ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Haley Should Cut Johnson (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=217063)

Silock 10-27-2009 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6211119)
Considering your 6 year hard-on for LJ, that must have been one big straw and one tiny camel.

lol

Silock 10-27-2009 06:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6211089)
Really?

Prove otherwise.

No more ****ing squirrely DC mumbo jumbo.

Douchetard

Bring it ON, Mother****er.

Al Davis. Clark is 31, at worst.

EDIT: And I know he brought the Raiders a Super Bowl appearance this decade. But, I'm talking about this very instant in time. Davis is worse than Clark. Not saying Clark is awesome, but at least he's not Davis.

Hammock Parties 10-27-2009 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silock (Post 6211257)
Damn, when you turn on someone, you REALLY turn on them.

I was the same way with Herm, if you remember.

There's always a "no mas" point. Where it comes abundantly clear that there's no future.

Actually, it was kind of like losing weight or quitting the Jehovah's Witnesses. One day I just snapped, in both instances. I remember I was assigned a public talk and I decided to just throw the assignment slip away and "forget" about it. From that point forward I did not give a rat's ****ing ass about Jehovah or any of his bullshit.

And now I don't care about Larry or any of his bullshit.

Silock 10-27-2009 06:34 AM

Hey, I'm happy for you. I don't see how anyone could apologize for LJ at this point. There's simply no excuse left.

StcChief 10-27-2009 06:53 AM

LJ needs to go. Good article GoChiefs....your writing is improving.

he doesn't deserve the Chiefs running title. bench him for conduct.

Hammock Parties 10-27-2009 12:20 PM

Quote:

The only logical course of action for Haley is to cut Johnson. At the least, he should be deactivated and banned from Arrowhead Stadium
It's done. Bravo.

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-27-2009 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6212052)
It's done. Bravo.

So how does this play out with you and Buck?

Hammock Parties 10-27-2009 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6212136)
So how does this play out with you and Buck?

LT has ligaments and bones last time I checked. They can be busted.

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-27-2009 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6212144)
LT has ligaments and bones last time I checked. They can be busted.

LMAO

SDChiefs 10-27-2009 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6211145)
I don't think Larry has a single fan left anywhere.



Like I told someone on WPI, it wrote itself. It wasn't difficult at all. The hard one will be when he's actually cut, and we recap the tragedy that is LJ. It is very, very ****ing sad. And it wasn't all Larry's fault.

I didn't exactly, have your man crush for Larry but I thought he had potential and I, as well, overlooked the prior things he did. But like you, I am now done with all the bull shit. I don't want him to have the record, and I hope he never plays another down in any jersey. Hes a douchebag thats never gonna change.

Mr. Kotter 10-27-2009 01:08 PM

LJ should be gone. The bad outweighs any good, or even potential for good at this point. Send his ass packing, and make his lawyers argue his case for any remaining pay.

JD10367 10-27-2009 01:10 PM

Am I the only one who read the title, "Haley Should Cut Johnson", and thought this?

http://www.islamtimes.org/images/doc...00001950-b.jpghttp://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Religio...cumtoolkit.jpg

DeezNutz 10-27-2009 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JD10367 (Post 6212269)
Am I the only one who read the title, "Haley Should Cut Johnson", and thought this?

http://www.islamtimes.org/images/doc...00001950-b.jpghttp://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Religio...cumtoolkit.jpg

Little late.

JD10367 10-27-2009 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6212273)
Little late.

Well, yeah. Dude's 30. :shrug:

HotRoute 10-27-2009 01:35 PM

the only reason he would make these comments would be to get himself out of KC. he wants out so he knows all he has to do is start yapping about the new regime. this was well thought out and he will probably get his way.

we need to figure out a way to suspend him without pay and restrict him from signing with another team. pioli is not going to be tested by a woman beating loud mouth punk like L.J. But the truth is a lot of the players in the locker room are going to look at this situation in the future as to how pioli/haley handle things so they need to make an example out of this chump.

Mr. Laz 10-27-2009 01:50 PM

So Clark,Pioli and Haley are all "Busts" after 6 months?

DaneMcCloud 10-27-2009 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6212384)
So Clark,Pioli and Haley are all "Busts" after 6 months?

Clark's been in charge for years.

