![]() |
Quote:
Yes anyone who doesn't agree with Pioli and his fluffer just passin by are idiots. Are you related to him or something really. |
Quote:
But here we have to weigh risk/reward. With LJ we had a broke-dick, unproductive back. With Charles, we've had production second only to Chris ****ing Johnson. The difference couldn't be more stark. Yet Charles was not only NOT used frequently, but he was also inactive at times. When these kinds of decisions are made, in addition to the most woeful game management that I've ever seen from a Chiefs HC, there should be serious talk about whether or not the HC should be retained. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I mean, do you even try to think before you post? |
Quote:
f |
Quote:
Having said that, I owe you an apology. I was wrong, and you didn't deserve to be called an idiot. As I was reading the posts, I got your name mixed up with another and called you a name that you didn't deserve. For reasons known only to the subconscious portion of my brain, I conflated your posts with OTW's posts, and that's unfair to you. I'll be far more vigilant in the future, in order to avoid such a mistake ever happening again. Once again, my sincerest apologies. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
They had to be sure before they cut him, that it was without a doubt, the only logical move. These moves are for real and permanent. I wish DV would have cut him. |
Because they didnt think Charles could carry the load that plus the fumbles. Dude is small. ONce LJ did what LJ does they really had no choice but to put Charles in there, Smith sure in the hell wasnt going to be the feature back. Oh, and Money.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But, it took them 1/2 a season to get rid of the cancer, progress, albeit not as fast as we would like. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.