ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Carroll's Comments on Sanchez (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=200406)

DaKCMan AP 01-16-2009 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5396304)
they had jon kitna who took them to the playoffs IIRC

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5396313)
Kitna was having a career year in 2003. Palmer most likely would have been given the nod earlier if Kitna was playing like he had in the past.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 5396324)
Nope. That was never in the plans for Palmer...they drafted him and everyone knew Cincy didn't want him to see the field that year. Not after Tim Couch...Cincy had front-row tickets to that disaster in Cleveland.

This.

Washington also sat Jason Campbell his rookie year when they had aging Mark Brunell.

Cleveland also sat Brady Quinn his rookie year when they had Derek Anderson who threw 5 TDs and 8 picks the prior year.

Hootie 01-16-2009 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5396322)
I don't know why anyone would think that Thigpen is the starter for next year. He hasn't proven the ability to be able to work from behind center. It would be stupid to draft Sanchez and have him learn behind Thigpen in a system that will be abandoned as soon as Sanchez were to take over.

Learn behind Thigpen?

What?

The 'Thigpen can't play behind center' shit is pure myth. No QB could play in R2P2 last year because half of our line didn't block...

Whoever is running the offense next year needs to run THEIR system...if Thigpen can't pull that off then I agree, he's worthless...but I saw Thigpen make several good throws and reads from behind center this year...the only reason we needed a gimmick offense was because, like I said, we had MAJOR MAJOR protection issues.

and obviously no one really thinks, or few people at least, that Thigpen will be our future...but Baltimore was heading into the season with Troy Smith as their QB...because Flacco was extremely 'raw'...and a fluke situation to Smith and a freak injury to Boller is the only reason Flacco ever sniffed the field.

Sanchez will probably be listed at #3 next year if we draft him...for a year...behind Thigpen and Croyle. Learn the ropes, give Pioli a season to evaluate, and then set him up for success in 2010.

Brock 01-16-2009 01:14 PM

This is the same guy who cost Matt Leinart a shit pot full of money by talking him into coming back.

OnTheWarpath15 01-16-2009 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5396824)
This is the same guy who cost Matt Leinart a shit pot full of money by talking him into coming back.

This.

If he truly cares about the kid, why publicly shit in the helmet of a player that is going to represent the USC program in the pros?

Chiefnj2 01-16-2009 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5396834)
This.

If he truly cares about the kid, why publicly shit in the helmet of a player that is going to represent the USC program in the pros?

What if the advisory report saying Sanchez is a 2nd rounder is fairly accurate and Carroll's contacts in the NFL told him Sanchez was a 2nd rounder?

OnTheWarpath15 01-16-2009 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5396843)
What if the advisory report saying Sanchez is a 2nd rounder is fairly accurate and Carroll's contacts in the NFL told him Sanchez was a 2nd rounder?

Even if true, it shows a huge lack of class on Carroll's part to drag this into the media. He's only hurting Sanchez more by blowing it up in the media.

Imagine Bob Stoops calling Bradford an idiot for returning to OU, if he happened to be told he'd be a Top 5 pick by the advisory committee and his contacts.

Right or wrong, you keep that kind of talk in house.

SCTrojan 01-16-2009 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5396852)
Even if true, it shows a huge lack of class on Carroll's part to drag this into the media. He's only hurting Sanchez more by blowing it up in the media.

Imagine Bob Stoops calling Bradford an idiot for returning to OU, if he happened to be told he'd be a Top 5 pick by the advisory committee and his contacts.

Right or wrong, you keep that kind of talk in house.

No one called anyone an idiot.

OnTheWarpath15 01-16-2009 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCTrojan (Post 5396856)
No one called anyone an idiot.

Might as well be.

If Carroll feels Mark is making a mistake, fine. He's entitled to that opinion.

But what I don't understand is what there is to gain for Carroll in making it public, other than trying to embarrass Mark, or get him to change his mind. Calling out the decision publicly serves no good purpose, IMO.

Jerm 01-16-2009 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5396859)
Might as well be.

If Carroll feels Mark is making a mistake, fine. He's entitled to that opinion.

But what I don't understand is what there is to gain for Carroll in making it public, other than trying to embarrass Mark, or get him to change his mind. Calling out the decision publicly serves no good purpose, IMO.

Exactly, it was a douchebag move on Carroll's part.

If he disagrees, so be it...handle it in house...not out in the public.

RustShack 01-16-2009 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 5396326)
This.

Washington also sat Jason Campbell his rookie year when they had aging Mark Brunell.

Cleveland also sat Brady Quinn his rookie year when they had Derek Anderson who threw 5 TDs and 8 picks the prior year.

NY sat Manning behind Warner. Cutler started out as the backup behind Plummer. Rothlisberger started out as the backup behind Maddox. Flacco started out as the backup.

