ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs sign Mike Brown (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=209502)

MOhillbilly 06-24-2009 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5861043)
Are you telling me you'd rather have a guy who sucks (Pollard) then a guy who only plays half the games but makes plays (Brown)?

risk(money) - reward(playingtime) he is an upgrade aslong as he can play.
black and white sides to this coin.

RedThat 06-24-2009 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5861021)
As I said earlier, if he contributes, GREAT!

But expecting him to beat out the incumbent starter and have a Pro-Bowl like season after missing 44 games over the past 5 seasons (not including the playoffs) is tenuous at best.

Especially at age 31.

if Mike Brown stays healthy, I assure you he is going to be a starter.

Never said he was going to have a probowl like season quit putting words in my mouth.

ToxSocks 06-24-2009 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5860981)
You don't know what you're talking about. He played 15 games last season. He'll make more of a contribution then Bernard Pollard will. Pollard has proven he's not a good safety. Mike Brown is a play maker.

Skeeeert! Stop right there. If Mike Brown didn't have such obvious injury concerns, he would've been picked up already. Just because he ALMOST completed a whole season last year does not make him durable, and god knows what his injuries have done to his speed, and he was never fast in the first place. He will NOT replace Pollard. If anything, he may replace page on obvious running situations. He's just another role player until he can prove otherwise.

MOhillbilly 06-24-2009 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5861055)
Uh, times are different now, Champ.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...oks/index.html


"I'll tell you the real reason,'' his friend Warren Sapp said over the weekend. "Because it's not the same for the veterans anymore. The NFL doesn't need us. In this NFL, the old vets don't factor in. The kids don't listen to nobody. Nobody! My last year in Oakland, I'd try to talk to some of the kids. Tommy Kelly, Terdell Sands. But they had no interest. I thought the ghosts in that building were so valuable, but none of the young guys cared. Once in a while, one of the old legends would come in the building, or make a trip. Jack Tatum would be around, and I'd say, 'You know who that dude is? You know how he played?' And the kids would be like, 'Nah, I don't care.'

"The game's different now. Look at Vince Young. Why wouldn't he listen to Kerry Collins? I'm sure Vince thinks, 'Nobody's been through what I'm going through. Nobody's been through my kind of pressure.' Are you kidding me! Kerry Collins, fifth pick in the draft, has all the ups and downs, gets benched, makes those racist comments, has the alcohol problems, moves from team to team, comes back, has success ... Vince Young should suck up all the knowledge Kerry Collins has to offer! There's no better role model for him.''

I have heard that Collins went out of his way last year to try to help Young when the struggling quarterback was having his quasi-breakdown. Young had no interest. Maybe Sapp's on to something. If he is, it's a sad commentary on the kids of the NFL. I remember being in Tampa last year to do a story for SI on Brooks playing Adrian Peterson and the Vikings, and I thought at least one of the young linebackers, Barrett Ruud, tried to siphon off Brooks' knowledge.

warren sapp is a dick. vince young is crazy.

BryanBusby 06-24-2009 02:26 PM

Even if Brown doesn't actually play, he's going to help improve the Defense. The dude was a hell of a player when he was healthy and will be a good resource for players like Pollard, Page and Morgan.

Titty Meat 06-24-2009 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 5861065)
Skeeeert! Stop right there. If Mike Brown didn't have such obvious injury concerns, he would've been picked up already. Just because he ALMOST completed a whole season last year does not make him durable, and god knows what his injuries have done to his speed, and he was never fast in the first place. He will NOT replace Pollard. If anything, he may replace page on obvious running situations. He's just another role player until he can prove otherwise.

Other teams were intrested him him and he's a much better player then Pollard. Look at the #'s of the 36 games he's played in compared to the # of games Pollard has played in. Brown is the better player.

Mr. Arrowhead 06-24-2009 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5861075)
Other teams were intrested him him and he's a much better player then Pollard. Look at the #'s of the 36 games he's played in compared to the # of games Pollard has played in. Brown is the better player.

Pollard never fit the cover 2, 3-4 fits him alot better

ToxSocks 06-24-2009 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 5861071)
Even if Brown doesn't actually play, he's going to help improve the Defense. The dude was a hell of a player when he was healthy and will be a good resource for players like Pollard, Page and Morgan.

This. Im glad they signed him. But lets not get shit twisted, he's not a reliable starter.

ToxSocks 06-24-2009 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5861075)
Other teams were intrested him him and he's a much better player then Pollard. Look at the #'s of the 36 games he's played in compared to the # of games Pollard has played in. Brown is the better player.

