ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Hank Baskett released.... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=214181)

DaneMcCloud 09-15-2009 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 6076247)
Devard Darling before he was placed on IR.
That guy might be one of the most physically gifted WR's on this team and that never amounted to much on the field.

Derrick Johnson's another player... Though I'd argue that his biggest problem was being taken 15th overall.
He crumbles under the weight of expectations. If you forget where he was drafted... He's been a fairly productive LB.

I don't know about Darling. I've heard "reports" from people I don't trust that he's athletic and so on but we've certainly never seen it. Plus, the guy was late third rounder cut by a team in desperate need of wide receivers.

DJ is a bust, plain and simple. The guy makes one great play ever 900 snaps.

htismaqe 09-15-2009 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 6076244)
I know people hate bringing them up, but the Patriots' title teams were never the most talented teams in the league. Their best team, which was the best team in the league that year, didn't even win the title, although I thought that was more a fluke than anything. We may never see another team that good in our lifetime.

Anyway, how many years running have the Chargers been the most talented team in the NFL? Unfortunately for them they're also consistently one of the most inconsistent teams in the NFL.

Because talent is only one of the pieces. The Patriots had the team chemistry, they had EXTREME discipline, and of course, they had some of the best coaching in the history of the game. They were overloaded with intangibles, so they could get away with lacking some talent.

That being said, I think some people are underestimating some of the talent they did have, but that's another discussion.

As for the Chargers, take the same idea and put it in reverse. The Chargers have all kinds of talent, but look at some of the personalities on that team, like Merriman. Or better yet, take a look at their $92M QB. Yeah, I know, he's talented. I'm also not firmly convinced that he isn't a big baby either. He's gonna have to get more mentally tough if he wants to be a SB champion. Sprinkle some Norv dust over the top and you have the perfect recipe for an example where LACK of intangibles hinders talent.

You have to have ALL OF THE ABOVE to win it all. It's as simple as that.

But like Coach Todd Haley says, "talent is the great equalizer."

htismaqe 09-15-2009 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6076242)
Whatever his problem is, he's a crazy athletic talent that should have been a third round pick.

My case in point. Perfect example.

htismaqe 09-15-2009 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6076184)
Great post.

Hey man, did you hear what Haley said in his presser today?

Hopefully, it can put to rest some of the "53 right guys" stuff, no? ;)

Micjones 09-15-2009 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6076259)
DJ is a bust, plain and simple. The guy makes one great play ever 900 snaps.

If the definition for the word "bust" can be confined to 'player that hasn't lived up to his draft position'... Certainly.

But he's the kind of bust I'd like to have IF we have to have one.
He's still been productive. Just not as productive as he should be given where he was drafted.

MahiMike 09-15-2009 04:32 PM

I feel like I'm setting my fantasy team here - picking up all kinds of guys off the waiver wire after the 1st week...

keg in kc 09-15-2009 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 6076269)
That being said, I think some people are underestimating some of the talent they did have, but that's another discussion.

Ironically, their best talent was primarily in the positions where we've been locking up talent recently. Quarterback. Defensive line.

They never had the best linebackers, but they played together *as a group* better than anybody else. Once Law and Milloy were gone, they didn't have much marquee talent in the secondary either, at least not that I recall. What they did have were savvy vets and young players, mixed in a way that seems oddly familiar. Offensively, until Moss and Welker, they were pedestrian at receiver, and even with Corey Dillon they've never had a marquee running back. They focused a lot on tight end. Their o-line was always good but I don't think they were ever the best.

What they did is mold the talent they had together until it became a machine.

htismaqe 09-15-2009 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 6076283)
If the definition for the word "bust" can be confined to 'player that hasn't lived up to his draft position'... Certainly.

But he's the kind of bust I'd like to have IF we have to have one.
He's still been productive. Just not as productive as he should be given where he was drafted.

The problem with DJ is that he's not disciplined and he's not consistent. If he were making one play and then disappearing for one play, that would be one thing.

DJ's lack of discipline and poor decision making have actually caused some of our problems over the last few years.

booger 09-15-2009 06:04 PM

Rams | R. Martin agrees to terms

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:47:55 -0700

Tom Silverstein, of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, reports the St. Louis Rams have agreed to terms on a new contract with free-agent WR Ruvell Martin (Packers), according to a source close to Martin. He is expected to be at practice Wednesday, Sept. 16.