SCTrojan 01-16-2009 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5396859)
Might as well be.

If Carroll feels Mark is making a mistake, fine. He's entitled to that opinion.

But what I don't understand is what there is to gain for Carroll in making it public, other than trying to embarrass Mark, or get him to change his mind. Calling out the decision publicly serves no good purpose, IMO.

Well, we disagree on this one. I've listened to other interviews Pete did, and he doesn't come within a stone's throw of calling Mark an idiot. He said Mark was making a decision that the percentages didn't support. He said that Mark is going against the grain and they didn't see eye-to-eye on the decision. If you interpret that as tantamount to calling him an idiot, then so be it.

OnTheWarpath15 01-16-2009 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCTrojan (Post 5396873)
Well, we disagree on this one. I've listened to other interviews Pete did, and he doesn't come within a stone's throw of calling Mark an idiot. He said Mark was making a decision that the percentages didn't support. He said that Mark is going against the grain and they didn't see eye-to-eye on the decision. If you interpret that as tantamount to calling him an idiot, then so be it.

I'd be curious as to what the failure rate is for Senior QB's. And I'd also like to see a breakdown on this 62% number and see how it was arrived at.

I bet the senior failure rate is comparable, yet Carroll wants to hang his hat on stats, while ignoring the fact that Sanchez gets jack shit if he suffers a significant injury after returning.

By PC bringing it out in the media, one of two things is going to happen:

Sanchez will not be a 1st round pick, and will look stupid for declaring, or he will he a high pick, and Carroll will look stupid for making an issue out of it publicly.

Someone is going to lose, and it didn't have to be this way. What's so hard about keeping this in-house?

SCTrojan 01-16-2009 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5396899)
I'd be curious as to what the failure rate is for Senior QB's. And I'd also like to see a breakdown on this 62% number and see how it was arrived at.

I bet the senior failure rate is comparable, yet Carroll wants to hang his hat on stats, while ignoring the fact that Sanchez gets jack shit if he suffers a significant injury after returning.

I think he was talking about underclassmen QBs, but am not sure. I think the more compelling data point is that of number of college starts in relation to success in the NFL.

IMO Pete used the stats to illustrate what the best set of circumstances might be for Mark to come out and be successful. I don't think people would argue that Mark has put himself in the best situation in terms of preparation and experience to be a productive NFL QB.

I admit I thought Pete could have handled the press conference better. But I also think that he had the player's best interests at heart. FWIW, I thought that this interview a bit later was more indicative of how he felt.

http://www.am570radio.com/cc-common/...KLAC-AM&TRACK=

Chiefnj2 01-16-2009 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5396859)
Might as well be.

If Carroll feels Mark is making a mistake, fine. He's entitled to that opinion.

But what I don't understand is what there is to gain for Carroll in making it public, other than trying to embarrass Mark, or get him to change his mind. Calling out the decision publicly serves no good purpose, IMO.

Maybe he was hoping the kid would change his mind. As long as he didn't talk to an agent he could have had a change of heart.

Brock 01-16-2009 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5397022)
Maybe he was hoping the kid would change his mind. As long as he didn't talk to an agent he could have had a change of heart.

No reason to go public.

OnTheWarpath15 01-16-2009 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5397022)
Maybe he was hoping the kid would change his mind. As long as he didn't talk to an agent he could have had a change of heart.

Which is fine, I pointed that out earlier.

But is calling him out in public the only way that Carroll feels is going to get Mark to change his mind?

Again, I have NO problem with Carroll having this opinion.

I have a huge problem with taking it to the media.

SAUTO 01-16-2009 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCTrojan (Post 5396873)
Well, we disagree on this one. I've listened to other interviews Pete did, and he doesn't come within a stone's throw of calling Mark an idiot. He said Mark was making a decision that the percentages didn't support. He said that Mark is going against the grain and they didn't see eye-to-eye on the decision. If you interpret that as tantamount to calling him an idiot, then so be it.

SOUNDED like pete is covering his own ass, you know if sanchez fails pete can tell the next HS qb who he's sitting with "well sanchez failed but i told him so' classless douchebag thing to do. like i said in another post self serving, the "i care about my players" is now "i care about them as long as they do as i want"

Chiefnj2 01-16-2009 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5396899)

I bet the senior failure rate is comparable, yet Carroll wants to hang his hat on stats, while ignoring the fact that Sanchez gets jack shit if he suffers a significant injury after returning.

Sanchez could get insurance and I'm sure boosters would have set him up* if he returned. Plus, if the advisory board is correct and he doesn't get drafted until the second round then he will have lost millions.





*Without violating any NCAA rules of course.

Hootie 01-16-2009 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5397034)
I have a huge problem with taking it to the media.

