ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Haley thinks Cassel's problem was the players around him (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=229703)

Mr. Laz 06-19-2010 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBOSHO (Post 6831830)
Cassel left the pocket well before it showed the slightest sign of collapsing in alot of plays last year. I guess its just his natural instinct to shift to the right

he was getting the shit beat out of him

alot of QB get skittish after being hit all the time

if he actually receives some protection this year then we'll see whether he can handle it or not.

Just Passin' By 06-19-2010 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6831823)
I don't dispute the fact that poor play around him is going to affect the QB negatively.

That, and the reality that such a situation will have tend to have some longer term effects, was the point I was making.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6831823)
My biggest complaint with Cassel, and why I think he'll ultimately continue to struggle, is that he's inaccurate and lacks the arm the arm strength that might help him compensate, in certain situations, for his inaccuracy.

The key in the NFL is to be of strong enough arm that you can make the throws. Cassel's arm is strong enough to do that. Not every QB is J.P. Losman or JaMarcus Russell: some of them are Chad Pennington. And, given where those respective careers have gone, it's pretty clear that the arm strength tends to get overblown.

Accuracy is a different issue. Cassel's completion percentage and accuracy were fine in 2008, when he had a good offensive line and quality receivers who could make proper reads, avoid disruption of patterns, and adjust for the ball when needed. They were not so fine in 2009, when he had a lousy offensive line and shitty receivers that couldn't catch, couldn't get off the line, didn't know or care where the hell they were supposed to be running, and couldn't adjust for the ball. The question moving forward is how Cassel's accuracy will be when he's got a receiving corps that's somewhere in between the top 2-3 corps in the game and one of the 2-3 sorriest groups of 'receivers' in the NFL.

Just Passin' By 06-19-2010 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6831811)
LMAO

Thanks for making my point.

I disagreed with you. You're making an erroneous claim. My pointing that out by breaking down a pair of terms does not make your point. You are essentially claiming to know why Cassel was running by giving an answer that runs counter to what he claims to be his reasoning.

That's just stupid.

milkman 06-19-2010 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 6831883)
I disagreed with you. You're making an erroneous claim. My pointing that out by breaking down a pair of terms does not make your point. You are essentially claiming to know why Cassel was running by giving an answer that runs counter to what he claims to be his reasoning.

That's just stupid.

Where did I claim to know why he was running.

I claimed that he ran when he didn't have to.

He ran even though it wasn't impacted by pressure.

Who gives a rat's ass as to why?

Just Passin' By 06-19-2010 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6831899)
Where did I claim to know why he was running.

I claimed that he ran when he didn't have to.

He ran even though it wasn't impacted by pressure.

Who gives a rat's ass as to why?


People with brains who are trying to analyze an issue rather than just piss and moan.

milkman 06-19-2010 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 6831907)
People with brains.

You are disqualified to care then.

I don't give a rat's ass as to why, because I can't do anything about it.
I can only talk about it.

I do want it fixed.

I want a QB that can play with confidence in the pocket, and run only wehn it's actually necessary.

'Hamas' Jenkins 06-19-2010 01:40 PM

Just Passing By playing the role of Michael Jack Johnson.

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Mwn53RU4p9Y&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Mwn53RU4p9Y&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

Halfcan 06-19-2010 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6831552)
If anyone has an excuse that says it's the players around him, that would be Croyle.

However, he's the football equivalent of Humpty Dumpty, so starting him would only mean we'd see Cassel starting later rather than the start of the season.

ROFL humpty dumpty

TRR 06-19-2010 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6831698)
And then there's Cassel.

Yea idiot....challenging for the starting job at USC isn't a major college.
Posted via Mobile Device

Bane 06-19-2010 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR (Post 6832046)
Yea idiot....challenging for the starting job at USC isn't a major college.
Posted via Mobile Device

ROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFL:spock::spock::spock::spock:ROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFL


Challenge.
a call to take part in a contest or competition, esp. a duel : he accepted the challenge.
• a task or situation that tests someone's abilities : the ridge is a challenge for experienced climbers.
an attempt to win a contest or championship in a sport : a world title challenge.
:Drochambeau

Pasta Little Brioni 06-19-2010 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 6831838)
so when are we trading for Randy Moss and Wes Welker? Because those are the only two guys you can put around Cassel to make him serviceable, and even then, he can't even win the right games to make the playoffs at 11-5.

