ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft What the hell is wrong with Denver? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=206630)

Quesadilla Joe 04-25-2009 05:54 PM

WHAT THE ****?

kstater 04-25-2009 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cutler7624 (Post 5709053)
WHAT THE ****?

LMAO

FD 04-25-2009 05:55 PM

Did they trade their first or chicago's?

At this rate theirs might be top ten.

beer bacon 04-25-2009 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cutler7624 (Post 5709053)
WHAT THE ****?

You guys got two of the draft's top five players. Now you have a 5'9 4.60 forty CB, and all you had to do was trade a 1st round draft pick. Nice!

Mr. Krab 04-25-2009 05:56 PM

Did Denver just trade their 1st round pick for the stronger draft next year for a 2nd round pick this year? :eek:

CrazyPhuD 04-25-2009 05:56 PM

awesome trade for the seahawks. This year's second for the likely no 1 overall next year.

Chiefs=Champions 04-25-2009 05:58 PM

HAR HAR HARRRR

Miles 04-25-2009 05:59 PM

Pretty big WTF move from Denver. Any word on which one of their 1st next year?

the Talking Can 04-25-2009 06:04 PM

seattle just raped Denver

that can easily be a top 15 pick in the 1st next year


holy shit

wild1 04-25-2009 06:09 PM

denver raped themselves getting that safety for a first round pick next year

Shaid 04-25-2009 06:18 PM

<object width="504" height="440"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allownetworking" value="all" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="flashvars" value="config=http://www.fandome.com/xml/jwConfig.php?vid=75116%26width%3D504%26height%3D440&autostart=true" /><param name="src" value="http://flash.fandome.com/sportsbox.swf" /><embed src="http://flash.fandome.com/sportsbox.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" id="videoId" name="videoId" allowscriptaccess="always" allownetworking="all" quality="high" allowfullscreen="true" wmode ="transparent" width="504" height="440" flashvars="config=http://www.fandome.com/xml/jwConfig.php?vid=75116%26width%3D504%26height%3D440&autostart=true"></embed></object><div><a href="http://www.fandome.com" title="Sports Videos, News, Blogs"><img src="http://www.fandome.com/img/poweredBy.png" style="border:none;" alt="Sports Videos, News, Blogs" /></a></div>

Quesadilla Joe 04-25-2009 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Miles (Post 5709114)
Pretty big WTF move from Denver. Any word on which one of their 1st next year?

Broncos coach Josh McDaniels said earlier in the afternoon that he would trade up in the second round if a "valuable" player was available.

He wasn't kidding. McDaniels dealt the 2010 first-round pick obtained from Chicago in the Jay Cutler deal to nab Alphonso Smith, an all-American cornerback from Wake Forest, at No. 37.

The Broncos retained their original second-round pick, No. 48 overall.

Smith intercepted 21 passes during his four-year college career, including eight in 2007 and seven in 2008.
http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_12228231

Mr. Arrowhead 04-25-2009 06:24 PM

LMAO

wild1 04-25-2009 06:24 PM

So for Jay Culter they got Ayers and a 5'9" cornerback?

Garcia Bronco 04-25-2009 06:24 PM

gay trade. gay front office.

Basileus777 04-25-2009 06:24 PM

ROFL @ Denver. Did they really give up a potential top 10 pick for Alphonso Smith?

Quesadilla Joe 04-25-2009 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wild1 (Post 5709313)
So for Jay Culter they got Ayers and a 5'9" cornerback?

apparently that + Orton + a 3rd round pick.

I didn't like the trade from the get go, but now I am starting to hate it.

Orton better be the next Tom Brady.:mad:

htismaqe 04-25-2009 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denver Dave (Post 5708648)
They should have taken Orkapo at 12 and Maclin at 18.

Uh, I'd rather have the two guys you got.

DaFace 04-25-2009 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Basileus777 (Post 5709320)
ROFL @ Denver. Did they really give up a potential top 10 pick for Alphonso Smith?

