ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs I am afraid that Haley might have lost the team today. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=215034)

SenselessChiefsFan 09-27-2009 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan (Post 6115766)
I love how everyone was saying the Chiefs had no chance in this game.

And then when we do lose, they're in here bitching because we lost.

Hypocrites, one and frappin' all.

The loss isn't the concern. Conceding the game bothers me.

Mecca 09-27-2009 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6115776)
Post 53 for OL
For DL: Olshansky, Canty,
For S: Jim Leonhard would have been a better pickup than Brown

Bart Scott was a FA also, but to make these moves we'd have probably had to have a different HC.

kcpasco 09-27-2009 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6115777)
I am not saying that Haley should be gone. I am just saying that with the pissing the bed against Oakland after dominating the game.... and then conceding the game in the third quarter..... plus his 'hard ass' attitude...... just think the players are at least having second thoughts.

JMO.

Maybe its the shitty ass players then

chiefzilla1501 09-27-2009 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan (Post 6115766)
I love how everyone was saying the Chiefs had no chance in this game.

And then when we do lose, they're in here bitching because we lost.

Hypocrites, one and frappin' all.

All I want is to give Cassel a chance to develop.

Surrounding him with an offensive line that forces him into a pass offense that relies on screens and doesn't let him go through progressions not only holds back his development, it also makes him a greater injury risk and it might make him develop poor habits like not checking down receivers and running first instead of settling into a pocket.

If nothing else happens this season, I wanted to see Cassel get better. Based on the last two games, all I hope is that we don't **** him up.

Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan 09-27-2009 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan88 (Post 6115780)
Funny how Parcells with Miami and Dimitroff in Atlanta had no problem upgrading the talent level for both teams before last season that resulted in both franchises going from laughingstock to playoff-caliber.

Take away the trade for Cassel and what did Pioli do to upgrade the talent on the Chiefs roster this past offseason, despite having high draft picks in virtually every round of the draft and a ton of salary cap space???

Trading for Matt Vrabel, Signing Zach Thomas (who didn't even make it out of the preseason), Signing Bobby Engram, Signing Mike Goff.

That is it until the preseason when the Chiefs began to panic shop by bringing in the likes of Toomer, Lelie, etc.

Who should he have brought in that he didn't? Come on. You must have names of people we passed over to be this passionate about it.

dirk digler 09-27-2009 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6115770)
You can be critical about Pioli's evaluation of this team right now. But saying this falls on his shoulders only is laughable.

This team has been digging themselves a hole for years with shitty decisions in FA, and shitty drafting. That's not on Pioli.

If he doesn't do shit after this off-season, put it on his shoulders. But this team is so void of talent, I can't imagine a scenario where we compete until at least 2011.

Yep. I will say that practically ignoring the O-Line when it was horrible last year has to fall on his shoulders. I still haven't heard a reason for that.

Mecca 09-27-2009 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan (Post 6115787)
Who should he have brought in that he didn't? Come on. You must have names of people we passed over to be this passionate about it.

Dude Hamas has posted names 4 times, are you blind?

SenselessChiefsFan 09-27-2009 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6115779)
Expecting to lose is one thing, it's another to see certain things in a loss that point to a bigger problem.

A loss it not just a loss, there's more to it than that.

If I were on the team, and the coach didn't call any pass plays and we were trailing by double digits and couldn't run for shit.... I may just have second thoughts about how qualified my coach was.

Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan 09-27-2009 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6115786)
All I want is to give Cassel a chance to develop.

Surrounding him with an offensive line that forces him into a pass offense that relies on screens and doesn't let him go through progressions not only holds back his development, it also makes him a greater injury risk and it might make him develop poor habits like not checking down receivers and running first instead of settling into a pocket.

If nothing else happens this season, I wanted to see Cassel get better. Based on the last two games, all I hope is that we don't **** him up.

Again, you and I are on the same page here.

I want to see the Chiefs do better. I want to see Cassel develop into a hell of a QB and I want to see the Chiefs dominate the line of scrimmage again like we used to.