Maybe they won't claim Baskett now. Martin is pretty much the same size.

R&GHomer 09-15-2009 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 6076244)
I know people hate bringing them up, but the Patriots' title teams were never the most talented teams in the league. Their best team, which was the best team in the league that year, didn't even win the title, although I thought that was more a fluke than anything. We may never see another team that good in our lifetime.

Anyway, how many years running have the Chargers been the most talented team in the NFL? Unfortunately for them they're also consistently one of the most inconsistent teams in the NFL.

Might not be the best 53 athletically but they are the best 53 for this team. Like it or not this isn't just the lip service
we've come to expect over the last two decades. We'll have our stars. I'm sure of it

DaneMcCloud 09-15-2009 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R&GHomer (Post 6076566)
Might not be the best 53 athletically but they are the best 53 for this team. Like it or not this isn't just the lip service
we've come to expect over the last two decades. We'll have our stars. I'm sure of it

IMO, this "The Best 53" nonsense is just that.

The "Best 53" will continue to change until this roster has been all but completely overhauled.

The "Best 53" won't be in place until they win a Championship.

booger 09-15-2009 06:25 PM

Wilson: Baskett expected to draw heavy interest
Wide receiver waived today by Eagles

Aaron Wilson

September 15, 2009, 07:48 PM EST

Now that wide receiver Hank Baskett has been placed on waivers by the Philadelphia Eagles, he's liable to draw heavy interest on waivers.

Before he was let go by Philadelphia, several teams contacted the Eagles about prospective trades for Baskett.

That included the Tennessee Titans, Chicago Bears, St. Louis Rams, Baltimore Ravens, Cleveland Browns,Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the Kansas City Chiefs, according to a league source.
Baskett caught one pass for six yards Sunday against the Carolina Panthers. For his career, he has registered 72 receptions for 1,052 yards and six touchdowns.

Baskett received the second-round restricted tender of $1.545 million this year, so any team that claims him would assume that salary.

In 2006, Baskett became the second rookie in NFL history to post two touchdown receptions of 85 yards or more in a single season since the Green Bay Packers' Billy Howton did so in 1952


http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/...-interest.html

Reerun_KC 09-15-2009 06:26 PM

Has he signed yet?

Sure-Oz 09-15-2009 06:27 PM

http://twitter.com/hankbaskett84 probably fake

htismaqe 09-15-2009 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6076576)
IMO, this "The Best 53" nonsense is just that.

The "Best 53" will continue to change until this roster has been all but completely overhauled.

The "Best 53" won't be in place until they win a Championship.

Did anybody actually listen to Haley's press conference today?

HALEY: “Again, I’m looking for guys who do it the way we want it done. Like I tell them: are you doing it how we’re coaching you and then it comes down to how well are you able to do it. Talent is the great separator. There may be some guys who are doing it the way we want it done but maybe they’re just not good enough. Then maybe there are some guys that probably potentially could be really good but they’re not doing it the way we want it done.

In other words, when they say they want the RIGHT 53, they're looking for a combination of talent AND work ethic. Notice the underlined portion of the quote: to him, those two guys - the guy that works hard but isn't talented, and the guy that's talented but doesn't work hard - are EQUAL.

Also, note the bolded part. And enjoy my sig. Thanks! :)

booger 09-15-2009 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 6076640)
Has he signed yet?

gotta go through waivers.

Sure-Oz 09-15-2009 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by booger (Post 6076667)
gotta go through waivers.

So who is ahead of us?

DeezNutz 09-15-2009 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6076686)
So who is ahead of us?

Lions and Rams.

htismaqe 09-15-2009 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6076688)
Lions and Rams.

And it looks like the Rams might have signed Ruvell Martin, who is in the same mold as Baskett.

Don't really think the Lions would want him, but you never know.

Sure-Oz 09-15-2009 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6076688)
Lions and Rams.

Hmm...hope we get him, we might have atleast an avg wr corp if we do

Sure-Oz 09-15-2009 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 6076697)
And it looks like the Rams might have signed Ruvell Martin, who is in the same mold as Baskett.

