ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs cut someone to make room for NT Anthony Toribio (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=233005)

jAZ 09-06-2010 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 6980086)
Wish they'd gotten more out of '09, but they didn't. Looks like Jackson and Succop are it out of that class. They may have 5 starters out of the last draft, though, if Moeaki manages to get and stay healthy, with Barry, McCluster, Asamoah, Moeaki and Lewis, and Arenas as nickel corner is already essentially a starter, too. I would be surprised if they weren't all playing significant time by the end of the year. I think Sheffield has a chance, as well, further down the road. As much as I didn't like '09 (and I didn't like anything about '09) I really like what they did this year.

It was offered up as an excuse at the time, and history would seem to suggest it was true... in '09, we were working mostly with the draft info from the former regime's scouting staff/reports. In '10, we finally were able to have in place a full scouting staff from Pioli for a full draft season.

If that is in fact the case, and the '09 draft was indeed a horrible bust, that doesn't necessarily mean that Pioli = horrible bust. Not at all, in fact.

BossChief 09-06-2010 02:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6980025)
As soon as I got to the spot where the guy says Stafford is "average" and called guys like Cushing, Raji and Crabtree nothing special, I stopped reading.

That site is full of complete idiots.

Just flippin ya a little shit, but I remember you saying how you would have rather taken Darius Heyward Bey over Crabtree before the draft.

There are a lot of idiots on that site, but everyone makes mistakes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6980043)
Yet that draft has 5 starters...you get 5 starters out of any draft it's good.

The Chiefs most likely won't have 5 starters out of these last 2 drafts combined, ponder that.

I bet by years end that at least 6 players from the last two drafts are solid starters for us.

Jackson (never will live up to his draft position, but will play solid football for us by the end of the year IMO under this coaching staff)
Succop (tied the NFL rookie record for field goal accuracy, missed NO kicks under 40 yards and only one kick all year under 50 yards. 2-5 from 50+)
Berry
Lewis
Moeaki
Asamoah

DMC and Arenas will both play more than half the snaps and play pivotal roles for us on special teams as well.

The like the 10 draft class as much as I dislike the 09 draft class.

Mecca 09-06-2010 02:46 AM

Actually what I said was I wouldn't take Crabtree top 10 when Nicks is going to go in the bottom of the 1st round and they are virtually the same player.

I still stand by that today after their rookie years. Michael Crabtree is not 20 some slots better than Hakeem Nicks, hell he may not even be better.

BossChief 09-06-2010 02:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6980848)
Actually what I said was I wouldn't take Crabtree top 10 when Nicks is going to go in the bottom of the 1st round and they are virtually the same player.

I still stand by that today after their rookie years. Michael Crabtree is not 20 some slots better than Hakeem Nicks, hell he may not even be better.

well, if you insist:

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...4&postcount=79

Maybe I'm weird but if I had a pick of WR and TE...I'd take Heyward-Bey and Cook over Crabtree and Coffman.

...

I thought I remember reading that.

SenselessChiefsFan 09-06-2010 07:37 AM

I understand the criticism of last year's draft. I disagree on some of the finer points, but it clearly wasn't a good draft.

After 4 preseason games, I don't understand the bashing of the Chiefs draft this year.

The first three picks all look like they will contribute great things in their first year.

McCluster has looked like a more versatile version of Wes Welker. He is a threat from the backfield, the slot and both of the return positions. So far, he is everything the Chiefs had hoped. I don't understand the criticism here. Given our QB's penchant for checking down.... this guy will be an integral part of the Chiefs passing game and a big time play maker.

Arenas has been electric in the return game. He is the same size as Flowers, only a little heavier. I can see him playing an awful lot in the nickel.

The Chiefs have lacked playmakers. These two are game changing types of players. I just don't understand the criticism. Especially, not now that they have shown it in the preseason.

Now, moving on.... Asamoah has looked like a solid third rounder.