ROFL

Pete is probably very sorry to disappoint you.

Chiefnj2 01-16-2009 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5397034)
Which is fine, I pointed that out earlier.

But is calling him out in public the only way that Carroll feels is going to get Mark to change his mind?

I think it was his last opportunity. According to Carroll everyone but Sanchez thought he should return - advisory board, coaches, his parents, etc.

SAUTO 01-16-2009 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCTrojan (Post 5396924)
I think he was talking about underclassmen QBs, but am not sure. I think the more compelling data point is that of number of college starts in relation to success in the NFL.

IMO Pete used the stats to illustrate what the best set of circumstances might be for Mark to come out and be successful. I don't think people would argue that Mark has put himself in the best situation in terms of preparation and experience to be a productive NFL QB.

I admit I thought Pete could have handled the press conference better. But I also think that he had the player's best interests at heart. FWIW, I thought that this interview a bit later was more indicative of how he felt.

http://www.am570radio.com/cc-common/...KLAC-AM&TRACK=

i havent got time now to listen, but if its any different then why didnt he say this on NATIONAL TV and just on local radio?

SAUTO 01-16-2009 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5397049)
I think it was his last opportunity. According to Carroll everyone but Sanchez thought he should return - advisory board, coaches, his parents, etc.

then why do all the experts have him as a sure fire 1st as of now?

OnTheWarpath15 01-16-2009 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5397049)
I think it was his last opportunity. According to Carroll everyone but Sanchez thought he should return - advisory board, coaches, his parents, etc.

That's the thing, it WASN'T his last opportunity.

Sanchez has (well, had) 4 days to rescind his decision. Michael Oher took advantage of this option last year. This is assuming he hasn't hired an agent.

I'm not sure how anyone can justify a coach doing this to one of his players.

SCTrojan 01-16-2009 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5397050)
i havent got time now to listen, but if its any different then why didnt he say this on NATIONAL TV and just on local radio?

Don't really know - maybe it was because he had cooled down. If you believe everyone involved, Pete and Mark had been up discussing it late into the night after Pete had just returned from vacation in Hawaii. Pete is a passionate guy and probably isn't used to Mark not listening to his counsel.

warrior 01-16-2009 03:01 PM

Carroll's just worried about another trophey.

Sweet Daddy Hate 01-16-2009 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crybaby Power (Post 5394200)
Of course Sanchez isn't ready for the NFL. No one is when they've only had one year of college playing exp.

It's ****ing laughable that people want to draft him with our top 3 pick LMAO

Quote:

Originally Posted by royr17 (Post 5394367)
I'd take Stafford before Sanchez. Sanchez is not ready yet, Bradford was more ready than Sanchez was.

Jesus Christ that was the dumbest of them all. You; build fire, jump in. Die.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 5394416)
I totally agree.
Sanchez will not do shit in the NFL. If I'm wrong I will eat crow, but I'm quite confident in this one.

Make that a donkey dick and we've got a deal.


Quote:

Originally Posted by DT58HOF (Post 5394491)
There is no QB in this years draft worth us picking in the first 2 rounds.


Quote:

Originally Posted by DT58HOF (Post 5394523)
Harrell is the only QB we should look at and he can be had later.
Stafford is overrated and Sanchez has bust written all over him.

Dropped on head much?

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5394631)
This might be the single dumbest post in CP history.

And that's saying a lot...



I'm sure Stafford and Sanchez came out early thinking they'd be 3rd round picks...

ROFL

You might want to wipe the paint chips off your chin.

He wouldn't know where to begin.

SAUTO 01-16-2009 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCTrojan (Post 5397071)
Don't really know - maybe it was because he had cooled down. If you believe everyone involved, Pete and Mark had been up discussing it late into the night after Pete had just returned from vacation in Hawaii. Pete is a passionate guy and probably isn't used to getting his way



FYP:D

DT58HOF 01-16-2009 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5394631)
This might be the single dumbest post in CP history.

And that's saying a lot...



I'm sure Stafford and Sanchez came out early thinking they'd be 3rd round picks...

ROFL

You might want to wipe the paint chips off your chin.

alot of guys can comeout early, that doesn't make them a succesful QB of the Chiefs. Sanchez has failure all over him.
Trade Larry to The Skins for Colt Brennan

Sweet Daddy Hate 01-16-2009 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DT58HOF (Post 5397229)
alot of guys can comeout early, that doesn't make them a succesful QB of the Chiefs. Sanchez has failure all over him.
Trade Larry to The Skins for Colt Brennan

Do you EVER get tired of being wrong?

kysirsoze 01-16-2009 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DT58HOF (Post 5397229)
alot of guys can comeout early, that doesn't make them a succesful QB of the Chiefs. Sanchez has failure all over him.
Trade Larry to The Skins for Colt Brennan

ROFL I hope you're kidding!