Mike brown played on a good D, with good coaches. Pollard, not so much. Brown is slow and often injured. Pollard may not be blazing fast, but at least we can count on him being there on sunday. Pollard is ascending. Brown is descending.

Garcia Bronco 06-24-2009 02:33 PM

Bad move. Your season is over.

ToxSocks 06-24-2009 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5861011)
Pollard takes wrong angles to the football thats stuff you learn in pee wee. He also misses alot of tackles and is slow. I guess you could play him on 1st and 2nd down and Mike Brown on 3rd downs. Either way this was the best signing this off-season for the Chiefs.

That's also stuff that can be coached at a high level. Lets see what Pollard does without Gunther before we judge him. He obviously has the talent.

ToxSocks 06-24-2009 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 5861099)
Bad move. Your season is over.

So when is the rest of your offense getting traded?

Titty Meat 06-24-2009 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 5861096)
Mike brown played on a good D, with good coaches. Pollard, not so much. Brown is slow and often injured. Pollard may not be blazing fast, but at least we can count on him being there on sunday. Pollard is ascending. Brown is descending.

Thats true but i'm talking about overall skills Brown is a better player. Pollard is a good special teams thats when he makes plays. This is a win-win for the Chiefs

ToxSocks 06-24-2009 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5861111)
Thats true but i'm talking about overall skills Brown is a better player. Pollard is a good special teams thats when he makes plays. This is a win-win for the Chiefs

I agree that the Chiefs did no wrong with this signing. I just don't see him beating out Pollard is all. Depth, maybe some leadership and certain packages.

DaneMcCloud 06-24-2009 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5861058)
Yup. It's laughable seeing you say the same thing over and over just change Mike Browns name with Zach Thomas and I bet you said the same shit. We'll be lucky to win a single game with a guy who makes plays? Says the guy who gets his dick wet watching DaJuan Morgan. Your posts are like a bad comedian telling the same joke it's pretty funny actually.

Well, thanks for putting words in my mouth there, Sporto.

You're such a welcome addition to this forum.

:shake:

DaneMcCloud 06-24-2009 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MOhillbilly (Post 5861068)
warren sapp is a dick. vince young is crazy.

What does your cousin think of this "Older player mentoring young players" business?

Has it ever been a topic of discussion?

I'm sure he'd have some interesting and accurate insight.

DaneMcCloud 06-24-2009 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5861043)
Are you telling me you'd rather have a guy who sucks (Pollard) then a guy who only plays half the games but makes plays (Brown)?

This is just the same old nonsense.

The Chiefs sign some over-the-hill player. Some fans on Chiefsplanet automatically assume that person will beat out the incumbent player and make an impact.

The truth of the matter is that it rarely, if ever, happens.

MOhillbilly 06-24-2009 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5861124)
What does your cousin think of this "Older player mentoring young players" business?

Has it ever been a topic of discussion?

I'm sure he'd have some interesting and accurate insight.

which cousin? I know gregg drags pierson prioleau around with him for mentoring. I know the skins players mentored each other and i know gregg has brought in players he coached on his staff to coach his LBs in washington.
Both my cousins were mentored by shawn taylor.
I think it depends on the teaching strength of the staff and it all comes down from the top.

Just Passin' By 06-24-2009 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5861055)
Uh, times are different now, Champ.

The article was written last year, when Mayo was a rookie.

Titty Meat 06-24-2009 02:45 PM

Whos your cousin Mohillbilly?

DaneMcCloud 06-24-2009 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MOhillbilly (Post 5861138)
which cousin? I know gregg drags pierson prioleau around with him for mentoring. I know the skins players mentored each other and i know gregg has brought in players he coached on his staff to coach his LBs in washington.
Both my cousins were mentored by shawn taylor.
I think it depends on the teaching strength of the staff and it all comes down from the top.

Thanks! :thumb:

RustShack 06-24-2009 02:53 PM

A healthy Brown is the best safety on our team. A hurt Brown still brings more leadership to the sidelines than a healthy McGraw. If Brown gets hurt then the guy who would be starting if we hadn't signed him would start anyways. If he gets seriously hurt then we can just sign McGraw again because no other team in the NFL would pick him up. There really is nothing to lose in this move. Plus he started 15 games last year, looks like hes on the right track.

BigChiefFan 06-24-2009 02:59 PM

It's a good move. This should help push Morgan, Pollard and Page to up their game.

Competition is always a good thing.