We all know that the only concern about Moeaki is his ability to stay healthy. This was a gamble here... but, a first round talent for a third round pick seems to be worth the gamble. One could argue that the Chiefs don't have the option to gamble given their lack of good players. I would tend to agree. But, it is a gamble I would take on most teams. I won't bash them for it.

Kendrick Lewis has looked pretty good so far. He lacks speed, but he has good instincts, and I don't see a problem with this pick whatsoever.

I won't sit here and lobby for Sheffield, because I don't know enough about him and he hasn't stood out, yet.


But, overall, the 2010 draft looks good to me.

mcaj22 09-06-2010 07:45 AM

Tyson Jackson and Glenn Dorsey will never amount to picks 3 and 5 overall, 30+ million garunteed dollars worth of playing talent. What we invested in these guys they should be ****ing stars and almost pro bowl type talent, or at least show flashes of it.

But they don't. They are serviceable at best if that, and they will be like that this year, next year, and five years from now. We as fans have to accept that, it's a shame our d-line is so bad seeing as 2 of the top 5 highest paid players on the team play on it.

Reaper16 09-06-2010 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6980851)
well, if you insist:

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...4&postcount=79

Maybe I'm weird but if I had a pick of WR and TE...I'd take Heyward-Bey and Cook over Crabtree and Coffman.

...

I thought I remember reading that.

I'd rather have Heyward-Bey than Crabtree, too. Heyward-Bey has upside.

SAUTO 09-06-2010 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6980779)
I don't think anyone declared the Bengals the draft winner, Smith was questionable, their 2nd and 3rd round picks however were good picks so people liked those.

I'm trying to remember which drafts I liked the best right after the draft. I really liked the Giants draft I remember that one. Baltimore, Green Bay the usual suspects.

Actually if you want to use a team as an example that was declared the draft winner following the 2009 draft, it's the Eagles not the Bengals, pretty sure everyone loved all their picks.

Actually i think some did.

SAUTO 09-06-2010 10:00 AM

yeah there are TONS of posts where people said they loved the draft, the bengals killed it, the bengals pwned, do a search.

you were all over their nuts mecca.

Coach 09-06-2010 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6981003)
yeah there are TONS of posts where people said they loved the draft, the bengals killed it, the bengals pwned, do a search.

you were all over their nuts mecca.

Well, not doubting your word, but it would be a wise idea to provide the link for the person(s) in question that said they loved the bengals killed it, loved it, etc.

Reaper16 09-06-2010 10:10 AM

I remember the Bengals draft being praised for taking value at nearly every pick.

SAUTO 09-06-2010 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach (Post 6981012)
Well, not doubting your word, but it would be a wise idea to provide the link for the person(s) in question that said they loved the bengals killed it, loved it, etc.

yeah i did but the post got ****ed up.

hell there's even a thread about it


give me a sec

SAUTO 09-06-2010 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach (Post 6981012)
Well, not doubting your word, but it would be a wise idea to provide the link for the person(s) in question that said they loved the bengals killed it, loved it, etc.



i hope these are enough, there ARE more though

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5717315)
The Giants and Eagles consistently win at the draft and the Bengals just rocked the house.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefRon (Post 5717305)
That's just it. For those of us that are disappointed, it's not about who we picked. It's about who else was on the board at the time we made the pick.

For instance, look at the Bengals draft. I like what they did. Also I like the Giants and the Eagles drafts.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 5716812)
Oh, great. I just noticed that the Bengals (who had a sick draft) signed Daniel Skuta from GVSU, another player I've advocated for in this thread.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 5715203)
The Bengals are pwning this draft. Bernard Scott is a ****ing great pick.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5714181)
Eagles, Ravens, Patriots, Bears and Bengals are tearing it up in this draft.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 5713082)
There's nothing quiet about the Bengals Draft.
They're kicking ass and taking names!!!

Andre Smith
Rey Maualuga
Michael Johnson
Chase Coffman
Jonathan Luigs

All 5 of these guys are starting-caliber draftees.

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 5713074)
Five top talents in the first four rounds. A lot of people might not like the Andre Smith pick, but if he can get his shit together, they might have the top draft this year.


