ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   GBN Report: 2010 SENIOR BOWL GAME REVIEW (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=222893)

Saccopoo 02-11-2010 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6523953)
What was your point in posting about Brown then?

You asked how many first round draft picks on the offensive line were on either team. I answered. Seems pretty straight forward to me.

Quote:

Did you think I didn't know he was on IR or drafted by the Saints in the first round?
You're the dipshit that asked the question, not me.

Saccopoo 02-11-2010 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 6516731)
And you know this how? You obviously haven't watched him play... so where do you get your info? (btw... what position does Hali play and what position does Woodley play? Here's a hint... NOT THE SAME ONE DUMBASS)

What position does Woodley play and what position does Graham play? Is it the same one? (Not that it's relevant - well as relevant as a Hali/Woodley comparison...)

Quote:

Also... you do know that until U-M put him at DE, Graham had played LB his entire career...
His entire career? You mean like high school? Eric Berry, up until he enrolled at Tennessee and ended up at safety, was a quarterback for his "entire career." It doesn't mean that he's going to be playing it in the NFL.

But, I concede. You win. You've convinced me that Brandon Graham is the greatest defensive end/linebacker prospect ever. I will never again besmirch his name by comparing him to someone of Hali's ilk. And they don't play the same position and shouldn't be considered to play the same position on the Chiefs.

Graham is Woodley, Woodley is Graham. Neither are Hali and to infer as such shall be considered heresy.

The Bad Guy 02-11-2010 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6524675)
You asked how many first round draft picks on the offensive line were on either team. I answered. Seems pretty straight forward to me.



You're the dipshit that asked the question, not me.

Doesn't "on the offensive line" imply that they have to be starting and actually playing, you cocksmoking ****ing reerun?

The Bad Guy 02-11-2010 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6524727)
But, I concede. You win.

You really didn't have to conceed. Anyone with the comprehension level of a 3rd grader could read how bad you got owned in this entire thread.

Watching you post back and forth with people who understand football is like watching Mike Tyson fight Peter McNeeley.

Saccopoo 02-11-2010 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6524835)
You really didn't have to conceed. Anyone with the comprehension level of a 3rd grader could read how bad you got owned in this entire thread.

Watching you post back and forth with people who understand football is like watching Mike Tyson fight Peter McNeeley.

*yawn*

Thanks once again for contributing...

nothing.

The Bad Guy 02-11-2010 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6524852)
*yawn*

Thanks once again for contributing...

nothing.

Wait, I'll make up a bunch of stuff and post it as fact and then go to YouTube to try to support every claim I make.

OKUNG FTW!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Saccopoo 02-11-2010 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6524949)
Wait, I'll make up a bunch of stuff and post it as fact and then go to YouTube to try to support every claim I make.

OKUNG FTW!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Since you obviously don't approve of highlight videos, here's a couple of reports/analysis on Graham:

Quote:

Pass rush: Relentless rusher able to pressure the quarterback lining up on the strong or weak side. Lines up at five-technique in some passing situations. Uses his strength, balance and lack of height to get under shoulder pads of tackle. Strong, violent hands to beat his man straight-out or disengage. Lacks a consistent counter move. Has an inside spin move but rarely shows it. Despite his stout build, Graham drops into zone coverage easily and shows some fluidity in space. Backpedal is slow, as expected, but he will still get a shot as a linebacker for a 3-4 team. Lines up wide so he can turn the corner against slower tackles, will struggle to do so against NFL tackles.

Run defense: Can punch the tackle to disengage or maintain the angle to force the action inside when run plays are coming his way. Occasionally gets skinny to penetrate on inside runs. Stays home to contain, watch for bootlegs and stop reverses. Must be more consistent using his hands to defeat cut blocks, although he can still make the tackle after a cut as he recovers fairly well. Has a good motor, works hard to get down the line on runs away from him. Lacks elite speed to chase down NFL backs consistently.

Quote:

Strengths:

Brandon Graham has a very quick first step and a relentless motor. He has a nice repertoire of pass rush moves. Graham appears to have more than adequate strength, especially in his lower body. He uses his hands very well and can "dip and rip" through blocks. He has quick, concise movements and takes a direct path to the quarterback as a pass rusher. He does a good job of staying under control and doesn't whiff on sacks when he gets to the quarterback. Graham diagnoses plays well and can scrape down the line well on run plays. He has good balance and always seems to be moving in the right direction despite being chipped or having any trash in his way. Graham typically takes nice angles on action away from him. He seems to have very nice, fluid lateral movement. He is somewhat versatile in that he could be a 3-4 OLB or a Tampa 2 type DE.