Titty Meat 06-24-2009 03:01 PM

So whos the odd man out? Mcgraw or Morgan? Haley said they will keep 2 guys for specail teams.

MOhillbilly 06-24-2009 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5861211)
So whos the odd man out? Mcgraw or Morgan? Haley said they will keep 2 guys for specail teams.

Mcgraw.

RustShack 06-24-2009 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5861211)
So whos the odd man out? Mcgraw or Morgan? Haley said they will keep 2 guys for specail teams.

Is that a serious question?

Quote:

Originally Posted by MOhillbilly (Post 5861213)
Mcgraw.

:clap:

DaneMcCloud 06-24-2009 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5861211)
So whos the odd man out? Mcgraw or Morgan? Haley said they will keep 2 guys for specail teams.

No way will it be Morgan.

Titty Meat 06-24-2009 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5861218)
Is that a serious question?



:clap:

Yea. I mean Pollard should be on special teams hes damn good at special teams. We just drafted Morgan last year he'd be like the 3rd or 4th guy from last years draft to be cut. McGraw only plays special teams so if you can get a guy who plays special teams and is a good backup he should be on the team.

evolve27 06-24-2009 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5861177)
A healthy Brown is the best safety on our team. A hurt Brown still brings more leadership to the sidelines than a healthy McGraw.

I think so too.

RustShack 06-24-2009 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5861227)
Yea. I mean Pollard should be on special teams hes damn good at special teams. We just drafted Morgan last year he'd be like the 3rd or 4th guy from last years draft to be cut. McGraw only plays special teams so if you can get a guy who plays special teams and is a good backup he should be on the team.

Pollard is a ST's stand out where McGraw isn't, hes just a ST's player. Pollard isn't a cover two safety like McGraw is either. Pollard needs to be used like Adrian Wilson(I'm in no way saying his that good), and since we have the guy who coached Wilson I think its safe to assume he will use Pollard in that role also. Pollard blows McGraw away, I think Page would be the next to go before Pollard or Morgan even.

DJ's left nut 06-24-2009 03:24 PM

With the NFL printing money and us being nowhere near the salary cap "Risk/reward" doesn't actually exist.

There's NO risk here. If he busts completely, Clark Hunt spent a few bucks he didn't have to. Who cares? It's not your money and with the money that flows around the NFL these days, that money isn't going to effect your parking, concession or ticket prices one bit.

Maybe he stays healthy, tutors the young kids and makes some plays. If he does, he'll have been a great pickup. Maybe he blows out his ACL on the first day of training camp. If he does, who gives a crap?

It's a zero downside move, good on the Chiefs for making it.

The Bad Guy 06-24-2009 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 5861278)
With the NFL printing money and us being nowhere near the salary cap "Risk/reward" doesn't actually exist.

There's NO risk here. If he busts completely, Clark Hunt spent a few bucks he didn't have to. Who cares? It's not your money and with the money that flows around the NFL these days, that money isn't going to effect your parking, concession or ticket prices one bit.

Maybe he stays healthy, tutors the young kids and makes some plays. If he does, he'll have been a great pickup. Maybe he blows out his ACL on the first day of training camp. If he does, who gives a crap?

It's a zero downside move, good on the Chiefs for making it.

I agree.

The Chiefs have boatloads to spend and this was a wise move.

TRR 06-24-2009 03:32 PM

I always made fun of my friends who are Bears fans because Mike Brown could NEVER stay healthy. He is (injury wise) the Brodie Croyle of safeties. The problem with him is that the Bears counted on him to be in their lineup every year with not much of a plan in place if he wasn't. If Brown does end up starting in KC, at least we have some young talent with starting experience behind him.

I like the move. I think he will bring some veteran and Super Bowl experience to KC. And he isn't ancient for a safety (31). If they count on him to hold up throughout an entire season...it won't happen. We would be lucky to see him make it through training camp/preseason without an injury.

chiefzilla1501 06-24-2009 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5860858)
No. And he also requested a trade because he wasn't just handed the starting gig in 2007.

Did you just start following the Chiefs in 2009?

Again, what the **** does wanting to start have anything to do with mentorship? Yes, Green wanted to start, but NOTHING indicates that this affected his relationship with Croyle. Everything I have seen indicates that the three were all pretty close to each other.

Did Green help Croyle? Yes. Did he teach Croyle things along the way? Undoubtedly. Did Croyle learn a lot by watching Green practice, play, and probably sit in the film room to learn from Green? Undoubtedly.