Round 1, Pick 6 (6) Andre Smith OT 6'4" 332 Alabama

Pick Analysis:Marvin Lewis has stated that he wants to get back to running the football, and Smith gives the Bengals a dominating offensive tackle to run behind. Though he had a series of mishaps in the run up to the draft, there is no denying that Smith is one of the best tackle prospects in the draft.


Round 2, Pick 6 (38) Rey Maualuga ILB 6'2" 249 Southern Cal

Pick Analysis:After surprisingly dropping out of the first round, Maualuga lands with the Bengals at No. 38. The high-motor playmaker from USC gives Marvin Lewis a heavy hitter at middle linebacker. With last year's top pick (Keith Rivers) coming back from an injury, the Bengals have a pair of young and athletic linebackers to anchor the middle of the defense.


Round 3, Pick 6 (70) Michael Johnson DE 6'7" 266 Georgia Tech

Pick Analysis:The Bengals pick up an edge rusher with first-round talent with their selection of Johnson. A tall, rangy athlete with explosive quickness, Johnson has the ability to run down quarterbacks from the backside. Though he doesn't play with great effort at all times, he has the potential to be an impact player as a situational pass rusher.


Round 3, Pick 34 (98) (Compensatory selection) Chase Coffman TE 6'6" 244 Missouri


Pick Analysis:A foot injury prevented him from probably being drafted higher. He's an excellent receiving tight end, but he'll have to learn how to block. He has outstanding hands and will be one of those move-type tight ends. His father was an All-Pro tight end with the Packers. His coach at Missouri said Coffman is the one guy who will go to the NFL and be good right away.


Round 4, Pick 6 (106) Jonathan Luigs C 6'4" 301 Arkansas

Pick Analysis:Cincy needed a center and looked at all of them. The Bengals staff coached at the Senior Bowl saw Luigs quite a bit. He was a four-year starter and was the center of the year in 2007. Some people feel he tailed off, but he has made all the calls at the line. The question is, how is he going to handle the power nose tackles? He may have to hit the weight room a bit to handle the Ravens and Steelers defenses.
Round 5, Pick 6 (142)
Round 6, Pick 6 (179)
Round 6, Pick 36 (209) (Compensatory selection)
Round 7, Pick 6 (215)
Round 7, Pick 40 (249) (Compensatory selection)
Round 7, Pick 43 (252) (Compensatory selection)

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 5713004)
The Bengals are killing this draft.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5712992)
Bengals keep kicking ass in this draft.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Delano (Post 5712085)
Bengals take Michael Johnson.

I like their draft a lot.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5712084)
Bengals are having a damn good draft.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Delano (Post 5709634)
Bengals, Jaguars and Texans have done pretty well.


Frankie 09-06-2010 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6979675)
'09 Draft Class:
Succop is a slightly above average kicker.

Common Hamas. Succop so far has been better than that. But anyway, isn't it sad that the the highlight of our '09 draft is the last player chosen in the entire draft?:(

Frankie 09-06-2010 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6979708)
I think people are being too hard on Magee. He had a decent rookie season and he looked OK this preseason. He's probably not starting material but he can clearly get off a block and get after the passer in nickel packages. For a third round pick that isn't horrible.

For a team like us, especially when the GM forces an immediate change in the defensive system, the first 3 rounds of picks must be starter material.

Frankie 09-06-2010 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6979855)
Hence 4-12, 2-14, 4-12

Damn, I hope this is not a pattern. We may be looking at a 2-14 season coming up.:eek:

Reaper16 09-06-2010 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6981053)
i hope these are enough, there ARE more though

None of those posts declare the Bengals as the outright winner of the draft, which is what the original charge was.

-King- 09-06-2010 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6980980)
I'd rather have Heyward-Bey than Crabtree, too. Heyward-Bey has upside.

