in a year, Tony Gonzalez leaves the locker room pouting over not breaking a record in the exact manner he wanted to. Because he got used to DV and Saunders and crap like the final game in 2004, when they threw him a dozen 1-yard passes just to break the single-season TE catches record. Even though the record was completely cheapened by the way they it.

What we had here under Vermeil were a bunch of soft, weak teams, and he turned a bunch of guys on the roster into soft, weak pussies.

Just imagine in 3 years what we can write about what Herm did to this franchise... I think drool buckets and Helmets are in order....

FAX 10-14-2008 03:08 PM

You don't need to be a psychic to realize what's happening to this team.

1. Our head coach is a doofus.
2. Our defense is worse than ever.
3. Our offense is worse than ever.
4. Our special teams are worse than ever. (The MVP notwithstanding.)
5. When panicked, we run the sloption.
6. Herm can blame every conceivable screw up on "youth" and "rebuilding".
7. Smart, competitive, veteran players who like winning don't need this.
8. Herm sells bullshit by the truckload.
9. When players aren't buying, he gets pissy.

Add it all up, and you have the ingredients for severe implosion. Which, in the long run, may not be a bad thing.

FAX

Sure-Oz 10-14-2008 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5115599)
Who do we have that is better?

Tynes got a ring yes?


SO STFU you Herm-sperm eater!! ROFL

Tynes was a shitty kicker, wow he got lucky and drilled a game winner...I'd rather have Rob Bironaus after this season.

dirk digler 10-14-2008 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5115592)
Okay, mindreader.:rolleyes:

Tait said it in so many words when the Chiefs didn't match Chicago's offer.

That whole cussing out incident pretty much ruined that relationship especially with Tait's family.

petegz28 10-14-2008 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5115592)
Okay, mindreader.:rolleyes:

Dude it is a fact. There was no if's and's or but's about it, Tait was not up to negotiating with Carl, he wanted LT money or he was gone. And his stubborness was based on how Carl treated him during his signing when we drafted him.

"Sit there and shut up" I believe is what Carl told Tait at the signing.

beach tribe 10-14-2008 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 5115613)
Tynes was a shitty kicker, wow he got lucky and drilled a game winner...I'd rather have Rob Bironaus after this season.

Me too. Unfortunately the Titans aren't stupid.

Reerun_KC 10-14-2008 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 5115605)
You don't need to be a psychic to realize what's happening to this team.

1. Our head coach is a doofus.
2. Our defense is worse than ever.
3. Our offense is worse than ever.
4. Our special teams are worse than ever. (The MVP notwithstanding.)
5. When panicked, we run the sloption.
6. Herm can blame every conceivable screw up on "youth" and "rebuilding".
7. Smart, competitive, veteran players who like winning don't need this.
8. Herm sells bullshit by the truckload.
9. When players aren't buying, he gets pissy.

Add it all up, and you have the ingredients for severe implosion. Which, in the long run, may not be a bad thing.

FAX

Sadly Fax, you nailed it...

petegz28 10-14-2008 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 5115613)
Tynes was a shitty kicker, wow he got lucky and drilled a game winner...I'd rather have Rob Bironaus after this season.

I am not saying Tynes was great. I am just saying he was the best kicker we had under the Herm era, i.e., Herm has yet to produce anyone that can compete with Tynes.


SAD!

beach tribe 10-14-2008 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 5115605)
You don't need to be a psychic to realize what's happening to this team.

1. Our head coach is a doofus.
2. Our defense is worse than ever.
3. Our offense is worse than ever.
4. Our special teams are worse than ever. (The MVP notwithstanding.)
5. When panicked, we run the sloption.
6. Herm can blame every conceivable screw up on "youth" and "rebuilding".
7. Smart, competitive, veteran players who like winning don't need this.
8. Herm sells bullshit by the truckload.
9. When players aren't buying, he gets pissy.

Add it all up, and you have the ingredients for severe implosion. Which, in the long run, may not be a bad thing.

FAX

And those are the FAX.

Reerun_KC 10-14-2008 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5115617)
Tait said it in so many words when the Chiefs didn't match Chicago's offer.

That whole cussing out incident pretty much ruined that relationship especially with Tait's family.

How can one forget about Carl and that?

petegz28 10-14-2008 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 5115630)
How can one forget about Carl and that?

Obviously a few Hermy-Humpers on here.

bobbything 10-14-2008 03:13 PM

People will still blame Dick Vermeil for the demise of this team long after Herm Edwards is gone.