You are arguing an entirely different issue. The argument isn't about whether Green was an upstanding player. It was whether his presence on the Chiefs was a positive influence on young players. And to prove your point, you're completely fabricating these made-up stories about how Trent Green was this stubborn veteran that refused to help any young players and that young players refused to listen to him.

DaneMcCloud 06-24-2009 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 5861332)
Again, what the **** does wanting to start have anything to do with mentorship? Yes, Green wanted to start, but NOTHING indicates that this affected his relationship with Croyle. Everything I have seen indicates that the three were all pretty close to each other.

Did Green help Croyle? Yes. Did he teach Croyle things along the way? Undoubtedly. Did Croyle learn a lot by watching Green practice, play, and probably sit in the film room to learn from Green? Undoubtedly.

You are arguing an entirely different issue. The argument isn't about whether Green was an upstanding player. It was whether his presence on the Chiefs was a positive influence on young players. And to prove your point, you're completely fabricating these made-up stories about how Trent Green was this stubborn veteran that refused to help any young players and that young players refused to listen to him.

Mr. Verbose strikes again.

Apparently, you don't read any articles or digest anything that's said in the media or by Mr. Green himself. Someone else here quoted Green as saying "That's what coaches are for".

I'm sick of you. You're going on ignore. Bye-Bye.

DaneMcCloud 06-24-2009 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 5861278)
With the NFL printing money and us being nowhere near the salary cap "Risk/reward" doesn't actually exist.

There's NO risk here. If he busts completely, Clark Hunt spent a few bucks he didn't have to. Who cares? It's not your money and with the money that flows around the NFL these days, that money isn't going to effect your parking, concession or ticket prices one bit.

Maybe he stays healthy, tutors the young kids and makes some plays. If he does, he'll have been a great pickup. Maybe he blows out his ACL on the first day of training camp. If he does, who gives a crap?

It's a zero downside move, good on the Chiefs for making it.

Unless there was a signing bonus involved, Clark Hunt didn't spend a dime.

These guys don't get paid until the season starts and even then, it's a weekly game check.

They don't get paid 52 weeks out of the year.

DaneMcCloud 06-24-2009 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5861227)
Yea. I mean Pollard should be on special teams hes damn good at special teams. We just drafted Morgan last year he'd be like the 3rd or 4th guy from last years draft to be cut. McGraw only plays special teams so if you can get a guy who plays special teams and is a good backup he should be on the team.

Apparently, you aren't familiar with DaJuan Morgan.

I don't think there's anyway this guy is cut. Traded? Maybe. But cut?

No way.

And it pisses me off to no end that Erik Walden is impressing Bill Parcells, yet the Chiefs cut him during the season last year. He may turn into a very solid pass rusher.

TRR 06-24-2009 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5861353)
Apparently, you aren't familiar with DaJuan Morgan.

I don't think there's anyway this guy is cut. Traded? Maybe. But cut?

No way.

And it pisses me off to no end that Erik Walden is impressing Bill Parcells, yet the Chiefs cut him during the season last year. He may turn into a very solid pass rusher.

Walden played very well on special teams last year. I was very surprised to see him cut by KC.

DaneMcCloud 06-24-2009 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR (Post 5861371)
Walden played very well on special teams last year. I was very surprised to see him cut by KC.

Yeah, that was a drag.

He would have been perfect as an outside 3-4 linebacker in this scheme. He was a fairly decent pass rusher at Middle Tennessee State and definitely has some speed.

chiefzilla1501 06-24-2009 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5861055)
Uh, times are different now, Champ.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...oks/index.html


"I'll tell you the real reason,'' his friend Warren Sapp said over the weekend. "Because it's not the same for the veterans anymore. The NFL doesn't need us. In this NFL, the old vets don't factor in. The kids don't listen to nobody. Nobody! My last year in Oakland, I'd try to talk to some of the kids. Tommy Kelly, Terdell Sands. But they had no interest. I thought the ghosts in that building were so valuable, but none of the young guys cared. Once in a while, one of the old legends would come in the building, or make a trip. Jack Tatum would be around, and I'd say, 'You know who that dude is? You know how he played?' And the kids would be like, 'Nah, I don't care.'

"The game's different now. Look at Vince Young. Why wouldn't he listen to Kerry Collins? I'm sure Vince thinks, 'Nobody's been through what I'm going through. Nobody's been through my kind of pressure.' Are you kidding me! Kerry Collins, fifth pick in the draft, has all the ups and downs, gets benched, makes those racist comments, has the alcohol problems, moves from team to team, comes back, has success ... Vince Young should suck up all the knowledge Kerry Collins has to offer! There's no better role model for him.''