I just want some of these people to tell me who we specifically didn't go after.

Mecca 09-27-2009 03:08 PM

If the ref had walked up to Todd Haley with 10 minutes to go in the 3rd and said "hey do you just wanna call it and go home now?" he would have said "yes, just end it" that was how that 2nd half was.

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-27-2009 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan (Post 6115787)
Who should he have brought in that he didn't? Come on. You must have names of people we passed over to be this passionate about it.

READ THE ****ING THREAD, YOU STUPID ****!!

FloridaMan88 09-27-2009 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6115783)
The loss isn't the concern. Conceding the game bothers me.

You could argue the Chiefs conceded the entire season by entering a season with a roster so void of talent.

I guess we should look on the bright side to the fact that the Chiefs are going to be forced to spend $$$ next offseason to avoid having their payroll drop below the NFL payroll minimum.

This after Clark Hunt said it was urgent the taxpayers of Jackson County open their wallet for millions of $$$ in stadium renovations and this as the Chiefs continue to charge $20+ for gameday parking.

I hope Clark brings his country club stiffs of a family out on the field during halftime next week, like he did during halftime of the Raiders game, and brings his fat ass GM with him so the fans in Arrowhead Stadium can shower them with the boos they deserve.

Mecca 09-27-2009 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan (Post 6115793)
Again, you and I are on the same page here.

I want to see the Chiefs do better. I want to see Cassel develop into a hell of a QB and I want to see the Chiefs dominate the line of scrimmage again like we used to.

I just want some of these people to tell me who we specifically didn't go after.

I'm about to call you a bunch of really abrasive names for ignoring the posts with the names.

dirk digler 09-27-2009 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6115791)
If I were on the team, and the coach didn't call any pass plays and we were trailing by double digits and couldn't run for shit.... I may just have second thoughts about how qualified my coach was.

Haley answered this in his pC.

Mecca 09-27-2009 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6115803)
Haley answered this in his pC.

Really what was his answer?

"My players got ****ed in the ass so hard I figured we should just get it over with"

Easy 6 09-27-2009 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 6115683)
Wait, after 3 games he's going to lose the team? Really?

Yes.

Its all over.

chiefzilla1501 09-27-2009 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan (Post 6115793)
Again, you and I are on the same page here.

I want to see the Chiefs do better. I want to see Cassel develop into a hell of a QB and I want to see the Chiefs dominate the line of scrimmage again like we used to.

I just want some of these people to tell me who we specifically didn't go after.

We gave a long list. I think where we're on a different page is that I think for the offensive line, we should have been okay with stopgaps.

We're not talking long-term solutions here. I agree that with the available options, we probably would have gotten one at the most (if any). But there were plenty of short-term solutions out there. And given the importance of developing and protecting your QB that you traded for, it should have been a priority to at least make us as good at every line position as possible.

The lists every one has brought up consists of cheap, short-term fixes, all of which were better than our current options. None of them would have turned our offensive line around, but all of them would have made it better.

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-27-2009 03:11 PM

One more time, for the ****ing troglodytes:

OL

FA: Jason Brown, Ray Willis.

Draft: Round 2: Eben Britton, Max Unger, Andy Levitre, William Beatty (Cassel Trade)
Round 3: (Magee): Antoine Caldwell, Kraig Urbik, Louis Vazquez
Round 4: Jonathan Luigs
Round 5: Duke Robinson, Fenuki Tupou

Defense:

For DL: Olshansky, Canty,
For S: Jim Leonhard would have been a better pickup than Brown

DeezNutz 09-27-2009 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6115802)
I'm about to call you a bunch of really abrasive names for ignoring the posts with the names.

Could be that he has you on ignore because of all the Sanchez talk.

He wasn't too happy with my allusion, in the game thread, to Sanchez's early success.

Mecca 09-27-2009 03:11 PM

I think it comes down to the Chiefs had a set amount of money they were spending they spent it on 2 players.

KcMizzou 09-27-2009 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 6115807)
Yes.

Its all over.

