ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Sanchez will throw at combine. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=202775)

SenselessChiefsFan 02-20-2009 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MWagg72 (Post 5510516)
Didn't he miss three weeks of practice? Not sure but he didn't miss a game.

Frankly, the more I learn about the guy... I am beginning to think he is a head case.

I initially liked the idea that he was going to throw at the combine.

Now, I think he may be a little too arrogant.

I am sure you know about his arrest, I think in his redshirt Sophomore year because the girl said no and he wasn't hearing it. He got Kobe'd, she figured she could get some money out of him if this is the case.

Now, he has one good year in college and Pete Carroll tells him he should stay in school and he's not hearing it. He's not hearing it because everyone else is saying your going to go very high. Just because Carroll said to stay doesn't mean anything. He could have stayed and gotten insurance like lionheart but why? He's going high first round and can learn in the NFL

Just have to wonder if he thinks he knows better than everyone else, and has this self titled attitude. Pretty sure he's doing whats best for him and his family, you don't know whats best for them.

Don't need that on this team. Would love his attitude and leadership on our team. It's not like everyone is saying he's a prick like Leaf.

I was really hoping to find out more about him and get sold on him.... nothing so far. I'm sold on him being the 2nd best QB and if Matthew is off the board, I'd love to have him as a member of the KC Chiefs.

Oh, by the way, his 'family' told him to stay in school. So, no, he isn't doing what is best for him and his family.

Also, how is the girl going to get any money out of him when he is a backup in his Sophomore year?

Wow, there is nothing not to like about the guy in your eyes. No reason for concern whatsoever.

smittysbar 02-20-2009 02:07 PM

YOU don't have a ****ing clue what is best for him and his family.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-20-2009 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MWagg72 (Post 5510658)
Yeah, I don't think I've seen too many people say they want Sanchez and only Sanchez. Most are merely making an argument for Sanchez since it was believed that Matthew would be off the board. Thats been my take at least.

I think this is right on. They just want any QB they can justify taking at #3.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-20-2009 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smittysbar (Post 5510707)
YOU don't have a ****ing clue what is best for him and his family.

Well, I expect that his family knows, and they told him to stay in school.

smittysbar 02-20-2009 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5510712)
Well, I expect that his family knows, and they told him to stay in school.

Only him and him alone knows whats best for him

Saccopoo 02-20-2009 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5510152)
You'd think the fact that his report says "very smart, makes the right reads, rarely throws into coverage, very cerebral" would immediately catch everyones eyes as a hugely important thing.

It does to me, and those are the specific reasons why I like Sanchez over the other quarterbacks. I also like his family background. They are very strong and supportive, and all show good intelligence and character. Personally, I don't think that his lack of experience means much, especially when almost everyone to a man thinks that he should sit and learn for at least a year, if not two before he even sees long term NFL action.

Saccopoo 02-20-2009 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 5510520)
Somone quickly point out what "dominant" WR Bradford threw to.... Someone quicky point out where those 4 SR Olineman are going to get drafted if they do.......

Gresham would have been the best receiver in this draft if he came out. Guy is a freak. Personally, I'd love to see the Chiefs look seriously at him next year. And their offensive line, especially in college, was utterly dominant.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-20-2009 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smittysbar (Post 5510716)
Only him and him alone knows whats best for him

That is about as dumb of a position as I have ever seen. The guy is 22 years old, he doesn't even know what's best for him. He has had several people try to tell him. Like his father, coach Palmer and of course Pete Carroll.

Oh, and Mecca didn't just say what was best for Sanchez, but Sanchez and his family. His family is fine and wanted him to go back to school because they want the best for him.

When my 7 year old daughter wants to eat all of her Halloween candy in one sitting, she THINKS it is what is best for her. Being older and wiser, I don't allow it.

Now, Sanchez 'thinks' this is what is best for him. And, he isn't listening to anyone tell him differently.

The more I read about him, the happier I will be when the Chiefs don't take him.

ChiefRon 02-20-2009 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CanadaKC (Post 5510600)
If you read Don Banks this morning...Sanchez lovers will have a fit. He said he almost guarantees the Lions do NOT take a QB with their #1 overall pick...rather one of the top OT's. That means St Louis will probably take the other OT...leaving us drafting Stafford, Curry, or Sanchez...IMO. If Stafford is passed on by the Lions...he's going to us rather than Sanchez.

I'd be cool with either one. Most would prefer Stafford. I would prefer Sanchez, mostly because of the way scouts have raved about his intangibles, passion, leadership, as well as physical tools. Combine that with Carrol's comments that he'd be the #1 overall pick next year if he stayed, and he's got more talent than Palmer? That's the guy I REALLY want.