Weakness:

As in most 3-4 defensive prospects, there is the projection factor to look at. You have to take what he has done at Michigan and project that not only to the next level, but to a very different position. Despite the recent success of some smaller rush ends, you have to take Graham's height into consideration. He needs to play with a better pad level. His hips appear to be on the stiff side and dropping into coverage could be an issue. He can struggle in space against the run. His arms appear shorter than scouts like. His overall athletic ability could be marginal.

Analysis:

Brandon Graham can be viewed as a boom or bust prospect. He certainly has a lot to like, but he also has his fair share of question marks. With a prospect like Graham there is always a lot of uncertainty involved because of the projection factor. With that said, I think teams are going to have a hard time ignoring his explosiveness off the edge. The NFL covets pass rushers and Graham could be a very good one. He might make the smoothest transition to the NFL if he were to end up playing in a Tampa 2 defense, but his ultimate upside is probably as a 3-4 OLB. If he does end up on a 3-4 team he will take some time to develop. At this point I feel Graham is safely within the first round.

Quote:

Pros

Non-stop powerful motor
Very Physical at point of attack
Very Strong
Great Character, hard worker
Bevy of moves, ability to work his man up the middle, around the outside, or bull rush
Plays with great pad level
Uses his hands extremely well
Does a great job in pursuit, never quits on a play
Great instincts and ability to diagnose plays, which makes him very good in stuffing the run.
Gets out of stance and up field very quickly

Cons

A bit shorter than your prototypical Defensive End
Does not have great speed for his size
Sometimes, can get engulfed by big Lineman
Has a tough time with double teams.

I just don't know what he's going to give you over a guy like Hali, especially when you take into account the learning curve. I doubt that he would be truly effective playing the SAM position, and I know Hali wouldn't be able to play it so you'd be drafting him to replace Hali. As such, did Hali's performance this past season dictate that the Chiefs need to consider using a high draft pick for a replacement?

Mecca 02-11-2010 10:34 PM

Look lets be frank here, most of the teams in the league that are consistently good, have 1 or no first round offensive linemen while having several 1st round dlinemen.

Saccopoo 02-11-2010 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6526284)
Look lets be frank here, most of the teams in the league that are consistently good, have 1 or no first round offensive linemen while having several 1st round dlinemen.

Chiefs have three first round picks on the defensive front line. Hali, Dorsey, Jackson.

Chiefs have one on the offensive line in Albert.

By your standard mentioned above, the Chiefs have set themselves up to be consistently good.

RustShack 02-11-2010 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6526324)
Chiefs have three first round picks on the defensive front line. Hali, Dorsey, Jackson.

Chiefs have one on the offensive line in Albert.

By your standard mentioned above, the Chiefs have set themselves up to be consistently good.

FAIL

Hali is an OLB. Which is not a DE, NT, or DE. Do you watch football?

RustShack 02-11-2010 10:52 PM

EDIT- Yes I know he was drafted as a DE and OLB's used to be DE's once upon a time. But fact is hes not one on our team anymore.

Saccopoo 02-11-2010 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 6526335)
EDIT- Yes I know he was drafted as a DE and OLB's used to be DE's once upon a time. But fact is hes not one on our team anymore.

So, what you're saying is that with Hali switching to the 3-4 ROLB spot that we now only have 2 first round draft picks on the defensive line and we now need another one to complete the trifecta?

Are you advocating a nose tackle with our first round selection this year? Terrence Cody? Dan Williams?

RustShack 02-11-2010 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6526379)
So, what you're saying is that with Hali switching to the 3-4 ROLB spot that we now only have 2 first round draft picks on the defensive line and we now need another one to complete the trifecta?

Are you advocating a nose tackle with our first round selection this year? Terrence Cody? Dan Williams?

I didn't say we need to draft a NT in the top five at all, douche bag.

RustShack 02-11-2010 11:06 PM

But if we are talking about drafting a NT before a LG, C, RG, or RT in the top five. Then yes I would.

RustShack 02-11-2010 11:08 PM

The fact is this years top five pick shouldn't be used on a linemen on either side of the ball.

Mr. Flopnuts 02-11-2010 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 6516731)
And you know this how? You obviously haven't watched him play... so where do you get your info? (btw... what position does Hali play and what position does Woodley play? Here's a hint... NOT THE SAME ONE DUMBASS)

Also... you do know that until U-M put him at DE, Graham had played LB his entire career...

ROFL I've never seen Austin ownage quite like this.

keg in kc 02-11-2010 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 6526395)
ROFL I've never seen Austin ownage quite like this.

That was pretty funny. Not that watching saccopoo try to talk about Graham wasn't funny enough on it's own.