Don't really think the Lions would want him, but you never know.

They dont need another WR just throw it to CJ every pass play

DeezNutz 09-15-2009 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 6076697)
And it looks like the Rams might have signed Ruvell Martin, who is in the same mold as Baskett.

Don't really think the Lions would want him, but you never know.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6076700)
Hmm...hope we get him, we might have atleast an avg wr corp if we do

Agree with both you guys.

It would be pretty cool for a respectable group of receivers (in theory, anyway) to fall into our lap.

R&GHomer 09-15-2009 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6076576)
IMO, this "The Best 53" nonsense is just that.

The "Best 53" will continue to change until this roster has been all but completely overhauled.

The "Best 53" won't be in place until they win a Championship.

I agree, in their minds this is the best 53 at the moment and it's subject to change at any given moment. But it's a process and I for one welcome the change. Carl, Gun, DV and Herm would stand pat or make changes only when they could save face.

I don't know if Pioli can re-create the machine that is the Pats, but he is doing it his way and so is the coach for that matter. When Haily took over the offense I about shit myself. First year head coach shouldering all the responsibility? Takes balls if you ask me, these guys seem accountable and that alone is reason to tip back a beer and welcome the future.

Hell, my fiance and I were watching the game and she made a comment, ahhhh it's the chiefs, they'll just do the same old stupid things and screw it up. I was actually speechless, all I could think to say was "these aren't the Chiefs" but of course they are, but you know what I'm saying. In the end... they did :spock: but they made adjustments throughout the game and I actually believed they could pull it off. If it was Herm and company... hell no, I would have been folding clothes or something.

DeezNutz 09-15-2009 06:43 PM

"The best 53" is the new "gleam."

htismaqe 09-15-2009 06:46 PM

Why is everybody ignoring me?!?!?! :huh:

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 6076662)
Did anybody actually listen to Haley's press conference today?

HALEY: “Again, I’m looking for guys who do it the way we want it done. Like I tell them: are you doing it how we’re coaching you and then it comes down to how well are you able to do it. Talent is the great separator. There may be some guys who are doing it the way we want it done but maybe they’re just not good enough. Then maybe there are some guys that probably potentially could be really good but they’re not doing it the way we want it done.

In other words, when they say they want the RIGHT 53, they're looking for a combination of talent AND work ethic. Notice the underlined portion of the quote: to him, those two guys - the guy that works hard but isn't talented, and the guy that's talented but doesn't work hard - are EQUAL.

Also, note the bolded part. And enjoy my sig. Thanks! :)


DeezNutz 09-15-2009 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 6076726)
Why is everybody ignoring me?!?!?! :huh:

What I want to see is how they'll handle things if we get a ridiculously talented player who is so skilled that he doesn't do things the "right way."

A Fitz-level player. Sick talent.

Wins make things look pretty darn right...

R&GHomer 09-15-2009 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6076716)
"The best 53" is the new "gleam."

Always thought that sounded gay, but you know what. That was the last Chiefs coach to actually field a team, a real ****ing team.

If it's "not that I believe it is" the new gleam "so be it" but there is much, much more to it. Marty is a great coach, and can no doubt build a damn good team, but what he lacks "IMHO" is getting all the pieces to fit together. I think he changed his style a little with the chargers and he almost pulled it off.

The the owner came in Carl style and they went their separate ways. Now all you here is How the Chargers are the most talented team to never win a Superbowl. Hmmmm

R&GHomer 09-15-2009 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6076767)
What I want to see is how they'll handle things if we get a ridiculously talented player who is so skilled that he doesn't do things the "right way."

A Fitz-level player. Sick talent.

Wins make things look pretty darn right...

Sorry, he can hit the ****ing bricks. It's a slap in the face with what they are trying to do. Marty on the other hand would do it and well, as much as I want a good team, I want one to win the superbowl. Look at pitt, NE, all the good ones. I watched Owens the other night and kind of felt sorry for him. Asshole is never going to get it. Moss seems to

DeezNutz 09-15-2009 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R&GHomer (Post 6076783)
Always thought that sounded gay, but you know what. That was the last Chiefs coach to actually field a team, a real ****ing team.

