ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football ESPN's frontpage "Rumor: Pioli to Grab Another Star for Chiefs" (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=206957)

htismaqe 04-29-2009 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho (Post 5727307)
Well, if we need depth we should just sign some RFAs because, collectively on the Dline, we have two guys drafted in the 1st round, one guy drafted in the 2nd round and two guys drafted in the third round. I know we were beyond awful last year and I know we are going to a new defensive scheme but I would really prefer to at least see these guys in the new scheme with the new coaches before I give up on any of them.

Taylor wouldn't provide depth at DE unless we were running a 4-3. He's ALMOST undersized for the 4-3, let alone the 3-4.

We need rush linebackers and that's what he would play here.

htismaqe 04-29-2009 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho (Post 5727289)
Ah. Well in either case I wouldn't be too terribly interested. The one thing I liked about Herm's tenure was the youth movement. Of course, Herm effed it up by going to an extreme but Pioli has taken us somewhat back to center with some vet signings. Overall, I would still prefer to sign guys that will still be contributing 3 or 4 or 5 years from now.

This isn't like what Carl did. We're not signing 31-year old guys with the hope that they'll play 4 or 5 more years. We're signing 35-year old guys with the idea that they'll play THIS YEAR until we have a chance to get another draft under our belt.

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-29-2009 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5727393)
This isn't like what Carl did. We're not signing 31-year old guys with the hope that they'll play 4 or 5 more years. We're signing 35-year old guys with the idea that they'll play THIS YEAR until we have a chance to get another draft under our belt.

This!

ILChief 04-29-2009 08:44 PM

so no one has ESPN insider and feeling generous?

RedThat 04-29-2009 08:47 PM

I'd take Jason taylor. I still think he's got game.

soundmind 04-29-2009 09:02 PM

Julius Peppers would cost us picks, I say fuck that.

Jason Taylor is a dancer, a prancer, and a Madonna fan club member. While both can obviously make a dent on defense, I'd hesitate on either one for various reasons.

As long as whoever we bring in is playing for the Chiefs and not themselves, I'm good with it...

blazzin311 04-29-2009 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILChief (Post 5727451)
so no one has ESPN insider and feeling generous?

Might want to check page 2 of this thread. The info on ESPN insider was already posted there.

gta0012 04-29-2009 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5727393)
This isn't like what Carl did. We're not signing 31-year old guys with the hope that they'll play 4 or 5 more years. We're signing 35-year old guys with the idea that they'll play THIS YEAR until we have a chance to get another draft under our belt.


Agreed. We signed Vets to positions we needed help with. They bring Leadership to the team and can help school the youth movement. Next year or so we draft those positions.

KCrockaholic 04-29-2009 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5727393)
This isn't like what Carl did. We're not signing 31-year old guys with the hope that they'll play 4 or 5 more years. We're signing 35-year old guys with the idea that they'll play THIS YEAR until we have a chance to get another draft under our belt.

I agree completely. Ive noticed this same trend and feeling. I like it though. I think it will work in the long run.

Red Beans 04-30-2009 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5727393)
This isn't like what Carl did. We're not signing 31-year old guys with the hope that they'll play 4 or 5 more years. We're signing 35-year old guys with the idea that they'll play THIS YEAR until we have a chance to get another draft under our belt.

This is so true, we'll be drafting some linebackers too. Realistically we may only have Vrabel on the roster after this season. DJ might not be resigned is he eats the cat shit this year, and unless we find a gem in some of those undrafted FA's our linebackers could be the area of concern. On a side note, I think there may be a chance this star is a linebacker...who knows ESPN could be blowin' smoke...

TheGuardian 04-30-2009 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5727383)
Taylor wouldn't provide depth at DE unless we were running a 4-3. He's ALMOST undersized for the 4-3, let alone the 3-4.

We need rush linebackers and that's what he would play here.

And we will be running some 4-3.

I've already proven that we're not running a true 3-4 scheme, and the fact is we will still be running a lot of 4-3 formations. What do you think we're going to be in in nickel and dime packages most of the time? A 40 front with 4 down linemen. And now teams run 3 wide so much that you end up in nickel about 45% of the time.

DMAC 04-30-2009 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILChief (Post 5727451)
so no one has ESPN insider and feeling generous?

It's Edge.

htismaqe 04-30-2009 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 5728032)
And we will be running some 4-3.

I've already proven that we're not running a true 3-4 scheme, and the fact is we will still be running a lot of 4-3 formations. What do you think we're going to be in in nickel and dime packages most of the time? A 40 front with 4 down linemen. And now teams run 3 wide so much that you end up in nickel about 45% of the time.

I appreciate the input and amount of detail you've put into all of this. I really do.

