ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Pass interference call on Page (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=215607)

Tiger's Fan 10-05-2009 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 6141549)
Shoulder pad to sternum.

This is exactly what it was. No helmet involved, and it certainly wasn't too high. Nothing more than a terrible call, and a momentum changer at that.

Lono 10-05-2009 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6141647)
Okay, I was just throwing a number out there.

Thanks for actually doing the math.

:thumb:

Haha i actually really didn't do that to prove you wrong, it just got me wondering how fast they really were.

-King- 10-05-2009 12:18 PM

Yeah dane is spot on here. Defensive players have gotten bigger, faster and stronger since 40 years ago. All that while offensive players are still in the same mold they were. Its not like they haven't gotten bigger also. Its not they aren't stronger or faster. They are the same 160lb offensive players from 4 decades ago. Only defensive players have changed hence the rules. /sarcasm

Hell most qbs are taller and some are even taller than runningbacks. Should you not be able to hit rbs then? I swear this league is pussifying itself each year. If a safety can't hit a wr and dislodge the ball, then what can he do? Should he wait for the wr to catch the ball and give an ok sign before he hits the wr? That hit was pure shoulder to shoulder. Not only was it not helmet to helmet, but I don't even think their helmets so much as grazed each other.
Posted via Mobile Device

Coach 10-05-2009 12:23 PM

Ray Lewis was right on his interview yesterday. I'm tired of all these pansy rules destroying football. I understand there must be protection done for the players, but come on, this is getting absurd.

Let them play football. If the NFL is so damned concerned about the violence, then just ban the damn game all together. In fact, let's just change the damn game to either two-touch or flag football.

DaneMcCloud 10-05-2009 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lono (Post 6141654)
Haha i actually really didn't do that to prove you wrong, it just got me wondering how fast they really were.

It's cool, Dude!

DaneMcCloud 10-05-2009 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverChiefs58 (Post 6141649)
Dane, while I agree with some of what those QB's are saying ie hitting below the knees or on the head, tackle football is going to have guys rushing the passer and they are not playing two hand touch. To say a QB is going to die on the field because guys are getting bigger and faster is a little far fetched. QB's are getting bigger too and faster. But I am talking about hits in general, from DB, LB's or even that stupid call against the offense for running into the defense and then him flop on the ground like it was a basketball game.

I watch a ton of football each and every Sunday, whether it's at home with the Sunday Ticket or at sports bars. I rarely see guys faking it like in basketball. I agree, BTW. I'm a big basketball fan, especially a Lakers fan, and the flopping there that goes on is disgusting.

But the bottom line is this: Bad calls happen every single Sunday to nearly every single team. Good teams overcome bad calls, bad teams don't.

If that call sent the Chiefs on a downward spiral, then I'd say that collectively, they have a defeatist attitude and loser's mentality.

One bad call by the refs shouldn't upset 45 guys and a coaching staff to the point of self-destruction.

htismaqe 10-05-2009 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6141670)
But the bottom line is this: Bad calls happen every single Sunday to nearly every single team. Good teams overcome bad calls, bad teams don't.

There are instances where a single bad call affects the outcome of the game. Yesterday wasn't one of them.

ForeverChiefs58 10-05-2009 12:36 PM

They pretty much got even with the no call hit from Carr really

ForeverChiefs58 10-05-2009 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 6141672)
There are instances where a single bad call affects the outcome of the game. Yesterday wasn't one of them.

Right after that call I got a sick feeling, and thought, "I hope the chiefs don't let up now and the giants score the very next play..."

CoMoChief 10-05-2009 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6141503)
Yay, you've been watching football for 40 years.

Big ****ing deal.

When I was a senior in high school in the mid-80's, I could bench press 225, run a 4.7 forty and was the second fastest guy on a State Championship football team in Kansas. I weighed 160 pounds (and wasn't all that good at football, quite honestly).

Guys today are 275 pounds, bench 600 and run a 4.7 forty. The collisions can be catastrophic, leading to brain injury, early death, etc. If you think that letting men of that size and speed collide into unprotected men at will, I'm sorry, but you're ****ing moron.

