ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs ESPN - Crennel likely to join Chiefs (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=220938)

Titty Meat 01-03-2010 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6400540)
they hired pendergast and didn't name him to a position

they were waiting on crennel to make up his mind, he decided to have hip surgery and pendergast was named dc....

i thought this was common knowledge at the time

and, now, voila, crennel is healthy and rumored to be our new dc...

Yes it makes sense but at the same time it doesn't. That would mean this franchise wasted a year developing chemistry on the defensive side of the ball waiting for a retred defensive cordinator. It's not like some young guy couldn't run a New Englands cover 4. So if Pioli dicked around hiring a DC he also dicked around with the draft.

the Talking Can 01-03-2010 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wild1 (Post 6400549)
What is the exact quote? Was it "Crennel is likely to join Chiefs" or was it just some naked speculation that they think makes sense just because Pioli is here?

it was both....he said "crennel is likely to join the chiefs," but he never tells you if he has a source or just speculating on what's obvious

so he can walk it back later...schefter is the worst at this...

doomy3 01-03-2010 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6400555)
Yes it makes sense but at the same time it doesn't. That would mean this franchise wasted a year developing chemistry on the defensive side of the ball waiting for a retred defensive cordinator. It's not like some young guy couldn't run a New Englands cover 4. So if Pioli dicked around hiring a DC he also dicked around with the draft.

What difference would it make if our one year hire to hold the seat for Crennel was a young guy or a guy who had experience being a DC? How would that affect chemistry?

The Bad Guy 01-03-2010 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6400555)
Yes it makes sense but at the same time it doesn't. That would mean this franchise wasted a year developing chemistry on the defensive side of the ball waiting for a retred defensive cordinator. It's not like some young guy couldn't run a New Englands cover 4. So if Pioli dicked around hiring a DC he also dicked around with the draft.

I think this year was a throw-away year anyway. Pendergast was not going to be a long term guy here. He's awful. When you get fired as the SB D coordinator, you must be a bag of ****ing shit.

I think this is good news. Crennel is an upgrade. He can effectively use talent. I'll be happy once Clancy is re-assigned to either a position coach or gone all together.

Simply Red 01-03-2010 12:01 PM

yawn

wild1 01-03-2010 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6400558)
it was both....he said "crennel is likely to join the chiefs," but he never tells you if he has a source or just speculating on what's obvious

so he can walk it back later...schefter is the worst at this...

This is so common now, that the fan watching has no clue who actually has a source for what they say. It's all carefully worded so that it sounds like they have actual information without them claiming that

bsp4444 01-03-2010 12:05 PM

What would be Clancy's area of expertise, if he were to stay on as a position coach?

Easy 6 01-03-2010 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bsp4444 (Post 6400599)
What would be Clancy's area of expertise, if he were to stay on as a position coach?

LB fluffer.

Dante84 01-03-2010 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6400555)
Yes it makes sense but at the same time it doesn't. That would mean this franchise wasted a year developing chemistry on the defensive side of the ball waiting for a retred defensive cordinator. It's not like some young guy couldn't run a New Englands cover 4. So if Pioli dicked around hiring a DC he also dicked around with the draft.

Keep in mind how late we were in the coaching hire process... there weren't exactly A-listers out there ripe for the plucking.

DaWolf 01-03-2010 12:25 PM

Depending on Crennel's health, you could also be looking at a co-DC scenario like the Lambs had in their Super Bowl season if they elect to keep Pendergast around for continuity...

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-03-2010 12:33 PM

:facepalm:

Hoover 01-03-2010 12:37 PM

Also consider that Pendergast implemented the 3-4 in KC and had to deal with all of the BS in changing schemes. Now Crennel comes in and has the luxury of watching film on guys like Hali, Dorsey, Jackson, and others. Its a prefect situation for Crennel as he can come in and look good.

Mr. Flopnuts 01-03-2010 12:39 PM

I hope we at least wait to see if Dallas fires Wade Phillips. That's the first, and best choice.

-King- 01-03-2010 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 6400718)
I hope we at least wait to see if Dallas fires Wade Phillips. That's the first, and best choice.

They look that they just might win a playoff game, so Wade might be safe for next year.

milkman 01-03-2010 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 6400718)
I hope we at least wait to see if Dallas fires Wade Phillips. That's the first, and best choice.

Pioli will never hire a non tree guy.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-03-2010 12:40 PM

Wade Phillips' 3-4 isn't the same as the dumbass 3-4 we run here.

-King- 01-03-2010 12:41 PM

Wrong thread.

Easy 6 01-03-2010 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 6400718)
I hope we at least wait to see if Dallas fires Wade Phillips. That's the first, and best choice.