Well, it was the Bears' pick next year, so it'll probably be a mid- to low-first.

DaFace 04-25-2009 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 5709318)
gay trade. gay front office.

We left just before the fun started apparently.

Garcia Bronco 04-25-2009 06:31 PM

You are never going to be able to take all those players and draft picks and say it'll match what Cutler can bring to the table. At best you could equal the value.

Denver Dave 04-25-2009 06:32 PM

:grovel: 1-15 :grovel:

Garcia Bronco 04-25-2009 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 5709379)
We left just before the fun started apparently.


Apparently

DaFace 04-25-2009 06:45 PM

So Denver has now spent 3 1sts and a 2nd on a RB, DE, CB, and S. :hmmm:

I guess that might help them out, but I'm really surprised that they didn't focus more on a pass rusher.

orange 04-25-2009 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 5709532)
So Denver has now spent 3 1sts and a 2nd on a RB, DE, CB, and S. :hmmm:

I guess that might help them out, but I'm really surprised that they didn't focus more on a pass rusher.

Who? I don't think any of the pass rushers are at all impressive this year.

Or the Chiefs would have drafted one.

Garcia Bronco 04-25-2009 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 5709532)
So Denver has now spent 3 1sts and a 2nd on a RB, DE, CB, and S. :hmmm:

I guess that might help them out, but I'm really surprised that they didn't focus more on a pass rusher.

We have as many Linebackers as Runningbacks. The FO and coach feel like we have enough.

DaFace 04-25-2009 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 5709567)
We have as many Linebackers as Runningbacks. The FO and coach feel like we have enough.

Quantity over quality I guess.

htismaqe 04-25-2009 06:56 PM

Wow.

Gotta wonder what the Broncos are thinking.

It could be worse though - the Raiders 2nd-round pick doesn't even have a profile on NFL.com. ROFL

Garcia Bronco 04-25-2009 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 5709577)
Quantity over quality I guess.

Yeah. I have concludedfrom a defensive perspective they want more vets than rookies at this point. They have stated we'll be playing a 4-3 and a 3-4 this year,

gcbroncos 04-25-2009 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 5709532)
So Denver has now spent 3 1sts and a 2nd on a RB, DE, CB, and S. :hmmm:

I guess that might help them out, but I'm really surprised that they didn't focus more on a pass rusher.

well that's what Ayers is for...he will edge rush along with Dumerville on the other side...

between the two of them i like our pass rush...

what i don't get is our lack of d-line help (esp NT)...

we didn't get Raji and we didnt get Brace...not sure what thats all about...

Garcia Bronco 04-25-2009 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gcbroncos (Post 5709872)
well that's what Ayers is for...he will edge rush along with Dumerville on the other side...

between the two of them i like our pass rush...

what i don't get is our lack of d-line help (esp NT)...

we didn't get Raji and we didnt get Brace...not sure what thats all about...

Powell, Thomas, and Fields are going in and out of that spot I guess.

gcbroncos 04-25-2009 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 5709894)
Powell, Thomas, and Fields are going in and out of that spot I guess.

yea i guess...

as expected...it's full meltdown mode at the Mane...

wild1 04-25-2009 07:50 PM

Denver traded up again!

wild1 04-25-2009 07:54 PM

Broncos traded up to get Richard Quinn, a blocking tight end

Ultra Peanut 04-25-2009 07:56 PM

Wow. After that appalling display of inept drafting, I'm pretty happy with our one unavoidable reach.

Mecca 04-25-2009 07:57 PM

Denvers draft is balls.

BigRock 04-25-2009 07:58 PM

I LOVE DENVER

chiefs1111 04-25-2009 07:59 PM

what in the hell was Denver thinking today

Spicy McHaggis 04-25-2009 08:01 PM

Man, after watching Denver and Oakland draft I feel way better about the Chiefs divisional chances the next few years.

