Oooh oooh! Marques Colston.

Got another one!

Chad Johnson is every bit as good as Randy Moss and Larry Fitzgerald?

Die, dumbass.

Yup. But nooo, Chad is just as good as Colston or even Moss/Fitzgerald.

So I guess the Donks are going to sweep the AFC North since they have already put the Bengals down?

I don't know if you realize this... but the Chiefs won the second game. There was this whole other game that the Chiefs actually won on the road.

The second week, the Chiefs had just lost Croyle and Huard was struggling. As the season went on, Thigpen gave us a better option at QB.

The Chiefs are much better at QB this year. I think the defense is better this year.

So, keep ignoring the fact that the Chiefs actually won one of the two games against Oakland if it makes you feel better..... but the Chiefs got better as the season went along and I think they are even better now.

If Denver wins the West and the Bengals score a better record than the Ravens this year, I'll start listening to KnowMo.

But before I do that, I'll swallow a bowl of broken glass.

No. We will go 3-1 against that division. We have the rest of the AFC North at home.

Sweet. I have a new sig.

I would say the Ravens are better than the Bengals just because they have a better DL, OL, and Ray Lewis and Ed Reed. The Bengals are better everywhere else though.

You might not realize this...but the Chiefs lack the proper personnel to run the defense that they currently employ.

DT and ILB are pretty important positions for stopping the run in this scheme, last time I checked. /Herm/

So keeping ignoring the fact that this is a terrible matchup for the Chiefs, on paper.

For the record, I believe the Chiefs will be 3-13 for the year, and I have this game penciled in as one of the 3 wins. But I wouldn't bet any money on it after watching this "defense" get shredded for 500 against a Ravens unit that, while it may be improving, might not be anywhere near elite.

Im done with this conversation. :shake:

Wow, the rest of the AFC North is at home....see, and I thought you had two at home and two away.... that seems like a competetive advantage to me.

My bad. I thought the Baltimore game was at home.

If Randy Moss and Larry Fitzgerald had Ryan Fitzpatrick throwing them the ball last year instead of Tom Brady and Kurt Warner then I guess you would understand.

Yeah, Tom Brady had a great year.

Wait, what?

Matt Cassel is better than Ryan Fitzpatrick.

Shut the **** up. Watch Randy Moss and Larry Fitzgerald play and you'll see that even with great QBs there's a reason why they're some of the most talented WRs to ever play this game. Ochocinco doesn't come ****ing close to what they can do.

Demarcus Ware.

He will conquer Alberts like Cortez conquered the Yucatan, and he will eat Cassel's heart too...

A loss is a loss, regardless of the score.

The NFL doesn't award extra points for being close.

Who the hell is "Alberts"?

As Chris Rock would say "Are you out of your mind?????"
Posted via Mobile Device

They also don't adjust scores to account for yardage.

The whole argument goes both ways. They played poorly on both sides of the ball. And yet they did JUST enough to stay in it until almost the end. Good? Bad? I don't know. It is what it is.

My point was aimed directly at Mic's assertion that they didn't "lose by 30 points".

Had it not been for the blocked punt for a TD (very rare) or DJ's interception return to the goal line, setting up a TD, it would have been 28 points.

But that's neither here or there: A loss is a loss.

We've already discussed the merits of the Chiefs play this past week and now it's in the books.

It's Raider time!

This.

Demarcus Ware ain't sh... nevermind.