But Stafford seems like a legit prospect too, by most accounts even better.

Hell, I would be cool with Cassell as long as we don't give up a high price for him. I don't think that would be the better choice, but if that's how Pioli & Haley thought would be best after their evaluations, then I'll be ok with it.

I just want a franchise QB. Period.

DeezNutz 02-20-2009 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefRon (Post 5510753)
I just want a franchise QB. Period.

You just want a quarterback, dude. Positional value. Talent be damned.

Stafford and Sanchez aren't worthy of the #3 overall selection. If they're available in the 3rd round, which is what the advisory committee evaluated them at, then it might be safer, and I'd be happier about the pick.

Stafford, Sanchez, Leaf, Freeman, George, Davis. All the same guys.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-20-2009 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5510708)
I think this is right on. They just want any QB they can justify taking at #3.

Which is why we've pilloried the spread monkeys coming out next year.

Nice try, you dumb ****.

Coogs 02-20-2009 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5510765)
Stafford and Sanchez aren't worthy of the #3 overall selection.

That is not what the crew on NFLNetworks Total Access was saying last night with regards to Stafford.

ChiefRon 02-20-2009 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5510765)
You just want a quarterback, dude. Positional value. Talent be damned.

Stafford and Sanchez aren't worthy of the #3 overall selection. If they're available in the 3rd round, which is what the advisory committee evaluated them at, then it might be safer, and I'd be happier about the pick.

Stafford, Sanchez, Leaf, Freeman, George, Davis. All the same guys.

Franchise QB, dude. **** positional value, I don't care about that. Talent is implied with moniker "Franchise QB".

And bullshit they're not worth of #3. If he becomes the man, then years from now they'll say "best value in that draft", regardless of current draft position.

smittysbar 02-20-2009 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5510749)
That is about as dumb of a position as I have ever seen. The guy is 22 years old, he doesn't even know what's best for him. He has had several people try to tell him. Like his father, coach Palmer and of course Pete Carroll.

Oh, and Mecca didn't just say what was best for Sanchez, but Sanchez and his family. His family is fine and wanted him to go back to school because they want the best for him.

When my 7 year old daughter wants to eat all of her Halloween candy in one sitting, she THINKS it is what is best for her. Being older and wiser, I don't allow it.

Now, Sanchez 'thinks' this is what is best for him. And, he isn't listening to anyone tell him differently.

The more I read about him, the happier I will be when the Chiefs don't take him.

Your comparing a 22 year old to a 7 year old? :spock:

Believe it or not at 22 years of age, most can think for themselves. You can go to war at 18, become a cop at 21, but I am sure that he can't make the correct decision regarding HIS life at 22.

He is going in the first and possibly very high in the 1st, I think it would have been a mistake not to come out. I think Bradford made a mistake going back, but it's just my opinion.

DeezNutz 02-20-2009 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 5510777)
That is not what the crew on NFLNetworks Total Access was saying last night with regards to Stafford.

Surprisingly, I was being a smartass and being passive aggressive with the bears, whom we never should have fed.

DeezNutz 02-20-2009 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefRon (Post 5510788)
Franchise QB, dude. **** positional value, I don't care about that. Talent is implied with moniker "Franchise QB".

And bullshit they're not worth of #3. If he becomes the man, then years from now they'll say "best value in that draft", regardless of current draft position.

See post #95, and check the batteries in sarcasm detector.

smittysbar 02-20-2009 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefRon (Post 5510788)
Franchise QB, dude. **** positional value, I don't care about that. Talent is implied with moniker "Franchise QB".

And bullshit they're not worth of #3. If he becomes the man, then years from now they'll say "best value in that draft", regardless of current draft position.

Your sarcasm meter in on the outs

ChiefRon 02-20-2009 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5510798)
See post #95, and check the batteries in sarcasm detector.

Eh, I thought so based on some of your other posts, but maybe all the mother****ers on here talking shit about *insert some dumbass suggestion for #3* are getting to me.

DeezNutz 02-20-2009 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefRon (Post 5510805)
Eh, I thought so based on some of your other posts, but maybe all the mother****ers on here talking shit about *insert some dumbass suggestion for #3* are getting to me.

Understandable.

Coogs 02-20-2009 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5510798)
See post #95, and check the batteries in sarcasm detector.

Sorry! I totally wiffed on that one. :)

ChiefRon 02-20-2009 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5510807)
Understandable.