So you were a small football player? What does that have anything to do with the NFL players at that time who were also roughly the same size as they are today?

DaneMcCloud 10-05-2009 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 6141785)
So you were a small football player? What does that have anything to do with the NFL players at that time who were also roughly the same size as they are today?

Huh?

The basic premise was that I was 6'1, 160 pounds and ran a 4.7 forty. That was good for second fastest on a state champion football team. And that was stop-watch. Not like today.

Guys today are 6'5, 275 pounds and run 4.7 forties. They've gotten bigger, stronger and faster than even 25 years ago and the impact of that hit can be catastrophic to an unprotected QB, regardless of his size.

philfree 10-05-2009 01:37 PM

A hit like Page made was the kind of hit that can set a tone early in a game. The crowd went wild, the sideline went wild and the players on the field were pumped. Then out comes the hanky and we got an opposite effect. The Chiefs are not a good team and crap like that just makes the hole we're trying to dig out of a little deeper. From elation to deflation.


PhilFree:arrow:

Chief Henry 10-05-2009 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 6141025)
Giants were holding all game.

Our guys were getting mugged and flat out tackled and they were NOT being flagged for it.......................so it goes being the fan of a shitty team.

ForeverChiefs58 10-05-2009 01:47 PM

Remember the Chiefs vs. 49ers game at arrowhead back in like 1993? DT and Anthony Davis hit Steve Young so hard in his blindside I thought I heard it at my house. If that kind of sack would kill somebody than make it a damn two hand touch game and be done with it geeze. Like I said, Carson (Jessie) Palmer needs to take off his dress and change his wadded up panties.

KCUnited 10-05-2009 01:48 PM

I liked one of Petro's takes today, he said if the NFL was so concerned maybe they should stop showing those hits to promote itself.

Chief Henry 10-05-2009 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buster Hymen (Post 6141652)
This is exactly what it was. No helmet involved, and it certainly wasn't too high. Nothing more than a terrible call, and a momentum changer at that.

It was a f'n horrible call. The NFL might as well as put skirts on the QB's and receivers :harumph:

Some guys on this board brag about they're HS playing days and how thats suppose to mean .02 inregards to NFL football !!!

ForeverChiefs58 10-05-2009 01:51 PM

Momentum in football IS a gamechanger, and our momentum was stolen from us and given to the other team because of the refs, not the play. Refs need to let em play.

Chiefnj2 10-05-2009 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverChiefs58 (Post 6141906)
Momentum in football IS a gamechanger, and our momentum was stolen from us and given to the other team because of the refs, not the play. Refs need to let em play.

If anything, momentum swung 5 seconds into the game with the kickoff fumble.

blaise 10-05-2009 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 6141919)
If anything, momentum swung 5 seconds into the game with the kickoff fumble.

And when they let Hakim Nicks run right through them all the way to the end zone.

Rain Man 10-05-2009 02:20 PM

It was a horrible, horrible call for which the officiating crew should have had their feet whipped in a Turkish prison.

That said, there were some questionable calls both ways. There were a couple of false starts that I couldn't see at all, even on the replay, and the one play where Mario "I catch it on the second bounce" Manningham clearly caught the ball and they called it incomplete even on the replay.

It was incredibly frustrating for them to get a long touchdown on the next play, though. That touchdown was a gift from the officiating crew.

Coach 10-05-2009 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverChiefs58 (Post 6141906)
Momentum in football IS a gamechanger, and our momentum was stolen from us and given to the other team because of the refs, not the play. Refs need to let em play.

No, I think the momentum was taken when Charles fumbled that opening kickoff.

I think that pretty much set the tone for the whole day.

BigMeatballDave 10-05-2009 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 6141987)
Mario "I catch it on the second bounce" Manningham clearly caught the ball and they called it incomplete even on the replay.

That was the correct call, tho. Its a shitty rule. Remember the Chargers-Raiders game a few weeks ago? The Raiders had an apparent TD nullified because the receiver did not secure the ball all the way to the ground.

BigMeatballDave 10-05-2009 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach (Post 6142002)
No, I think the momentum was taken when Charles fumbled that opening kickoff.