What upside does he have over crabtree?
Posted via Mobile Device

Reaper16 09-06-2010 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing (Post 6981139)
What upside does he have over crabtree?
Posted via Mobile Device

The physical attributes, speed namely, that the Raiders so prized in Heyward-Bey give him a higher ceiling. Crabtree seems maxed out, is slow, is a poor route-runner. Heyward-Bey has a better chance of busting than Crabtree but also a much better chance at becoming an elite player.

RedThat 09-06-2010 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 6981097)
Common Hamas. Succop so far has been better than that.

I agree Succop is one good kicker.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 6981097)
But anyway, isn't it sad that the the highlight of our '09 draft is the last player chosen in the entire draft?:(

Sure. If you choose to look at it that way, then yeah it is miserable.
But what is the sense? It's done, it's over with. Nothing we can do about it, that draft is history. Can we just move on?

*Anyway, it's great to see we got a kicker. I've wanted one for years because I felt this franchise never had a really good one for a long time. Now we have one. Thank you lord.

-King- 09-06-2010 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6981156)
The physical attributes, speed namely, that the Raiders so prized in Heyward-Bey give him a higher ceiling. Crabtree seems maxed out, is slow, is a poor route-runner. Heyward-Bey has a better chance of busting than Crabtree but also a much better chance at becoming an elite player.

Eh, Heyward Bey will never have a 1k season in his career.
Posted via Mobile Device

Titty Meat 09-06-2010 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6980980)
I'd rather have Heyward-Bey than Crabtree, too. Heyward-Bey has upside.

I'd rather have Crabtree he played well with a shitty QB. You what they say if "I buy a lottery ticket I have the chance to be a millionare". Thats how I feel about Heyword-Bey he was a 2nd round talent not a first.

The Bad Guy 09-06-2010 12:41 PM

Yeah, I don't know why in the hell people would rather have Hey-Bey over Crabtree. Crabtree runs great routes, has better hands. The speed thing is overrated when you have stonehands.

RedThat 09-06-2010 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6981212)
Yeah, I don't know why in the hell people would rather have Hey-Bey over Crabtree. Crabtree runs great routes, has better hands. The speed thing is overrated when you have stonehands.

At the end of the day, it really comes down to who is the more polished player? I'll take Crabtree 9x out of 10 over Heyward Bey.

Heyward Bey's speed is overemphasized because we all know Al Davis is infatuated by speed.

Reaper16 09-06-2010 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6981166)
I'd rather have Crabtree he played well with a shitty QB. You what they say if "I buy a lottery ticket I have the chance to be a millionare". Thats how I feel about Heyword-Bey he was a 2nd round talent not a first.

I agree with you, more or less. I personally wouldn't have touched either one until the second round.

SAUTO 09-06-2010 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6981129)
None of those posts declare the Bengals as the outright winner of the draft, which is what the original charge was.

well i guess if you want it word for word im sorry but pwning and winning arent too far off.

and ill have to search again but the first time im pretty sure i saw a post calling them winners.
Posted via Mobile Device

OnTheWarpath15 09-06-2010 03:27 PM

Getting back on topic, is this guy the only signing we've had off the wire?

If so, we are dreadfully thin on the OL, and not much better off on the DL.

Frankie 09-06-2010 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 6980273)
Some day I'd like to see them pick somebody off waivers who doesn't make me think "who?" and/or "why?"

Although Chris Chambers last year wasn't too bad.

The Chiefs have a tendency to make those kind of picks out of mid-season desperation. It seems they almost never make necessary free agent picks in the off-season geared to preparing the team for the season beforehand. Instead of being active rebuilding the team they are almost always reactive. It is very very frustrating.

SAUTO 09-06-2010 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6981637)
Getting back on topic, is this guy the only signing we've had off the wire?

If so, we are dreadfully thin on the OL, and not much better off on the DL.

as far as i could find, yes.
Posted via Mobile Device

Frankie 09-06-2010 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6980830)
The like the 10 draft class as much as I dislike the 09 draft class.

This. 09 was a great opportunity missed. A lot of folks blame the bad 09 draft on the fact that Pioli did not have his own scouts. If that were really the case, then (in retrospect of course) we would have done a hell of a lot better if he had traded all of the 09 draft picks to other teams for '10 picks. He could have almost fill all our holes in one ('10) draft.