If it's "not that I believe it is" the new gleam "so be it" but there is much, much more to it. Marty is a great coach, and can no doubt build a damn good team, but what he lacks "IMHO" is getting all the pieces to fit together. I think he changed his style a little with the chargers and he almost pulled it off.

The the owner came in Carl style and they went their separate ways. Now all you here is How the Chargers are the most talented team to never win a Superbowl. Hmmmm

If you need one coach to prepare a team well and win a regular season game, no matter how shitty the overall talent level on the roster, Marty would be a damn fine choice. Dude can flat out coach.

Unfortunately, that's not the ultimate goal, and, for whatever reason, Marty isn't a closer.

Too bad, really.

My positive Marty feelings all came back when I saw him at DT's induction ceremony.

Sure-Oz 09-15-2009 07:07 PM

It's too bad marty didn't win 1 SB, he is a great coach imo

htismaqe 09-15-2009 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6076767)
What I want to see is how they'll handle things if we get a ridiculously talented player who is so skilled that he doesn't do things the "right way."

A Fitz-level player. Sick talent.

Wins make things look pretty darn right...

I don't think you get to be a Fitz-level player without also "doing it the right way". Know what I mean? Take a look across the league at the truly elite players and you're not going to find many guys, if ANY, that get by on talent alone.

After all, look at what they did with Bowe. So far nobody that they cut was high on talent but low on doing it their way. They were low on talent.

DeezNutz 09-15-2009 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 6076823)
I don't think you get to be a Fitz-level player without also "doing it the right way". Know what I mean? Take a look across the league at the truly elite players and you're not going to find many guys, if ANY, that get by on talent alone.

After all, look at what they did with Bowe. So far nobody that they cut was high on talent but low on doing it their way. They were low on talent.

Moss pre-NE might be the only exception I can think of...

He was pretty sick in MN but left with nothing to show for it, so it still ends up supporting your assertion above.

Good point.

Buehler445 09-15-2009 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 6076662)
Did anybody actually listen to Haley's press conference today?

HALEY: “Again, I’m looking for guys who do it the way we want it done. Like I tell them: are you doing it how we’re coaching you and then it comes down to how well are you able to do it. Talent is the great separator. There may be some guys who are doing it the way we want it done but maybe they’re just not good enough. Then maybe there are some guys that probably potentially could be really good but they’re not doing it the way we want it done.

In other words, when they say they want the RIGHT 53, they're looking for a combination of talent AND work ethic. Notice the underlined portion of the quote: to him, those two guys - the guy that works hard but isn't talented, and the guy that's talented but doesn't work hard - are EQUAL.

Also, note the bolded part. And enjoy my sig. Thanks! :)


Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 6076823)
I don't think you get to be a Fitz-level player without also "doing it the right way". Know what I mean? Take a look across the league at the truly elite players and you're not going to find many guys, if ANY, that get by on talent alone.

After all, look at what they did with Bowe. So far nobody that they cut was high on talent but low on doing it their way. They were low on talent.

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 6076726)
Why is everybody ignoring me?!?!?! :huh:


Fine. I'll play. When he made the "53" comment, he probably thought that the fanbase wouldn't be such go-tards and think he could win with highschoolers with big hearts. Either that or he didn't realize what kind of douchebags Herm put on the field last year.

FTR, I think Bowe COULD be a Fitz type talent if he had Fitz type FOCUS and WORK ETHIC. Which he currently does not.

There happy? :p

htismaqe 09-15-2009 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6076836)
Moss pre-NE might be the only exception I can think of...

He was pretty sick in MN but left with nothing to show for it, so it still ends up supporting your assertion above.

Good point.

Yeah, I thought about Moss especially. But then I remembered how many conference championships he won prior to arriving in New England.

So I'll stand by it - I think the truly great players have the talent AND the work ethic.

Pasta Little Brioni 09-15-2009 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 6076922)
Yeah, I thought about Moss especially. But then I remembered how many conference championships he won prior to arriving in New England.

So I'll stand by it - I think the truly great players have the talent AND the work ethic
.

Absolutely, you do not get to that kind of level without working your tail off.