Well, now that I re-read your post I should have caught it. Sorry this shit's getting to me.

I just don't understand some of these fans...

Kyle DeLexus 02-20-2009 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5510704)
Oh, by the way, his 'family' told him to stay in school. So, no, he isn't doing what is best for him and his family.

Also, how is the girl going to get any money out of him when he is a backup in his Sophomore year?

Wow, there is nothing not to like about the guy in your eyes. No reason for concern whatsoever.

Like I said what he felt it was best for him and his family. They could tell him to stay in school, but he did what he felt was right.

Also, the same way alot of athletes have girls do that same stuff. A backup sophomore can become a jr/sr starter. She would only get the money when he's going pro anyway. You would have to file charges after they hook up also you can't wait till he is the starter and go oh yeah 2 years ago he raped me.

He can do wrong, he is my 2nd best QB in the draft, but I feel he is still worth a #3 pick. IF he would happen to fall, it would be because of his limited experience not his ability, attitude/off field behavior, or anything else really.

Kyle DeLexus 02-20-2009 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5510749)
That is about as dumb of a position as I have ever seen. The guy is 22 years old, he doesn't even know what's best for him. He has had several people try to tell him. Like his father, coach Palmer and of course Pete Carroll.

Oh, and Mecca didn't just say what was best for Sanchez, but Sanchez and his family. His family is fine and wanted him to go back to school because they want the best for him.

When my 7 year old daughter wants to eat all of her Halloween candy in one sitting, she THINKS it is what is best for her. Being older and wiser, I don't allow it.

Now, Sanchez 'thinks' this is what is best for him. And, he isn't listening to anyone tell him differently.

The more I read about him, the happier I will be when the Chiefs don't take him.

Mecca didn't say that, I did. I believe every word of it too. At 22 years of age with a fully functional brain, I'd like to think he can weigh his options and pick what is best. His family might have disagreed and wanted him to graduate, but he might have felt financially, going early was best for them considering the potential rookie cap that might be placed.

I also think Bradford made a mistake by not leaving early. He might get drafted higher next year, but if a new CBA is in place and has a rookie cap, he missed out on a ton of money.

ChiefRon 02-20-2009 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MWagg72 (Post 5510882)
I also think Bradford made a mistake by not leaving early. He might get drafted higher next year, but if a new CBA is in place and has a rookie cap, he missed out on a ton of money.

And who's to say this didn't play a BIG factor into his decision, worried about a rookie cap...

CoMoChief 02-20-2009 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5510020)
And now we're right back to this "pac 10 sucks" argument, people need to get over that.

Why its true.

Uh oh.......here comes your........confrence bowl game record argument........GAY

BigCatDaddy 02-20-2009 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5510738)
Gresham would have been the best receiver in this draft if he came out. Guy is a freak. Personally, I'd love to see the Chiefs look seriously at him next year. And their offensive line, especially in college, was utterly dominant.


Good so they didn't have a dominant WR. Gresham was the 3rd best TE in the conference this year. They were good, but not dominant by any means. OU has had better in the Stoops era.

-King- 02-20-2009 03:11 PM

Off topic, but did anybody read about this kid Devin Moore? Showed some heart and love for the game today. Wyoming running back Devin Moore wasn’t invited to the Scouting Combine in Indianapolis.

So he held his own.

On Thursday, Moore performed in T-shirt and shorts for scouts who were in town for the much bigger party for which someone who isn’t good enough at scouting to get a scouting job with an NFL team deemed Moore to be unworthy to attend.

According to Gil Brandt of NFL.com and Sirius NFL Radio, representatives from 14 teams attended the workout.

Moore ran the 40-yard dash in 4.43 and 4.41 seconds. Per Brandt, the 4.41 would have been the fifth-fastest time at running back at last year’s Combine.

(That said, we haven’t seen or heard whether the times will be adjusted based on any possible differences between the surface on which Moore ran and the FieldTurf at Lucal Oil Stadium in Indy.)

Moore also jumped 35 inches vertically, 10 feet broadly, pressed 225 pounds 27 times, ran the short-shuttle in 4.22 and 4.29 seconds, and performed the three-cone drill in 7.14 seconds.

Since Moore resides in Indianapolis, he was permitted to arrange a workout there. Otherwise, he would have had to wait until the Wyoming Pro Day.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-20-2009 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smittysbar (Post 5510791)
Your comparing a 22 year old to a 7 year old? :spock:

Believe it or not at 22 years of age, most can think for themselves. You can go to war at 18, become a cop at 21, but I am sure that he can't make the correct decision regarding HIS life at 22.