I'd be fine with that as well, but would he settle for a coordinator position? after being HC for 'Americas Team/groan' i have a hard time seeing it.

Pioli Zombie 01-03-2010 12:43 PM

This wóuld be a great thing for KC. While Belichick ran the show in NE, the Patriots defense has not been as dominant since Romeo left. And don't give me 2007 stats, they blew it wehen the Championship was on the line. The Patriots from 2001 thru 2004 were defense first, and Crennel was part of that.
Posted via Mobile Device

Mr. Flopnuts 01-03-2010 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6400722)
Pioli will never hire a non tree guy.

Unless I'm mistaken, Wade is definitely on the tree and should be near the top when it comes to defense.

Thig Lyfe 01-03-2010 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 6400489)
Jay Glazer said it's highly likely that both Romeo Crennel & Charlie Weis will be coaching in KC next season.

Now all we need is Trent Green as QB coach and the Sooper Bowl is OURS!!!

chiefzilla1501 01-03-2010 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6400520)
Do you have proof of that besides it just being a rumor? Thats pretty ****ing stupid of Pioli to just hire a guy for 1 year. I would have rather hired a younger guy like Boles and been done with it.

So you would have rather settled for a second-rate coordinator for 5 years rather than wait for the guy you really want after one season? Who cares if you threw a season away, as long as you got a guy in there you want. I would rather Philips than Romeo. But then, maybe Romeo is like Mike Nolan--a good coordinator who was never meant to be a head coach.

milkman 01-03-2010 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 6400732)
Unless I'm mistaken, Wade is definitely on the tree and should be near the top when it comes to defense.

I'm pretty sure you're mistaken.

Mr. Flopnuts 01-03-2010 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6400742)
I'm pretty sure you're mistaken.

Huh. I thought he and Parcells worked together, but I guess he just replaced Parcells in Dallas so that wouldn't make any sense. I don't know where the **** I got that from.

Well, shit. Romeo it is.

Hammock Parties 01-03-2010 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6400702)
:facepalm:

Oh STFU. This isn't that bad. At least they are cutting deadwood in Pendergast. This is nepotism for sure but we could do a lot worse than a defensive coordinator with Super Bowl rings who has coordinated top defenses.

Hammock Parties 01-03-2010 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeMaslowski (Post 6400450)
Let's see what WPI has to say!

Heh. Interesting that you posted this because Warpaint Illustrated was talking about Crennel joining the Chiefs last offseason...and they had a lot of contact. They definitely wanted him...

Mr. Flopnuts 01-03-2010 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6400753)
Oh STFU. This isn't that bad. At least they are cutting deadwood in Pendergast. This is nepotism for sure but we could do a lot worse than a defensive coordinator with Super Bowl rings who has coordinated top defenses.

You know that beer commercial where Romeo talks about the cold activated cans talking to him and wishing him congratulations? That really happened.

MMXcalibur 01-03-2010 12:56 PM

Oh thank God....Clancy better be gone tomorrow.

petegz28 01-03-2010 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6400527)
It's not that stupid. If he had in mind that Crennel would be the DC after this year, I am not surprised at all that he would hire a guy who he is so familiar with in Pendergast as a stopgap, since he had coached with him in Arizona.

this

kstater 01-03-2010 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6400759)
Heh. Interesting that you posted this because Warpaint Illustrated was talking about Crennel joining the Chiefs last offseason...and they had a lot of contact. They definitely wanted him...

As did every other news source.

DeezNutz 01-03-2010 12:57 PM

The biggest positive I see in getting the band back together is that takes a lot of excuses off the table.

OnTheWarpath15 01-03-2010 12:57 PM

Meh.

The only good thing about this, provided it happens, is that Pendergast is gone.

But as our friend htismaqe always said, better than bad does not equal good.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-03-2010 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6400753)
Oh STFU. This isn't that bad. At least they are cutting deadwood in Pendergast. This is nepotism for sure but we could do a lot worse than a defensive coordinator with Super Bowl rings who has coordinated top defenses.

He was a figurehead in New England. If I want a defensive coordinator, I want a defensive coordinator.

Hammock Parties 01-03-2010 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 6400767)
As did every other news source.

Actually, no. And we got laughed at here over it.

RedThat 01-03-2010 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6400570)
I think this year was a throw-away year anyway. Pendergast was not going to be a long term guy here. He's awful. When you get fired as the SB D coordinator, you must be a bag of ****ing shit.

I think this is good news. Crennel is an upgrade. He can effectively use talent. I'll be happy once Clancy is re-assigned to either a position coach or gone all together.