I wonder if there is ANY GM in the NFL with balls to do something out of the box like that. :hmmm:

OnTheWarpath15 09-06-2010 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6981858)
as far as i could find, yes.
Posted via Mobile Device

Damn.

Hope they aren't waiting until Week 2 so they don't have to guarantee salary.

Christ, the payroll is around $60M for the season. If there's someone out there they want, they should grab them no, instead of potentially being sniped by another team.

If there's not anyone else out there they want, Gold help us.

SAUTO 09-06-2010 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6981862)
Damn.

Hope they aren't waiting until Week 2 so they don't have to guarantee salary.

Christ, the payroll is around $60M for the season. If there's someone out there they want, they should grab them no, instead of potentially being sniped by another team.

If there's not anyone else out there they want, Gold help us.

LMAO.

i can see your point.

one positive about the o line is that we have so many that can play multiple positions.

d line?? IDK
Posted via Mobile Device

Frankie 09-06-2010 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 6981158)
Sure. If you choose to look at it that way, then yeah it is miserable. But what is the sense? It's done, it's over with. Nothing we can do about it, that draft is history. Can we just move on?

In most parts of life I am with you on that point. But fan is short for fanatic. Passion and feeling is a big ingredient in how we react to these things, as it should be.

RedThat 09-06-2010 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 6981871)
In most parts of life I am with you on that point. But fan is short for fanatic. Passion and feeling is a big ingredient in how we react to these things, as it should be.

True. Hopefully the con of being a fan doesn't bring your day down.

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-06-2010 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6981862)
Damn.

Hope they aren't waiting until Week 2 so they don't have to guarantee salary.

Christ, the payroll is around $60M for the season. If there's someone out there they want, they should grab them no, instead of potentially being sniped by another team.

If there's not anyone else out there they want, Gold help us.

The "Clark Hunt is cheap" rap has to be gaining some momentum.

Again, this is a bad football team. 620 players were cut from other teams, and our scouts, who Pioli said last year attend every PS game, saw it fit to pick up 1 guy among those 620 cuts.

1.

bevischief 09-06-2010 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6981894)
The "Clark Hunt is cheap" rap has to be gaining some momentum.

Again, this is a bad football team. 620 players were cut from other teams, and our scouts, who Pioli said last year attend every PS game, saw it fit to pick up 1 guy among those 620 cuts.

1.

:facepalm:

DaneMcCloud 09-06-2010 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6981894)
The "Clark Hunt is cheap" rap has to be gaining some momentum.

Again, this is a bad football team. 620 players were cut from other teams, and our scouts, who Pioli said last year attend every PS game, saw it fit to pick up 1 guy among those 620 cuts.

1.

It's ****ing hilarious.

I was in New York in October 2008 for the Jets-Chiefs game.

I dropped some details about with whom I met and with whom I was sitting with at the game, and also happened to mention the opinion of other owners around the league in regards to Clark Hunt.

Cheap. No passion for football. Business.

From that point, ****ing Claythan starts attacking me, as did a few others (Dumb ****ing ****s, of course).

Fast forward to Opening Day, 2009. Chiefs payroll? $88 million.

SALARY CAP FLOOR.

**** you, Clay.

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 09-06-2010 11:47 PM

I'd like to see some research that supports the idea that being the vulture of the NFL is productive way to build a winning team. I'm not saying the research doesn't exist or that there are not players I'd like to see replace a certain 7 or 8 guys on the chiefs.... But it's a reach to really get upset about this. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see how a ton of Jamon Merediths help this team's future. I'm not against stop-gap salary casualties either, but we already have Thomas Jones

BossChief 09-06-2010 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lemon_Pie (Post 6983343)
I'd like to see some research that supports the idea that being the vulture of the NFL is productive way to build a winning team. I'm not saying the research doesn't exist or that there are not players I'd like to see replace a certain 7 or 8 guys on the chiefs.... But it's a reach to really get upset about this. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see how a ton of Jamon Merediths help this team's future. I'm not against stop-gap salary casualties either, but we already have Thomas Jones

Oh ****

:facepalm:

Just ****ing look at our roster after the first 20 or so players...that being generous.