Pioli and Haley have been in charge since February, which is not six months.

I think it's safe to say that since none of their draft picks have improved the team or proven to be game changing playmakers and the fact that the Chiefs are 1-6, I'd think it's safe to label them "busts" to this point.

So far, they're the polar opposite of their counterparts in Denver.

Dave Lane 10-27-2009 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6210922)
Screw cutting him or benching him that is what he wants. I would just play his worthless ass.
Posted via Mobile Device

Run him till his asshole is sucking butter milk!

penguinz 10-27-2009 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6212406)
Clark's been in charge for years.

Pioli and Haley have been in charge since February, which is not six months.

I think it's safe to say that since none of their draft picks have improved the team or proven to be game changing playmakers and the fact that the Chiefs are 1-6, I'd think it's safe to label them "busts" to this point.

So far, they're the polar opposite of their counterparts in Denver.

God damn you are stupid. You can not compare this team to Denver. Denver had a good team in place already. They had above average players on offense and defense. KC had nothing.

You can not label the draft picks as busts after only playing 7 games. Especially when the #1 was a D-lineman.

Hammock Parties 10-27-2009 02:15 PM

Ryan Succop hasn't improved the team, Dane?

booger 10-27-2009 02:18 PM

i hope when they do cut him they announce it via twitter

Hammock Parties 10-27-2009 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by booger (Post 6212462)
i hope when they do cut him they announce it via twitter

@ToonIcon - U no longr cakn, patna

Sure-Oz 10-27-2009 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6212469)
@ToonIcon - U no longr cakn, patna

LMAO

booger 10-27-2009 02:30 PM

It's only fair since Gunther got an email

Marcellus 10-27-2009 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6212406)
Clark's been in charge for years.

Pioli and Haley have been in charge since February, which is not six months.

I think it's safe to say that since none of their draft picks have improved the team or proven to be game changing playmakers and the fact that the Chiefs are 1-6, I'd think it's safe to label them "busts" to this point.

So far, they're the polar opposite of their counterparts in Denver.

They should have shit canned Jimmy Johnson and company in Dallas after their first year too, they went 1-15 in 89' after going 3-13 the year before like a bunch of clowns. They obviously did irreparable damage by not immediately getting better.

Bill Walsh went 2-14 his first year after taking over the 49'ers. They went 5-11 the second year. What a joke.

Obviously if you don't make immediate improvement you are a bust.

DaneMcCloud 10-27-2009 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 6212528)
They should have shit canned Jimmy Johnson and company in Dallas after their first year too, they went 1-15 in 89' after going 3-13 the year before like a bunch of clowns. They obviously did irreparable damage by not immediately getting better.

Bill Walsh went 2-14 his first year after taking over the 49'ers. They went 5-11 the second year. What a joke.

Obviously if you don't make immediate improvement you are a bust.

So, you're comparing Haley to Bill Walsh & Jimmy Johnson?

Seriously?

Let me get this straight: You feel that Bill Walsh and Jimmy Johnson's coaching pedigree was the same as Todd Haley's?


LMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAO

Marcellus 10-27-2009 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6212548)
So, you're comparing Haley to Bill Walsh & Jimmy Johnson?

Seriously?

Let me get this straight: You feel that Bill Walsh and Jimmy Johnson's coaching pedigree was the same as Todd Haley's?


LMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAO

See this is your problem, you fail to understand simple points. I was simply stating that teams can go backwards before going forward and it is not an overnight task with this much work to do. Surly you can get that? You can understand that you would rather just be a dick which unlike giving decent arguments regarding the point at hand, you are good at.

I never said Haley was JJ or BW, but was countering your ****ing reeruned statement about calling them a bust after 7 games.

Do you really think people thought Dallas was getting better the 89' season? They were getting ripped by everybody in the media. Thank God there weren't message boards back then. Oh yea, they wouldn't have given shit just like I am sure Pioli and Clark could give a **** less what DaneMcCloud football message board genius thinks.

You are a hopeless dickhead.

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-27-2009 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6212450)
Ryan Succop hasn't improved the team, Dane?