Love this. Except, he doesn't have much to work with.

If he is the type of coach that can bring out the best in a defensive player or know how to use a player effectively by taking advantage of their strengths, then Im all for that.

I hope he is the kind of guy that can help assist with evaluating defensive talent. Chiefs need that. When it comes to the draft, they could use all the help they could get as far as evaluation goes because this team needs to select some good defensive players.

milkman 01-03-2010 01:00 PM

Where's the photoshop of Pioli in a dress on a balcony and Crennel in tights below.

"Romeo, Romeo, wherefore art thou Romeo?'

DeezNutz 01-03-2010 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6400777)
Actually, no. And we got laughed at here over it.

WPI could post the time and temperature here and get laughed at.

Hammock Parties 01-03-2010 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6400773)
He was a figurehead in New England. If I want a defensive coordinator, I want a defensive coordinator.

At this point how do we really know what level of responsibility he had in their success?

You just don't like the move because it reeks of nepotism. I can accept that, but realize the league is full of nepotism.

I will say Crennel's lack of defense in Cleveland is a bad sign. But I'm much more positive about this than I was Pendergast.

cdcox 01-03-2010 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6400770)
The biggest positive I see in getting the band back together is that takes a lot of excuses off the table.

When are BB and Brady coming?

SenselessChiefsFan 01-03-2010 01:02 PM

I am not too thrilled with Crennel, but he is better than Pendersuckscompleteass.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-03-2010 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6400785)
At this point how do we really know what level of responsibility he had in their success?

You just don't like the move because it reeks of nepotism. I can accept that, but realize the league is full of nepotism.

I will say Crennel's lack of defense in Cleveland is a bad sign. But I'm much more positive about this than I was Pendergast.

I want this to work out, therefore I will ignore the mountains of evidence that point out that this will solve nothing.

MoreLemonPledge 01-03-2010 01:03 PM

He looks like a cuddly teddy bear. I like him.

RedThat 01-03-2010 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6400785)
At this point how do we really know what level of responsibility he had in their success?

You just don't like the move because it reeks of nepotism. I can accept that, but realize the league is full of nepotism.

I will say Crennel's lack of defense in Cleveland is a bad sign. But I'm much more positive about this than I was Pendergast.

Dillon you son of a b*tch! lol...just say that to hamas will ya

OnTheWarpath15 01-03-2010 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6400788)
I am not too thrilled with Crennel, but he is better than Pendersuckscompleteass.

That's like saying pancreatic cancer is better than lung cancer.

OnTheWarpath15 01-03-2010 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6400791)
I want this to work out, therefore I will ignore the mountains of evidence that point out that this will solve nothing.

The official motto of ChiefsPlanet.

Hammock Parties 01-03-2010 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6400791)
I want this to work out, therefore I will ignore the mountains of evidence that point out that this will solve nothing.

Oh come on. A MOUNTAIN of evidence?

I see evidence both for and against Crennel. I'm going to be positive about it because he won freaking Super Bowls as a defensive coordinator. That's more accomplishment at defensive coordinator than we've had since Bill Cowher.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-03-2010 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 6400793)
Dillon you son of a b*tch! lol...just say that to hamas will ya

What happened to you, Hamas, you used to be somebody I could trust?

I woke up. Why don't you?

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-03-2010 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6400798)
Oh come on. A MOUNTAIN of evidence?

I see evidence both for and against Crennel. I'm going to be positive about it because he won freaking Super Bowls as a defensive coordinator. That's more accomplishment at defensive coordinator than we've had since Bill Cowher.

Peter Giunta.

OnTheWarpath15 01-03-2010 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6400801)
Peter Giunta.

Oh, snap.

DeezNutz 01-03-2010 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 6400787)
When are BB and Brady coming?

Soon, I hope.

But when Weis is added on the offensive side, I don't want to hear any bullshit. Produce.

We have all sorts of people with rings. Now find the proper personnel and ****ing make legit progress.

I will throw the **** up if I have to hear more shit about an "evaluation year." The fact that this is seriously discussed is amazing to me.

kcxiv 01-03-2010 01:08 PM

Everyone had to see this coming a mile away. Weis i didnt expect though.

Hammock Parties 01-03-2010 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6400801)
Peter Giunta.

The difference is that no one put any stock in Guinta's "Super Bowl defense."

Crennel's shut down PEYTON MANNING.

RedThat 01-03-2010 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6400794)
That's like saying pancreatic cancer is better than lung cancer.

Hmmm...Well how did the cancer start off? Oh...because of the sh*ts we currently have on defense?