RustShack 02-11-2010 11:18 PM

A deaf mute who has just watched one game of football in his life could own sacapoo when it comes to talking about football. Hes just a ****ing idiot.

Saccopoo 02-12-2010 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 6526395)
Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief
And you know this how? You obviously haven't watched him play... so where do you get your info? (btw... what position does Hali play and what position does Woodley play? Here's a hint... NOT THE SAME ONE DUMBASS)

Also... you do know that until U-M put him at DE, Graham had played LB his entire career...
I've never seen Austin ownage quite like this.

Ownage? That he took offense about a comparison between Hali and Graham in terms of the position that they played in college, then proceeded to start screaming "Woodley! Woodley! Woodley!" and then mentioning something about Graham playing linebacker in high school?

(BTW, I never even mentioned Woodley, so I still don't understand why the Hali/Woodley comparison was brought up anyway.)

That's "ownage?" I guess if you say so...

Saccopoo 02-12-2010 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 6526384)
I didn't say we need to draft a NT in the top five at all, douche bag.

You seemed to get pretty bent out of shape about not having Hali's first round draft status on the defensive line anymore. I just figured that you were so distraught about having him be a first round linebacker now, that you were advocating a new first round defensive tackle to take his place.

Or perhaps you are just a bit miffed that with Hali now playing linebacker, that it would nullify any potential pick of Rolando McClain because that would give the Chiefs three first round picks at linebacker versus only two on the defensive line. And we all know how bad you are on McClain's jock.

BTW - Your sig is kinda ghey. Not the Iowa State one, but the little internet gif. It makes you look like you are 13 or so. I'm having a difficult time taking anything you say seriously when you've got "WAI" "NO WAI" "KENT B!" flashing repeatedly. (Not that I take anything you say seriously anyway as it seems all you can do is hurl personal insults with the now worn out RustShack mantra of "he never watched football." You really haven't provided anything of substance of late. Maybe it's just the whole "I know we really need an offensive lineman, but the "cool" kids want a kick returner so I'll play along so they let me into their gang and I can be a cool kid too." thing. It's probably eating at your very existence. The guilt, the inner conflict. Slowly disintegrating your subconscious, gnawing at your objective reasoning, poisoning your soul. I can see the conflict within you. Your words scream for help, for understanding.)

bdeg 02-12-2010 01:03 AM

oh shit, sacc bringin out the big guns.

i know my opinion doesn't count for a lot but poo brings a lot to the table. doesn't go along with the consensus and backs it up(whether or not u want to admit albert may not be an elite lt, dude has a point).

I think a lot of the backlash is based on the fact that we want to see this team as far along in the rebuilding as possible. If Albert can hold down the LT we've already got a key player and are therefore farther along in the process, but if he ends up not being able to the team is set back practically a whole year from a drafting standpoint. I think the dude is just a realist.

milkman 02-13-2010 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6523817)
Again, you are being a douche. I specifically stated Brown, with the caveat that he was on IR all season.

How is that intellectually dishonest?

Let me clue you in - it's not.

If you want to argue for the sake of arguing, that's one thing. Maybe it's your only thing.

You are being intellectually dishonest because it was clear the reason he asked the question was the fact that none of the starters in the SB on the OL were first rounders, and he was asking a rhetorical question to make a point.

If you didn't know that, then you are a ****ing moron.

Which is it?

Are you intellectually dishonest or a moron?

The Bad Guy 02-13-2010 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bdeg (Post 6526534)
oh shit, sacc bringin out the big guns.

i know my opinion doesn't count for a lot but poo brings a lot to the table. doesn't go along with the consensus and backs it up(whether or not u want to admit albert may not be an elite lt, dude has a point).

I think a lot of the backlash is based on the fact that we want to see this team as far along in the rebuilding as possible. If Albert can hold down the LT we've already got a key player and are therefore farther along in the process, but if he ends up not being able to the team is set back practically a whole year from a drafting standpoint. I think the dude is just a realist.

Albert isn't setting any team back a full year in rebuilding. Saying this makes Okung look like he's the best LT talent to come out in the last 10 years, which is hilarious.

A lot of the backlash is because the dude is a moron. It has nothing to do with the Chiefs rebuilding.

His takes are on the RoyR scale of excellence.

Albert isn't setting back any process a year. He is in the 2nd year in a new system, lost way too much weight in my opinion, and now we want to throw him to the wolves. This is exactly the same type of panic move that has constantly set this team back to the point where we have shit on this roster.