:spock: JFC Claythan, SAUTO could draft a ****ing kicker.:shake:

DaneMcCloud 10-27-2009 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 6212625)
See this is your problem, you fail to understand simple points. I was simply stating that teams can go backwards before going forward and it is not an overnight task with this much work to do. Surly you can get that? You can understand that you would rather just be a dick which unlike giving decent arguments regarding the point at hand, you are good at.

I never said Haley was JJ or BW, but was countering your ****ing reeruned statement about calling them a bust after 7 games.

Do you really think people thought Dallas was getting better the 89' season? They were getting ripped by everybody in the media. Thank God there weren't message boards back then. Oh yea, they wouldn't have given shit just like I am sure Pioli and Clark could give a **** less what DaneMcCloud football message board genius thinks.

You are a hopeless dickhead.

No, you're just a ****ing moron.

Bill Walsh coached under the legendary Paul Brown. He coached at Stanford. He actually had a track record before Eddie DeBartolo hired him.

Jimmy Johnson was successful at Oklahoma State and even more so at the University of Miami. He actually had a track record before Jerry Jones hired him.

Neither men were in danger of losing their jobs or their teams, regardless of their poor first seasons because the players knew of their histories. They knew that they could believe in them and their vision.

Todd Haley has been a WR's coach for the majority of his career. He didn't coach high school and he didn't coach in college. He wasn't a head coach at any level, anywhere, before being hired by the Chiefs.

Comparing Haley to two Hall of Fame Coaches is tenuous at best and ****ing stupid at worst.

Oh, and no one gives a **** about you or your worthless opinion, Asswipe.

LOCOChief 10-27-2009 05:11 PM

Let me get this straight, the Haley, Pioli and Clark are complete **** ups?

The Poz 10-27-2009 07:37 PM

Maybe LJ gone by the end of the week? Don't know how reliable this source is but....

http://football.realgm.com/src_wiret...larry_johnson/

Jeff Risdon/RealGM - The Kansas City Chiefs will sever ties with problematic running back Larry Johnson, according to a team source that spoke to RealGM's Jeff Risdon on Tuesday afternoon.

The league and the team are investigating a pair of recent incidents, including one where Johnson used a gay slur. This is not the first time Johnson has gotten himself in trouble by using a gay slur, having had to apologize for the same offense last season. He was forced to apologize for this, as well as for negative comments directed at head coach Todd Haley. Haley has thus far refused comment.

The team has barred Johnson from any contact with the team.

This is a precursory move before the team formally releases Johnson before the end of the week, according to the source.

Part of the delay in releasing him involves going through the NFL’s disciplinary investigation, but the source was adamant that Larry Johnson has played his last game in Kansas City

OctoberFart 10-27-2009 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 6211093)
yesterday...YESTERDAY, you made every excuse in the book for LJ. Now 24 hours later you're saying cut his ass.

you have no integrity. its ok, nobodys perfect

You really didn't use integrity and reference to GOQUEER did you? That guy should make fat people flip flops for as much as he does it.

Reerun_KC 10-27-2009 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AutumnWind (Post 6213263)
You really didn't use integrity and reference to GOQUEER did you? That guy should make fat people flip flops for as much as he does it.

GoChiefs is our little soft bitch... Our own personal disfunctional Mangini....

We tolerate him and his 4 year old temper tantrums........

So far his Death Cockholster is taking down another one of the Chiefs players....

Who knows whos next....

soundmind 10-27-2009 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6212406)
Clark's been in charge for years.

Pioli and Haley have been in charge since February, which is not six months.

I think it's safe to say that since none of their draft picks have improved the team or proven to be game changing playmakers and the fact that the Chiefs are 1-6, I'd think it's safe to label them "busts" to this point.

So far, they're the polar opposite of their counterparts in Denver.

You're right, 8 months. Christ. Who wouldn't have had this team 7-0 by now? These guys are turds.

DaneMcCloud 10-27-2009 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soundmind (Post 6213514)
You're right, 8 months. Christ. Who wouldn't have had this team 7-0 by now? These guys are turds.

**** off, Dummy.

How has this team improved?

20+ new players. 7 draft choices. 1-6.

Tell us.

Or just SHUT THE **** UP!

WildTurkey 10-27-2009 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soundmind (Post 6213514)
You're right, 8 months. Christ. Who wouldn't have had this team 7-0 by now? These guys are turds.