Now how do they cure the cancer? Just add some defensive talent either through FA or the draft...Co-ordinator or no co-ordinator everybody knows that is the root of the problem on defense. Simple as that.

DeezNutz 01-03-2010 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6400791)
I want this to work out, therefore I will ignore the mountains of evidence that point out that this will solve nothing.

You hate the Chiefs.

You're not working in the NFL, so I don't know how you can possibly make this statement.

Hammock Parties 01-03-2010 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6400799)
What happened to you, Hamas, you used to be somebody I could trust?

I woke up. Why don't you?

Crennel is going to blast your arm off your body and watch it fall to the ground firing a machine gun.

RustShack 01-03-2010 01:10 PM

I just love the dumbasses who think Bill Billichick completely did everything all by himself. Just because hes assistants don't make good HC's in no way means they aren't good assistants.

Hammock Parties 01-03-2010 01:11 PM

At the very least we get to start in with all the "fat coach" jokes now.

We haven't had a tub of goo roaming the sidelines in Kansas City since...I don't know when.

kcxiv 01-03-2010 01:11 PM

Well Kansas did. lol

Mr. Flopnuts 01-03-2010 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6400805)
Soon, I hope.

But when Weis is added on the offensive side, I don't want to hear any bullshit. Produce.

We have all sorts of people with rings. Now find the proper personnel and ****ing make legit progress.

I will throw the **** up if I have to hear more shit about an "evaluation year." The fact that this is seriously discussed is amazing to me.

It better not happen. This staff has had an entire year to soak in the ineptitude of this franchise. Anything less than .500 next year is entirely unacceptable.

What does that mean to you and me? If they don't get there, they'll be gone by 2015. If they do, they'll be here until at least 2020.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-03-2010 01:11 PM

Ok, let's break it down, Dr. Jack Ramsey style:

Crennel coordinated Ds in New England, where he had a back 7 that had Tedy Bruschi, Rodney Harrison, and Mike Vrabel, who were all like coaches on the field. Not to mention the fact that he had Ty Law, Asante Samuel, Vince Wilfork, Dick Seymour, Ted Johnson, and on and on and on.

Now, combine that with the fact that his boss was a legendary DC whose gameplan from SB XXV is in the ****ing HOF and who keeps the longest hours in the game.

Then, add on our new DC's 4 years of coaching in Cleveland, where he never fielded a decent defense with talent comparable to that in Kansas City.

Where is the evidence to suggest that he'll do well, other than the osmosis theory, which we assumed would work for Scott Pioli, Eric Mangini, Crennel himself once, and McDaniels??

chiefzilla1501 01-03-2010 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6400773)
He was a figurehead in New England. If I want a defensive coordinator, I want a defensive coordinator.

It will be interesting to see how good he really is. The defense in New England hasn't been even as dominant in the later years as they were under Romeo. I don't know how much of that was based on poor drafting in the later years. But maybe there's something to it.

I also think that Romeo will get a ton of mileage out of Tyson Jackson and Dorsey. His experience teaching 3-4 D-linemen is almost unparalleled. One thing I feel pretty comfortable about is that he'll help Pioli find the right nose tackle and our D-line is going to be very well equipped to win in the trenches. At the very least, that's what we get.

dirk digler 01-03-2010 01:13 PM

I see nothing wrong with this hire it is definitely an upgrade over our current DC

cdcox 01-03-2010 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 6400822)
I just love the dumbasses who think Bill Billichick completely did everything all by himself. Just because hes assistants don't make good HC's in no way means they aren't good assistants.

Well, basically they've been successful with a revolving door at the coordinator positions. That potentially indicates that the coordinators weren't difference makers.

OnTheWarpath15 01-03-2010 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6400840)
I see nothing wrong with this hire it is definitely an upgrade over our current DC

Christ, just about anyone would be considered an upgrade.

People bitched for 20 years about Carl hiring his buddies, and now when the Executive of the Decade does it, it's perfectly acceptable.

RedThat 01-03-2010 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6400799)
What happened to you, Hamas, you used to be somebody I could trust?

I woke up. Why don't you?

lol

OnTheWarpath15 01-03-2010 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 6400844)
Well, basically they've been successful with a revolving door at the coordinator positions. That potentially indicates that the coordinators weren't difference makers.

This.

chiefzilla1501 01-03-2010 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6400833)
Ok, let's break it down, Dr. Jack Ramsey style:

Crennel coordinated Ds in New England, where he had a back 7 that had Tedy Bruschi, Rodney Harrison, and Mike Vrabel, who were all like coaches on the field. Not to mention the fact that he had Ty Law, Asante Samuel, Vince Wilfork, Dick Seymour, Ted Johnson, and on and on and on.