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-07-2010 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lemon_Pie (Post 6983343)
I'd like to see some research that supports the idea that being the vulture of the NFL is productive way to build a winning team. I'm not saying the research doesn't exist or that there are not players I'd like to see replace a certain 7 or 8 guys on the chiefs.... But it's a reach to really get upset about this. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see how a ton of Jamon Merediths help this team's future. I'm not against stop-gap salary casualties either, but we already have Thomas Jones

You are right that you won't build a Super Bowl winner on the backs of waiver wire pickups, but think about this:

Tony Richardson was waiver wire trash for this team, as were Brian Waters and Casey Wiegmann.

3 of the 11 guys on the best offense we ever had were guys that other teams released that we picked up. In Waters' and Richardson's case, they were shitcanned as rookies.

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 09-07-2010 12:05 AM

**** you and your facepalm, dickshit. Worst emoticon ever.

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-07-2010 12:11 AM

If you look back at the Colts 2006 SB team, Gary Brackett, Nick Harper, Jeff Saturday, and Raheem Brock were either UDFAs or rookie waiver wire pickups by the Colts, as were Willie Parker and James Harrison for the Steelers.

The fact of the matter is that you can't fill every hole with 7 draft picks a year. You have to be able to not only scout UDFAs in May, but also other teams' cuts during the final cut down.

You aren't going to find Peyton Manning doing that, but you can find valuable role players, and in rarer cases solid starters and even Pro Bowlers.

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 09-07-2010 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6983361)
You are right that you won't build a Super Bowl winner on the backs of waiver wire pickups, but think about this:

Tony Richardson was waiver wire trash for this team, as were Brian Waters and Casey Wiegmann.

3 of the 11 guys on the best offense we ever had were guys that other teams released that we picked up. In Waters' and Richardson's case, they were shitcanned as rookies.

I understand that. When you have one of the best offenses in the history of the NFL...it probably means you got lucky in some areas. That's not all too common. Or maybe it's more common than I think.... But it's a 95% chance that the guys just end up going from team to team before their 4 year window is up. I agree... I would like to see the chiefs bring in up to 8 new faces...but that's just because the chiefs have been so awful in developing their own talent in the last decade. Still, I don't see the optimism in it

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 09-07-2010 12:47 AM

Also... Is there a greater rate of James Harrisons on super bowl teams than say a Pierre Thomas?

Another thing worth mentioning.... How many of the successful waiver wire guys were given roster spots by another team after final cuts? No doubt that a good number of these 600+ players will go on to have success with other teams, but that's likely after they spend a camp or two with that team starting next year. It's then that coaches will find them roles. Most teams don't wanna give up a roster spot to an unfamiliar project.

BossChief 09-07-2010 01:10 AM

For a team like ours, with half the roster being devoid of talent, we should have picked up at least 3-4 guys off the wire that would keep the back end of our roster churning so that we have a chance at finding that diamond in the rough. Otherwise, it makes the perception that we truly aren't trying...or that we are truly happy with the way the current roster sits.

Either scenario is very disheartening...wouldn't you agree?

I find it hard to swallow that with how bad our roster is that the only guy we have picked up to improve it, is a guy NOBODY has even heard of.

BossChief 09-07-2010 01:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6980980)
I'd rather have Heyward-Bey than Crabtree, too. Heyward-Bey has upside.

LOL Are you trying to make a point that Crabtree has no potential to be an elite receiver in the NFL?

And Heyward-Bey has that type of potential?

Seriously?

If so, WOW!

milkman 09-07-2010 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6983396)
For a team like ours, with half the roster being devoid of talent, we should have picked up at least 3-4 guys off the wire that would keep the back end of our roster churning so that we have a chance at finding that diamond in the rough. Otherwise, it makes the perception that we truly aren't trying...or that we are truly happy with the way the current roster sits.