Garcia Bronco 04-25-2009 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spicy McHaggis (Post 5710160)
Man, after watching Denver and Oakland draft I feel way better about the Chiefs divisional chances the next few years.

Ayers and Moreno are good picks. Quinn is a nice pick. Think Jason Dunn.

I think we traded our 1st next year to get the CB wanted and because we need to ditch that pick next year because of the cost.

rad 04-25-2009 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 5710188)
Ayers and Moreno are good picks. Quinn is a nice pick. Think Jason Dunn.

I think we traded our 1st next year to get the CB wanted and because we need to ditch that pick next year because of the cost.

(snort)

Mecca 04-25-2009 08:09 PM

What position is Robert Ayers in a 3-4?

Spicy McHaggis 04-25-2009 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 5710188)
Ayers and Moreno are good picks. Quinn is a nice pick. Think Jason Dunn.

I think we traded our 1st next year to get the CB wanted and because we need to ditch that pick next year because of the cost.

I'll concede the Moreno pick. I think he was the #1 RB in this draft and I think he'll excel in Denver. However, I'm not a fan of taking Ayers in the first round whatsoever. And I don't believe trading back into the 2nd round for a TE that was primarily a blocker in college is a sound strategy.

Miles 04-25-2009 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 5710188)
Quinn is a nice pick. Think Jason Dunn.

Great so they just traded up to draft a Danial Graham type when they are already paying Graham roughly 6M per year.

gcbroncos 04-25-2009 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spicy McHaggis (Post 5710221)
I'll concede the Moreno pick. I think he was the #1 RB in this draft and I think he'll excel in Denver. However, I'm not a fan of taking Ayers in the first round whatsoever. And I don't believe trading back into the 2nd round for a TE that was primarily a blocker in college is a sound strategy.

Ayers is a stud and projected in some Mocks to go much earlier than #18...

but i can't argue the rest of your points..

after the 1st round, Denver really put out some head scratchers to me...

Mecca 04-25-2009 08:17 PM

I like Moreno but Ayers is out of position in the 3-4 and the rest of those picks are really questionable.

BigRock 04-25-2009 08:21 PM

So... Denver turned Jay Cutler into Ayres, a 2nd round CB, and a blocking TE. What?

AND they gave away *their* 1st-round pick next year, not Chicago's.

I LOVE DENVER

orange 04-25-2009 08:21 PM

They are people McDaniels and Xanders liked, and they made moves to get them.

They didn't consult the fans who've been reading mock drafts all year - so sorry. If they had, they might have gotten a great bargain like Rey Maualuga (#38) at #12.


LMAO

Basileus777 04-25-2009 08:21 PM

That Alphonso Smith trade is easily the worst move of the day. They gave up what is likely a top 10 pick for #37. ****ing awful.

Mr. Arrowhead 04-25-2009 08:22 PM

Ayers is a Turk Mcbride Clone

Mecca 04-25-2009 08:22 PM

Josh McDaniels is Eric Mangini junior.

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 04-25-2009 08:23 PM

I would never think Jason Dunn as a 2nd rounder....FWIW

Miles 04-25-2009 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRock (Post 5710271)
So... Denver turned Jay Cutler into Ayres, a 2nd round CB, and a blocking TE. What?

AND they gave away *their* 1st-round pick next year, not Chicago's.

I LOVE DENVER

Any conformation that it's their 1st? If so that's a pretty ****ing brutal price for that 2nd rounder this year.

Delano 04-25-2009 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Miles (Post 5710286)
Any conformation that it's their 1st? If so that's a pretty ****ing brutal price for that 2nd rounder this year.

Yeah. NFLN reported it was their natural 2010 first rounder.

orange 04-25-2009 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRock (Post 5710271)
So... Denver turned Jay Cutler into Ayres, a 2nd round CB, and a blocking TE. What?