We're gonna have a female, black, president, colonization on the Moon, and cures for both cancer and AIDS and people will still blame the Chiefs' 2-14 record on Vermeil. Even though Carl Peterson will still be at the helm during all of this.

CoMoChief 10-14-2008 03:13 PM

It's gotten to the point where the players (minus Waters.....good lord he needs to grow a pair and speek his mind) are not following Herm's plan......

This offense doesn't allow anyone to develope. We look like we don't belong on a football field on offense. It might the worst offense I've ever seen.....not kidding.

Eventually the losing falls directly and solely on the coaching staff....and in this case we have the most stubborn coach in the NFL that refuses to change anything......results still the same......then he sits on the sidelines not knowing what th **** to do.....

Eventually players lose all their hope.......now they are going into the game KNOWING they are about to get their asses handed to them.

dirk digler 10-14-2008 03:14 PM

Yeah Tait really wanted to come back :rolleyes:


Quote:

“I'm at a point right now where I really have to be careful what I say,” Tait said. “I'd be glad to go back. There's a lot of good reasons I should stay. My teammates. The fans.

BigRock 10-14-2008 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5115568)
Tynes has a ring doesn't he? He got it when we cut him for a kicker worse than him. We have yet to replace him with a kicker that was better than him.

We had John Carney last year. Carney was signed by the Giants because Tynes got hurt. Tynes is healthy and Carney is still their kicker.

Ergo, the Giants are choosing Carney over Tynes. Ergo, Carney is better than Tynes. Ergo, we have replaced Tynes with someone better, brief though it was.

And the hilarious thing is that if we'd kept Carney, it's the same crew bringing up Tynes in this thread that would be like "WTF?! REBUILDING?! CONNER BARTH FTW!!!!"

Brock 10-14-2008 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5115621)
Dude it is a fact. There was no if's and's or but's about it, Tait was not up to negotiating with Carl, he wanted LT money or he was gone. And his stubborness was based on how Carl treated him during his signing when we drafted him.

"Sit there and shut up" I believe is what Carl told Tait at the signing.

It isn't a fact. Stop acting like it is.

Brock 10-14-2008 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5115647)
Yeah Tait really wanted to come back :rolleyes:

That quote doesn't say what you said he said.

dirk digler 10-14-2008 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5115654)
That quote doesn't say what you said he said.

Cmon Brock you know as well as I do that he didn't like Carl and that was one of the reasons why he didn't want to stay.

Sure some of it was money as it always is but this was personal to him. Surely you would admit that.

Brock 10-14-2008 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5115664)
Cmon Brock you know as well as I do that he didn't like Carl and that was one of the reasons why he didn't want to stay.

Sure some of it was money as it always is but this was personal to him. Surely you would admit that.

I don't know John Tait. All I do know is that he signed with another team for far, far more money than he was going to get here. I don't hold it personally against him and I don't think he does either. He did what was right for him.

1ChiefsDan 10-14-2008 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5115476)
Worst in Chiefs History?

ROFL

When we're this bad for the next 15+ years, like we were from 1974-1989, get back to me.

I swear, we have some of the dumbest ****ing fans in the NFL.

No shit - Herm is annoying, but this team has a long way to go to be worst ever

petegz28 10-14-2008 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 5115642)
It's gotten to the point where the players (minus Waters.....good lord he needs to grow a pair and speek his mind) are not following Herm's plan......

This offense doesn't allow anyone to develope. We look like we don't belong on a football field on offense. It might the worst offense I've ever seen.....not kidding.

Eventually the losing falls directly and solely on the coaching staff....and in this case we have the most stubborn coach in the NFL that refuses to change anything......results still the same......then he sits on the sidelines not knowing what th **** to do.....

Eventually players lose all their hope.......now they are going into the game KNOWING they are about to get their asses handed to them.


That's the part that gets me. 3 years in and we look exactly the same only worse on D. We still can't get a 1st down until 2 min to go in the half, we still can't run for more than 1 yard on 1st down, we still can't throw for more than 2 yards at a time no matter who the QB is.

The fact McInstosh is still on the field is evidence that Herm is the biggest dumb **** in the NFL.

And no Hermy-Humping, Carl-Coddlingm Warpaint, Nick "The Erroneous One" Athan, or any other jock strap, douche in this world can defend what is going on with this team right now.

This coach and GM have allowed the Chiefs to become the laughing stock of the NFL. The mere fact we are even mentioned in the same breath as Detroit is proof positive that Carl and Herm are idiots and need to be fired.