I know... it was a nice attempt by this current admin but I say lets tear the ****er down and start the rebuild over again :shake:

Sure-Oz 10-27-2009 10:42 PM

kb_kcstar Considering everything I've heard, and mixing in some logic gathered from the team's "investigation," I don't think LJ will be cut this wk.half a minute ago from web

jAZ 10-27-2009 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6211089)
Really?

Prove otherwise.

No more ****ing squirrely DC mumbo jumbo.

Douchetard

Bring it ON, Mother****er.

The day Clark Hunt signs puts Mayflower Moving Company on retainer and forces Kansas City to play rent-a-team with LA every decade he can be considered in the same breath as Al Davis.

Until such a time, and for that reason alone, no team in the history or future of the NFL will ever have a worse owner than Al Davis.

DaneMcCloud 10-27-2009 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 6213713)
The day Clark Hunt signs puts Mayflower Moving Company on retainer and forces Kansas City to play rent-a-team with LA every decade he can be considered in the same breath as Al Davis.

Until such a time, and for that reason alone, no team in the history or future of the NFL will ever have a worse owner than Al Davis.

You should really contain yourself to DC, Dumb****.

The Raiders have won three Super Bowls and appeared in a fourth since the Chiefs have won ONE.

JFC.

Are you really this stupid?

jAZ 10-27-2009 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 6211074)
Clark's only real move so far has been hiring the most sought after GM candidte of the last 5 years.

My god this is taking stupid to 11.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6211092)
You are epic ****ing stupid when it comes to football

Outstanding.
Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5388856)
Gee, thanks JWhit for introducing Chiefs fans to the most successful GM of this decade.

As if we aren't already aware.


DaneMcCloud 10-27-2009 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 6213740)
Outstanding.

**** you.

You're "point" is to quote me?

First off, dumbass, I didn't want Pioli to be the GM. I wanted Eric Decosta of the Ravens.

Secondly, I've ****ing grilled every move Pioli has made because quite frankly, they've all ****ing SUCKED ASS, from Cassel to Tyson Jackson to Donald Washington.

So why don't you enlighten us with YOUR football knowledge. okay?

I'm waiting.

You ****ing tool.

jAZ 10-27-2009 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6213717)
You should really contain yourself to DC, Dumb****.

The Raiders have won three Super Bowls and appeared in a fourth since the Chiefs have won ONE.

JFC.

Are you really this stupid?

I'll take a 100 years of no championships over a lifetime of franchise whack-a-mole.

DaneMcCloud 10-27-2009 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 6213752)
I'll take a 100 years of no championships over a lifetime of franchise whack-a-mole.

Huh?

You've already had 40 years without a championship.

Obviously, you don't really give a **** about the Chiefs.

DBOSHO 10-27-2009 11:27 PM

Chill out dane. ****.

jAZ 10-27-2009 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6213755)
Huh?

You've already had 40 years without a championship.

Obviously, you don't really give a **** about the Chiefs.

I'll take an owner who's failed to deliver on a Championship over the last 40 years ala KC.... over an owner who rips out the heart of the fans and takes an atomic crap on it every 10 years, no matter how many championships that owner wins.

I'm not a fan of the Chiefs because of the owner, or because of the championships, or because of the uniforms or whatever. I'm a fan of the Chiefs because they are my hometown team.

The moment Clark Hunt moves the team to LA, I become a fan of the expansion Kansas City Jazz or Jaguars or whatever NFL team they end up with. The moment Hunt makes his 2nd move to another city, he enters the discussion of worst owner ever. The moment he threatens to move the team to every open city he thinks might make him an extra $1 billion in profit, he ties Al Davis.

Until then, the owner who's only major move was hiring the "the most successful GM of this decade" can't remotely be considered among the worst owner in the NFL.

Suggesting that his grade is anything other than "Incomplete" is just taking stupid to 11.

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-28-2009 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 6213785)
I'll take an owner who's failed to deliver on a Championship over the last 40 years ala KC.... over an owner who rips out the heart of the fans

And the difference is?



Quote:

Until then, the owner who's only major move was hiring the "the most expensive GM of this decade"
Yep, had to put the fix on that one.