But if you want to be respected around here, it might be best to stop with the condescending tone.

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-30-2009 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DMAC (Post 5728076)
It's Edge.

****......That.

Chiefnj2 04-30-2009 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 5728032)
And we will be running some 4-3.

I've already proven that we're not running a true 3-4 scheme, and the fact is we will still be running a lot of 4-3 formations. What do you think we're going to be in in nickel and dime packages most of the time? A 40 front with 4 down linemen. And now teams run 3 wide so much that you end up in nickel about 45% of the time.

How have you "proven" they will not run a true 3-4 scheme other than say Clancy doesn't have the experience with it?

htismaqe 04-30-2009 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5728226)
How have you "proven" they will not run a true 3-4 scheme other than say Clancy doesn't have the experience with it?

Clancy DOES have experience with it. So does Gary Gibbs.

TheGuardian 04-30-2009 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5728240)
Clancy DOES have experience with it. So does Gary Gibbs.

Clancy does not. He has never run a 3-4 two gap front as a defensive coordinator and one of the reasons that Whiz let him go in Zona was because he wanted to get someone who runs a two gap 3-4. Gary Gibbs also ran a 4-3 with the Saints, not a 3-4. And this wasn't by request of Sean Payton, who is also a Parcell's descendant.

Basically you guys keep going back to the fact that you think we are going to run a two gap 3-4 but you haven't shown a thing that points to that, other than Haley being a Parcell's guy and Pioli being in New England. If they wanted to run a true 3-4 that bad, they would have hired TRUE 3-4 guys. They didn't. They hired guys that have run fronts that are SIMILAR to 3-4 fronts, but run in 1 gap schemes. And that's a fact. So until you have something tangible that points to us going to a 3-4 two gap front maybe it's best to stop talking about it like it's fact.

htismaqe 04-30-2009 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 5728426)
Clancy does not. He has never run a 3-4 two gap front as a defensive coordinator and one of the reasons that Whiz let him go in Zona was because he wanted to get someone who runs a two gap 3-4. Gary Gibbs also ran a 4-3 with the Saints, not a 3-4. And this wasn't by request of Sean Payton, who is also a Parcell's descendant.

I didn't say either of them had experience with the 3-4 as a COORDINATOR. Both of them, especially Gibbs, have 3-4 experience as position coaches or graduate assitants for college teams.

The big knock on Gibbs with the fans in New Orleans was that his background was almost exclusively 3-4 prior to joining the team. And he was a key member of the 2005 Cowboys coaching staff transitioning them from 4-3 to 3-4.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 5728426)
Basically you guys keep going back to the fact that you think we are going to run a two gap 3-4 but you haven't shown a thing that points to that, other than Haley being a Parcell's guy and Pioli being in New England. If they wanted to run a true 3-4 that bad, they would have hired TRUE 3-4 guys. They didn't. They hired guys that have run fronts that are SIMILAR to 3-4 fronts, but run in 1 gap schemes. And that's a fact. So until you have something tangible that points to us going to a 3-4 two gap front maybe it's best to stop talking about it like it's fact.

I haven't said a word about gap assignments. I'm talking about 30 fronts vs. 40 fronts. The two ARE NOT inclusive. It's too bad the rest of us can't be up to your level of football acumen.

Jethopper 04-30-2009 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5727383)
Taylor wouldn't provide depth at DE unless we were running a 4-3. He's ALMOST undersized for the 4-3, let alone the 3-4.

We need rush linebackers and that's what he would play here.

Too tall.

TheGuardian 04-30-2009 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5728509)
I didn't say either of them had experience with the 3-4 as a COORDINATOR. Both of them, especially Gibbs, have 3-4 experience as position coaches or graduate assitants for college teams.

The big knock on Gibbs with the fans in New Orleans was that his background was almost exclusively 3-4 prior to joining the team. And he was a key member of the 2005 Cowboys coaching staff transitioning them from 4-3 to 3-4.

He ran a 4-3 at LSU in 01.

When Gibbs got to Dallas in 02 they ran a 4-3. They didn't start making the transition until the 05 draft when they took Marcus Spears. Gibbs took over in New Orleans in 06.

Maybe it's best you know what you are talking about before you post this stuff.


Quote:

I haven't said a word about gap assignments. I'm talking about 30 fronts vs. 40 fronts. The two ARE NOT inclusive. It's too bad the rest of us can't be up to your level of football acumen.
When I'm talking about going to a 3-4, I'm talking about two gap 30 front defense. That is the 3-4 the Steelers run. We are NOT going to run that. We will run a hybrid 3-4 with a stand up end, no different than what the Cards ran last year. It IS NOT a true 3-4.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.