FAX 10-14-2008 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by denverdanchiefsfan (Post 5115681)
No shit - Herm is annoying, but this team has a long way to go to be worst ever

We ran the sloption, dude peep. The sloption.

Just think about it, for a minute. The sloption.

FAX

petegz28 10-14-2008 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5115651)
It isn't a fact. Stop acting like it is.

Yes it is. I'm sorry if this is news to you, but that does not mean it was not the situation.

RedThat 10-14-2008 03:21 PM

Imo, we aren't competitive because we have one of the worst FO's in the league.

they can talk about rebuilding all they want. but the real rebuilding never took place inside the FO. It's one thing to get players, its another thing when you have a FO that is not capable of getting good players.

If you look around the league, most organizations that are successful have a great front office. why were teams like Cincinatti bad for so many years? Because mike Brown is a bad owner. Why have the Lions not had any success? And a lot of us will say because of Matt Millen. And thats true.

The Raiders have been basement dwellers of the league for the past 6 seasons now? Al Davis is half the man he used to be..He's done, and not the same. It happens we get old.

But really I am not pleased at all with the Chiefs ownership. Clark has shown to much patience, loyalty, and treats his own FO like family. In todays world of sports that doesn't equate to success. It's one thing when you suck, but when you can't make changes? Oh boy

petegz28 10-14-2008 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by denverdanchiefsfan (Post 5115681)
No shit - Herm is annoying, but this team has a long way to go to be worst ever

I suggest you go back and check some stats. This is the worst Chiefs team ever.

OnTheWarpath15 10-14-2008 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5115699)
Yes it is. I'm sorry if this is news to you, but that does not mean it was not the situation.

Then the burden of proof is on you, ****tard.

Show PROOF.

Otherwise, quit making shit up to suit your argument.

petegz28 10-14-2008 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 5115695)
We ran the sloption, dude peep. The sloption.

Just think about it, for a minute. The sloption.

FAX

Mr. Fax, it just can't get any more plain than that. Some will just defend Herm and Carl no matter what.

Zouk 10-14-2008 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 5115695)
We ran the sloption, dude peep. The sloption.

Just think about it, for a minute. The sloption.

FAX

Have you missed this new trend about the Wildcat formation? The Dolphins are scoring TDs with it every week - the Browns used it last night, etc. It's basically the option. I saw the Niners run the option this weekend too.

CoMoChief 10-14-2008 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5115651)
It isn't a fact. Stop acting like it is.

actually that did happen.

Brock 10-14-2008 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5115699)
Yes it is. I'm sorry if this is news to you, but that does not mean it was not the situation.

You have nothing but your opinion backing up your opinion.

Brock 10-14-2008 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 5115716)
actually that did happen.

I don't think you know what the argument is about.

Boris The Great 10-14-2008 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 5115603)
Just imagine in 3 years what we can write about what Herm did to this franchise...

You mean like:

- Brought about sweeping change in the organization
- Took power away from King Carl
- Made the team focus on the draft
- Stopped the team from blowing their money on FAs who never deliver
- Actually tried to build a team the right way

Even if Herm never wins another game as Chiefs coach and the offense finishes with negative yards in every game, he has already done more positive things for this franchise than anyone else in a decade.

petegz28 10-14-2008 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5115706)
Then the burden of proof is on you, ****tard.

Show PROOF.

Otherwise, quit making shit up to suit your argument.

Why I took your dumb ass off my ignore list is beyond me?

I am sorry, I forgot, John Tait, Carl and you were having nut-munching 3-somes with each other.

I did not mean to offend your sugar daddy.


John Tait and Carl loved each other. What the **** was I thinking ?

OnTheWarpath15 10-14-2008 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5115703)
I suggest you go back and check some stats. This is the worst Chiefs team ever.

I suggest you look at the records of each Chiefs team from 1974-1989.

You're a ****ing moron.

2 losing seasons in a row, or 13 losing seasons out of 15 between '74-'89?

triple 10-14-2008 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5115678)
I don't know John Tait. All I do know is that he signed with another team for far, far more money than he was going to get here. I don't hold it personally against him and I don't think he does either. He did what was right for him.

I would have done what he did too.

Frosty 10-14-2008 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zouk (Post 5115713)
Have you missed this new trend about the Wildcat formation? The Dolphins are scoring TDs with it every week - the Browns used it last night, etc. It's basically the option. I saw the Niners run the option this weekend too.

Exactly. The Chiefs do it three weeks ago and they are idiots. The Browns do it on MNF and they are creative genius'.