Sad, aint it? So who are the next hot GM and HC candidates?

Mecca 09-27-2009 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6115812)
Could be that he has you on ignore because of all the Sanchez talk.

He wasn't too happy with my allusion, in the game thread, to Sanchez's early success.

Oh so he's one of those bleeding vagina posters is he?

Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan 09-27-2009 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6115808)
We gave a long list. I think where we're on a different page is that I think for the offensive line, we should have been okay with stopgaps.

We're not talking long-term solutions here. I agree that with the available options, we probably would have gotten one at the most (if any). But there were plenty of short-term solutions out there. And given the importance of developing and protecting your QB that you traded for, it should have been a priority to at least make us as good at every line position as possible.

The lists every one has brought up consists of cheap, short-term fixes, all of which were better than our current options. None of them would have turned our offensive line around, but all of them would have made it better.

Chiefzilla,

I'm not arguing with you. You provided me a list and I completely agree, some of them would have been an improvement.

It's the other gloom and doomers who I want responses from. I haven't seen a response from anyone but you.

I've also seen a few names brought up in other threads, and the same people who're bringing up their names now were the SAME people who were screaming that they were a waste of money, too old, not the right mix, etc. a few months ago.

So which is it? Should I believe them now or should I have believed them in May/June?

Easy 6 09-27-2009 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 6115814)
Sad, aint it? So who are the next hot GM and HC candidates?

I highly doubt that the game has passed Art Donovan by yet, lets try it...:shrug:

DaneMcCloud 09-27-2009 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan (Post 6115831)
Chiefzilla,

I'm not arguing with you. You provided me a list and I completely agree, some of them would have been an improvement.

It's the other gloom and doomers who I want responses from. I haven't seen a response from anyone but you.

I've also seen a few names brought up in other threads, and the same people who're bringing up their names now were the SAME people who were screaming that they were a waste of money, too old, not the right mix, etc. a few months ago.

So which is it? Should I believe them now or should I have believed them in May/June?

WTF?

Do you Hamas on ignore?

How the **** can you be so ****ing stupid?

dirk digler 09-27-2009 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6115805)
Really what was his answer?

"My players got ****ed in the ass so hard I figured we should just get it over with"

He wanted to keep running because this team has no identity. He said it had a purpose as far as the team goes and he would leave it at that

I am also sure that the O-Line giving Cassel .00005 seconds to throw the ball played into that as well.

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-27-2009 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan (Post 6115831)

It's the other gloom and doomers who I want responses from. I haven't seen a response from anyone but you.

http://mphotos.live.com/p.ashx?url=h...=149&mkt=en-US

Mecca 09-27-2009 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6115847)
He wanted to keep running because this team has no identity. He said it had a purpose as far as the team goes and he would leave it at that

I am also sure that the O-Line giving Cassel .00005 seconds to throw the ball played into that as well.

The purpose was to just get the game over with.

chiefzilla1501 09-27-2009 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6115858)
The purpose was to just get the game over with.

Frankly, I don't see how it matters. The Chiefs had two options: run a screen pass where Cassel gets walloped as he gets rid of the ball or run the ball unsuccessfully.

I would rather have option B, even if it's conservative.

It's pretty damn sad that we had designed plays where Cassel got rid of the ball immediately and he STILL got hit on almost every pass play.

dirk digler 09-27-2009 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6115858)
The purpose was to just get the game over with.

Yeah I am sure it had nothing to do with the O-Line letting 3 defenders on ever play run free and destroy Cassel. :rolleyes:

dirk digler 09-27-2009 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6115863)
Frankly, I don't see how it matters. The Chiefs had two options: run a screen pass where Cassel gets walloped as he gets rid of the ball or run the ball unsuccessfully.

I would rather have option B, even if it's conservative.

It's pretty damn sad that we had designed plays where Cassel got rid of the ball immediately and he STILL got hit on almost every pass play.

Yep

Mecca 09-27-2009 03:23 PM

This is incredibly low standard to say you can't even throw passes when you're getting your asses kicked.