This team has far too many holes to worry about moving a player who has shown signs of being really good at the LT position to draft another one and move Albert elsewhere. Not to mention the fact that Russell Okung is not an elite prospect. We have zero idea whether or not he'd be an upgrade to Albert at the pro level. Albert is not going to be a LG with Brian Waters on the roster, so where does he play then?

This draft is loaded at playmakers at key positions we can upgrade and we are discussing drafting a replacement for a player, who one year ago, was viewed as a dominant LT for the future?

That's complete nonsense. He's the absolute only one who thinks Albert played like shit all year. That should tell you something.

RustShack 02-13-2010 11:32 AM

If you want to replace Albert fine, but at least wait until theres a ****ing better LT prospect than Albert in the draft. Or are you just worried because you know if we wait for a real LT we will pass on him because Albert will emerge in his third year like most players do?

milkman 02-13-2010 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 6529069)
If you want to replace Albert fine, but at least wait until theres a ****ing better LT prospect than Albert in the draft. Or are you just worried because you know if we wait for a real LT we will pass on him because Albert will emerge in his third year like most players do?

Bag of Shit does make one solid point as it relates to taking a LT in this draft.

That being, should Albert prove he's not the guy, then LT becomes a need in next year's draft, a draft in which we could/should be looking at QB and WR in the first round.

That in no way diminishes the rest of his dumbassery.

RustShack 02-13-2010 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6529078)
Bag of Shit does make one solid point as it relates to taking a LT in this draft.

That being, should Albert prove he's not the guy, then LT becomes a need in next year's draft, a draft in which we could/should be looking at QB and WR in the first round.

That in no way diminishes the rest of his dumbassery.

This was also supposed to be the year of DE's, so it doesn't always work out like you think the year before.

milkman 02-13-2010 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 6529088)
This was also supposed to be the year of DE's, so it doesn't always work out like you think the year before.

The point still has merit, regardless of which positions jump to thhe top of the next draft.

The Bad Guy 02-13-2010 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6529102)
The point still has merit, regardless of which positions jump to thhe top of the next draft.

And if Albert doesn't pan out, you do not need to replace him with a first round pick.

AustinChief 02-13-2010 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6526488)
Ownage? That he took offense about a comparison between Hali and Graham in terms of the position that they played in college, then proceeded to start screaming "Woodley! Woodley! Woodley!" and then mentioning something about Graham playing linebacker in high school?

(BTW, I never even mentioned Woodley, so I still don't understand why the Hali/Woodley comparison was brought up anyway.)

That's "ownage?" I guess if you say so...

And you have missed EVERYTHING I Was saying yet again...

Woodley was mentioned because EVERYONE says that Graham is Woodley minus 1 inch of height... He learned DIRECTLY from Woodley, is almost identical in size and strength. Played the same position in college for the same school and is projected to play the exact same spot in the Pros.

THAT is why Woodley is mentioned.

NOW... please reread that paragraph until you understand it ....

.....
.....
.....

ok, got it now?
no? ok reread it again please....

OK, moving on... so assuming Graham becomes Woodley part 2 in the NFL.. he will play LOLB not ROLB which is where Hali plays... so your point that he would replace Hali (who you mistakenly think is anywhere near as good) is moot.

AND please quit saying "he can't play SAM".. #1 you are wrong and #2 WE DON'T HAVE A SAM LB IN OUR DEFENSE.. unless Crennel changes things up ... KC plays with a LOLB and ROLB

and finally... he didn't just play LB in high school.. he started playing LB at 8 years old... so a solid 10 years at LB... hence why I said his entire career before U-M.

BossChief 02-13-2010 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 6529711)
And you have missed EVERYTHING I Was saying yet again...

Woodley was mentioned because EVERYONE says that Graham is Woodley minus 1 inch of height... He learned DIRECTLY from Woodley, is almost identical in size and strength. Played the same position in college for the same school and is projected to play the exact same spot in the Pros.

THAT is why Woodley is mentioned.

NOW... please reread that paragraph until you understand it ....

.....
.....
.....

ok, got it now?
no? ok reread it again please....

OK, moving on... so assuming Graham becomes Woodley part 2 in the NFL.. he will play LOLB not ROLB which is where Hali plays... so your point that he would replace Hali (who you mistakenly think is anywhere near as good) is moot.

AND please quit saying "he can't play SAM".. #1 you are wrong and #2 WE DON'T HAVE A SAM LB IN OUR DEFENSE.. unless Crennel changes things up ... KC plays with a LOLB and ROLB

and finally... he didn't just play LB in high school.. he started playing LB at 8 years old... so a solid 10 years at LB... hence why I said his entire career before U-M.

Well, if it wasnt pwnage before, it sure as **** is now!

Well done. If he argues that, he is to be considered in the realm of knowmo


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.