The problem was the Chiefs did it badly.

petegz28 10-14-2008 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boris The Great (Post 5115722)
You mean like:

- Brought about sweeping change in the organization
- Took power away from King Carl
- Made the team focus on the draft
- Stopped the team from blowing their money on FAs who never deliver
- Actually tried to build a team the right way

Even if Herm never wins another game as Chiefs coach and the offense finishes with negative yards in every game, he has already done more positive things for this franchise than anyone else in a decade.


So 3 years and we still can't get more than 1 yard on 1st down and that is building the team the right way?



ROFL

This is ****ing classic!

petegz28 10-14-2008 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arc (Post 5115736)
Exactly. The Chiefs do it three weeks ago and they are idiots. The Browns do it on MNF and they are creative genius'.

The problem was the Chiefs did it badly.

We need to focus on the basics first, like getting a 1st down quicker than 24 mins and 4 possessions into the game.

FAX 10-14-2008 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zouk (Post 5115713)
Have you missed this new trend about the Wildcat formation? The Dolphins are scoring TDs with it every week - the Browns used it last night, etc. It's basically the option. I saw the Niners run the option this weekend too.

No. What I did miss, though, was the part where we scored a touchdown with the sloption. Or gained a yard. Or made a positive gain. Or fooled anybody. Or accomplished anything. Whatsoever.

FAX

OnTheWarpath15 10-14-2008 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5115725)
Why I took your dumb ass off my ignore list is beyond me?

I am sorry, I forgot, John Tait, Carl and you were having nut-munching 3-somes with each other.

I did not mean to offend your sugar daddy.


John Tait and Carl loved each other. What the **** was I thinking ?

Nice deflection, ****stick.

I'm not defending anyone. The entire FO needs to be whacked.

However, you're talking out of your ass.

Sorry you don't like getting called out. Maybe you should think before you post.

So, like I said, PROVE the premise of your argument.

It's YOUR argument, how hard is it to PROVE it?

DaneMcCloud 10-14-2008 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by triple (Post 5115734)
I would have done what he did too.

You mean take $14 million up front?

Was that some sort of statement or something?

jspchief 10-14-2008 03:29 PM

The only thing we know for a fact about the Tait situation is that Chicago offered more than KC was willing to (or should have) paid. We can speculate about the Tait Carl relationship and what effect it may have had on re-signing him, but it's only speculation. Money is why we lost Tait. Period.

OnTheWarpath15 10-14-2008 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 5115752)
The only thing we know for a fact about the Tait situation is that Chicago offered more than KC was willing to (or should have) paid. We can speculate about the Tait Carl relationship and what effect it may have had on re-signing him, but it's only speculation. Money is why we lost Tait. Period.

Ding.

bobbything 10-14-2008 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5115730)
I suggest you look at the records of each Chiefs team from 1974-1989.

You're a ****ing moron.

2 losing seasons in a row, or 13 losing seasons out of 15 between '74-'89?

I'll reserve my judgment till the end of the season, but I can't remember a team that looked this bad. Maybe the 86-87 team. That team was bad. But I think they won 4 games. At this rate, I don't see us doing that well this year.

Many of the others between 1979-1989 hovered around 6-10 and 8-8. That's bad, but not this bad.

I bet we win 3 games this year and it is the worst Chiefs team since 1977.

DaneMcCloud 10-14-2008 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5115599)
Who do we have that is better?

Tynes got a ring yes?


SO STFU you Herm-sperm eater!! ROFL


So, this is all about Tynes?

JFC.

Larry Twinkle-Toe Tynes?

He ****ing sucks.

But I guess you're used to sucking off losers.

Boris The Great 10-14-2008 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5115738)
So 3 years and we still can\'t get more than 1 yard on 1st down and that is building the team the right way?

So you think that building a team is based on how many hards a team gets on offense?

I see. No wonder you think Vermeil was great.

And no wonder everyone else thinks you are reeruned.

Sure-Oz 10-14-2008 03:32 PM

I'm glad Tait didn't become our LJ of the offensive line, now only if we can throw away Mcinpussy

Zouk 10-14-2008 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 5115745)
No. What I did miss, though, was the part where we scored a touchdown with the sloption. Or gained a yard. Or made a positive gain. Or fooled anybody. Or accomplished anything. Whatsoever.

FAX

Okay - then in the future I suggest you state your objection as that we failed to get more than 3 or 4 yards with the sloption (which I believe is what we got), rather than we simply ran the sloption. Even thought the latter is exactly what you've been posting for a month.