Now, combine that with the fact that his boss was a legendary DC whose gameplan from SB XXV is in the ****ing HOF and who keeps the longest hours in the game.

Then, add on our new DC's 4 years of coaching in Cleveland, where he never fielded a decent defense with talent comparable to that in Kansas City.

Where is the evidence to suggest that he'll do well, other than the osmosis theory, which we assumed would work for Scott Pioli, Eric Mangini, Crennel himself once, and McDaniels??

Where is the evidence to suggest that he won't do it well? You're making the argument that Patriots coordinators don't make good coaches, and that's probably true. They try to hard to be Bellichick when they're not.

But Mike Nolan was a horrible head coach in San Francisco and Gregg Williams was an absolute nightmare in Buffalo. How do you know Romeo won't follow in their shadow?

DeezNutz 01-03-2010 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6400847)
Christ, just about anyone would be considered an upgrade.

People bitched for 20 years about Carl hiring his buddies, and now when the Executive of the Decade does it, it's perfectly acceptable.

In Pioli's defense, the Cassel acquisition was a clear anti-Carl move.

OnTheWarpath15 01-03-2010 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6400854)
In Pioli's defense, the Cassel acquisition was a clear anti-Carl move.

Yeah, because he only gave up a R2 pick, instead of a R1 pick.

LMAO

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-03-2010 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6400852)
Where is the evidence to suggest that he won't do it well? You're making the argument that Patriots coordinators don't make good coaches, and that's probably true. They try to hard to be Bellichick when they're not.

But Mike Nolan was a horrible head coach in San Francisco and Gregg Williams was an absolute nightmare in Buffalo. How do you know Romeo won't follow in their shadow?

Crennel and Mangini installed their defensive systems where they went and failed miserably.

They didn't fail b/c of their offense, which might be understandable.

RustShack 01-03-2010 01:17 PM

LOL You can't use the Browns defense as a example since he wasn't the DC. How often to great DC's become HC's and field great defenses with that team also? Defenses Guru Dungy never had a good defense with the Colts.

Hammock Parties 01-03-2010 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6400833)
Where is the evidence to suggest that he'll do well

He's morbidly obese. Those guys make the best coaches. Mangini is just fat, for instance. Maybe if he ate more fast food while spending countless hours in the office, he'd be a better coach. But no, Mangini has to take the time to prepare a salad every once inawhile.

RustShack 01-03-2010 01:18 PM

Also think about what your saying, he didn't make the Browns good? Bill ****ing Billichick couldn't make the Browns good.

Hammock Parties 01-03-2010 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6400847)
Christ, just about anyone would be considered an upgrade.

People bitched for 20 years about Carl hiring his buddies, and now when the Executive of the Decade does it, it's perfectly acceptable.

I think they bitched about it because it didn't work.

Everyone in the NFL hires their buddies for the most part.

RedThat 01-03-2010 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 6400822)
I just love the dumbasses who think Bill Billichick completely did everything all by himself. Just because hes assistants don't make good HC's in no way means they aren't good assistants.

Its just really a team concept isn't it? yes, this means we need to look at things from a broader perspective.

OnTheWarpath15 01-03-2010 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 6400863)
Also think about what your saying, he didn't make the Browns good? Bill ****ing Billichick couldn't make the Browns good.

Actually, the Browns were improving, then the bottom fell out when Modell announced the move mid-season.

dirk digler 01-03-2010 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6400847)
Christ, just about anyone would be considered an upgrade.

People bitched for 20 years about Carl hiring his buddies, and now when the Executive of the Decade does it, it's perfectly acceptable.

Christ definitely would be an upgrade but he is not available or so I hear.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-03-2010 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 6400863)
Also think about what your saying, he didn't make the Browns good? Bill ****ing Billichick couldn't make the Browns good.

Marty Schottenheimer did, and I'm no fan of Marty's.

That's a stupid argument.

kcxiv 01-03-2010 01:20 PM

So what you are saying is that in order to have a good team you n eed good players? Ya, we didnt already know that.

This team has to get good players plain and simple. I rather have Crennel. Hopefully he has a good eye for talent and we can draft some players. He doesnt have to concentrate on both sides of the ball just 1.

No matter how we look at it, we are ging to have to pick something from someones tree.

We do have to give the guys a few years to see if they can raise the ****ing dead.

I will say this again, KC started over. They completely threw out Herm's plans and started from scratch.

We may not like it, but thats what it is. Welcome to rebuilding hell, it takes a toll on the fans.

DeezNutz 01-03-2010 01:21 PM

Peyton Manning wouldn't be successful in KC.

Were you ****ers expecting a playoff birth?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.