I think that pretty much set the tone for the whole day.

Yep. That and the fact that the Chiefs only got 3 points from the 2 turnovers by NY. Chiefs could have been up 14-0 at that point.

Rain Man 10-05-2009 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 6142025)
That was the correct call, tho. Its a shitty rule. Remember the Chargers-Raiders game a few weeks ago? The Raiders had an apparent TD nullified because the receiver did not secure the ball all the way to the ground.

It looked to me like he had it. I was surprised that they didn't rule it a catch. Maybe I'm not understanding the rule correctly.

But either way, screw Manningham. I hate him and I hate the Giants today.

Imon Yourside 10-05-2009 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 6141013)
Tony G's offensive PI call in the Indy divisional playoff game in 2003 was the worst call I've ever seen.


Literally. And not to mention that cost us points.

I agree it has to be that or the dreaded 97 playoff game where Tony went up in bounds for a TD pass and was forced out by the defender.

orange 10-05-2009 06:21 PM

Found this while responding to another post.
Owners adopt four safety-related rule changes
By Tom Silverstein of the Journal Sentinel
March 24, 2009


Dana Point, Calif. -- It's nothing akin to the introduction of instant replay or the "K" ball, but the NFL owners have approved four minor rule changes submitted by the league's competition committee.

All four rules were made with the safety of players in mind.

Rule Change No. 1: No blindside blocks in which there is contact to the player's head.
It will now be a 15-yard penalty if "the initial force of the contact by a blocker's helmet, forearm or shoulder is to the head or neck area" if the blocker is moving toward his own endline and he approaches the opponent from behind or the side.

In simple terms, no crackback blocks to the head. Examples are receivers blocking down on linebackers and defenders blocking back on interception or fumble returns. Under this rule, it still appears that Warren Sapp's block on Chad Clifton was legal, but I'll check later with vice president of officiating Mike Pereira when he has his officiating seminar later today.

Rule Change No. 2: No more kickoff wedges.
It will be a 15-yard penalty if players intentionally form a wedge of three or more players on a kickoff return. No more than two receiving team players can join together shoulder-to-shoulder within 2 yards of each other and block for the returner.

Rule Change No. 3: Unnecessary roughness has been expanded to include shots to a defenseless receiver's head.
The amendment states, a penalty will be called "If the initial force of the contact by a defender's helmet, forearm, or shoulder is to the head or neck area of a defenseless receiver who is catching or attempting to catch a pass."


This would presumably cover the hit Steelers safety Ryan Grant had on Baltimore running back Willis McGahee in the AFC Championship game.

Rule Change No. 4: No bunch formations on kickoffs.
There must be at least four players on each side of the kicker and at least three of those must be lined up between the hash mark and the out of bounds line, one of which must be outside the yard-line number.

What the rule does is prevent teams from bunching up players on onsides kicks.

Look for an update to this story later in which I"ll have remarks from Pereira.

http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/archiv...ate=03-31-2009
The call was correct. Rant about the rule all you want, the refs got it right.

BigMeatballDave 10-05-2009 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6142520)

Rule Change No. 3: Unnecessary roughness has been expanded to include shots to a defenseless receiver's head.
The amendment states, a penalty will be called "If the initial force of the contact by a defender's helmet, forearm, or shoulder is to the head or neck area of a defenseless receiver who is catching or attempting to catch a pass."




The call was correct. Rant about the rule all you want, the refs got it right.

Actually, you are wrong. Watch the hit again. Page does not come in contact the receiver's head or neck area.

WilliamTheIrish 10-05-2009 06:38 PM

Nothing you bolded in that post took place during the tackle.

Mecca 10-05-2009 06:40 PM

It wasn't even the worst call in the league yesterday...

Crashride 10-05-2009 06:41 PM

WHERES THE GIF

BigMeatballDave 10-05-2009 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6142601)
It wasn't even the worst call in the league yesterday...

Nobody said it was. Bad calls go for you and against you. I was pointing how orange was wrong.

orange 10-05-2009 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 6142591)
Actually, you are wrong. Watch the hit again. Page does not come in contact the receiver's head or neck area.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 6142592)
Nothing you bolded in that post took place during the tackle.