Either scenario is very disheartening...wouldn't you agree?

I find it hard to swallow that with how bad our roster is that the only guy we have picked up to improve it, is a guy NOBODY has even heard of.

Never heard of him, but I figured out what Pioli likes about him.

Signed as an UDFA last year by Miami.

BossChief 09-07-2010 01:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6983403)
Never heard of him, but I figured out what Pioli likes about him.

Signed as an UDFA last year by Miami.

are you on strike?

...

seriously though, some of us (myself included) spend 2-4 hours on most days on here reading and commenting on Chiefs and NFL dealings and I hadnt even ever heard the guys name before.

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 09-07-2010 01:37 AM

NOBODY. Like Brandon Carr.... He doesn't even have a draft profile OMG!

To me it's like this... We're complaining about keeping Travis Daniels over some other guy who will likely wash out. I was reading the old draft thread and it's apparent that some people take themselves way too seriously when it comes to talent evaluation. One post was particularly funny. OTWP, raging from the selection of Colin Brown, said that taking Brown ahead of (names three guys) was "inexcusable!" Now Brown ended up being a terrible pick and true WTF moment, but the three guys he mentioned have already been released by other teams. So...inexcusable? really? Now sometimes they'll get it right... like siler or something.... but you just don't know. The waiver wire is the same way. Just as likely as picking up a stud...we'll give away a Joe horn or Bernard Pollard. That said, ocallahan doesn't need to be here....anybody else you could probably make a case for.

Hammock Parties 09-07-2010 01:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6980894)
McCluster has looked like a more versatile version of Wes Welker. He is a threat from the backfield, the slot and both of the return positions. So far, he is everything the Chiefs had hoped.

Why has no one addressed this post?

McCluster has done jack shit from the slot and we're already comparing him to Welker? Right now he is a gimmick out of the backfield. He has a lot to prove. Remember, he was NOT a wide receiver in college.

Quote:

Now, moving on.... Asamoah has looked like a solid third rounder.
Based on what? He had a horrible preseason.

Titty Meat 09-07-2010 01:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6983423)
Why has no one addressed this post?

McCluster has done jack shit from the slot and we're already comparing him to Welker? Right now he is a gimmick out of the backfield. He has a lot to prove. Remember, he was NOT a wide receiver in college.

Based on what? He had a horrible preseason.

He played some WR in college. I feel as though your lack of college football knowledge can hurt you at times.

chiefzilla1501 09-07-2010 05:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6983423)
Why has no one addressed this post?

McCluster has done jack shit from the slot and we're already comparing him to Welker? Right now he is a gimmick out of the backfield. He has a lot to prove. Remember, he was NOT a wide receiver in college.

Based on what? He had a horrible preseason.

Again, define "gimmick." Why do you keep using the word? Is he being used on a bunch of trick plays? Is he only there to run the wildcat?

He's playing conventional positions. Right now, we know he can be an effective runner and effective catching balls on screens--that's no gimmick. If he can play the slot well, then that makes him multi-dimensional. I don't understand why being a jack of all trades is considered a gimmick. The only gimmick is that you never know where he's going to line up until the ball is snapped.

chiefzilla1501 09-07-2010 05:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lemon_Pie (Post 6983343)
I'd like to see some research that supports the idea that being the vulture of the NFL is productive way to build a winning team. I'm not saying the research doesn't exist or that there are not players I'd like to see replace a certain 7 or 8 guys on the chiefs.... But it's a reach to really get upset about this. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see how a ton of Jamon Merediths help this team's future. I'm not against stop-gap salary casualties either, but we already have Thomas Jones

I agree. I'd also like to see some research that supports the idea that teams are built off of free free agency and waiver wire pickups. Do people really think the front office is too cheap because we're not picking up an $850,000 1-year contract waiver wire guy?