How many teams (besides them) have ever missed the playoffs at 11-5? Also, even with Brady back the Pats "only" went 11-5 last year and won thier division.

orange 06-19-2010 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR (Post 6832046)
Yea idiot....challenging for the starting job at USC isn't a major college.
Posted via Mobile Device

Matt Cassel - CAREER statistics at USC
Matt Cassel #10 QB

CAREER STATS
YARDS TOUCHDOWNS
97 0


Stats Overview Passing
YEAR CMP ATT YDS CMP% YPA LNG TD INT SACK RAT
2004 10 14 97 71.4 6.93 22 0 1 1 115.35
There certainly is an idiot involved in this conversation. No doubt about that.


"Hey Matt, bring me another towel, will 'ya? And take this funky one away."

Hammock Parties 06-19-2010 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 6831876)

The key in the NFL is to be of strong enough arm that you can make the throws. Cassel's arm is strong enough to do that.

Yes, but the problem is, he's not particularly accurate, has problems with taking sacks, and has a terrible deep ball.

Throwing in a weak arm only adds to the list of his inadequacies.

Chad Pennington can get away with having a weak arm because he has stellar accuracy and has all of the intangibles you look for in a good quarterback.

Cassel can't really get away with a weak arm because the rest of his game isn't all that impressive.

Franchise quarterbacks have to have some outstanding part in their game. Something that wows you, consistently, every game. Cassel really doesn't do anything outstanding. His best trait is he works hard.

Brock 06-19-2010 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR (Post 6832046)
Yea idiot....challenging for the starting job at USC isn't a major college.
Posted via Mobile Device

cool story bro

kcchiefsus 06-19-2010 06:31 PM

Well it is entirely possible that a lot of his problems had to do with the players around him.

For instance, without knowing exactly how many drops we had last year, lets just say we had 50. You can't entirely cut out all of the drops but lets just drop that number half of that and make it 25. Multiply those additional 25 completions by his average yards per completion of 5.9 (which yes I know this is a pretty shitty ypc) and you get an additional 147.5 yards. That puts him at about 3,100 yards for the season.

Also add those 25 completions to his previous completion total of 271 and you get 296 completions out of 493 attempts for a completion percentage of just over 60% which is respectable.

Maybe I'm reaching but I don't think it's to far of a stretch of the imagination to suggest that at least one of those incompletions was in the endzone and perhaps at least one was tipped and picked off by the defense. So instead of 16 TD's and 16 int's we could adjust it to 17 TD's and 15 int's.

After these adjustments you end up with a stat line of about 3,100 yards, 60% completion percentage, 17 touchdowns, and 15 interceptions. That is certainly not great but it isn't god awful either. Add in other factors such as:

- A full offseason for Chambers in the offense.
- Dwayne Bowe hopefully being in shape and committed to the team.
- The addition of McCluster and Moeaki as weapons.
- The additions to the offensive line as well as Albert hopefully stepping up his game.
- The addition of Thomas Jones plus the emergence of Jammal Charles.
- A quality offensive coordinator, Charlie Weis.

With these additions I see no reason why Cassel won't be able to step up his game. If he still struggles like he did last year then by all means the guy needs to go. Is he the guy to lead us to a super bowl? It's possible, but probably not. Is he worth the money he is being paid? No. But he is who we have for now and I think he can at least be an above average quarterback.

I understand frustration from people if they believe he has kept us from getting somebody younger and more talented. But there is plenty of time for that and there are quite a few options in the upcoming draft who I like a hell of alot better than Clausen.

milkman 06-19-2010 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchiefsus (Post 6832300)
Well it is entirely possible that a lot of his problems had to do with the players around him.

For instance, without knowing exactly how many drops we had last year, lets just say we had 50. You can't entirely cut out all of the drops but lets just drop that number half of that and make it 25. Multiply those additional 25 completions by his average yards per completion of 5.9 (which yes I know this is a pretty shitty ypc) and you get an additional 147.5 yards. That puts him at about 3,100 yards for the season.