AND they gave away *their* 1st-round pick next year, not Chicago's.

I LOVE DENVER

Quote:

Originally Posted by Basileus777 (Post 5710273)
That Alphonso Smith trade is easily the worst move of the day. They gave up what is likely a top 10 pick for #37. ****ing awful.

I'll bet McDaniels thinks that's going to be a pick in the 25+ range.

Delano 04-25-2009 08:25 PM

The draft value chart says Denver lost 55 pts in the trade for Quinn.

Mecca 04-25-2009 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5710296)
I'll bet McDaniels thinks that's going to be a pick in the 25+ range.

And he would be out of his ****ing mind.

BigRock 04-25-2009 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lemon_Pie (Post 5710283)
I would never think Jason Dunn as a 2nd rounder....FWIW

He actually was a 2nd rounder in Philly. But that was when he was more of a pass catcher. The blocking Dunn we know and love came later, after his knees were shot.

orange 04-25-2009 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5710302)
And he would be out of his ****ing mind.

Because NFL teams routinely hire coaches who don't expect to improve their teams.

In Mecca world.

Miles 04-25-2009 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Delano (Post 5710293)
Yeah. NFLN reported it was their natural 2010 first rounder.

Thanks.

kstater 04-25-2009 08:28 PM

Any word on what they gave up to get the last trade? The TE I believe.

orange 04-25-2009 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 5710318)
Any word on what they gave up to get the last trade? The TE I believe.

Their two third-rounders.

kstater 04-25-2009 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5710310)
Because NFL teams routinely hire coaches who don't expect to improve their teams.

In Mecca world.

I'd think he's smoking crack if he thinks they'll improve to roughly a top 3 AFC Team.

Mecca 04-25-2009 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5710310)
Because NFL teams routinely hire coaches who don't expect to improve their teams.

In Mecca world.

Call it what you want but you should be realistic in making moves.

kstater 04-25-2009 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5710319)
Their two third-rounders.

*snicker*

Pitt Gorilla 04-25-2009 08:33 PM

A blocking TE? Seriously?!?

Garcia Bronco 04-25-2009 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Miles (Post 5710224)
Great so they just traded up to draft a Danial Graham type when they are already paying Graham roughly 6M per year.

We are going to a full on 3 wide receiver set. We'll use two blocking TE's probably more than anything.

Delano 04-25-2009 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 5710329)
*snicker*

Don't laugh too hard, Denver SWINDLED the 132nd pick. Genious move. They really made out like bandits there.

A blocking TE and the last pick in the fifth round for two third rounders.

LMAO

Garcia Bronco 04-25-2009 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5710253)
I like Moreno but Ayers is out of position in the 3-4 and the rest of those picks are really questionable.

Not as a Joker. Which is where I think he'll end up.

Garcia Bronco 04-25-2009 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRock (Post 5710271)
So... Denver turned Jay Cutler into Ayres, a 2nd round CB, and a blocking TE. What?

AND they gave away *their* 1st-round pick next year, not Chicago's.

I LOVE DENVER

We can't afford it. That's the only benefit from it.

kstater 04-25-2009 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Delano (Post 5710342)
Don't laugh too hard, Denver SWINDLED the 132nd pick. Genious move. They really made out like bandits there.

A blocking TE and the last pick in the fifth round for two third rounders.

LMAO

Just think, they could have used one of those 3rd rounders on a flier for Nate Davis, you know, someday replace Kyle Orton. Oh well, they could use next years first on McCoy.

Garcia Bronco 04-25-2009 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lemon_Pie (Post 5710283)
I would never think Jason Dunn as a 2nd rounder....FWIW

That dude was integral to the running game success with Holmes and LJ.

Garcia Bronco 04-25-2009 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5710296)
I'll bet McDaniels thinks that's going to be a pick in the 25+ range.

It's probably a top 10 pick. At least top 15. Our schedule is brutal.