He is going in the first and possibly very high in the 1st, I think it would have been a mistake not to come out. I think Bradford made a mistake going back, but it's just my opinion.

Sorry. I was kind of a jerk there.

I think a junior that has played at least two full years is fine coming out. I think a junior that has only started one year at the QB position should go back.

I joined the Navy at 18. I thought I was doing what was 'best' for me. I then became a Deputy Sheriff at 22, because I thought I was doing what was 'best' for me. I got married at 22, again... thought it was best for me.

All of them were mistakes....and frankly, I think this is a mistake for him too.

But, that is jmho.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-20-2009 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5510766)
Which is why we've pilloried the spread monkeys coming out next year.

Nice try, you dumb ****.

That is just more rationalization for taking a QB THIS year.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-20-2009 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MWagg72 (Post 5510847)
Like I said what he felt it was best for him and his family. They could tell him to stay in school, but he did what he felt was right.

Also, the same way alot of athletes have girls do that same stuff. A backup sophomore can become a jr/sr starter. She would only get the money when he's going pro anyway. You would have to file charges after they hook up also you can't wait till he is the starter and go oh yeah 2 years ago he raped me.

He can do wrong, he is my 2nd best QB in the draft, but I feel he is still worth a #3 pick. IF he would happen to fall, it would be because of his limited experience not his ability, attitude/off field behavior, or anything else really.


Do you know that the girls mother is who called the police. Again, there is NO way that she can get money out of this. Now, it could be some other motive, but the money angle is BS.

She can't get money to not file charges if he won't have any for two years.

Rigodan 02-20-2009 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5511037)
That is just more rationalization for taking a QB THIS year.

I think the fact that Tyler Thigpen was our stater last year and that there are 2 QB's deemed worthy to be taken in the top 10 is enough rational for taking a qb this year.

For the record I would take Sanchez with the number one pick if we were in that position.

Kyle DeLexus 02-20-2009 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5511051)
Do you know that the girls mother is who called the police. Again, there is NO way that she can get money out of this. Now, it could be some other motive, but the money angle is BS.

She can't get money to not file charges if he won't have any for two years.

No I didn't know that, I've only heard about it vaguely and have not gotten all details. From what I have heard it sounded to me like a Kobe thing. From what I have heard, he was not charged with anything due to lack of evidence. The three witnesses, one of which was a friend of both Sanchez and the girl and another was Cushing, all supported Sanchez. Also, I saw that times were messed up her initial report said that the assault happened at 12:30, but Sanchez was still at the bar at this time. Then the reports said 1:30 when Sanchez was helping 2 other USC Students push their car, which had ran out of gas, to a parking stall.

The money thing is what I still see in this. Just because he didn't have the money she was looking for in 2006 doesn't mean a guy who was once regarded as the top high school QB in the country won't have money. It's like Sherron Collins was originally to pay around $75k to the girl that said he did the elevator stuff, when he was only a sophomore. She saw NBA dollars...even if he doesn't go to the NBA people still see it.

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-20-2009 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5510561)
I still don't think there was much talent around Bradford, and the differences in offensive systems between OU and USC don't matter.

Next year is going to be an epic quarterback class. Visions of '83.

1883, however. Like the Brooklyn Bridge stampede. I still can't believe that mother****er held.

ROFL

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5510564)
ROFLROFLROFL

He asked, and he received!

Quote:

Originally Posted by CanadaKC (Post 5510600)
If you read Don Banks this morning...Sanchez lovers will have a fit. He said he almost guarantees the Lions do NOT take a QB with their #1 overall pick...rather one of the top OT's. That means St Louis will probably take the other OT...leaving us drafting Stafford, Curry, or Sanchez...IMO. If Stafford is passed on by the Lions...he's going to us rather than Sanchez.

And I will have NO problem with that whatsoever. Just like a rational, knowledgeable football fan should.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5510625)
Of course they will. Because most of the people hoping that the Chiefs select Sanchez are so myopic in their analysis of the relative value of the quarterback position that there is no way that these same people could understand the positive qualities of Stafford and his allure to a franchise.

No way.

Those ****ing dumbshits, who when discussing the upside (note this word, those who like to misconstrue posts) of Stafford and Sanchez have been comparing the two to Elway and Aikman, will certainly shit themselves.

Excuse me while I go wipe. ****.