No, I'm right. Completely. That is EXACTLY what happened - shoulder to neck area.

http://www.nfl.com/videos/kansas-cit...efs-highlights

At the 35 second mark.

I saw it. The ref saw it.
Even Deion and Haley saw it - they just don't know the rule. They both think it was legal because Page used his shoulder....

... Oh, yeah. And the penalty was marched off. Refs 1 - Chiefs Homers 0.


Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 6142619)
Nobody said it was. Bad calls go for you and against you. I was pointing how orange was wrong.

orange was right.

WilliamTheIrish 10-05-2009 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6142640)
No, I'm right. Completely. That is EXACTLY what happened - shoulder to neck area.

http://www.nfl.com/videos/kansas-cit...efs-highlights

At the 35 second mark.

I saw it. The ref saw it.
Even Deion and Haley saw it - they just don't know the rule. They both think it was legal because Page used his shoulder....

... Oh, yeah. And the penalty was marched off. Refs 1 - Chiefs Homers 0.

I've seen it too. Nothing to the neck. Perfect form tackle. You don't know what you're talking about.

Rant on.

BigMeatballDave 10-05-2009 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6142640)
No, I'm right. Completely. That is EXACTLY what happened - shoulder to neck area.

http://www.nfl.com/videos/kansas-cit...efs-highlights

At the 35 second mark.

I saw it. The ref saw it.
Even Deion and Haley saw it - they just don't know the rule. They both think it was legal because Page used his shoulder....

... Oh, yeah. And the penalty was marched off. Refs 1 - Chiefs Homers 0.

LMAO Dude, are you ****ing blind? The announcers during the game and EVERY postgame show I saw showed the SAME 2 clips and they ALL said it was a bad call. There was NO contact to the head or neck area.

orange 10-05-2009 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 6142656)
LMAO Dude, are you ****ing blind? The announcers during the game and EVERY postgame show I saw showed the SAME 2 clips and they ALL said it was a bad call. There was NO contact to the head or neck area.

I could really give a shit what the announcers said - as I mentioned above, they don't even know the rule.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 6142651)
I've seen it too. Nothing to the neck. Perfect form tackle. You don't know what you're talking about.

Rant on.

And I just linked the video. Look at it all you want. The penalty yardage still stands - and it's Chiefs Homers who've posted at least two threads about it. I'm not the one ranting. I'm LMAO.

How many times would you guess in this very thread someone has said it was legal because (1) Page used his shoulder and (2) he didn't hit Smith in the head?

morphius 10-05-2009 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 6142656)
LMAO Dude, are you ****ing blind? The announcers during the game and EVERY postgame show I saw showed the SAME 2 clips and they ALL said it was a bad call. There was NO contact to the head or neck area.

He has donkeyvision, and should be ignored in general when it comes to just about anything. Pam on the jersey's, funny, not cheating, breaking the salary cap, eh... etc. etc.

I watched the video there a few times now and there is no way anyone could see a penalty.

orange 10-05-2009 07:16 PM

Jarrad Page nails Steve Smith shoulder to collarbone
 
1 Attachment(s)
15 yards, 1st Down Giants!

morphius 10-05-2009 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6142769)
15 yards, 1st Down Giants!

Sadly we will never hear if their is an apology letter from the NFL, but people often slide down from the neck to the elbow on a hard hit, lol!!!

orange 10-05-2009 07:25 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by morphius (Post 6142779)
Sadly we will never hear if their is an apology letter from the NFL, but people often slide down from the neck to the elbow on a hard hit, lol!!!

:LOL: "elbow"

Chiefaholic 10-05-2009 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6141421)
Sorry guys, it looked to me as if Page led with his helmet and in real time, it looked helmet to helmet.

In reality, it was helmet to shoulder pad but the bottom line is that if you don't want to get called for a personal foul, don't lead with your helmet.

Besides that, only losers complain about bad penalties. Shake it off and continue playing.