Hammock Parties 09-27-2009 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6115843)
WTF?

Do you have Hamas on ignore?

How the **** can you be so ****ing stupid?

Just reading Hamas' posts raises your IQ!

dirk digler 09-27-2009 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6115878)
This is incredibly low standard to say you can't even throw passes when you're getting your asses kicked.

I agree. I saw our supposedly stud LT get abused a ton today and let people just run by him. It was embarrassing.

Mecca 09-27-2009 03:26 PM

So hey if we just have to run cause we can't dare throw..

Does that mean the gameplan against the Giants will have 3 passes for the entire game in it?

Easy 6 09-27-2009 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6115867)
Yeah I am sure it had nothing to do with the O-Line letting 3 defenders on ever play run free and destroy Cassel. :rolleyes:

No kidding.

He might have had 3, loosely defined 'pockets' all. day. long.

Same type of FAIL on the run, with 2-3 iggles swarming the backfield by the time a handoff could be completed.

chiefzilla1501 09-27-2009 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6115888)
So hey if we just have to run cause we can't dare throw..

Does that mean the gameplan against the Giants will have 3 passes for the entire game in it?

The Giants game is going to be really, really, really ugly. That might be the first game that I intentionally miss.

Mecca 09-27-2009 03:28 PM

If they play like they did today they won't beat anyone.

chiefzilla1501 09-27-2009 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6115894)
If they play like they did today they won't beat anyone.

We won't win any games against top-tier teams. We are clearly outmatched. Let's not forget that Philly, even with Kolb, is a very good team.

FAX 09-27-2009 03:39 PM

Dang. "Fire Haley!" "Kill Haley!" "Decapitate Haley!" "Burn Haley!" "Drink Haley's Blood And Eat His Spleen!"

I admire the enthusiasm, but seriously, you can't have10 penalties for almost 100 yards on the road against anybody in the NFL. Talent-wise, we are a very bad team and Haley's been right all along; we can't afford any mistakes - even against average teams - if we're going to give ourselves a chance.

Haley is not going to lose the team (unless it's via the waiver wire, or by trade). He's not going to quit. And, he's not going to buy a gallon of gas and set himself on fire in front of the Jason Whitlock's house.

All of us (including Haley) just saw how far we have to go. We were outplayed and outclassed by a far superior team. We're not 85% of the way there. We may not be 20% of the way there. This is going to take years ... many, many years.

I don't think we converted a single third down today. Some fans need to run laps.

FAX

JuicesFlowing 09-27-2009 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 6115933)
Dang. "Fire Haley!" "Kill Haley!" "Decapitate Haley!" "Burn Haley!" "Drink Haley's Blood And Eat His Spleen!"

I admire the enthusiasm, but seriously, you can't have10 penalties for almost 100 yards on the road against anybody in the NFL. Talent-wise, we are a very bad team and Haley's been right all along; we can't afford any mistakes - even against average teams - if we're going to give ourselves a chance.

Haley is not going to lose the team (unless it's via the waiver wire, or by trade). He's not going to quit. And, he's not going to buy a gallon of gas and set himself on fire in front of the Jason Whitlock's house.

All of us (including Haley) just saw how far we have to go. We were outplayed and outclassed by a far superior team. We're not 85% of the way there. We may not be 20% of the way there. This is going to take years ... many, many years.

I don't think we converted a single third down today. Some fans need to run laps.

FAX

Fax, if you posted this as the first reply, a mod could have closed the thread. But really, we all like running up our post counts debating hilarious bullshit. In other words, well said ....

OnTheWarpath15 09-27-2009 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 6115933)
Dang. "Fire Haley!" "Kill Haley!" "Decapitate Haley!" "Burn Haley!" "Drink Haley's Blood And Eat His Spleen!"

I admire the enthusiasm, but seriously, you can't have10 penalties for almost 100 yards on the road against anybody in the NFL. Talent-wise, we are a very bad team and Haley's been right all along; we can't afford any mistakes - even against average teams - if we're going to give ourselves a chance.