LMAO

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-20-2009 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MWagg72 (Post 5511181)
No I didn't know that, I've only heard about it vaguely and have not gotten all details. From what I have heard it sounded to me like a Kobe thing. From what I have heard, he was not charged with anything due to lack of evidence. The three witnesses, one of which was a friend of both Sanchez and the girl and another was Cushing, all supported Sanchez. Also, I saw that times were messed up her initial report said that the assault happened at 12:30, but Sanchez was still at the bar at this time. Then the reports said 1:30 when Sanchez was helping 2 other USC Students push their car, which had ran out of gas, to a parking stall.

The money thing is what I still see in this. Just because he didn't have the money she was looking for in 2006 doesn't mean a guy who was once regarded as the top high school QB in the country won't have money. It's like Sherron Collins was originally to pay around $75k to the girl that said he did the elevator stuff, when he was only a sophomore. She saw NBA dollars...even if he doesn't go to the NBA people still see it.

It's a bunch of ****ing bullshit. The guy didn't play in Blacksburg VA. for Christ's sake.

Pasta Little Brioni 02-20-2009 05:02 PM

Sanchez is not a "reach". Alot of people have him as a top 3 pick already and his combine will solidify that.

Kyle DeLexus 02-20-2009 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 5511252)
Sanchez is not a "reach". Alot of people have him as a top 3 pick already and his combine will solidify that.

Great opinion on the subject!

In my expert opinion, I agree with you.

I am an expert on this btw. I once was an assistant JH Football coach for a 3 year span. After seeing one kid play for just one full practice, I proclaimed "that kid's gonna be 6'5", 230lbs, and have a laser rocket arm." That particular kid had a little brother who would watch the practices and was kind of the team mascot. He was just a little tike then, but people sure loved him because of his big brother.

Pioli Zombie 02-20-2009 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MWagg72 (Post 5511321)
Great opinion on the subject!

In my expert opinion, I agree with you.

I am an expert on this btw. I once was an assistant JH Football coach for a 3 year span. After seeing one kid play for just one full practice, I proclaimed "that kid's gonna be 6'5", 230lbs, and have a laser rocket arm." That particular kid had a little brother who would watch the practices and was kind of the team mascot. He was just a little tike then, but people sure loved him because of his big brother.

what??

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-20-2009 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing (Post 5510930)
Off topic, but did anybody read about this kid Devin Moore? Showed some heart and love for the game today. Wyoming running back Devin Moore wasn’t invited to the Scouting Combine in Indianapolis.

So he held his own.

On Thursday, Moore performed in T-shirt and shorts for scouts who were in town for the much bigger party for which someone who isn’t good enough at scouting to get a scouting job with an NFL team deemed Moore to be unworthy to attend.

According to Gil Brandt of NFL.com and Sirius NFL Radio, representatives from 14 teams attended the workout.

Moore ran the 40-yard dash in 4.43 and 4.41 seconds. Per Brandt, the 4.41 would have been the fifth-fastest time at running back at last year’s Combine.

(That said, we haven’t seen or heard whether the times will be adjusted based on any possible differences between the surface on which Moore ran and the FieldTurf at Lucal Oil Stadium in Indy.)

Moore also jumped 35 inches vertically, 10 feet broadly, pressed 225 pounds 27 times, ran the short-shuttle in 4.22 and 4.29 seconds, and performed the three-cone drill in 7.14 seconds.

Since Moore resides in Indianapolis, he was permitted to arrange a workout there. Otherwise, he would have had to wait until the Wyoming Pro Day.

I don't understand this. He was a really productive player. He's a little small, but no smaller than a lot of other backs in the league. He'd be a great change of pace back for a team like the Giants.

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-20-2009 06:59 PM

Iglesias, you wonderful, wonderful young man:

Quote:

Oklahoma wide receiver Juagin Iglesias

Will spread offense work in NFL

“I don’t see it because I think in the NFL the defenses are too fast. It’s hard to get people like that in the NFL out of their zone. They’re disciplined they’re mature, they know what they’re doing. That’s the biggest thing in college is getting people out of their zone and get them uncomfortable and on their heels and in the NFL that doesn’t really happen much on defense.”

dirk digler 02-20-2009 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan (Post 5511454)
Iglesias, you wonderful, wonderful young man:

Apparently he didn't watch the AFC West D's this year :)

On the flip side Chase Daniels was on 610 this afternoon and he said in his informal interviews last night all the teams told him that in 1-2 years 80% of the teams in the NFL will be running some version of the spread offense as their primary offense.

Now they could be blowing smoke up his ass but that is what he was told.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-20-2009 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan (Post 5511454)
Iglesias, you wonderful, wonderful young man:

Reminds me of something...