WRONG!!! I recorded the game and watched the play multiple times. Page's helmet didn't touch any part of his head or body. It was a clean hit shoulder to shoulder. Even after commercial break, the guy in the booth admitted he was wrong and the hit was clean.

stlchiefs 10-05-2009 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6142769)
15 yards, 1st Down Giants!

and you really don't see Page's shoulder in his CHEST in that picture? You and Mecca need to hang out so you can have someone to argue with just for the hell of it.

Hammock Parties 10-05-2009 07:54 PM

Those crappy stills are pissing me off. You guys deserve better, so here is the proof of what we already know. **** THE REFS AND **** THE NEW YORK ****ING GIANTS!

http://i36.tinypic.com/wv27g0.gif

chief52 10-05-2009 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6142968)
Those crappy stills are pissing me off. You guys deserve better, so here is the proof of what we already know. **** THE REFS AND **** THE NEW YORK ****ING GIANTS!

http://i36.tinypic.com/wv27g0.gif

Try making that call on the field at full speed... I have no problem with it. Remember, the officials do not make the rules. Given the rules I can see why the guy made this call. Not saying it was right, but I can see why he called it like he did.

Hammock Parties 10-05-2009 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chief52 (Post 6142981)
Try making that call on the field at full speed... I have no problem with it. Remember, the officials do not make the rules. Given the rules I can see why the guy made this call.

I realize it was a difficult call. But they got it wrong. The ability to review that type of play should be instituted.

BigMeatballDave 10-05-2009 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chief52 (Post 6142981)
Try making that call on the field at full speed... I have no problem with it. Remember, the officials do not make the rules. Given the rules I can see why the guy made this call. Not saying it was right, but I can see why he called it like he did.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6142988)
I realize it was a difficult call. But they got it wrong. The ability to review that type of play should be instituted.

This

morphius 10-05-2009 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6142818)
:LOL: "elbow"

See, that is why we are thinking your and idiot, 'cause you rounded up the other half. Just look at the gifs from gochiefs and tell me which way his head would go if his neck or head were hit.

morphius 10-05-2009 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chief52 (Post 6142981)
Try making that call on the field at full speed... I have no problem with it. Remember, the officials do not make the rules. Given the rules I can see why the guy made this call. Not saying it was right, but I can see why he called it like he did.

you still need to err on the side of no call.

chefsos 10-05-2009 08:43 PM

Looks to me like Page didn't hit Smith in the head, neck, collarbone, shoulder, chest, or cock.

Page hit the BALL.

Buehler445 10-05-2009 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6142659)
I could really give a shit what the announcers said - as I mentioned above, they don't even know the rule.



And I just linked the video. Look at it all you want. The penalty yardage still stands - and it's Chiefs Homers who've posted at least two threads about it. I'm not the one ranting. I'm LMAO.

How many times would you guess in this very thread someone has said it was legal because (1) Page used his shoulder and (2) he didn't hit Smith in the head?

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6142968)
Those crappy stills are pissing me off. You guys deserve better, so here is the proof of what we already know. **** THE REFS AND **** THE NEW YORK ****ING GIANTS!

http://i36.tinypic.com/wv27g0.gif

HAY ORANGE! TRY HARDAR!

orange 10-05-2009 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 6143562)
HAY ORANGE! TRY HARDAR!

Don't need to.

Shoulder to neck area.

Just like the rule says.

The penalty stands.

:thumb:

BigMeatballDave 10-05-2009 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6143588)
Don't need to.

Shoulder to neck area.

Just like the rule says.

The penalty stands.

:thumb:

There's no reason to be a dick. Just admit you were wrong.

Buehler445 10-05-2009 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6143588)
Don't need to.

Shoulder to neck area.

Just like the rule says.

The penalty stands.

:thumb:

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 6143631)
There's no reason to be a dick. Just admit you were wrong.

Beat me to it. Wrong call. It just is.

chefsos 10-05-2009 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6143588)
Don't need to.

Shoulder to neck area.

Just like the rule says.

The penalty stands.

:thumb:

Then Steve Smith is a ****ing freak, because his neck area is below his shoulder pads.

BigMeatballDave 10-05-2009 09:35 PM

Orange is just being a trolling douchbag. Time for a neg rep bomb.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.