I have heard that Collins went out of his way last year to try to help Young when the struggling quarterback was having his quasi-breakdown. Young had no interest. Maybe Sapp's on to something. If he is, it's a sad commentary on the kids of the NFL.

And your entire argument hinges on an opinion made by Warren Sapp and about the followership of Vince Young.

You have stories about Tony G teaching receivers routes and sitting down with Tyler Thigpen VOLUNTARILY to tutor the kid. You have stories of Cassel shadowing Brady and developing the same work ethic. You have stories of young players shadowing Cassel's strong workout regimen. You have stories about LJ throwing a shit-fit after T-Rich was traded. Are you really going to suggest that good leaders don't affect young players? I take a lot more stock in these stories than one opinion by a player who has a reputation for being an asshole.

No, not all veterans are great leaders (Favre) and not all young players are great listeners (Young). But it's a really tough argument to make that solid veterans have no effect whatsoever in helping out young players.

Titty Meat 06-24-2009 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR (Post 5861304)
I always made fun of my friends who are Bears fans because Mike Brown could NEVER stay healthy. He is (injury wise) the Brodie Croyle of safeties. The problem with him is that the Bears counted on him to be in their lineup every year with not much of a plan in place if he wasn't. If Brown does end up starting in KC, at least we have some young talent with starting experience behind him.

I like the move. I think he will bring some veteran and Super Bowl experience to KC. And he isn't ancient for a safety (31). If they count on him to hold up throughout an entire season...it won't happen. We would be lucky to see him make it through training camp/preseason without an injury.


The difference between Croyle and Brown is Brown actually makes plays. Yes he gets injured its becuz he goes all out and makes play. This is a damn good signing as everyone said we didn't really spend much on a guy who when he plays is awesome.

Bob Dole 06-24-2009 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dante84 (Post 5860266)
Yes. Special Teams.

You mean where he runs behind the return guy for about 25 yards and then takes a dive about a foot behind his feet?

Super.

Sweet Daddy Hate 06-24-2009 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 5860321)
Chiefs agree to deal with ex-Pro Bowl S Brown

Chiefs agreed to terms with S Mike Brown, formerly of the Bears.

The KC Star's report says Brown "could" swipe Jarrad Page or Bernard Pollard's starting job, but he's more likely to be a third safety. It's the role he's best suited for at age 31 with a long history of unreliable health. A onetime Pro Bowler (2005) and Chicago's all-time leader in defensive TDs (7), Brown can play both safety spots. There's a lot to like about this pickup. Jun. 24 - 12:18 pm et
Source: Kansas City Star

1) The Star is high as a kite.

2) Yes...another Safety. That's exactly what we needed.







































NOT!

TRR 06-24-2009 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5861425)
The difference between Croyle and Brown is Brown actually makes plays. Yes he gets injured its becuz he goes all out and makes play. This is a damn good signing as everyone said we didn't really spend much on a guy who when he plays is awesome.

That's why I put (injury wise) in my initial post.

I will have to disagree with you on the point about Mike Brown getting hurt because he goes all out. We are talking about the NFL here. Every player goes all out. You wouldn't make it through one game if you didn't. Mike Brown is INJURY PRONE. Nothing is going to change that.

It is still a good signing though.

Titty Meat 06-24-2009 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR (Post 5861442)
That's why I put (injury wise) in my initial post.

I will have to disagree with you on the point about Mike Brown getting hurt because he goes all out. We are talking about the NFL here. Every player goes all out. You wouldn't make it through one game if you didn't. Mike Brown is INJURY PRONE. Nothing is going to change that.

It is still a good signing though.

Yea but didn't croyle miss a game because his back was sore? I mean theres a difference between a sore back and a torn ACL. Look at the Brown highlight tape he's a beast. Anyway understand why I love this signing i'm a Cornhusker fan and Brown was one of the best Husker players. Also I said before it'd be awesome if we'd sign Mike Brown. I also said we should trade for Cassel you can look it up. I will put my rep on this both will be very good players for the Chiefs.

TRR 06-24-2009 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5861452)
Yea but didn't croyle miss a game because his back was sore? I mean theres a difference between a sore back and a torn ACL. Look at the Brown highlight tape he's a beast. Anyway understand why I love this signing i'm a Cornhusker fan and Brown was one of the best Husker players. Also I said before it'd be awesome if we'd sign Mike Brown. I also said we should trade for Cassel you can look it up. I will put my rep on this both will be very good players for the Chiefs.