R&GHomer 09-15-2009 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 6076823)
I don't think you get to be a Fitz-level player without also "doing it the right way". Know what I mean? Take a look across the league at the truly elite players and you're not going to find many guys, if ANY, that get by on talent alone.

After all, look at what they did with Bowe. So far nobody that they cut was high on talent but low on doing it their way. They were low on talent.

I believe in the philosophy Pioli and Haley are bringing to this franchise. Talent is paramount, but equally, so is discipline, dedication and hard work. If you build a team, you do it as a team. When your on the field you work as a unit, the WR is no more important than a gunner on Special teams. Sure the WR may have more god given talent, but both do there jobs the way it's coached and at a 100%.

The more talented player see's his reward on his paycheck, the ego shouldn't be a part of it. No one should get a free pass, period. That being said, sometimes you have to make exceptions for aging vets and keeping them healthy.

TEX 09-15-2009 08:57 PM

IMO, Hank is absolutely worth a look. Haley might be able to get the best out of him.

Micjones 09-15-2009 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 6077128)
IMO, Hank is absolutely worth a look. Haley might be able to get the best out of him.

Agreed. Hopefully they put in a claim for Baskett.

Sure-Oz 09-15-2009 09:52 PM

When do we find out

Micjones 09-15-2009 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6077219)
When do we find out

I'm guessing we'll know something by Friday one way or another.

Micjones 09-15-2009 11:32 PM

Well now...

Turns out that Chiefs' brass made a call inquiring about how they might acquire Baskett in a trade when it was believed that Philly was shopping him. They were one of 6 teams. The bad news? So was St. Louis.

So there is a chance that if he clears waivers that he'll join this team.

Then again...
They probably made this call BEFORE adding Bobby Wade so there's a chance that this is all moot.

Titty Meat 09-15-2009 11:34 PM

Whered you hear this at Micjones?

DaneMcCloud 09-15-2009 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 6077399)
Well now...

Turns out that Chiefs' brass made a call inquiring about how they might acquire Baskett in a trade when it was believed that Philly was shopping him. They were one of 6 teams. The bad news? So was St. Louis.

So there is a chance that if he clears waivers that he'll join this team.

Then again...
They probably made this call BEFORE adding Bobby Wade so there's a chance that this is all moot.


I'm almost certain, as I said this morning, that Spags put a claim in for him.

Mecca 09-15-2009 11:37 PM

Hank Baskett is married to a playboy chick......so he>Brodie Croyle.

Dylan 09-16-2009 01:18 AM

I only had a chance to read the first page --

I had a feeling the Eagles were going to cut Hank Baskett --

Baskett played on special teams -- The Eagles rarely used him as WR -- especially during the last two seasons.

Baskett is tall-- But, he couldn't hold on to the ball. -- I'm pretty sure that's why he was demoted to special teams.

Extra Point 09-16-2009 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6077411)
Hank Baskett is married to a playboy chick......so he>Brodie Croyle.

Croyle hasn't screwed up his career, LITERALLY.

htismaqe 09-16-2009 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 6077399)
Well now...

Turns out that Chiefs' brass made a call inquiring about how they might acquire Baskett in a trade when it was believed that Philly was shopping him. They were one of 6 teams. The bad news? So was St. Louis.

So there is a chance that if he clears waivers that he'll join this team.

Then again...
They probably made this call BEFORE adding Bobby Wade so there's a chance that this is all moot.

No worries. The call from the Rams probably came before they signed Ruvell Martin. And Martin is much closer in build/skills to Baskett than Wade is.

In other words, we still have a need while the Rams might not.

Kylo Ren 09-16-2009 10:11 AM

SIGN HIM!!

......... and release who? Personally, I'd rather release Engram than Copper. I know everyone hates Copper. But, he's younger and has greater "upside" (I hate that over used term) than Engram who is on his last legs. Copper could at least develop into something for the future. But, Engram is not going to be apart of this team's future.

I wish we could trade Thiggy or Guti. Even for a low draft pick. We don't need to carry 4 QBs.

htismaqe 09-16-2009 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John_Wayne (Post 6078068)
SIGN HIM!!