99% chance a waiver wire guy will never be anything more than a 1-year contributor or roster bubble guy. We can bitch all we want about payroll, but the reason the Chiefs lose is not because they're cheap, but because they haven't drafted well in years.

Marcellus 09-07-2010 06:43 AM

Can someone name 1 significant contributing waiver wire pick for any team last year?

SenselessChiefsFan 09-07-2010 06:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6983423)
Why has no one addressed this post?

McCluster has done jack shit from the slot and we're already comparing him to Welker? Right now he is a gimmick out of the backfield. He has a lot to prove. Remember, he was NOT a wide receiver in college.

Based on what? He had a horrible preseason.



First, McCluster was originally a WR in college. He worked his way into being a running back. He also has done more in training camp than was shown in preseason games.

BTW: He was compared to Welker on draft day. And, he has done NOTHING to dissapoint.

Now, for Asamoah. I don't think he has had a horrible preseason. I think he is about what a third rounder should be. And, I think he can work into a starting player.

Mr. Flopnuts 09-07-2010 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lemon_Pie (Post 6983363)
**** you and your facepalm, dickshit. Worst emoticon ever.

LMAO Struck a nerve?

ChiefsCountry 09-07-2010 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 6983491)
Can someone name 1 significant contributing waiver wire pick for any team last year?

Chris Chambers
Posted via Mobile Device

Marcellus 09-07-2010 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6983620)
Chris Chambers
Posted via Mobile Device

I was going to actually point this out but the main topic was roster day cuts so I decided to not mention it.

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 09-07-2010 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 6983491)
Can someone name 1 significant contributing waiver wire pick for any team last year?

Pollard....

Oh and don't forget Pope and Castille....errr

BossChief 09-07-2010 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6983423)
Why has no one addressed this post?

McCluster has done jack shit from the slot and we're already comparing him to Welker? Right now he is a gimmick out of the backfield. He has a lot to prove. Remember, he was NOT a wide receiver in college.

Based on what? He had a horrible preseason.

Ummm, yeah.

His first two years for Ole Miss he was a receiver. The coaching staff wanted to get him the ball more so they moved him to running back, but he still lined up as a receiver quite a bit.

Asamoah had a bad first game in PS, but seemed to play better each game after that as well, showing he is applying what he was working on in practice on the game field. That's a sign of a player that will be pretty good in time. I think by years end he will be a fan favorite. I really liked that pick.

-King- 09-07-2010 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lemon_Pie (Post 6983419)
NOBODY. Like Brandon Carr.... He doesn't even have a draft profile OMG!

To me it's like this... We're complaining about keeping Travis Daniels over some other guy who will likely wash out. I was reading the old draft thread and it's apparent that some people take themselves way too seriously when it comes to talent evaluation. One post was particularly funny. OTWP, raging from the selection of Colin Brown, said that taking Brown ahead of (names three guys) was "inexcusable!" Now Brown ended up being a terrible pick and true WTF moment, but the three guys he mentioned have already been released by other teams. So...inexcusable? really? Now sometimes they'll get it right... like siler or something.... but you just don't know. The waiver wire is the same way. Just as likely as picking up a stud...we'll give away a Joe horn or Bernard Pollard. That said, ocallahan doesn't need to be here....anybody else you could probably make a case for.

Dude, it's a forum. Not a book or article. Break your paragraph down some more. No one wants to read a wall of words.

RedThat 09-07-2010 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6984424)
Ummm, yeah.

His first two years for Ole Miss he was a receiver. The coaching staff wanted to get him the ball more so they moved him to running back, but he still lined up as a receiver quite a bit.

Asamoah had a bad first game in PS, but seemed to play better each game after that as well, showing he is applying what he was working on in practice on the game field. That's a sign of a player that will be pretty good in time. I think by years end he will be a fan favorite. I really liked that pick.

Yeah I agree. Asamoah was a good pick by the Chiefs. Probably the second best guard to come out of this draft next to Iupati.

BossChief 09-07-2010 03:18 PM

Either RedThat is starting to come around lately, or I need to reassess my posting quality before hitting "post reply"


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.