Brown has missed 44 games over the last 5 seasons. That's 4 games less than 3 FULL seasons. Brown just can't stay healthy, it doesn't matter how big or small the injury is.

Good signing...but nothing to get too excited about. He won't hold up an entire season.

KCChiefsMan 06-24-2009 04:40 PM

hey I like it! As long as it's not for too much. But we could definately use some quality experience back there.

Micjones 06-24-2009 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 5860418)
It's about setting examples. How to prepare, how to win. etc. These are grown men. Nobody expects them to be big brothering them. Especially when they are ultimately going to replace them.

Exactly.

Though I think sometimes players do take a liking to veterans and vice versa.
Ultimately... I'll take veterans who can lead by example. That can often be more influential than the "under the wing" approach.

DaneMcCloud 06-24-2009 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 5860418)
It's about setting examples. How to prepare, how to win. etc. These are grown men. Nobody expects them to be big brothering them. Especially when they are ultimately going to replace them.

Yeah, that Mike Vrabel's really set the tone for the youthful players.

:shake:

chiefzilla1501 06-24-2009 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5861588)
Yeah, that Mike Vrabel's really set the tone for the youthful players.

:shake:

How do you know that? Because he didn't show up to optional workouts and because he said he was unhappy to be traded?

But did you hear from players that said he was inapproachable? Have there been any reports that he hasn't been working hard since going to camp? Have you heard any single player say that they are upset at him for not showing up?

You're speculating. Hines Ward held out several years ago from training camp. So did Tony Gonzalez. And these are two of the hardest working players in the game (and in the case of Tony G, we've seen specific cases of his mentourship). Players understand the difference between business and playing. I have yet to see any specific evidence to suggest that his skipping OTAs had any negative effect on the youth. In fact, it's probably a ridiculous suggestion to say so. We haven't seen any evidence of a positive influence either, but I guarantee that you will very soon.

Micjones 06-24-2009 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5861588)
Yeah, that Mike Vrabel's really set the tone for the youthful players.

:shake:

Drafted players don't yet understand the politics or business of the NFL.
I'm sure no rookie working his way onto this roster will bat an eyelash at Vrabel exercising his right not to show up for voluntary OTA's.

rad 06-24-2009 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5861588)
Yeah, that Mike Vrabel's really set the tone for the youthful players.

:shake:

Dude, it's June. Give it a rest. Are you really gonna hang your argument on statements from Sapp recounting his days with the Raiders? The Raiders. Losers. You can't say no veteran will mentor a rookie. Winning teams do, losing teams don't.

Chiefs=Champions 06-24-2009 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rad (Post 5861707)
Dude, it's June. Give it a rest. Are you really gonna hang your argument on statements from Sapp recounting his days with the Raiders? The Raiders. Losers. You can't say no veteran will mentor a rookie. Winning teams do, losing teams don't.

Thread over...

Mecca 06-24-2009 08:46 PM

If he stays on the field he's better than both Page and Pollard......Page has become one of the most overrated Chiefs players, I'm not sure why.

Hammock Parties 06-24-2009 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5862110)
If he stays on the field he's better than both Page and Pollard......Page has become one of the most overrated Chiefs players, I'm not sure why.

Because he makes plays. Few others do.

But I agree. He probably is overrated by homers like myself.

Mecca 06-24-2009 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5862117)
Because he makes plays. Few others do.

But I agree. He probably is overrated by homers like myself.

I pictured alot of people losing their minds when EA put out it's roster update last year and Page went from a 78 to like a 72.

DaneMcCloud 06-24-2009 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rad (Post 5861707)
Dude, it's June. Give it a rest. Are you really gonna hang your argument on statements from Sapp recounting his days with the Raiders? The Raiders. Losers. You can't say no veteran will mentor a rookie. Winning teams do, losing teams don't.

The "argument's" already been made. There are plenty (if not hundreds) of NFL players that flat out do not want anything to do with "mentoring".

And why the hell would they? So that after they mentor a younger player, they're out of a job?

That doesn't make much sense.

chiefzilla1501 06-24-2009 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5862259)
The "argument's" already been made. There are plenty (if not hundreds) of NFL players that flat out do not want anything to do with "mentoring".

And why the hell would they? So that after they mentor a younger player, they're out of a job?

That doesn't make much sense.

The argument hasn't been made. You're using one person's opinion (Sapp, a really awkward example in the first place) and generalizing across to "plenty" and potentially "hundreds" of players?