Also add those 25 completions to his previous completion total of 271 and you get 296 completions out of 493 attempts for a completion percentage of just over 60% which is respectable.

Maybe I'm reaching but I don't think it's to far of a stretch of the imagination to suggest that at least one of those incompletions was in the endzone and perhaps at least one was tipped and picked off by the defense. So instead of 16 TD's and 16 int's we could adjust it to 17 TD's and 15 int's.

After these adjustments you end up with a stat line of about 3,100 yards, 60% completion percentage, 17 touchdowns, and 15 interceptions. That is certainly not great but it isn't god awful either. Add in other factors such as:

- A full offseason for Chambers in the offense.
- Dwayne Bowe hopefully being in shape and committed to the team.
- The addition of McCluster and Moeaki as weapons.
- The additions to the offensive line as well as Albert hopefully stepping up his game.
- The addition of Thomas Jones plus the emergence of Jammal Charles.
- A quality offensive coordinator, Charlie Weis.

With these additions I see no reason why Cassel won't be able to step up his game. If he still struggles like he did last year then by all means the guy needs to go. Is he the guy to lead us to a super bowl? It's possible, but probably not. Is he worth the money he is being paid? No. But he is who we have for now and I think he can at least be an above average quarterback.

I understand frustration from people if they believe he has kept us from getting somebody younger and more talented. But there is plenty of time for that and there are quite a few options in the upcoming draft who I like a hell of alot better than Clausen.

The problem, the scenario you laid out for improvement is very possible.

The additional problem is that it may very well convince Pioli that he doesn't need a QB with actual talent that can make the players around him better.

We'll have that mediocre QB who needs to have top flight talent around him to make him play like a good NFL, and pass on QBs with actual talent in the draft.

Hammock Parties 06-19-2010 06:49 PM

60 percent is a below average completion percentage in the modern NFL, especially when you are only averaging a meager 5.9 yards per attempt.

Cassel would have been 22nd in the league last year at 60 percent.

You want to talk about TD/INT ratio, you have to bring up the fact that Cassel padded his numbers with garbage-time touchdowns last season. He threw one against Philly, two against the Giants, and you can argue he threw at least one against the Jaguars.

Cassel was shitty, even if you fabricate statistics out of thin air.

TRR 06-19-2010 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6832085)
Matt Cassel - CAREER statistics at USC
Matt Cassel #10 QB

CAREER STATS
YARDS TOUCHDOWNS
97 0


Stats Overview Passing
YEAR CMP ATT YDS CMP% YPA LNG TD INT SACK RAT
2004 10 14 97 71.4 6.93 22 0 1 1 115.35
There certainly is an idiot involved in this conversation. No doubt about that.


"Hey Matt, bring me another towel, will 'ya? And take this funky one away."

Answer this question...is USC a major college? You said he didn't play for a major college IDIOT. Your not the backup QB at USC without major talent. Bottom line...
Posted via Mobile Device

Hammock Parties 06-19-2010 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR (Post 6832348)
Your not the backup QB at USC without major talent. e

Rob Johnson and John David Booty were STARTING quarterbacks at USC.

Brock 06-19-2010 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR (Post 6832348)
Answer this question...is USC a major college? You said he didn't play for a major college IDIOT. Your not the backup QB at USC without major talent. Bottom line...
Posted via Mobile Device

Using that logic, you're not a backup QB in the NFL without major talent, but the fact is most backups in the NFL suck when they actually play.

Hammock Parties 06-19-2010 07:24 PM

If Cassel has MAJOR talent, please, define it.

MadMax 06-19-2010 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR (Post 6832348)
Answer this question...is USC a major college? You said he didn't play for a major college IDIOT. Your not the backup QB at USC without major talent. Bottom line...
Posted via Mobile Device



he was a backup for a reason...no? He has NO major talent.

milkman 06-19-2010 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MadMax (Post 6832371)
he was a backup for a reason...no? He has NO major talent.

Wasting time here.