......... and release who? Personally, I'd rather release Engram than Copper. I know everyone hates Copper. But, he's younger and has greater "upside" (I hate that over used term) than Engram who is on his last legs. Copper could at least develop into something for the future. But, Engram is not going to be apart of this team's future.

I wish we could trade Thigpen or Guti. Even for a low draft pick. We don't need to carry 4 QBs.

Is Copper REALLY part of the future? I mean, we heard the same thing about Samie Parker and Jeff Webb and the list goes on and on and on.

I mean, who cares? Engram can produce this season. NEITHER of them are likely to be part of the future.

doomy3 09-16-2009 10:41 AM

The Rams waived two players today....

Wonder if they're making room for Baskett?

ToxSocks 09-16-2009 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John_Wayne (Post 6078068)
SIGN HIM!!

......... and release who? Personally, I'd rather release Engram than Copper. I know everyone hates Copper. But, he's younger and has greater "upside" (I hate that over used term) than Engram who is on his last legs. Copper could at least develop into something for the future. But, Engram is not going to be apart of this team's future.

I wish we could trade Thigpen or Guti. Even for a low draft pick. We don't need to carry 4 QBs.

Eh, i would keep Engram, though i wouldn't care if he was released. We already have another copper type of Player in Wade. I'd cut Copper and bring in Baskett.

Baskett has always seemed like he has a boat load of talent to me. He has the size speed, I've seen him make some nice grabs. Wonder why he isn't a top 3 WR for the Eagles?

ToxSocks 09-16-2009 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6078196)
The Rams waived two players today....

Wonder if they're making room for Baskett?

I hope not. It makes sense though. Damn those Rams. Don't they know that Jeff Webb is available?

DaneMcCloud 09-16-2009 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 6078222)
I hope not. It makes sense though. Damn those Rams. Don't they know that Jeff Webb is available?

I mentioned this early yesterday. Baskett was in Philly at the same time as Spags. It seems like a no-brainer that St. Louis would claim him.

MahiMike 09-16-2009 10:56 AM

um, why would we want a guy that can't make Philly's lineup? He ain't all that.

DaneMcCloud 09-16-2009 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 6078261)
um, why would we want a guy that can't make Philly's lineup? He ain't all that.

:shake:

nychief 09-16-2009 11:00 AM

this guy is not really that good.

htismaqe 09-16-2009 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6078249)
I mentioned this early yesterday. Baskett was in Philly at the same time as Spags. It seems like a no-brainer that St. Louis would claim him.

Except that they signed Ruvell Martin. Unless they're looking for 2 guys like that (and they very well could be).

htismaqe 09-16-2009 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nychief (Post 6078284)
this guy is not really that good.

I've always said that better than bad does not equal good.

The corollary to that is that better than bad is STILL BETTER.

doomy3 09-16-2009 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nychief (Post 6078284)
this guy is not really that good.

I agree. He is not that good. But, he is probably still better than Copper. I definitely didn't want to give up a draft pick for him, but I wouldn't mind taking a flier on him if we get him for a waiver claim.

Coogs 09-16-2009 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6078306)
I definitely didn't want to give up a draft pick for him

Since we already gave Miami our 7th for O'Connell, and who knows what for the two O-linemen, I would have to agree with this one.

Bill Lundberg 09-16-2009 11:13 AM

Quote:

@Adam_SchefterWould be surprised if anyone claimed Hank Baskett on waivers today. They'd have to assume his $1.5 million contract -- I'd guess no one does


...

Mr. Laz 09-16-2009 11:15 AM

nice post Bill

DaneMcCloud 09-16-2009 11:26 AM

Just saw that Tweet: So are we to assume that no one claimed Baskett?

Bill Lundberg 09-16-2009 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6078370)
Just saw that Tweet: So are we to assume that no one claimed Baskett?

I would think we'd have heard about it by now. What time was his release yesterday? Teams have 24 hours to claim him, correct?

DaneMcCloud 09-16-2009 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Lundberg (Post 6078376)
I would think we'd have heard about it by now. What time was his release yesterday? Teams have 24 hours to claim him, correct?

Yeah but I think it would be end of business today, 5pm EST, before we know for sure.