9/22/08
Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5045826)
There is too much speed in the NFL for the spread option to work. You can run a strong nickel and put everyone in a short zone and you'll take away the QBs throwing lanes.


Earlier this week to Austin Chief

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5504678)
You don't understand the history of your argument is the problem.

The fact that an offense is en vogue in college does not mean it will be so in the NFL, hence the option.

Secondly, look up the defensive rankings of Big XII teams, or just look at how many legitimate NFL prospects are coming from Big XII defenses. You'll find almost none.

Finally, the spread works in college because there isn't enough speed on defense for the corners to adequately cover the field, even in a zone. That's not a problem in the NFL. Speed doesn't matter for a #2 WR in college in the spread because he's going to be running a short route against soft zone coverage against guys that run in the 4.6s and 4.7s who don't challenge their man. Think Tommie Saunders. Probably couldn't run a 4.8, but was a productive college #2.

A #2 WR in the NFL has to be able to beat press man coverage and run with guys that run a 4.4. There is a world of difference there.


Sweet Daddy Hate 02-20-2009 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5511460)
Apparently he didn't watch the AFC West D's this year :)

On the flip side Chase Daniels was on 610 this afternoon and he said in his informal interviews last night all the teams told him that in 1-2 years 80% of the teams in the NFL will be running some version of the spread offense as their primary offense.

Now they could be blowing smoke up his ass but that is what he was told.

I'd love it if they did! Smart teams will play REAL Offense, and the talent level at the QB position will be so stark and defined coming out of college, making a pick becomes that much easier.
Tearing apart those spread offenses at the pro level becomes that much easier.

VIVA LA STUPID! :D

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-20-2009 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5511463)
Reminds me of something...

9/22/08



Earlier this week to Austin Chief

You got it brother! :thumb::toast:

SAUTO 02-20-2009 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5511460)
Apparently he didn't watch the AFC West D's this year :)

On the flip side Chase Daniels was on 610 this afternoon and he said in his informal interviews last night all the teams told him that in 1-2 years 80% of the teams in the NFL will be running some version of the spread offense as their primary offense.

Now they could be blowing smoke up his ass but that is what he was told.


CANT be true. ask any of these "experts" here. thats a HS offense nothing more:D

Mecca 02-20-2009 07:24 PM

Why do people bring up the Sanchez arrest thing when it was completely thrown out? There was so little evidence it was laughed about...

That would be like if someone accused you of something the cops went jesus there's no evidence at all throw that shit out, and 3 years later people acted like you did it.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-20-2009 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5511506)
CANT be true. ask any of these "experts" here. thats a HS offense nothing more:D

Goddammit, Sauto, you will speak only when spoken to.

SAUTO 02-20-2009 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5511517)
Goddammit, Sauto, you will speak only when spoken to.

ROFL whatever

Mecca 02-20-2009 07:28 PM

I think it's funny to see people try to hold onto the spread like it's the future...isn't your college team doing it enough?

Kyle DeLexus 02-20-2009 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5511514)
Why do people bring up the Sanchez arrest thing when it was completely thrown out? There was so little evidence it was laughed about...

That would be like if someone accused you of something the cops went jesus there's no evidence at all throw that shit out, and 3 years later people acted like you did it.

I tried to tell him...they even said "by all means go ahead we are sure you will not find anything" when the DA wanted an extra week to try and find any evidence at all, IIRC.

Mecca 02-20-2009 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MWagg72 (Post 5511527)
I tried to tell him...they even said "by all means go ahead we are sure you will not find anything" when the DA wanted an extra week to try and find any evidence at all, IIRC.

Logic just doesn't apply, like the people who automatically assume he wasn't good enough to beat out Booty when it's been explained 500 times what happened, and then they act like it didn't happen.

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-20-2009 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5511517)
Goddammit, Sauto, you will speak only when spoken to.

LMAO

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5511533)
Logic just doesn't apply, like the people who automatically assume he wasn't good enough to beat out Booty when it's been explained 500 times what happened, and then they act like it didn't happen.

Mmm. The Peckerson Stockholm Syndrome has MANY faces, and all of them ugly as a two ruble Ukranian whore.

Mecca 02-20-2009 07:45 PM

I get really tired of having to explain the same shit everyday, it's like some posters have Alzheimer's.

Yet the same poster who doesn't like Sanchez jumps up and down because I said Crabtree isn't elite...

SAUTO 02-20-2009 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5511573)
I get really tired of having to explain the same shit everyday, it's like some posters have Alzheimer's.