DaneMcCloud 10-14-2008 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbything (Post 5115763)
I'll reserve my judgment till the end of the season, but I can't remember a team that looked this bad. Maybe the 86-87 team. That team was bad. But I think they won 4 games. At this rate, I don't see us doing that well this year.

All of the others between those years you mentioned hovered around 6-10 and 8-8. That's bad, but not this bad.

I bet we win 3 games this year and it is the worst Chiefs team since 1977.

If you're referring to the 1987 and 1988 teams, I'd agree.

Both of those teams had FAR more talent than the current Chiefs roster.

That was just all-around bad coaching and game-planning those two years.

OnTheWarpath15 10-14-2008 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbything (Post 5115763)
I'll reserve my judgment till the end of the season, but I can't remember a team that looked this bad. Maybe the 86-87 team. That team was bad. But I think they won 4 games. At this rate, I don't see us doing that well this year.

All of the others between those years you mentioned hovered around 6-10 and 8-8. That's bad, but not this bad.

I bet we win 3 games this year and it is the worst Chiefs team since 1977.

You're missing the point.

The sandy vags are bitching about how bad things are, without putting things in perpsective.

2 bad seasons in a row is NOTHING.

Bottom line is that people were spoiled by mediocrity over the last 20 years.

Reerun_KC 10-14-2008 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boris The Great (Post 5115722)
You mean like:

- Brought about sweeping change in the organization
- Took power away from King Carl
- Made the team focus on the draft
- Stopped the team from blowing their money on FAs who never deliver
- Actually tried to build a team the right way

Even if Herm never wins another game as Chiefs coach and the offense finishes with negative yards in every game, he has already done more positive things for this franchise than anyone else in a decade.

thats one way to look at it....

CoMoChief 10-14-2008 03:34 PM

People will stay at home and wont go to games. Blackouts will come......Chiefs won't make as much money.......Carl will be out of a job.

CoMoChief 10-14-2008 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5115719)
I don't think you know what the argument is about.

Were you not ref to the John Tait situation while he was here?

DaneMcCloud 10-14-2008 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 5115781)
thats one way to look at it....

That's the ONLY way to look at it today

Sure-Oz 10-14-2008 03:35 PM

This sunday's game going to be blacked out?? I wan't to see Gonzo's celebration hehe

FringeNC 10-14-2008 03:37 PM

It's obvious Herm wanted Tony gone, and Tony wanted out. Carl didn't do it. What game is Carl playing? Also suggests that the power hasn't completely shifted to Herm.

If Clark were really in Herm's corner, Tony gets traded.

Interesting times. Somebody is going to lose his job, if not both.

triple 10-14-2008 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 5115806)
It's obvious Herm wanted Tony gone, and Tony wanted out. Carl didn't do it. What game is Carl playing? Also suggests that the power hasn't completely shifted to Herm.

If Clark were really in Herm's corner, Tony gets traded.

Interesting times. Somebody is going to lose his job, if not both.

it appears that the Carl and Herm relationship has gone sour.

No doubt, Carl knows a battle for employment may be looming. he's preparing to throw Herm under the bus, or to make him want out

DaneMcCloud 10-14-2008 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 5115806)
If Clark were really in Herm's corner, Tony gets traded.

Uh, it takes TWO teams to make a trade. Not one.

No one was offering adequate compensation for Gonzalez.

PERIOD.

bobbything 10-14-2008 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5115779)
You're missing the point.

The sandy vags are bitching about how bad things are, without putting things in perpsective.

2 bad seasons in a row is NOTHING.

Bottom line is that people were spoiled by mediocrity over the last 20 years.

I think we're well on our way to duplicating those years.

But, I don't think it's the mediocrity that has spoiled everyone. Nobody is happy with mediocrity. It's the fact that when this team has been put in a position to succeed, in recent memory, (95, 97, 03) that it has fallen flat on its face. At least, that's what pisses me off.

OnTheWarpath15 10-14-2008 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbything (Post 5115827)
I think we're well on our way to duplicating those years.

But, I don't think it's the mediocrity that has spoiled everyone. Nobody is happy with mediocrity. It's the fact that when this team has been put in a position to succeed, in recent memory, (95, 97, 03) that it has fallen flat on its face. At least, that's what pisses me off.

Take off the doom and gloom glasses.

You REALLY think this team is going to go 13 of the next 15 seasons with a losing record?

Bowser 10-14-2008 03:42 PM

Really, where the **** is Clark?