Why would they mentor other players? Oh, I don't know. Maybe because they want to win? Maybe because they know that coaches and front offices would much rather keep a leader around than a loner? Do you really think that an above average veteran who isn't on Brett Favre status can get away with shunning young players without the coach or front office noticing? Most players would get "fired" for not working hard and putting themselves above the team.

Yes, there are "plenty" of young players who shun advice and "plenty" of veterans who refuse to give it. But there are also plenty who follow by example (even if unadmittedly) and there are also plenty who lead (even if unintentionally).

MadMax 06-24-2009 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5862137)
I pictured alot of people losing their minds when EA put out it's roster update last year and Page went from a 78 to like a 72.



I'll admit I ****in snapped :mad: :D

Micjones 06-24-2009 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 5862474)
The argument hasn't been made. You're using one person's opinion (Sapp, a really awkward example in the first place) and generalizing across to "plenty" and potentially "hundreds" of players?

Why would they mentor other players? Oh, I don't know. Maybe because they want to win? Maybe because they know that coaches and front offices would much rather keep a leader around than a loner? Do you really think that an above average veteran who isn't on Brett Favre status can get away with shunning young players without the coach or front office noticing? Most players would get "fired" for not working hard and putting themselves above the team.

Yes, there are "plenty" of young players who shun advice and "plenty" of veterans who refuse to give it. But there are also plenty who follow by example (even if unadmittedly) and there are also plenty who lead (even if unintentionally).

Excellent post.

Thig Lyfe 06-24-2009 11:39 PM

(See: Ship, To da)

brent102fire 06-24-2009 11:45 PM

Good signing. He will definately create competition. No one will be handed starting jobs this year. I remember when the Chargers Front Office thought Rodney Harrison was washed up. He gave the Patriots some pretty good years...Brown could do the same in KC...

Sweet Daddy Hate 06-24-2009 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5862110)
If he stays on the field he's better than both Page and Pollard......Page has become one of the most overrated Chiefs players, I'm not sure why.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5862117)
Because he makes plays. Few others do.

But I agree. He probably is overrated by homers like myself.

Oh for the love of ****:

Let's put Brown behind Krumrie's awesome front-four, ****her's All-Star LB Corps, and watch him run around like Sauto fetching Sake in a hail-storm!


I wrote a song in honor of your posts:

Quote:

"Ching-a Ching-a Ching-Chong, Chong-Chong-CHO,"

"Ching-a Ching-a Ching-Chong, Chong-Chong-CHO,"

"Now-it's time for twin Mon-key's fetch Sa-ke"!

Micjones 06-24-2009 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brent102fire (Post 5862547)
Good signing. He will definately create competition. No one will be handed starting jobs this year. I remember when the Chargers Front Office thought Rodney Harrison was washed up. He gave the Patriots some pretty good years...Brown could do the same in KC...

Problem with that comparison is the fact that Harrison had been relatively healthy throughout his career leading up to that point. Brown's always been plagued by injuries. I think it's a good signing nonetheless. Just an entirely different situation.

Direckshun 06-25-2009 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5862110)
If he stays on the field he's better than both Page and Pollard......Page has become one of the most overrated Chiefs players, I'm not sure why.

Blow me. The guy has had to cover half the field for 5 seconds with zero pass rush.

DaneMcCloud 06-25-2009 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 5862541)
Excellent post.

You know, I never took you for a lemming.

Guess I was wrong.

Sweet Daddy Hate 06-25-2009 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5862556)
You know, I never took you for a lemming.

Guess I was wrong.

:eek:ROFL

BossChief 06-25-2009 04:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5862137)
I pictured alot of people losing their minds when EA put out it's roster update last year and Page went from a 78 to like a 72.

I bet I was one of the five people that wasnt surprised by Pollards jump to a 87.

Page should be a 80-84, but isnt close to elite as some have suggested. If Brown ends up starting in this scheme, I would think he would take Pages spot. Pollard is a much better box safety, that is what he did at Purdue to get recognized.


Brown can teach one hell of alot in pass coverage to Pollard (by teaching, or example) and a shitton about the importance of good tackling and form tackling to both.

I see him as the third safety and see him taking over for Pollard on third and long situations.

If this holds true, Pollard might make the probowl as a special teamer. Dont forget, or discount, that Pollard is also in a contract year iirc.

good signing at the very least

MOhillbilly 06-25-2009 07:10 AM

i think brown will be a run stop specialist. He probably isnt fast enough to play cover anything. who gives a shit if he mentors anyone as long as he makes some plays to help the team win acouple games.