Haley is not going to lose the team (unless it's via the waiver wire, or by trade). He's not going to quit. And, he's not going to buy a gallon of gas and set himself on fire in front of the Jason Whitlock's house.

All of us (including Haley) just saw how far we have to go. We were outplayed and outclassed by a far superior team. We're not 85% of the way there. We may not be 20% of the way there. This is going to take years ... many, many years.

I don't think we converted a single third down today. Some fans need to run laps.

FAX

Which is probably why people are getting pissed.

Talent and discipline are two different things.

We know the team isn't talented.

We've also learned that the team isn't disciplined, which is a bit of a concern seeing as how Haley is a so-called disciplinarian.

To me, a loss is a loss, regardless of why.

To others, losing may be acceptable when you know we have such a lack of talent. But it may not be acceptable to see them lose the way they are losing - negating big plays, scoring or otherwise because of a lack of discipline.

htismaqe 09-27-2009 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 6115933)
Dang. "Fire Haley!" "Kill Haley!" "Decapitate Haley!" "Burn Haley!" "Drink Haley's Blood And Eat His Spleen!"

I admire the enthusiasm, but seriously, you can't have10 penalties for almost 100 yards on the road against anybody in the NFL. Talent-wise, we are a very bad team and Haley's been right all along; we can't afford any mistakes - even against average teams - if we're going to give ourselves a chance.

Haley is not going to lose the team (unless it's via the waiver wire, or by trade). He's not going to quit. And, he's not going to buy a gallon of gas and set himself on fire in front of the Jason Whitlock's house.

All of us (including Haley) just saw how far we have to go. We were outplayed and outclassed by a far superior team. We're not 85% of the way there. We may not be 20% of the way there. This is going to take years ... many, many years.

I don't think we converted a single third down today. Some fans need to run laps.

FAX

I absolutely agree.

However, it's time for Haley to show that this "right 53" thing isn't glorified favoritism. The guys committing the penalties (Ndukwe) need to be dealt with the same way that DJ and Bowe were dealt with.

htismaqe 09-27-2009 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6115956)
We've also learned that the team isn't disciplined, which is a bit of a concern seeing as how Haley is a so-called disciplinarian.

This.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6115956)
To others, losing may be acceptable when you know we have such a lack of talent. But it may not be acceptable to see them lose the way they are losing - negating big plays, scoring or otherwise because of a lack of discipline.

And this.

Mama Hip Rockets 09-27-2009 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 6115933)
I don't think we converted a single third down today.

which is exactly why haley is a dipshit. all he called all day on third and long was handoffs and 3 yard passes.

DeezNutz 09-27-2009 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 6115961)
I absolutely agree.

However, it's time for Haley to show that this "right 53" thing isn't glorified favoritism. The guys committing the penalties (Ndukwe) need to be dealt with the same way that DJ and Bowe were dealt with.

The problem, however, is that Haley has created a slippery slope.

He can't deactivate the entire ****ing team, so now he has to pick and choose. Appearing capricious isn't very desirable...

okcchief 09-27-2009 03:49 PM

I don't think it matters if he loses the team. Over half of them will be gone in two years. Our roster is ****ing pathetic.

KcMizzou 09-27-2009 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6115973)
The problem, however, is that Haley has created a slippery slope.

He can't deactivate the entire ****ing team, so now he has to pick and choose. Appearing capricious isn't very desirable...

If he benches every guy that ****s up, we wont be able to field a team...

munkey 09-27-2009 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6115632)
This is a game where we were horribly outmatched. It reminds me of the Eagles game several years ago when we played without Roaf.

I'm not too upset at Haley for the way the game was coached. I'm upset that his players still make boneheaded mistakes. But the playcalling is fine. There's nothing you can do when on every pass play, at least two pass rushers are getting to Cassel unblocked.

I'm more pissed at Pioli for not realizing this was a problem sooner. Haley is doing the best he can with what he was given.