I'm sure that the skins are desperate to replace an elite back in Portis with a washed up headcase like LJ.

DT58HOF 01-16-2009 03:15 PM

seriously how many people here think Sanchez will be a better pro QB than Colt Brennan?

DCS,Keep plugging for those USC players that fail in the league and obtw they are failing in College as well, they seem to lose to some nobody PAC 10 school every year now. LMAO

DT58HOF 01-16-2009 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kysirsoze (Post 5397277)
ROFL I hope you're kidding!

I'm sure that the skins are desperate to replace an elite back in Portis with a washed up headcase like LJ.

Portis will not be back in D.C. Mark that down poncho!!

Sam Hall 01-16-2009 03:18 PM

I think Pete should have said "Mark is going against the grain" and left it at that.

kysirsoze 01-16-2009 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DT58HOF (Post 5397288)
Portis will not be back in D.C. Mark that down poncho!!

How'd you guess my real name?

kobebehar 01-16-2009 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Great Expectations (Post 5394495)
Carroll is known for trying to keep players at USC regardless if it is in their best interest to leave for the draft or not.

True, and it's really shitty of him. That's going to hurt him in recruiting eventuall.

kysirsoze 01-16-2009 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kobebehar (Post 5397296)
True, and it's really shitty of him. That's going to hurt him in recruiting eventuall.

I actually think Carroll has the players best interests at heart. Living in L.A. I hear about all of the things he does in the community. Obviously this helps his recruiting but he goes above and beyond to stem gang violence and keep kids off the street. He seems like a great guy which is why I was surprised he let his emotion get the better of him and sound off in the press at the possible detriment to Sanchez's career.

Sweet Daddy Hate 01-16-2009 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DT58HOF (Post 5397284)
seriously how many people here think Sanchez will be a better pro QB than Colt Brennan?

DCS,Keep plugging for those USC players that fail in the league and obtw they are failing in College as well, they seem to lose to some nobody PAC 10 school every year now. LMAO

I've tried to avoid this and be merciful, but no more.

This is step 1:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/N_Sgi5WzoUI&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/N_Sgi5WzoUI&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

You'll find step 2 on your Rep Page. Dickwad.

DT58HOF 01-16-2009 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan (Post 5397347)
I've tried to avoid this and be merciful, but no more.

This is step 1:



You'll find step 2 on your Rep Page. Dickwad.

OMG please no ,please don't screw with my rep,lol
I don't want to have to run and hide behind my desk!!:):clap:

Chiefnj2 01-16-2009 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5397068)
That's the thing, it WASN'T his last opportunity.

Sanchez has (well, had) 4 days to rescind his decision. Michael Oher took advantage of this option last year. This is assuming he hasn't hired an agent.

I'm not sure how anyone can justify a coach doing this to one of his players.

He didn't do anything to the kid. Apparently the guys who make millions and actually make the picks have the kid as a second round prospect. Carroll isn't lowering the kids value, he's just telling the internet "gurus" inside info.

Chiefnj2 01-16-2009 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5397055)
then why do all the experts have him as a sure fire 1st as of now?

The same experts who had Brohm as an early 1st, Quinn as an early 1st and who at this time last year had Flacco in the 2nd and 3rd round?

kysirsoze 01-16-2009 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5397361)
He didn't do anything to the kid. Apparently the guys who make millions and actually make the picks have the kid as a second round prospect. Carroll isn't lowering the kids value, he's just telling the internet "gurus" inside info.

That's a good point. I suppose anything he said was probably known by the folks that matter.

Sweet Daddy Hate 01-16-2009 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DT58HOF (Post 5397354)
OMG please no ,please don't screw with my rep,lol
I don't want to have to run and hide behind my desk!!:):clap:

Wanna' go for two, asshole?

SAUTO 01-16-2009 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DT58HOF (Post 5397284)
seriously how many people here think Sanchez will be a better pro QB than Colt Brennan?
DCS,Keep plugging for those USC players that fail in the league and obtw they are failing in College as well, they seem to lose to some nobody PAC 10 school every year now. LMAO

ABOUT 99.9% i would hope

kobebehar 01-16-2009 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kysirsoze (Post 5397316)
I actually think Carroll has the players best interests at heart. Living in L.A. I hear about all of the things he does in the community. Obviously this helps his recruiting but he goes above and beyond to stem gang violence and keep kids off the street. He seems like a great guy which is why I was surprised he let his emotion get the better of him and sound off in the press at the possible detriment to Sanchez's career.

If I came off as saying carroll was a bad guy, I didn't mean to. I just think that he tends to make things harder, not easier, on his college players once they leave.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.