Quote:

Suggesting that his grade is anything other than "Incomplete" is just taking stupid to 11.
It's early, but still you can not deny that the total moves in general present a very clouded vision at best in terms of where the overall program is headed.
And with all due respect, the "revolving roster" at this stage in the season smacks of desperation that runs fully counter to the "I build teams"-mantra.

007 10-28-2009 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AutumnWind (Post 6211085)
I hope you guys keep him. Cutting his barely over 2 YPC would be addition by subtraction.

You know Al is dying to bring him in.:D

KCrockaholic 10-28-2009 12:53 AM

I want to join the **** parade! **** *** ******* You **** worthless **** mother****** eat **** and **** now *** stupid mother ****


ahhhh....Now I feel like a man. Try it out fellas, makes you feel superior and smart :)

jAZ 10-28-2009 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6213847)
And the difference is?

We have a team.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6213847)
It's early, but still you can not deny that the total moves in general present a very clouded vision at best in terms of where the overall program is headed.

Yes, I'd agree that future success is cloudy at best. But, I think the vision is pretty clear. Whether it's going to work remains in question at the moment.

But no matter the case, anyone trying to argue that Hunt is the worst owner in the NFL based on the uncertain success our future holds, 7 games into a new regime is just acting like an over-reactive drama queen.

Again, Hunt's lone major move was putting the future of the football operations in the hands of "the most successful GM of this decade". That's a homerun move that might or might not work out. But that's the sort of owner I want. That's so far from the worst owner in football it's pathetic.

JohnnyV13 10-28-2009 01:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6210889)
Clark should fire himself.

I truly hope he's setting up this franchise with the new stadium improvements, Pioli & Haley etc., in order to sell it.

I think he's the worst owner in the NFL, bar none.

Not happening Dane.

First of all, Clark Hunt doesn't own the Chiefs by himself. He's the "chairman", because actual ownership is split between himself and his three siblings.

Secondly, I highly doubt Hunt would put over 100 million of his family's money into a facility owned by the county if they intended to sell the franchise.

jAZ 10-28-2009 02:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6213847)
And with all due respect, the "revolving roster" at this stage in the season smacks of desperation that runs fully counter to the "I build teams"-mantra.

Maybe so. But you are talking about Haley.

If, in the end, Todd Haley fails, it in no way means Hunt is the worst owner in football. In fact, unless something massively horrible transpires, the only way that Hunt can really have that case made about him, is if he emasculates his GM and starts micromanaging and trying to fire the coach or force various player moves like Al Davis or Dan Snyder or Jerry Jones have at times.

I want an owner who hires the best people and gives them the freedom to do their thing and a fair chance to succeed. Hunt clearly is doing that. Whether he hired the best person is "incomplete".

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-28-2009 02:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 6213883)
We have a team.



Yes, I'd agree that future success is cloudy at best. But, I think the vision is pretty clear. Whether it's going to work remains in question at the moment.

But no matter the case, anyone trying to argue that Hunt is the worst owner in the NFL based on the uncertain success our future holds, 7 games into a new regime is just acting like an over-reactive drama queen.

Again, Hunt's lone major move was putting the future of the football operations in the hands of "the most successful GM of this decade". That's a homerun move that might or might not work out. But that's the sort of owner I want. That's so far from the worst owner in football it's pathetic.

Then we disagree.

jAZ 10-28-2009 02:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyV13 (Post 6213884)
I highly doubt Hunt would put over 100 million of his family's money into a facility owned by the county if they intended to sell the franchise.

If that's true, and Hunt didn't just take a pass and wait for someone in LA to build a stadium for him to move into... he's a great owner.

jAZ 10-28-2009 02:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6213887)
Then we disagree.

I assume you disagree with the "vision is clear" part, and not with everything.

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-28-2009 02:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 6213885)
Maybe so. But you are talking about Haley.

If, in the end, Todd Haley fails, it in no way means Hunt is the worst owner in football. In fact, unless something massively horrible transpires, the only way that Hunt can really have that case made about him, is if he emasculates his GM and starts micromanaging and trying to fire the coach or force various player moves like Al Davis or Dan Snyder or Jerry Jones have at times.

I want an owner who hires the best people and gives them the freedom to do their thing and a fair chance to succeed. Hunt clearly is doing that. Whether he hired the best person is "incomplete".