That being said, this is an interesting test for Haley. Yellers and screamers have a hard time yelling, when players don't buy into what you're selling. It reminds me of when Coughlin was almost ousted several years ago.

THIS

Mecca 09-27-2009 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thurman merman (Post 6115972)
which is exactly why haley is a dipshit. all he called all day on third and long was handoffs and 3 yard passes.

You weren't impressed going 0-11 on 3rd down?

DeezNutz 09-27-2009 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 6115987)
If he benches every guy that ****s up, we wont be able to field a team...

Exactly.

Thus my point about appearing capricious in deciding whom he "punishes."

chiefs1111 09-27-2009 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6115894)
If they play like they did today they won't beat anyone.

At this point the Chiefs are so bad they couldn't beat an All Star team made up of College All Stars

Mama Hip Rockets 09-27-2009 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6115999)
You weren't impressed going 0-11 on 3rd down?

not exactly. i thought herm edwards and chan gailey were bad, but today was by far the worst offensive gameplan i have ever seen.

DeezNutz 09-27-2009 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefs1111 (Post 6116028)
At this point the Chiefs are so bad they couldn't beat an All Star team made up of College All Stars

Let's not get too carried away.

Even as shitty as they are, they'd fist **** the best college team one could assemble.

Bowser 09-27-2009 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thurman merman (Post 6116032)
not exactly. i thought herm edwards and chan gailey were bad, but today was by far the worst offensive gameplan i have ever seen.

Don't get carried away. Herm's gameplan against the Colts in '06 was total ass. THAT was the worst offensive gameplan I have ever seen.

dirk digler 09-27-2009 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6115956)
Which is probably why people are getting pissed.

Talent and discipline are two different things.

We know the team isn't talented.

We've also learned that the team isn't disciplined, which is a bit of a concern seeing as how Haley is a so-called disciplinarian.

To me, a loss is a loss, regardless of why.

To others, losing may be acceptable when you know we have such a lack of talent. But it may not be acceptable to see them lose the way they are losing - negating big plays, scoring or otherwise because of a lack of discipline.

I agree with you OTW. After the Ravens game I said many times how the team played smart and was one of the reasons why they were able to stay in the game. I don't know what has happened the last 2 weeks.

Easy 6 09-27-2009 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 6116037)
Don't get carried away. Herm's gameplan against the Colts in '06 was total ass. THAT was the worst offensive gameplan I have ever seen.

What are you talking about?

RRPP was executed with flawless, machine-like precision.

Mecca 09-27-2009 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6116002)
Exactly.

Thus my point about appearing capricious in deciding whom he "punishes."

One thing I've noticed is Goff and Ndukwe have been as bad as anyone but so far the only guys that have been "punished" are guys that were here before. No new additions have been punished.

DeezNutz 09-27-2009 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6116046)
I agree with you OTW. After the Ravens game I said many times how the team played smart and was one of the reasons why they were able to stay in the game. I don't know what has happened the last 2 weeks.

I'll tell you what happened in the Ravens game, and that's that we definitely did NOT get "lucky" or "fortunate" from a blocked punt for a TD and 70 INT return to set up a TD.

These two plays DID NOT cover up an otherwise abortion of a game and instill a sense of false hope in many fans.

The last two weeks have been the exception, not the rule.

Mecca 09-27-2009 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thurman merman (Post 6116032)
not exactly. i thought herm edwards and chan gailey were bad, but today was by far the worst offensive gameplan i have ever seen.

This offensive gameplan is the equivalent of Huard going big fetal in the pocket.

DeezNutz 09-27-2009 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6116063)
One thing I've noticed is Goff and Ndukwe have been as bad as anyone but so far the only guys that have been "punished" are guys that were here before. No new additions have been punished.

"Their guys"? Yeah, this will certainly be something to keep an eye on as the season progresses, especially considering that the new guys are, largely, just as shitty as the old guys.

Marcellus 09-27-2009 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6116063)
One thing I've noticed is Goff and Ndukwe have been as bad as anyone but so far the only guys that have been "punished" are guys that were here before. No new additions have been punished.