SAUTO 09-16-2009 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6078383)
Yeah but I think it would be end of business today, 5pm EST, before we know for sure.

you would think for 1.5 mil we would be all over him, we have money to spare for sure

Bill Lundberg 09-16-2009 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6078390)
you would think for 1.5 mil we would be all over him, we have money to spare for sure

Just because we have it doesn't mean we spend it unwisely.

DaneMcCloud 09-16-2009 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6078390)
you would think for 1.5 mil we would be all over him, we have money to spare for sure

Maybe, maybe not. For all we know, he doesn't fit their idea of the "Best 53".

I'm still trying to figure out Copper is in that equation.

Micjones 09-16-2009 11:37 AM

I don't think it's a foregone conclusion that he'll go to St. Louis.
They signed Ruvell Martin AND David Tyree's been in for a workout.

Micjones 09-16-2009 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Lundberg (Post 6078397)
Just because we have it doesn't mean we spend it unwisely.

It would be unwise to upgrade the WR position with a player who is clearly better than the one who is currently occupying a roster spot?

Dylan 09-16-2009 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 6078219)
Eh, i would keep Engram, though i wouldn't care if he was released. We already have another copper type of Player in Wade. I'd cut Copper and bring in Baskett.

Baskett has always seemed like he has a boat load of talent to me. He has the size speed, I've seen him make some nice grabs. Wonder why he isn't a top 3 WR for the Eagles?


Baskett seemed promising during his rookie year - but then came the drops -- I/M/O, Hank had trouble running the right routes.

I was surprised Baskett lasted this long on special teams. The Eagles felt he was a good special teams blocker, he would be on the team. Honestly, I was surprised he made the team at the end of preseason.

I'm not sure if the Eagles had Baskett listed as a reserve. However, if he was -- I’d expect him to be dead last. The Eagles have younger and much better receivers on their roster.

Just my observations of Baskett through the years.

Chiefnj2 09-16-2009 11:39 AM

KC should claim him. Ticket sales will increase just to see Kendra in some skimpy Chiefs gear.

Dylan 09-16-2009 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 6078417)
KC should claim him. Ticket sales will increase just to see Kendra in some skimpy Chiefs gear.

LMAO

but not on Pioli & Haley's dime. ...

Sometimes it's the players agents feeding the media on teams that are interested in their client. Honestly, I believe that's the case here. Could be wrong

sorry for all the grammatical errors -- i'm at work

Micjones 09-16-2009 11:43 AM

It may or may not matter, but the Chiefs added Lance Long to their roster so they may feel that they've adequately addressed the WR spot.

Bill Lundberg 09-16-2009 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 6078409)
It would be unwise to upgrade the WR position with a player who is clearly better than the one who is currently occupying a roster spot?

If 31 other teams pass on him at that price tag then, I would say, yes it's unwise. Besides, who says he's clearly better? The guy has yet to be anything other than potential.

ToxSocks 09-16-2009 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Lundberg (Post 6078448)
If 31 other teams pass on him at that price tag then, I would say, yes it's unwise. Besides, who says he's clearly better? The guy has yet to be anything other than potential.

But at least he HAS TALENT. Something, oh say, Copper, doesn't have much of

Buehler445 09-16-2009 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Lundberg (Post 6078328)

...

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6078390)
you would think for 1.5 mil we would be all over him, we have money to spare for sure

This 1.5 MIL isn't all that much.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Lundberg (Post 6078448)
If 31 other teams pass on him at that price tag then, I would say, yes it's unwise. Besides, who says he's clearly better? The guy has yet to be anything other than potential.

IIRC he had some nice catches in the playoffs one year. I think he was Donovan's go to guy before they upgraded the position.

DaneMcCloud 09-16-2009 12:24 PM

Posted via Mobile Device

Bill Lundberg 09-16-2009 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6078556)
Posted via Mobile Device

I'm calling Bullshit on this one.

gta0012 09-16-2009 12:50 PM

Well his GF is a HUGE chargers fan so this would be hilarious if we picked him up.

I think he is a more solid option then some of the WR's we have. Eagles have a lot of young Wr's hence why he was let go.

But who needs WR's when our line blows dick and can't give the qb anytime anyway.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.