TRR knows that when I called him a marginally talented QB, he knows that I was talking in relation to other QBs in the NFL.

He is simply being an ass, and responding to his dumb ass is wasted keystrokes.

DeezNutz 06-19-2010 07:36 PM

With the first overall pick, the St. Louis Rams select, Sam Bradford, individual who challenged for the starting QB job, University of Oklahoma.

BigMeatballDave 06-19-2010 07:39 PM

I think with the players we've added and him having a real OC, he SHOULD show marked improvement. Especially if JC can continue what he did last season. I'm hopeful Cassel will improve, I'm just not confident that he can.

el borracho 06-19-2010 07:44 PM

I guess we'll see this season. Can't say I have much faith in Cassel because the things I dislike the most about his game (weak arm and inaccuracy) are not correctable.

whoman69 06-19-2010 08:51 PM

I'm tired of the homers who back guys that should have been gone long before they left. We have Grob, CP, Herm, and add to that list Cassel. No more apologies for sucking. The fact that the guy had as low a completion percentage as he did while not throwing the ball downfield is atrocious. He has 70s type completion percentages throwing the ball only a third as far. And to blame all the drops for his problems overlooks the fact that many of the drops were his fault in not getting the ball where it needed to be, often low or behind his receivers. I'm giving him a short leash this year. If he can't get the job done we need to see how well Croyle had done in being able to build up his body to stay on the field.

boogblaster 06-19-2010 08:58 PM

Start Croyle ... I think ....

orange 06-19-2010 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR (Post 6832348)
Answer this question...is USC a major college? You said he didn't play for a major college IDIOT. Your not the backup QB at USC without major talent. Bottom line...
Posted via Mobile Device

He didn't PLAY. He practiced, jackass! He never showed ANYTHING to get on the field. Maybe the Chiefs should make him a Tight End - those backup TEs at USC, whoa nellie!!!

Keep on sucking on him, though.

Shaid 06-19-2010 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6831552)
If anyone has an excuse that says it's the players around him, that would be Croyle.

Didn't Croyle and Cassel both have pretty much the same players? Actually, Croyle had Tony G so..... :hmmm:

Goldmember 06-20-2010 02:11 AM

yeah it was, the defensive players around him

Rasputin 06-20-2010 02:11 AM

I don't care what any body or expert says, it shouldn't take 16 games to drive a td in the first quart of a game for the season. 15 games with out an offensive TD that's like going 3.75 games with out scoring a TD. If we went a streatch of 3- 4 games with out scoreing an offensive TD heads would roll and fans would lose there freaking minds.

It's the starting QBs job to get the O on a roll and start scoreing not buy himself but get the ball where in needs to go and on time delivery.

I'm tired getting a back up vet QB comming here to be starter and suck ass then have all the excuses so they don't lose there job. Huard Cassle no differance. Excuses excuses excuses. just quit. Croyle didn't get the excuses like that and he got his ass kicked by the Titans because nobody would block. I watch how they play and Cassel has very poor delivery he is has slow motion reaction to blitz, i don't see much that he can improve at this stage of his career. What ever, can't wait for this to get started hopefully Cassel proves me wrong OR let Croyle do it.

Pioli Zombie 06-20-2010 06:48 AM

Relax people. Even the great, hall of famer, ****y ****erson struggled in his first year with a rebuilding team.

TRR 06-20-2010 07:17 AM

It doesn't matter if Cassel played at USC or not. Or that Rob Johnson (who was immensely talented) or David Booty fizzled in the NFL. The bottom line is that you don't get to the NFL by being marginally talented. It doesn't happen.

Are there more talented QB's in the league than others? Sure there are. Either way, you are a hell of an athlete if your playing QB on the NFL level.

Quit acting like Joe arm chair is more talented because Cassel didn't start for USC, and because he had a down year in his first season with new receivers that changed every week, a revolving door in front of him, no running game till mid-season, a new offense 10 days before the season started, and a sprained MCL.

Yea I know...excuses. All I've ever said is don't be so quick to hang him.
Posted via Mobile Device

dj56dt58 06-20-2010 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 6831514)
So once we surround Cassel with all Pros, people will feel better about him?