Niswanger ring a bell to you?

OnTheWarpath15 09-27-2009 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6116046)
I agree with you OTW. After the Ravens game I said many times how the team played smart and was one of the reasons why they were able to stay in the game. I don't know what has happened the last 2 weeks.

My guess, though I'll get flamed for it:

They are tuning out their coach.

DaneMcCloud 09-27-2009 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6116063)
One thing I've noticed is Goff and Ndukwe have been as bad as anyone but so far the only guys that have been "punished" are guys that were here before. No new additions have been punished.

Thus eliminating the statement that there are "No Sacred Cows".

What a load of horseshit.

Mecca 09-27-2009 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 6116078)
Niswanger ring a bell to you?

Apparently you can be an abortion as long as it's on the OL it's great, if you're a WR or a RB though you won't get to play.

Mama Hip Rockets 09-27-2009 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 6116037)
Don't get carried away. Herm's gameplan against the Colts in '06 was total ass. THAT was the worst offensive gameplan I have ever seen.

how was today any better?

DeezNutz 09-27-2009 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6116081)
My guess, though I'll get flamed for it:

They are tuning out their coach.

Already?

Man, I'd believe this in week 10, but if this is indeed the case in week 3, this will turn into a complete ****ing circus and Haley won't last beyond year 2.

chiefs1111 09-27-2009 04:12 PM

So how many sacks do you think we will give up next week against the Giants? Ill say at least 6

Mecca 09-27-2009 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6116081)
My guess, though I'll get flamed for it:

They are tuning out their coach.

You mean like when you're a kid and one of your parents constantly yells...or if your wife were to do it after awhile you just tune it out?

Marcellus 09-27-2009 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6116088)
Apparently you can be an abortion as long as it's on the OL it's great, if you're a WR or a RB though you won't get to play.

Yet they replace 2 of the staring 5 OL.


You are being contradictory.

RJ 09-27-2009 04:13 PM

The 60 million dollar man completed 14 passes for 90 yards?

JFC, I'm glad I went to play golf. That must have been like watching paint dry.

DeezNutz 09-27-2009 04:13 PM

The Giants will be looking for, and probably expecting, consecutive shutouts.

DaneMcCloud 09-27-2009 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 6116096)
Yet they replace 2 of the staring 5 OL.


You are being contradictory.

Two?

Who?

Mecca 09-27-2009 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 6116096)
Yet they replace 2 of the staring 5 OL.


You are being contradictory.

Replaced them with guys just as bad as the last guy, man I'm impressed.

dirk digler 09-27-2009 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6116068)
I'll tell you what happened in the Ravens game, and that's that we definitely did NOT get "lucky" or "fortunate" from a blocked punt for a TD and 70 INT return to set up a TD.

These two plays DID NOT cover up an otherwise abortion of a game and instill a sense of false hope in many fans.

The last two weeks have been the exception, not the rule.

We didn't hurt ourselves with turnovers and penalties. If we had the score would have been like it was today.

This team has very little margin of error

Marcellus 09-27-2009 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6116094)
You mean like when you're a kid and one of your parents constantly yells...or if your wife were to do it after awhile you just tune it out?

Wham, Wham, Wham, Wham, still beating the same old drum.

Mecca 09-27-2009 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6116099)
Two?

Who?

He's counting Goff and Ndukwe replacements since they weren't starters for us last year.

chiefzilla1501 09-27-2009 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RJ (Post 6116097)
The 60 million dollar man completed 14 passes for 90 yards?

JFC, I'm glad I went to play golf. That must have been like watching paint dry.

That's not Cassel's fault. I have never seen a worse game in terms of pass protection. And that's counting some of the worst games under Herm Edwards.

Marcellus 09-27-2009 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6116105)
Replaced them with guys just as bad as the last guy, man I'm impressed.

Well, they made moves which you were screaming for before it happened.

Bunit 09-27-2009 04:15 PM

It's the third game of the season. Relax, he did not lose the team even though a lot of players on this team need to be lost.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.