Yet the same poster who doesn't like Sanchez jumps up and down because I said Crabtree isn't elite...

maybe some people just dont put too much stock in what you say

Mecca 02-20-2009 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5511585)
maybe some people just dont put too much stock in what you say

Or maybe they're stupid?

Isn't it ironic that most of the posters that don't like Sanchez love that short slow WR from the spread offense?

SAUTO 02-20-2009 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5511589)
Or maybe they're stupid?

Isn't it ironic that most of the posters that don't like Sanchez love that short slow WR from the spread offense?

short? 6'3" is short? slow? we dont know about that. he hasnt ran

Mecca 02-20-2009 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5511598)
short? 6'3" is short? slow? we dont know about that. he hasnt ran

He measured at 6'1 today pal, he isn't 6'3.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-20-2009 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5511598)
short? 6'3" is short? slow? we dont know about that. he hasnt ran

Look at this.
Look at how stupid you are.

SAUTO 02-20-2009 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5511605)
Look at this.
Look at how stupid you are.

why because EVERY site about crabtree has him at 6'3"? **** if he was measured today how the **** would i know? i actually work for a living

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-20-2009 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5511610)
why because EVERY site about crabtree has him at 6'3"? **** if he was measured today how the **** would i know? i actually work for a living

Schedule light Fridays.

SAUTO 02-20-2009 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5511614)
Schedule light Fridays.

cant. mondays set up the week, and fridays it seems as though EVERYONE needs something done. cant let that money walk somewhere else. people are creatures of habit. if they HAVE to have it done and i cant do it they will go somewhere else and next time probably call there first, at least thats what i tell myself when i'm cramming all that shit in on a friday:D moneys good though

SAUTO 02-20-2009 08:02 PM

see hamas maybe im not so stupid after all

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-20-2009 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5511614)
Schedule light Fridays.

LMAO

Skip Towne 02-20-2009 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5511626)
cant. mondays set up the week, and fridays it seems as though EVERYONE needs something done. cant let that money walk somewhere else. people are creatures of habit. if they HAVE to have it done and i cant do it they will go somewhere else and next time probably call there first, at least thats what i tell myself when i'm cramming all that shit in on a friday:D moneys good though

I agree. Don't ever force your customer to go to a competitor. Some of them will like him better.

Kyle DeLexus 02-20-2009 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skip Towne (Post 5511695)
I agree. Don't ever force your customer to go to a competitor. Some of them will like him better.

Write that down.

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-20-2009 08:31 PM

I find myself contemplating what "warm and fuzzy" customer service from Skip Towne must be like.

ohiobronco2 02-20-2009 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5511614)
Schedule light Fridays.

ROFL

milkman 02-21-2009 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CanadaKC (Post 5510600)
If you read Don Banks this morning...Sanchez lovers will have a fit. He said he almost guarantees the Lions do NOT take a QB with their #1 overall pick...rather one of the top OT's. That means St Louis will probably take the other OT...leaving us drafting Stafford, Curry, or Sanchez...IMO. If Stafford is passed on by the Lions...he's going to us rather than Sanchez.

I can only speculate, but I'm betting that even if Stafford is sitting there with Sanchez, and Pioli pulls the trigger on a QB, he will take Sanchez.

Stafford is more physically gifted, by only by a small margin, but Sanchez brings more in terms of intangibles.

milkman 02-21-2009 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rigodan (Post 5511097)
I think the fact that Tyler Thigpen was our stater last year and that there are 2 QB's deemed worthy to be taken in the top 10 is enough rational for taking a qb this year.

For the record I would take Sanchez with the number one pick if we were in that position.

I would, as well.

milkman 02-21-2009 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5510295)
Didn't he miss three weeks of practice?

Frankly, the more I learn about the guy... I am beginning to think he is a head case.

I initially liked the idea that he was going to throw at the combine.

Now, I think he may be a little too arrogant.

I am sure you know about his arrest, I think in his redshirt Sophomore year because the girl said no and he wasn't hearing it.

Now, he has one good year in college and Pete Carroll tells him he should stay in school and he's not hearing it.

Just have to wonder if he thinks he knows better than everyone else, and has this self titled attitude.

Don't need that on this team.

I was really hoping to find out more about him and get sold on him.... nothing so far.

Misnomer much?

Ultra Peanut 02-21-2009 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5509841)
Okay, I have been critical of this kid from the start.

All the more reason to believe Sanchez is all of that and a bag of potato chips.

