ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Texas busts taken in the top ten... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=202176)

Saul Good 02-11-2009 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 5481878)
The Saints gave up the 12th pick, the 71st pick, the 107th pick, the 144th pick, the 179th pick and the 218th pick of the 1999 draft, AND the 2nd and 64th picks of the 2000 draft for Ricky Williams.

That's EIGHT picks for one player.

That's why he's not only a bust, he's one of the most monumental busts in NFL history. You can't even discuss him the same way you discuss other picks. Because a team traded their entire draft for him. You don't do that for a guy who gets suspended twice and spends a year playing in canada, a guy who only once in 9 years surpassed 1500 yards and/or 10 TDs.

What someone gave up to get a player has nothing to do with whether or not a player is a bust. Again, you don't understand the difference between busts and disappointments.

If Bill Gates buys an NFL franchise in 2010, which turns out to be an uncapped year, and he pays $10 Billion to get Matt Cassell and Matt Cassell wins him 2 Super Bowls, you would be spouting, "Cassell is a bust. For $10 billion, he should have won 811 Super Bowls." Fortunately, your stupidity would be difficult to understand, as it's difficult to enunciate while licking a window.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-11-2009 09:50 PM

It amazes me how many people still don't understand positional value. It's not superstring theory, you ****s, it's relatively simple.

The most important position on the field is QB
After that is DE and LT
After that is DT, WR, CB, RB, S, LB, and TE
Interior linemen are the least important position on the field, which is why you almost never see them go in the first round, and you never see them go in the top 10.

Saul Good 02-11-2009 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5481919)
It amazes me how many people still don't understand positional value. It's not superstring theory, you ****s, it's relatively simple.

The most important position on the field is QB
After that is DE and LT
After that is DT, WR, CB, RB, S, LB, and TE
Interior linemen are the least important position on the field, which is why you almost never see them go in the first round, and you never see them go in the top 10.

I understand positional value very clearly, and I agree with you completely. My argument is that a great NFL player can not be considered a bust regardless of where he was drafted.

I would never draft a RB in the top 5, but I wouldn't consider LaDainian Tomlinson to be a bust.

If you told me that Sanchez and Stafford were the next Leaf and Manning, but you didn't know which was which and you also said that Moreno was the next Tomlinson, I'd probably tell you to draft a QB. That's how important I think a QB is.

That doesn't mean that drafting Moreno would be a guaranteed bust, though.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-11-2009 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 5481958)
I understand positional value very clearly, and I agree with you completely. My argument is that a great NFL player can not be considered a bust regardless of where he was drafted.

I would never draft a RB in the top 5, but I wouldn't consider LaDainian Tomlinson to be a bust.

If you told me that Sanchez and Stafford were the next Leaf and Manning, but you didn't know which was which and you also said that Moreno was the next Tomlinson, I'd probably tell you to draft a QB. That's how important I think a QB is.

That doesn't mean that drafting Moreno would be a guaranteed bust, though.

I'll put it this way:

Rather than making it a semantic argument over "bust" or not a bust, if you had to choose between Will Shields, one of the best to ever play his position, and Drew Brees, who is a premier player, but nowhere near one of the best of all time, who are you taking?

The fact of the matter is that there is absolutely no way that an interior lineman could ever play well enough to justify a top five pick. It's the same reason why you'd never give 20 million a year to a left-handed specialist in baseball. They don't have enough of an effect on the game in order to justify that draft status/monetary expenditure.

alanm 02-11-2009 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5481696)
I guess that Lawrence Phillips, Ryan Leaf, and Rae Carruth were also derailed by unforeseen circumstances, since they all had the physical talent to play in the league.

But none of those guys had careers cut short by injury. Billy Sims knee blew out.

Saul Good 02-11-2009 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5481987)
I'll put it this way:

Rather than making it a semantic argument over "bust" or not a bust, if you had to choose between Will Shields, one of the best to ever play his position, and Drew Brees, who is a premier player, but nowhere near one of the best of all time, who are you taking?

The fact of the matter is that there is absolutely no way that an interior lineman could ever play well enough to justify a top five pick. It's the same reason why you'd never give 20 million a year to a left-handed specialist in baseball. They don't have enough of an effect on the game in order to justify that draft status/monetary expenditure.

That's actually a pretty close choice in my book. I'd lean towards Brees, but it's about a coin flip in my book. If Brees had ever won anything, I might feel more strongly about it.

I agree that it's been an argument over semantics, but words are important. A bona fide bust is not a guy who becomes a valuable contributor to a team's success for a decade or more regardless of position.

If Shields would have been taken with a top 5 pick, the pick would not have been a bust.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-11-2009 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanm (Post 5482074)
But none of those guys had careers cut short by injury. Billy Sims knee blew out.

The argument was about Ricky Williams.

keg in kc 02-11-2009 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyrus (Post 5482073)
96-99% of the time you wait until later rounds to draft interior o-linemen, but if you are a personnel guy that believes so-and-so is the next Larry Allen, you're not letting him go past your pick. There are exceptions.

I don't think there have been exceptions, at least not to this point in time. Steve Hutchinson was looked at as maybe the most can't-miss pure guard prospect ever. He didn't go until 17 and a lot of folks at the time argued that was too high for a guard to go (I wasn't one of them).

Any recent guard I can think of that's been drafted that high or higher (and this includes Brandon Albert) has been drafted with the intention of moving him to left tackle.

You've got to go all the way back to Chris Naole in 1997 to find an actual guard drafted higher than Hutchinson. And you've got to go all the way back to the 80s (pre salary-cap era) to find one drafted in the top-10. They just don't spend high picks on the position.

Ebolapox 02-11-2009 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5481747)
Hampton was, Rogers wasnt.

mecca='good at the draft'

jspchief 02-11-2009 10:50 PM

If the argument is that Texas doesn't produce good NFL players, then you can't dismiss certain players from the discussion simply because of the round they were taken in.

Did Ross and Hampton play for the same "country club" program that all these busts played for?

easymobee 02-11-2009 11:39 PM

This thread was DOOMED from the beginning. To look at that list of players and to think that there was a damning or laughingstock in store for Texas football was a stupid thought.

To properly start a thread like this, I would need a Penn State list for example ( Blair Thomas, Todd Blackledge, Tamba Hali, Jimmy Kennedy, DJ Dozier, Ki Jana Carter, Michael Haynes, Curtis Enis, Courtney Brown, and Lavar Arrington ). If I wanted to make a similarly crappy point as the list provider on this thread, I would have highlighted my list with LJ (Malcontent spitter) Levi Jones (Casino Punchee) ,Matt Millen (worst GM ever) and Kerry Collins (Ho Hum Former drunk) instead.

In regards to Leonard Davis, its important to factor in the phenomenon known as the "Arizona Cardinals Bust Factory" as well. Garrison Hearst and Thomas Jones were top 10 busts as well, until the moment they left AZ ( Davis gets to the Pro Bowl his 1st year out as well, and that DEFINATELY wasn't a selection given due to past reputation ).
Posted via Mobile Device

The Buddha 02-12-2009 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5481723)
Ryan Sims being brought up, this fan base really is motivated by fear.

When you get burned a few times, you start playing off a bit. You don't go after things as aggressively, not out of fear, but wisdom. :-)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.