Brilliant....

Yeah because it takes all pros to hang onto the ****ing ball

milkman 06-20-2010 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR (Post 6832852)
It doesn't matter if Cassel played at USC or not. Or that Rob Johnson (who was immensely talented) or David Booty fizzled in the NFL. The bottom line is that you don't get to the NFL by being marginally talented. It doesn't happen.

Are there more talented QB's in the league than others? Sure there are. Either way, you are a hell of an athlete if your playing QB on the NFL level.

Quit acting like Joe arm chair is more talented because Cassel didn't start for USC, and because he had a down year in his first season with new receivers that changed every week, a revolving door in front of him, no running game till mid-season, a new offense 10 days before the season started, and a sprained MCL.

Yea I know...excuses. All I've ever said is don't be so quick to hang him.
Posted via Mobile Device

You're a dumbass.

milkman 06-20-2010 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dj56dt58 (Post 6832862)
Yeah because it takes all pros to hang onto the ****ing ball

No it doesn't take all pros.

However, when you have receivers with a reputatuion already established for drops, and you team them with a QB who makes poor throws, you're going to see a shit load of drops.

Cheater5 06-20-2010 08:10 AM

I'm pretty much down with what TRR said. Like most of us, at times last year I shot up off the couch and threw my hat at the screen at many of the under/over thrown balls to open receivers-"Are you f#*king kidding me!?"...
HOWEVER I think Cassel walked into the perfect storm; what key factors can you check Y or N that ANY QB would have had in place on the '09 Chiefs? I am not a student of QBs and their mechanics/skills. And I'm not a Cassel homer. I'd start Croyle if he were 20lbs heavier- then maybe he wouldn't be as frail as chalk. But like any organization- it takes leadership (read: coaching) to truly change.

Bane 06-20-2010 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6832367)
If Cassel has MAJOR talent, please, define it.

ROFLROFLROFLROFL

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6832595)
He didn't PLAY. He practiced, jackass! He never showed ANYTHING to get on the field. Maybe the Chiefs should make him a Tight End - those backup TEs at USC, whoa nellie!!!



Keep on sucking on him, though.

He's Pioli's tight end already.:D

Bane 06-20-2010 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cheater5 (Post 6832881)
I'm pretty much down with what TRR said. Like most of us, at times last year I shot up off the couch and threw my hat at the screen at many of the under/over thrown balls to open receivers-"Are you f#*king kidding me!?"...
HOWEVER I think Cassel walked into the perfect storm; what key factors can you check Y or N that ANY QB would have had in place on the '09 Chiefs? I am not a student of QBs and their mechanics/skills. And I'm not a Cassel homer. I'd start Croyle if he were 20lbs heavier- then maybe he wouldn't be as frail as chalk. But like any organization- it takes leadership (read: coaching) to truly change.

Nevermind...:shake:

Hammock Parties 06-20-2010 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR (Post 6832852)

Quit acting like Joe arm chair is more talented

NO ONE is acting like that.

But compared to other quarterbacks, yes he has marginal talent.

Rasputin 06-20-2010 11:25 AM

So Haily is blaming the lack of tallent around Cassel, wander how that makes the rest of the team feel? Basically it's the lack of tallent that Haily inherited from Carl Peterson. Damnet Carl :cuss:

If only we had tallent around Cassel, or like the scarecrow, "If only I had a brain"

Sweet Daddy Hate 06-20-2010 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6831922)
You are disqualified to care then.

I don't give a rat's ass as to why, because I can't do anything about it.
I can only talk about it.

I do want it fixed.

I want a QB that can play with confidence in the pocket, and run only wehn it's actually necessary.

LMAO :clap: This.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6832364)
Using that logic, you're not a backup QB in the NFL without major talent, but the fact is most backups in the NFL suck when they actually play.

Or...they have one magical, Cinderella-like season and end up finding a home with some dumbass franchise that thrives on giving that kind of player a home...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie (Post 6832836)
Relax people. Even the great, hall of famer, ****y ****erson struggled in his first year with a rebuilding team.

ROFL I love ****y.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.