Delano 04-25-2009 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 5710358)
It's probably a top 10 pick. At least top 15. Our schedule is brutal.

Were you at Rain Man's party? If so, did he laugh at the Broncos fans? :D

Garcia Bronco 04-25-2009 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Delano (Post 5710360)
Were you at Rain Man's party? If so, did he laugh at the Broncos fans? :D

We had a good time. Rain Man was a great host.

RINGLEADER 04-25-2009 08:42 PM

I haven't read this thread so sorry if it's a repost but I just saw McDaniels on television talking about their picks. This guy looks, sounds, and acts completely and utterly clueless. If the Broncos face ANY adversity this year he's going to lose this team, lose them quickly, and lose them completely.

And I'll love every second of it.

If I was a Bronco fan I'd be pissed -- especially punting next year's first because if they aren't able to get over the hump that is very likely to grow through the season they're going to see their top 5 pick being used by someone else.

From launching Cutler to using first round picks on second round corners, this guy is a REALLY EPIC FAIL.

htismaqe 04-25-2009 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RINGLEADER (Post 5710380)
I haven't read this thread so sorry if it's a repost but I just saw McDaniels on television talking about their picks. This guy looks, sounds, and acts completely and utterly clueless. If the Broncos face ANY adversity this year he's going to lose this team, lose them quickly, and lose them completely.

And I'll love every second of it.

If I was a Bronco fan I'd be pissed -- especially punting next year's first because if they aren't able to get over the hump that is very likely to grow through the season they're going to see their top 5 pick being used by someone else.

From launching Cutler to using first round picks on second round corners, this guy is a REALLY EPIC FAIL.

Man, my wife was sitting there saying "who is that high school kid talking about the Broncos?" ROFL

Pitt Gorilla 04-25-2009 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RINGLEADER (Post 5710380)
I haven't read this thread so sorry if it's a repost but I just saw McDaniels on television talking about their picks. This guy looks, sounds, and acts completely and utterly clueless. If the Broncos face ANY adversity this year he's going to lose this team, lose them quickly, and lose them completely.

And I'll love every second of it.

If I was a Bronco fan I'd be pissed -- especially punting next year's first because if they aren't able to get over the hump that is very likely to grow through the season they're going to see their top 5 pick being used by someone else.

From launching Cutler to using first round picks on second round corners, this guy is a REALLY EPIC FAIL.

I've been enjoying reading the Donx fans' justifications for their craptastic draft. One guy was arguing that it was ok to trade away what could be a top 5-10 pick next year because first round QBs (like Bradford) never work out. Of course, Denver just jettisoned a talented QB to create this little problem. Awesome.

orange 04-25-2009 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5710296)
I'll bet McDaniels thinks that's going to be a pick in the 25+ range.


Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 5710323)
I'd think he's smoking crack if he thinks they'll improve to roughly a top 3 AFC Team.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5710325)
Call it what you want but you should be realistic in making moves.



FYI of the eight teams who earned draft selections 25 - 32 in 2008, five improved by three games or more - which is what the Broncos would need to do to crack that barrier:

Tennessee 10 - 6 -> 13 - 3
Carolina 7 - 9 -> 12 - 4
Atlanta 4 - 12 -> 11 - 5
Baltimore 5 - 11 -> 11 - 5
Miami 1 - 15 -> 11 - 5

Unrealistic? Actually, it's better than 50/50.



Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 5710358)
It's probably a top 10 pick. At least top 15. Our schedule is brutal.

Improve your team and win games - screw the schedule. Those last four teams above looked like breaks on everyones' schedule at this time last year.

htismaqe 04-25-2009 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5710433)
Improve your team and win games - screw the schedule. Those last four teams above looked like breaks on everyones' schedule at this time last year.

I think the whole schedule thing is BS anyway. Every year, team's that look like pushovers make the playoffs and teams that look like world-beaters go 3-13.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.