Ultra Peanut 02-21-2009 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefRon (Post 5510147)
However, why don't scouts rate intangibles and intelligence as premier qualities?

Because the biggest intangible -- can this guy handle being an NFL quarterback? -- is absolutely impossible to measure, no matter how many times you interview someone or watch him play.

Danman 02-21-2009 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5512555)
I can only speculate, but I'm betting that even if Stafford is sitting there with Sanchez, and Pioli pulls the trigger on a QB, he will take Sanchez.

Stafford is more physically gifted, by only by a small margin, but Sanchez brings more in terms of intangibles.

I can live with that. I like Sanchez better too. I'd be happy with Stafford though. Either way and I'd feel we got good value for the #3 pick.

Coogs 02-21-2009 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danman (Post 5512602)
I can live with that. I like Sanchez better too. I'd be happy with Stafford though. Either way and I'd feel we got good value for the #3 pick.

I really hope we have the option to pick either one of these guys. Right now, the Saturday morning of the combine, I prefer Stafford slightly to Sanchez. But either one is fine by me.

milkman 02-21-2009 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut (Post 5512589)
Because the biggest intangible -- can this guy handle being an NFL quarterback? -- is absolutely impossible to measure, no matter how many times you interview someone or watch him play.

While that's true, one can get a sense of an individual's mental toughness from watching him play, interacting with teammates, how he handles pressure in the pocket, and how he handles himself under scrutiny from the media, as well as how he interviews.

The level of comfort and confidence that Sanchez displays in these situations gives one a feeling that he is more mature and better equipped emotionally to make the transition.

Dave Lane 02-21-2009 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soundmind (Post 5510080)
I have the sneakiest feeling he's going to work his way into being seriously considered at #3 overall...but a big piece of the Pioli/Haley ideal seems to be toughness and team-oriented.

What little I've seen him in interview scenarios, he's seems confident, but sometimes to the point of arrogant...they say the biggest part of the combine is actually the interview processes and tests - that may be where he seals his deal with us or not.

You want a QB to have that much confidence. Everyone I have ever seen that succeeded greatly had extremely high confidence.

Ultra Peanut 02-21-2009 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5512658)
While that's true, one can get a sense of an individual's mental toughness from watching him play, interacting with teammates, how he handles pressure in the pocket, and how he handles himself under scrutiny from the media, as well as how he interviews.

The level of comfort and confidence that Sanchez displays in these situations gives one a feeling that he is more mature and better equipped emotionally to make the transition.

I agree about Sanchez, but then, I was also enamored with Joey Harrington's intangibles.

I guess what I'm saying is that there's a reason why they're called that.

milkman 02-21-2009 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut (Post 5513003)
I agree about Sanchez, but then, I was also enamored with Joey Harrington's intangibles.

I guess what I'm saying is that there's a reason why they're called that.

My memory is hazy, but I think that Harrington played in a spread, and as we've seen, those guys don't transition all that well to the NFL.

I also liked Harrington's intangibles, but he's a guy that should have sat and learned and worked on his mechanics for a couple of years before he was thrown out there.

I also thought that he was a system specific QB, and the Lions offense was a bad fit.

The one thing I didn't really see in Harrington was maturity

I think all these things worked to stunt his development, and he has never recovered.

melbar 02-21-2009 02:15 PM

I think the big thing with both these guys is how will they be handled by the staff. Guys like Harrington may have had more success with a better team and better coaching. Harringtons confidence was destroyed by year 3. How the coaches bring them along will be immense. Every guy will react differently and need different things from their coaches in transitioning to the NFL. Archie Manning got his a-- kicked repeatidly and kept coming. If we dont pass block well we better have more 3 step drops and quick passes to help out. If they arent ready we cant push em either.

melbar 02-21-2009 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5513028)
My memory is hazy, but I think that Harrington played in a spread, and as we've seen, those guys don't transition all that well to the NFL.

I also liked Harrington's intangibles, but he's a guy that should have sat and learned and worked on his mechanics for a couple of years before he was thrown out there.

I also thought that he was a system specific QB, and the Lions offense was a bad fit.

The one thing I didn't really see in Harrington was maturity

I think all these things worked to stunt his development, and he has never recovered.

Yes...said much better than my rambling...

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-21-2009 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5512559)
I would, as well.

I'd wager the gist of today's interview, on the non-playing side, was something to this effect:

"We're looking for a guy who can not only learn the job at the professional level and take direction well, but someone who can be a leader quickly and is prepared to call Kansas City home for a long time to come".

"Can you do this"?

:shrug:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.