RedThat 10-14-2008 03:42 PM

How do ppl know if Carl or Herm are going to lose their job?

It's all wishful thinking. Look at this organization? People who have followed them closely and known them for years how they operate. They hardly make changes.

The Chiefs rarely fire ppl. Vermeil resigned. Schottemheimer the same. They were horrible in the 80's and still kept Steadman in the FO. Coincedence Carl is still here? Wouldn't surprise me if Herm is next year as well.

Bowser 10-14-2008 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5115830)
Take off the doom and gloom glasses.

You REALLY think this team is going to go 13 of the next 15 seasons with a losing record?

JINX!!!!!

DaneMcCloud 10-14-2008 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 5115832)
Really, where the **** is Clark?

Counting his money

FAX 10-14-2008 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zouk (Post 5115774)
Okay - then in the future I suggest you state your objection as that we failed to get more than 3 or 4 yards with the sloption (which I believe is what we got), rather than we simply ran the sloption. Even thought the latter is exactly what you've been posting for a month.

You're right, now that I think about it, we may have netted 2 full yards running the sloption. That was after we signed our sloption quarterback around the first of September (a 2-year contract), promoted him off the PS for one game (three plays, to be precise), and waived him about 10 days later.

Are you defending this stupidity? Really?

FAX

FringeNC 10-14-2008 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5115821)
Uh, it takes TWO teams to make a trade. Not one.

No one was offering adequate compensation for Gonzalez.

PERIOD.

My guess is that a 4th-round pick would have been plenty for Herm.

RedThat 10-14-2008 03:43 PM

To top it off, they got beat reporters writing articles saying have firing coaches or managers doesn't help solve problems.

bobbything 10-14-2008 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5115830)
Take off the doom and gloom glasses.

You REALLY think this team is going to go 13 of the next 15 seasons with a losing record?

No. Not with the way the NFL is run in contrast with the way it was run during those years. It would be almost impossible now.

But, relatively speaking, I think we're looking at 2-3 (not including this season) more years before this team is even competitive.

You get way too worked up I've noticed.

DaneMcCloud 10-14-2008 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedBull (Post 5115833)
They were horrible in the 80's and still kept Steadman in the FO.

You know, Steadman and company may have been awful at choosing head coaches but they were pretty damn good at loading the roster with a shit ton of talent.

When Marty took over, Okoye, Palmer, Alt, Maas, Dino Hackett, Deron Cherry, Lloyd Burrus, Albert Lewis, Mike Bell, Stephone Paige, Jonathon Hayes, Neil Smith, Steve DeBerg, Rich Baldinger, Carlos Carson, Nick Lowery, Kevin Porter, JC Pearson, Kevin Ross and Alfredo Roberts were all on the roster.

Compare that to the Chiefs of 2006. Or 2007. Or 2008.

OnTheWarpath15 10-14-2008 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbything (Post 5115850)
No. Not with the way the NFL is run in contrast with the way it was run during those years. It would be almost impossible now.

But, relatively speaking, I think we're looking at 2-3 (not including this season) more years before this team is even competitive.

You get way too worked up I've noticed.

Because people around here would rather talk out of their ass, and base everything they say on hate, than be rational about the situation.

I can't wait for Clark to clean house either, but that doesn't mean I'm going to manipulate or ignore facts to try to make shallow points about why they should be fired.

Objective posters are a dying breed around here...

And BTW, I'm not calling you out. Talking in generalities.



EDIT: Here's an example. The Nap Harris was cut thread.

Almost every comment is something to the effect of "well, that was a waste of $12M"

We all knew that LAST year.

And the funny thing? Is it not a waste of $12M had he been KEPT on the roster?

FAX 10-14-2008 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbything (Post 5115850)
No. Not with the way the NFL is run in contrast with the way it was run during those years. It would be almost impossible now.

But, relatively speaking, I think we're looking at 2-3 (not including this season) more years before this team is even competitive.

You get way too worked up I've noticed.

2 to 3 years is probably a pretty good estimate, Mr. bobbything. I suppose it all depends on how well and how quickly our drafts work out. Based on Herm's first draft (2006), it's not looking all that fantastic, to be honest. The best we can hope for from that class is that Pollard and Page will get better (and Hali, I guess). Croyle looks like he's just not able to withstand the punishment that comes during a complete season.

The 2007 draft looks a lot better, by comparison. Tank, Turk, Bowe, Kolby, Taylor, etc. I just don't know how well those guys would fair on other teams.

FAX


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.