No, I am talking about Pioli. You don't build a team by shuffling players in and out of a revolving door for half of the season. At some point, you have to bunker-down with what you have and build some solidarity for the season.
Otherwise, you're calling the season and the good players you DO have a wash, and that you'd rather play chess and diddle with a never-ending roster of has-been's and wannabe's than try to build some consistent support for your GOOD players.
Cull the chaff from the wheat BEFORE you go to war. Players have been inconsistent because the PROGRAM has no consistency, save "your job and livelihood are on the line every week".
Bottom line; there were no better players to be had, at least not in great leaps and bounds talent-wise.

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-28-2009 02:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 6213891)
I assume you disagree with the "vision is clear" part, and not with everything.

Yes.

ChiefJustice 10-28-2009 02:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 6213853)
I want to join the **** parade! **** *** ******* You **** worthless **** mother****** eat **** and **** now *** stupid mother ****


ahhhh....Now I feel like a man. Try it out fellas, makes you feel superior and smart :)


It's refreshing,isn't it?

Of course you have to gargle an occasional Summer's Eve cocktail from time to time.

That is a small price to pay for intrawebs awsomeness though.

jAZ 10-28-2009 02:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6213901)
Yes.

That's fair.

jAZ 10-28-2009 02:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6213897)
No, I am talking about Pioli. You don't build a team by shuffling players in and out of a revolving door for half of the season. At some point, you have to bunker-down with what you have and build some solidarity for the season.
Otherwise, you're calling the season and the good players you DO have a wash, and that you'd rather play chess and diddle with a never-ending roster of has-been's and wannabe's than try to build some consistent support for your GOOD players.
Cull the chaff from the wheat BEFORE you go to war. Players have been inconsistent because the PROGRAM has no consistency, save "your job and livelihood are on the line every week".
Bottom line; there were no better players to be had, at least not in great leaps and bounds talent-wise.

I don't know that on this issue it's possible to seperate Haley from Pioli. In fact, I'd guess that Haley is a huge part of the in-season player decisions, largely because he sees the threat of losing your job as a key part of his coaching philosophy. But that also means that you are right. Pioli is a key part of that approach.

That's not true of Hunt though. It is (as I understand it, and as it should be) hands off on his end.

Marcellus 10-28-2009 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6212805)
No, you're just a ****ing moron.

Bill Walsh coached under the legendary Paul Brown. He coached at Stanford. He actually had a track record before Eddie DeBartolo hired him.

Jimmy Johnson was successful at Oklahoma State and even more so at the University of Miami. He actually had a track record before Jerry Jones hired him.

Neither men were in danger of losing their jobs or their teams, regardless of their poor first seasons because the players knew of their histories. They knew that they could believe in them and their vision.

Todd Haley has been a WR's coach for the majority of his career. He didn't coach high school and he didn't coach in college. He wasn't a head coach at any level, anywhere, before being hired by the Chiefs.

Comparing Haley to two Hall of Fame Coaches is tenuous at best and ****ing stupid at worst.

Oh, and no one gives a **** about you or your worthless opinion, Asswipe.

Look, I don't need a history lesson on where Haley coached or didn't coach, once again you are spewing common knowledge like you are making some type of ****ing football revelation. One of your specialties.

You called the regime a bust 7 ****ing games into a season. You are such a jaded, conceited, biased, **** stick it is ridiculous.

Anytime someone makes a point you find some reeruned ****ing counter argument usually based on 1 sliver of a statement and blow it out of proportion.

If you think very many people around here value YOUR football opinion you are as delusional as you are an asshole. But that is to be expected at this point. Besides,unlike you I don't judge the quality of my life by the opinions of strangers on a ****ing message board. That is ****ing sad Dane.

If you suddenly swallowed yourself up with your giant bleeding asshole you would not be missed around here any more than I would.

soundmind 10-28-2009 07:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBOSHO (Post 6213772)
Chill out dane. ****.

Dane doesn't chill out. He just spews slander and profanity at people online, I have to assume for reasons I'll never know. He's all for just jumping all over people today though, disagree with him and he'll neg rep you. Ooooh, horry shitz batman, not a neg rep from an asshole...?!? What am I to do?

Dane, you're in California, buy some weed. Smoke it. Repeat as necessary.

Or buy less and smoke less and maybe the mood swings will subside.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.