KCUnited 06-25-2009 08:01 AM

Kolby's 1st cousin, no wonder he can't stay healthy.

TheGuardian 06-25-2009 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5860368)
Not to single you out but I don't buy into this supposed "role".

Did you read Peter King's MMQB this week? There's a piece with Warren Sapp where Sapp unequivocally states that younger players do not listen to veterans. They blow them off, entirely. He saw it with the Bucs and the Raiders. He said Derrick Brooks has experienced the same thing.

Trent Green was pissed about the drafting of Brodie Croyle in 2006.

This whole "mentoring" thing is a figment of the imagination of the fans.

It just doesn't exist.

It actually does exist, but it's about players who are receptive to it. Sapp DID in fact try to teach those guys but they didn't care. And guess what? They sucked. Tony G often cited Ted Popson as a guy that mentored him and helped him tremendously when he was drafted. Grunny said that he learned more from Mike Webster than any coach. Cris Carter most certainly mentored Randy Moss. It does in fact exist, and the vets are willing to help the young guys but it's actually more about the young guys than the vets. You have to have young guys who want to learn and get better.

Hootie 06-25-2009 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5860634)
If he was truly a team player that cared about the team, he wouldn't have tried to force his way back into the lineup when the Chiefs were performing very well on offense under Huard. But of course, that's a different issue.

...

All of the shit I took for this very point...

Hootie 06-25-2009 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5861014)
Oh, I don't, huh? If was so good for the Bears last year, why was he released? Why wasn't he signed by any team in the NFL earlier than June 24th?

And apparently, you missed this nugget:

Since 2003, he's played in exactly 36 out of a possible 80 games due to various injuries.

STFU

He's an injury prone mother ****er, that's for sure...but he's always been a great player when on the field...the Bears didn't sign him because they have been drafting his replacement for years due to all of the injuries...the fact Mike Brown played 15 games last year was a shock to everyone in Chicago...that's for sure. The dude is an injury waiting to happen.

Sweet Daddy Hate 06-25-2009 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 5862626)
I bet I was one of the five people that wasnt surprised by Pollards jump to a 87.

As Wendler gently weeps over the move, I too am not surprised. He's picking off Epic Fraud in practice, he'll be working the box and getting shit done.

Monster season ahead for BP.

Chiefnj2 06-25-2009 08:31 AM

I love it when people think Madden football has some relationship to what actually happens in real football.

Sweet Daddy Hate 06-25-2009 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5862782)
I love it when people think Madden football has some relationship to what actually happens in real football.

Meh. It's just a game.

More fun is when people's fantasy teams take BIG dump due to star player getting mangled for rest of season.

Ohhhhh....Sankyou!:D

Hammock Parties 06-25-2009 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 5862781)
As Wendler gently weeps over the move, I too am not surprised. He's picking off Epic Fraud in practice, he'll be working the box and getting shit done.

Monster season ahead for BP.

If Mike Brown stays healthy, he's gonna plant Pollard's ass on the bench.

Write it down.

Sweet Daddy Hate 06-25-2009 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5862878)
If Mike Brown stays healthy, he's gonna plant Pollard's ass on the bench.

Write it down.

You will rarely get laid in life.

Write THAT down, and sell it for $109.00.

:evil:

Hammock Parties 06-25-2009 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 5862917)
You will rarely get laid in life.

But in death, I'll be a playa.

Pimp 'O Hades

DaneMcCloud 06-25-2009 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 5862766)
It actually does exist, but it's about players who are receptive to it. Sapp DID in fact try to teach those guys but they didn't care. And guess what? They sucked. Tony G often cited Ted Popson as a guy that mentored him and helped him tremendously when he was drafted. Grunny said that he learned more from Mike Webster than any coach. Cris Carter most certainly mentored Randy Moss. It does in fact exist, and the vets are willing to help the young guys but it's actually more about the young guys than the vets. You have to have young guys who want to learn and get better.

You're mentioning extraordinary players: Gonzalez, Chris Carter, Randy Moss. These guys are sure-fire Hall of Famers - Duh.

What about the non-Hall of Fame guys? The other 1,689 football players in the league? They're just hanging on to their jobs by a thread. The Chiefs are a perfect example of that. How would you like to be Pollard or Page or Morgan at this point after the Chiefs signed Brown? Personally if I were Brown, I wouldn't help them at all. This is probably his last chance to play football.

Again (for the 100th time), this mentoring business is highly overrated by the fans.

And pointing out HOFer's does nothing to support the fact that is does exist in spades.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.